|
Their rifle drill hasn't changed since - er, well...
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 15:13 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 12:44 |
|
They semi-regularly do that, pres and kanzler are seen off with one of those etc. From gut feeling I'd say it happens like every couple years-ish. The basic ceremony allegedly dates back to Prussia.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 16:04 |
|
Scratch Monkey posted:https://twitter.com/BMVg_Bundeswehr/status/1448544043911323648?s=20 Is this the Frankenstein response platoon?
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 16:11 |
|
Bundeswehr doesn't have the budget to give everyone a rifle
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 17:11 |
|
I try not to fill this thread up with my endless questions about this, and I know this is a long shot, but does anyone know the squad and platoon-level organization of the Luxembourg Army in the late 80s? Specifically, how many soldiers were carrying how many of which weapons, etc. Trying to find data on this kind of thing is always a bit of a hassle, but the Luxembourg Army really has me stumped, probably because there's few enough of them that the chances of anyone sharing their experiences online in a place I can find it are small, and they're not big enough to really get momentum behind talking about the details for miniature wargaming purposes. All I've got so far is that the army had FALs, MAGs, and M72 LAWs, and the squads prooobably rode in Land Rovers, but that doesn't tell me stuff like how many soldiers to a squad, or whether the MAGs were a squad or platoon-level weapon, which is the kind of needlessly fiddly detail I'm looking for.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 20:37 |
|
I've quoted your request and passed it on to my father (retired danish major of the reserves) who might be able to tap into his network of old danish officers and their NATO exercise experiences. I've also passed the request on to a Belgian friend of mine who is historically inclined and his father who served in the Belgian army and may have some knowledge through joint operations experiences as well. No clue when or if a response will appear of course.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 22:32 |
|
Scratch Monkey posted:https://twitter.com/BMVg_Bundeswehr/status/1448544043911323648?s=20 Apparently they have been doing this for a while. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lb2_vOMRZ1Y&t=191s What are they carrying here? It looks like a Roman Eagle with a flag on it.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 22:56 |
|
LatwPIAT posted:I try not to fill this thread up with my endless questions about this, and I know this is a long shot, but does anyone know the squad and platoon-level organization of the Luxembourg Army in the late 80s? Specifically, how many soldiers were carrying how many of which weapons, etc. There is a little-known Finnish alternate history / war movie about invading Luxembourg made in the 1980s if I recall- I’m not sure if it will help you or not since it has been a while since I saw it and I doubt it goes into details you need. It is called Kummeli: stories.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 23:00 |
|
PeterCat posted:
Varus, give me back my legions!
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 23:00 |
|
Xlorp posted:Varus, give me back my legions! That would be amazing if the Germans still had captured Roman Eagles.
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 23:03 |
|
SerthVarnee posted:I've also passed the request on to a Belgian friend of mine who is historically inclined and his father who served in the Belgian army and may have some knowledge through joint operations experiences as well. Thanks! If your Belgian friend has time, could you also get him to confirm for me if there were supposed to be two Minimis in an AIFV-B-mounted squad in the late 80s, and how many soldiers were in a squad? So far I've mostly had to look at FAL-armed Belgian squads and just sort of guess that the FALs turned to FNCs and the FALOs turned to Minimis, and the old FAL squads had nine men in them but an AIFV-B is typically listed as having a crew of 3+7... Sorry for asking so much, but I feel I have to seize on the opportunity when I have it because otherwise I'm working off a decade-old The Miniature Page forum posts...
|
# ? Oct 14, 2021 23:17 |
|
sullat posted:The ancient world operated under a completely different system. It wasn't quite conscription, but people who could afford arms and armor were expected to go off and fight when needed, and Rome 'needed' to go out and fight a lot. So they had a lot of practice. No joke. From 509 to 31BC, the Roman Republic was at war every single year except from 241 BC to 235 BC. Except for those six years, the Roman Republic was fielding an army every single year.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 04:38 |
|
Valtonen posted:There is a little-known Finnish alternate history / war movie about invading Luxembourg made in the 1980s if I recall- I’m not sure if it will help you or not since it has been a while since I saw it and I doubt it goes into details you need. It is called Kummeli: stories. Now that's just mean.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 05:20 |
|
PeterCat posted:Apparently they have been doing this for a while. Apparently this is something called a "schellenbaum." According to an article I found it was originally carried by the Turks, then the Austrians, before being adopted by the Germans. http://www.tomahawkfilms.com/blog/index-p=8104.html article posted:The Schellenbaum & Tambourstock…
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 05:33 |
|
Cessna posted:Their rifle drill hasn't changed since - er, well... Speaking of, there's a very cute story about Imperial German askari veterans being offered a pension five decades after the war but only a few being able to offer written proof, so they were prompted to perform the old manual of arms. 'Not one of them failed the test.' Almost too nice, is this quite what happened?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 06:28 |
|
Valtonen posted:There is a little-known Finnish alternate history / war movie about invading Luxembourg made in the 1980s if I recall- I’m not sure if it will help you or not since it has been a while since I saw it and I doubt it goes into details you need. It is called Kummeli: stories. I wonder if you'd bother physically taking Luxembourg City or just bomb it flat. From memories of being there 20 years ago, it seems like trying to get actual troops into the central city would be pretty difficult.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 06:30 |
|
Elissimpark posted:I wonder if you'd bother physically taking Luxembourg City or just bomb it flat. From memories of being there 20 years ago, it seems like trying to get actual troops into the central city would be pretty difficult. IIRC it was more of an infiltration mission by a small team of highly trained commandos rather than a mass assault.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 07:23 |
|
In WW2 the city’s defense strategy was “stay in barracks we will lose to three panzer divisions” and no one died.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 09:14 |
|
Arbite posted:Speaking of, there's a very cute story about Imperial German askari veterans being offered a pension five decades after the war but only a few being able to offer written proof, so they were prompted to perform the old manual of arms. 'Not one of them failed the test.' I could see this happening but the person asking them to do it not knowing the first thing about the old manual of arms and going, "Well poo poo, good enough for me" and signing off.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 10:39 |
|
Gort posted:I could see this happening but the person asking them to do it not knowing the first thing about the old manual of arms and going, "Well poo poo, good enough for me" and signing off. Original German article from Der Spiegel quote:In Treue fest
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 11:32 |
|
What does it say?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 11:37 |
|
Gort posted:What does it say? Well with the help of google translate... quote:For four years, ex-sergeant Hasani Silanda wore the uniform of the German emperor. In the field he remained undefeated like his general, General Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck. Half a century had to pass before Hasani's belief in the invincibility of the German race was shaken.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 12:02 |
|
Imperialism and colonialism is bad, but there's a part of me screaming "that's cool as gently caress."
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 14:52 |
|
Gort posted:I could see this happening but the person asking them to do it not knowing the first thing about the old manual of arms and going, "Well poo poo, good enough for me" and signing off. If the veterans were just making it up, they'd do different moves. If they all performed the same move on a command it would be clear that they had been trained at the same time.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 14:55 |
|
I kind of wondered if they called them all in at once and asked them to do it together to avoid one teaching others.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 15:17 |
|
Finally a chance for my confidence scheme dance group to shine.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 15:19 |
|
Oh hey that slow-motion T-34 movie is free on youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aA0dVzCvn0
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 19:40 |
|
How do combat medics work in tank units? Shove them in a loader's seat?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 21:34 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:How do combat medics work in tank units? Shove them in a loader's seat? When i served in the Danish army the loader was crosstrained as free medic. But we trained that in event of combat casualties the tanks would keep tanking, and the attached ambulance apc would render aid. There are very few instances where it would make sense for the loader to dismount,
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 21:40 |
|
Edgar Allen Ho posted:How do combat medics work in tank units? Shove them in a loader's seat? Yes. Armor units are almost never up to full TO&E strength for crew, but you always have a few extras along for the ride, like radio repair people, medics, engine mechanics, etc. They get taught how to ride along and work the intercom. After they've been out a few times if they're nice they get taught how to do other jobs like driving. It really helps to have extra hands for jobs like putting up cammie nets, so they get to help with those things as well.
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 21:46 |
|
Are they taught maintenance jobs too?
|
# ? Oct 15, 2021 23:10 |
|
Scratch Monkey posted:Are they taught maintenance jobs too? There is no sort of strict rule here. Generally speaking the more time they spend with you and the more interest they show, the more you teach them - and, for that matter, the more they teach you. If you're assigned some snooty Air Observer who thinks he's above it all because he's an officer and spends his time in Staff meetings while you're changing shock absorbers, well, okay - he'll be a "hatch plug," no more. You'll give him rides and he'll play with his radios, and that will be all there is. But if they're a good person who pitches in and helps out with the grubby tasks like cammie nets, or does nice things like helping to cook the food and sharing their stuff, crew will teach them everything they can over time. "Hey, want to learn how to walk track? Want to help us strip and clean the machinegun?" If they're assigned consistently to a unit and they do a lot of field ops and build up time and trust they'll eventually become just another respected crewman. If you're on a firing range you might let them have a turn shooting, or let them drive for a while. And, for that matter, the same goes in reverse. In the time before the Gulf War our Corpsman spent a LOT of his time teaching us all sorts of in-depth first aid in between card games. Unofficially - and maybe, in retrospect a bit hair-raisingly - he had us to the point where we could deal with pretty nasty wounds, give an injection or start an IV, call for an evac helo, etc. And, yes, this did really make a difference when we had a couple of jarheads get seriously hurt in a Humvee accident just before the ground war started - Doc just started yelling "you, do this, you, do that," and they all survived. This sort of cross-training is even more prevalent in Amtracks (and presumably other APCs). In the USMC AAVs aren't "organic" to the infantry - that is, there's an Amtrack Battalion that supports infantry units on an as-needed basis - the 'tracks aren't ever permanently assigned to a specific unit of grunts like they are in the Army. But nonetheless you end up working with the same units over and over, especially in a deployment like a WESTPAC. If you've got a good relationship with the grunts and vice versa after a fwhile they'll be helping check oil levels and road wheel hubs on the halt, and they'll take crew out with them on patrols if they want to do something different. I've heard of some people spending enough time and getting enough of this training that they were able to pick up a secondary MOS doing it.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2021 02:08 |
|
PeterCat posted:That would be amazing if the Germans still had captured Roman Eagles. Considering archeologists still can't agree on where the Varus battle was or if it even happened, I wouldn't hold my breath, but it's a cool thought!
|
# ? Oct 16, 2021 06:44 |
|
What would the antiquity version of trading them for for a couple cases of smokes and Rip-its be? Some kind of salted meat maybe?
|
# ? Oct 16, 2021 20:17 |
|
Silphium and mastic.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2021 22:17 |
|
Wine probably the Germans couldn't trade for enough of that stuff so much so people were complaining about it feminizing their men.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2021 03:34 |
|
Tias posted:Considering archeologists still can't agree on where the Varus battle was or if it even happened, I wouldn't hold my breath, but it's a cool thought! It was at Kalkriese https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Teutoburg_Forest#Site_of_the_battle
|
# ? Oct 17, 2021 03:46 |
|
Other than the more practical reasons why Sealion was impossible, did the Germans even have any man portable anti-tank weapons at that point other than I guess rifles?
|
# ? Oct 17, 2021 10:46 |
|
Pretty much AT rifles, anti tank grenades, bombs and mines.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2021 15:24 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 12:44 |
|
The backbone of infantry AT defense were 3.7cm PaK's, which at combat weight of 327 kg plus ammunition were actually possible to move around manually without too much trouble. 5cm PaK 38 already weighed more than a Kübelwagen.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2021 18:04 |