Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

Trin Tragula posted:

Last month a longstanding C-SPAM poster (with an 06 reg date) in the USA got himself charged with attempted murder after apparently shooting at some Proud Boys.

lol that's badass as hell

e: but very illegal ofc, very naughty boy. shouldn't have done it, etc etc

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Trickjaw
Jun 23, 2005
Nadie puede dar lo que no tiene



I say there should be a thread meet at Peter Pans playground on Southend Seafront with packed lunches, and ride the roller coaster like those cubs off Jim'll fix it whilst enjoying our milkshakes. That would make for a sober and thoughtful tribute to a man who loved animals, yet hated humans. Then we can all go get pissed.

kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008
IIRC, the guy who was visited by the plod did so after saying on Twitter that he was thinking about ambushing the Olympic relay when it came by his home.
He also posted some - less ambitious - things here, but he said afterwards it was the Twitter posting that caught plod's attention.

If the filth are going to come after us for being mean about a dead person, they're going to be very busy with the other couple of million people in the country doing the same thing.

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


Political violence is bad.

At the same time it doesn't mean we have to celebrate a politician that even within Tories would be considered to have a bit odious opinions.

e: Or perhaps we could ban abortion and reintroduce the death penalty, just as a quick tribute to him.

Private Speech fucked around with this message at 17:27 on Oct 16, 2021

Tomberforce
May 30, 2006

ThomasPaine posted:

lol that's badass as hell

e: but very illegal ofc, very naughty boy. shouldn't have done it, etc etc

Cool that Andy Ngo has a mainstream press platform to shill for nazis.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

We've already established that if the cops want to gently caress you up they can just do it whenever they feel like it with impunity anyway.

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


OwlFancier posted:

We've already established that if the cops want to gently caress you up they can just do it whenever they feel like it with impunity anyway.

I'm pretty sure that's not true, they do a need a reason as well.

Stay safe thread etc.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001


:allears:

:fuckoff:

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


Also the guy who did it appears to have been an islamic extremist, so it's not like we need to blame the left for it, islamic extremism is hardly socialism.

Tesla was right
Apr 3, 2009

Whats with all the robot sex avatars?

Private Speech posted:

I'm pretty sure that's not true, they do a need a reason as well.

Stay safe thread etc.

Flag down a bus if you think the plod are arresting you unfairly.

Private Speech posted:

Also the guy who did it appears to have been an islamic extremist, so it's not like we need to blame the left for it, islamic extremism is hardly socialism.

Wait 'til you hear about Corbyn's Hamas ties

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


Well the arrest may not be "fair" (whatever that means) or legal, but usually there is a reason behind it even then.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Seems a weird target for would be isis nutter given they probably agreed on most points.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Trin Tragula posted:

Interesting thing.

Last month a longstanding C-SPAM poster (with an 06 reg date) in the USA got himself charged with attempted murder after apparently shooting at some Proud Boys.

His post history for his original and his alt account is fully available, and if you go back far enough, you can see him slowly radicalising himself over time. It's all just jokes and shitposting, until suddenly it wasn't.

If this thread continues going the way it has been for the last several years, then sooner or later we'll have someone who's either posting or lurking here, who crosses the Rubicon and starts to think they should act on some of the sentiments being thrown around here ten-a-penny ha-ha-only-serious, and that really isn't going to end well.

On a completely unrelated note, combating what they call "self-initiated terrorism", particularly involving use of the Internet, is already a hot button issue for the police, and will likely become even more so in the wake of yesterday. I also vaguely recall that some people ITT back in the dim and distant have had door knocks from Dixon of Dock Green after some particularly uncharitable posting in close proximity to major events.

By the way, encouraging or glorifying acts of terrorism is an offence contrary to section 1 Terrorism Act 2006. The offence is potentially triable at Crown Court, where the maximum sentence is seven years in prison.

If we're not comfortable with all this, then we really need to take a long hard look at ourselves, and what we say ITT, and what we tolerate being said.

On the other hand, if we've successfully run off the outside world and we're only left with genuine true revolutionary believers, or at least those who are happy to hang around with people who are, then I'd want to at least be expressing myself somewhere a little more discreet than the internet equivalent of the public bar at the Red Rose Club.

"I go to civil rights rallies
And I put down the old D.A.R.
(D.A.R., that's the Dykes of the American Revolution)
I love Harry and Sidney and Sammy
I hope every colored boy becomes a star
But don't talk about revolution
That's going a little bit too far
So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal"

Or the TL;DR version

Nobody here is encouraging people to do political violence, merely pointing out that when your politics are a form of violence on people then you can hardly be stunned if, eventually, they strike back. This is an observation, not incitement. Do enjoy your use of "we" though. Very droll.

Scikar
Nov 20, 2005

5? Seriously?

Trin Tragula posted:

By the way, encouraging or glorifying acts of terrorism is an offence contrary to section 1 Terrorism Act 2006. The offence is potentially triable at Crown Court, where the maximum sentence is seven years in prison.

What made you think this would change anybody's mind? If you want to argue that something is immoral then by all means go ahead, but pointing out that it's illegal is meaningless. Laws are guided by morality, not the other way around, and even then that's only in theory.

The Tories are tearing up the social contract right in front of our eyes. People agree to be bound by laws on the understanding that they have a fair say in how those laws are written. But the Tories are pressing ahead with gerrymandering and voter disenfranchisement to make disagreeing at the ballot box all but impossible. They then follow that up by passing new laws to make effective forms of protest illegal.

They obstruct people's right to vote, and they obstruct their right to protest, and then they enact policies which lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. A repressive and undemocratic government bringing about the deaths of its own citizens - what means do you think people should use to oppose that?

If it's already illegal to take any meaningful action to effect change, why is anyone going to care that it's illegal to say nasty words about the people who passed those laws?

Lastly, if you want to take the position that by saying any of this I am somehow responsible by proxy for someone I've never known or met taking it upon themselves to go out and commit murder, then get hosed.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

https://twitter.com/Coldwar_Steve/status/1449349901633081346

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

Private Speech posted:

Also the guy who did it appears to have been an islamic extremist, so it's not like we need to blame the left for it, islamic extremism is hardly socialism.

Western reactionaries absolutely believe that Islamic extremism and socialism are somehow allied to one another, hence the belief that if the left got in charge we'd all somehow be forced to become gay trans muslim vegan furries or whatever the hell your infowars weirdos are spouting these days

It is weird because as OF says, islamic fundamentalism and British fascism agree on pretty much all the practical bits just with a different aesthetic

ThomasPaine fucked around with this message at 17:55 on Oct 16, 2021

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


forkboy84 posted:


Nobody here is encouraging people to do political violence, merely pointing out that when your politics are a form of violence on people then you can hardly be stunned if, eventually, they strike back. This is an observation, not incitement. Do enjoy your use of "we" though. Very droll.

If you want to start purity-testing people who have been following and posting in various UKMTs about when exactly they can use "we" as a collective noun, then the culthood has already begun. Or maybe you just don't pay attention to other posters except when you want to drop hot takes on them?

Azza Bamboo
Apr 7, 2018


THUNDERDOME LOSER 2021

Lucky boy had his luggage come out intact

Scikar
Nov 20, 2005

5? Seriously?

Nothingtoseehere posted:

If you want to start purity-testing people who have been following and posting in various UKMTs about when exactly they can use "we" as a collective noun, then the culthood has already begun. Or maybe you just don't pay attention to other posters except when you want to drop hot takes on them?

There's a significant and meaningful difference between using "we" to collectively support one another, and using "we" to try to claim support for your point of view on a contentious topic.

endlessmonotony
Nov 4, 2009

by Fritz the Horse

Nothingtoseehere posted:

If you want to start purity-testing people who have been following and posting in various UKMTs about when exactly they can use "we" as a collective noun, then the culthood has already begun. Or maybe you just don't pay attention to other posters except when you want to drop hot takes on them?

What?

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I think the suggestion is that "we" implies a level of collective responsibility that the poster rejects.

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Until we have more info about the attacker's ideology (which I have noticed has been conspicuously absent from the papers), i'm going to assume he was a natural consequence of how hard the Tories have been pushing people in the last few years.

gently caress it, if Amess wants to reap the social benefits, money and comforts of associating with the tories ideology, he can bear the consequences.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Nothingtoseehere posted:

If you want to start purity-testing people who have been following and posting in various UKMTs about when exactly they can use "we" as a collective noun, then the culthood has already begun. Or maybe you just don't pay attention to other posters except when you want to drop hot takes on them?

Yes, the culthood has begun & the cult is good. Well, no it's really poo poo & just involves posting nonsense in this thread more than once a month but you don't get anyone to join a cult by telling them the truth about it.

endlessmonotony
Nov 4, 2009

by Fritz the Horse
Telling Trin Tragula to gently caress off is evidence the thread is a cult?

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


Denying them the ability to use we as a collective noun is, as it's cutting people out of being "true followers". If you disagree you can tell someone to gently caress off, but you can do that without refusing to count them as valid since they don't angrypost as often as you.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
I saw a news article on't phone earlier about a man being charged with kidnapping and impersonating a police officer. You gotta hand it to them, realising they can now always tack on that extra latter charge to any instance of the former.

Pablo Bluth
Sep 7, 2007

I've made a huge mistake.

NotJustANumber99 posted:

He's already got a job. Why does he feel the need for another one?
1 - You can never earn enough money
2 - Ruining the UK isn't enough, they yearn to wreck every other country too.

Oh dear me
Aug 14, 2012

I have burned numerous saucepans, sometimes right through the metal
I muddle up Tin Tower and Trin Tragula. I assumed that was just because of the names, but now I realize there is a deeper truth.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I think tintower actually did at some point get sick of the lib dems.

Doctor_Fruitbat
Jun 2, 2013


Do they still post about student politics as though anyone else knows who literally any of the people involved are?

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

Doctor_Fruitbat posted:

Do they still post about student politics as though anyone else knows who literally any of the people involved are?

Excellent practice for talking about the grown up lib Dems.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Not that I know of, but she does still post occasionally. Still seems to be largely politically engaged with LGBT stuff which is fair enough.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

Trickjaw posted:

I say there should be a thread meet at Peter Pans playground on Southend Seafront with packed lunches, and ride the roller coaster like those cubs off Jim'll fix it whilst enjoying our milkshakes. That would make for a sober and thoughtful tribute to a man who loved animals, yet hated humans. Then we can all go get pissed.

Are you talking about hitler?

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

Trin Tragula posted:

If this thread continues going the way it has been for the last several years, then sooner or later we'll have someone who's either posting or lurking here, who crosses the Rubicon and starts to think they should act on some of the sentiments being thrown around here ten-a-penny ha-ha-only-serious, and that really isn't going to end well.
this thread was the furthest left on the whole forums like ten years ago, with mccaine posting his morning star articles. it's much more conservative now hth

Not So Fast
Dec 27, 2007


Political violence is the inevitable result of the breakdown of society caused by the contradictions of capitalism. Random political violence shouldn't be celebrated as it doesn't achieve a cogent aim or goal for the left or right, it just represents how badly liberal democracy represents the people. Organised political violence should [REDACTED].

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


Bobby Deluxe posted:

Until we have more info about the attacker's ideology (which I have noticed has been conspicuously absent from the papers), i'm going to assume he was a natural consequence of how hard the Tories have been pushing people in the last few years.

gently caress it, if Amess wants to reap the social benefits, money and comforts of associating with the tories ideology, he can bear the consequences.

Pretty sure BBC or Guardian said it was investigated as islamist-related terrorism.

e: Here it is:

BBC posted:

Police added: "The early investigation has revealed a potential motivation linked to Islamist extremism."

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

happy John Brown Day to all the limeys across the pond

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe
I'm *deeply* suspicious about how quickly the police announced that they weren't looking for anyone else. That struck me as very odd, as the announcement came at the same time as the arrest, and *before* the announcement of the death. It's definitely not something they could have said with such confidence with just the evidence they had to hand at the time, IMO.

I can't quite put my finger on it but it just doesn't sit right. Even if you suppose he was under active enough investigation for them to know that he was acting completely alone (and I have to say that would have to be to the level of "They knew he took the bus or walked there so there isn't a loose end to be tied up of whether whoever drove him there knew what was going on", i.e. full-on surveillance) they would surely want to go through his house and electronics to make certain that he wasn't under the control of someone else.

Now the part of my brain that is forever :tinfoil: is thinking "Maybe they know *exactly* who inspired him to do this and are desperately hoping nobody else finds out" but even that doesn't quite line up - like even if you assume he was being provoked by state actors into doing something they could nick him for and it got out of hand, they surely wouldn't pass up the opportunity to do a bit of Clancying about vast underground sleeper cell networks and by the way here's our budget application for next year?

Like I say, it's an odd little detail, but it's preying on my mind.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I did think that was an odd turn of phrase just generally, I don't ever think of the police saying "we aren't looking for anyone else" like it's always "we are investigating" etc.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

Private Speech posted:

Pretty sure BBC or Guardian said it was investigated as islamist-related terrorism.
More than likely they found a Quran in his flat.

Hey look, new video by Abbie is relevant:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3S7ypQQIMQk

Specifically the bits about entrapment and profiling.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply