|
Lots of mopey vampires from this set.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 16:19 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:18 |
Pablo Nergigante posted:Seems mid for a mythic Yeah even with all the value stuff on the front side that P/T seems a bit low. The templating of that pump ability also kind of weird but flavor win I guess? Would've preferred something like: - Each creature you control with deathtouch, flying, or lifelink gets +1/+0. -1BB: Put a flying, deathtouch, or lifelink counter on target creature you control.
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 16:26 |
|
The edict on a stick might position it well for some standard matchups.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 16:28 |
|
resistentialism posted:The edict on a stick might position it well for some standard matchups. Yeah, this is what I mean by being the sort of card that might see early play but then gets edged out. If you know you want an edict you just play Soul Shatter. If you don't know you want an edict, but you might want one, or you might want a 3/4 lifelinker to survive the next few turns, or you might want a creature that replaces itself and makes your opponent answer it ... this can fill that spot until the format gets more stable and you know exactly what you want.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 16:36 |
|
I'm just glad we are getting zombies that don't have decayed on them.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 16:55 |
|
This card design is actually really cool. This how I would prefer cards be created instead of ETB bullshit.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 16:55 |
|
that wording seems somewhat vague for the 1BB pump... seems like you'd need 1: both flying and deathtouch OR lifelink 2: (all three) flying, deathtouch, AND lifelink I'm guessing it's suppose to mean any of the 3? or is my parsing the one they want... If it's suppose to mean that the creature could have any of the 3... why not put "any of these:" or "either" in front... something like, "Each creature you control with either flying, deathtouch or lifelink [...]" anyways.. the backside of the dracula version is hilarious: vampire dog
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:05 |
|
Voltaic Visionary {1}{R} Creature - Human Wizard Uncommon {T}: Voltaic Visionary deals 2 damage to you. Exile the top card of your library. You can play that card in this turn. Activate only whenever you could cast a sorcery. When you play an exiled card with Voltaic missionary, transform Voltaic visionary. 3/1 Voltaic Berserker Creature - Human Berserker Voltaic Berserker can't block 4/3
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:06 |
|
Sickening posted:This card design is actually really cool. This how I would prefer cards be created instead of ETB bullshit. I like the design but I wish it was a little cheaper or better P/T before transformation
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:08 |
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:08 |
|
Jiro posted:I'm just glad we are getting zombies that don't have decayed on them. Still waiting for a good one
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:09 |
|
Boring
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:10 |
|
Pablo Nergigante posted:I like the design but I wish it was a little cheaper or better P/T before transformation Its a cmc more expensive because its a flexible card. If this was 3 cmc it would probably be too good.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:11 |
|
Is the trample on the transformed side supposed to imply that he's stepping on his partner's feet? Because if so, A+ flavor.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:14 |
|
Wizards should know that paying 4 mana for a 1/3 mythic that can be killed before it can do literally anything is pretty.....sad I like the creativity in some of the design but a lot of it seems consciously blunted. But you never know, I think we were pretty underwhelmed by Kaldheim when it was unveiled and thought it was super wordy and then a bunch of the cards ended up impressing (after Eldraine rotated out lol)
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:16 |
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:28 |
|
Did we miss Odric or did he die?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:31 |
|
fadam posted:Did we miss Odric or did he die? Hero's Downfall implies he got vamp'd.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:34 |
|
fadam posted:Did we miss Odric or did he die? The new printing of Hero's Downfall has flavor text saying he got turned. I'm expecting a Vampire Odric card.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:38 |
This seems pretty good, tbh.
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:40 |
|
Sculptor of Winter seems strong with this
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:49 |
|
Mat Cauthon posted:This seems pretty good, tbh. I think it's bad. The thing that doubles all your guys p/t is way more powerful if you're trying to play a 5 mana enchantment.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 17:54 |
|
"How about we design The Great Henge but bad?"
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:01 |
|
The guys that make and repair fancy windows must do pretty well on Innistrad.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:06 |
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:08 |
|
E: Beaten
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:09 |
|
This set is all over the goddamn place https://twitter.com/SandwurmFood/status/1455559102315302918
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:10 |
|
I just realized Change in Fortune tracks cards you’ve discarded before casting the spell, which makes it better than I originally thought.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:12 |
|
Can't wait to make cuts for this
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:13 |
|
whydirt posted:I just realized Change in Fortune tracks cards you’ve discarded before casting the spell, which makes it better than I originally thought. Ah you're right. I didn't catch that either.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:14 |
|
A good effect in this set that is not once per turn? Hell yeah get in
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:16 |
|
Pablo Nergigante posted:This set is all over the goddamn place So do the people that Don't Get the rare not realise that you draw a card for every card you've discarded this turn, including ones from before casting it? Like, even if there isn't a specific case for it right now, that's a really powerful effect that I think is unique?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:16 |
|
Lone Goat posted:So do the people that Don't Get the rare not realise that you draw a card for every card you've discarded this turn, including ones from before casting it? It costs so much mana that any combo for it is wildly impractical and you might as well compare them apples to apples because that's the only context you're ever going to be casting them in outside of the funny formats. It's very cool, but it should've cost 3 if they wanted it to do the thing it's built for
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:18 |
|
Seems like it’d combo with blood tokens well. Edit. 2r or instant speed seems like it would be way too strong. At the very least they should let you draw X+1 and make it up to that number of cards Strong Sauce fucked around with this message at 18:24 on Nov 2, 2021 |
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:21 |
|
The theoretical use case for the rare is, in a deck that already generates lots of mana, casting it and wheeling into another one which draws twice as much to keep the chain going. I don’t think that’s a very powerful effect at that cost but I can at least theoretically see the point of it
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:23 |
|
Change of Fortune is insane in Commander wheel decks. You'll end up drawing like 14+ cards minimum. That's where I think it finds its place.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:23 |
|
Dope card. Long time since they've made a headless horseman card.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:26 |
|
TheKingofSprings posted:It costs so much mana that any combo for it is wildly impractical and you might as well compare them apples to apples because that's the only context you're ever going to be casting them in outside of the funny formats. It’s a powerful effect that’s probably worth testing before writing it off imo.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:28 |
|
Lone Goat posted:So do the people that Don't Get the rare not realise that you draw a card for every card you've discarded this turn, including ones from before casting it? It's ridiculously good in formats where you have the opportunity to wheel multiple times in a turn.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:28 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 07:18 |
|
Zombies definitely like to survive wipes. AngryBooch posted:The new printing of Hero's Downfall has flavor text saying he got turned. I'm expecting a Vampire Odric card. I figure he'll be the main monowhite vampire.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2021 18:33 |