Deceptive Thinker posted:

Smythe posted:

no need for a gun, my very large & strong gf can protect me from anyone

Trapick posted:

If Antifa would carry rifles and defend themselves America wouldn't have a nazi problem much longer. Self defense is a loving important right specifically so nazis and others like them can get hosed.

Smythe posted:

no need for a gun, my very large & strong gf can protect me from anyone

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

i just want to challenge the liberal anti-gun orthodoxy, since that isnt the solution to anything except passive acceptance of cops and kyle and george and every other fascist.

Cranappleberry posted:

Leftists who get armed, even for community defense, get shot by cops or outright assassinated.

Americans nod and say "hai" because this is a good thing in their minds. Law enforcement is protecting them from dangerous radicals.

Smythe posted:

https://forums.somethingawful.com/banlist.php?userid=226575

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

i just want to challenge the liberal anti-gun orthodoxy, since that isnt the solution to anything except passive acceptance of cops and kyle and george and every other fascist.

Smythe posted:

no need for a gun, my very large & strong gf can protect me from anyone

Cao Ni Ma posted:

spacetoaster posted:

I see you also enjoy reading the AITA thread.

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

yeah agreed although what's less clear to me is the implications of gun control / confiscation in the context of like an actual dotp, and how I feel about that. fodder for a thread IMO but I haven't made a thread in years and I'm not about to start now

err posted:

3'him

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

if you arent a nazi, you should take better precautions before killing people you politically disagree with, but surely cspam posters have already internalized this. right? i mean this is poo poo my hyper-conservative dad told me like 25 years ago.

i just want to challenge the liberal anti-gun orthodoxy, since that isnt the solution to anything except passive acceptance of cops and kyle and george and every other fascist.

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

too true. rip to a real one.

Smythe posted:

hello old friend.

Smythe posted:

its my opinion that he should be unbanned when released from prison. its only fair. otherwise its double jeopardy and thats a crime.

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

and therefore the solution is give the state a monopoly on violence.

Torpor posted:

dotp?

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

it's time to play everyone's favorite game, anarchist or cop

hobbesmaster posted:

but what about the In re aatrek precedent

Reik posted:

In what world does "purposefully manufacturing a conflict" not constitute provoking an attack?

VitalSigns posted:

Idk what should you legally do in a non-idiotic place if you point a gun at someone and they say "oh my god a mass shooter" and try to take it from you.

If you are not a mass shooter you should probably let them, if you want to point guns at random people and blow them away if they react you might just be a mass shooter!

vyelkin posted:

I've seen the video.

Literally like the very first thing you learn about firearms is that you do not bring one to a confrontation or use it unless you are willing to kill someone. He illegally obtained a lethal weapon and brought it with him to a protest to "protect businesses", which if you are able to connect even two dots in your head means he shows a demonstrable willingness to kill the protesters who he thinks are there to destroy businesses. What he says in the video doesn't really matter because his actions show a demonstrable recklessness, i.e., he illegally obtained a firearm and brought it with him to a protest so that he could use it to shoot people, which he then did.

Cranappleberry posted:

Leftists who get armed, even for community defense, get shot by cops or outright assassinated.

Americans nod and say "hai" because this is a good thing in their minds. Law enforcement is protecting them from dangerous radicals.

DesertIslandHermit posted:

So today's gotta be the day, right?

quote:

Eva writes, “Every person has fell in to some degeneracy that they push, mine was tattoos, learned my lesson, no more, moving forward”

quote:

Eva continues,”I look forward to the sales of removal cream someday.”

quote:

And Eva says, “Though I heart emoticon my swastika, Adolf Hitler quote, SS motto, SS bolts & Swastika eagle… they will stay and I won’t ever dislike those ones.”

Trapick posted:

Sure, it does. But where are you getting "manufacturing a conflict" from? What did Rittenhouse do that created a conflict? If you say "pointed gun at Rosenbaum out of nowhere", again, I'm going to ask for video or testimony about that, because the fbi footage from the plane does not sufficiently show that.

Reik posted:

Here's a hint: how does rittenhouse get in to a conflict if he doesn't go there?

Trapick posted:

lol you went from "because in this video he admits going to the protest willing to shoot and kill people to protect property" to "What he says in the video doesn't really matter" in two posts, nice. Open carry is legal in the state. So yes, carrying it shows a willingness to use it to kill someone in self defense, if necessary, while he was doing lawful things. That isn't the same as provocation. It's just not.

Cranappleberry posted:

How about the video where Rittenhouse is watching people come out of a CVS and says "I wish I had my AR-15" that was disallowed for entry into evidence by the judge because he said it would prejudice the jury?

Smythe posted:

lol the crazy nazi bimbo has some cool quotes:

Reik posted:

Here's a hint: how does rittenhouse get in to a conflict if he doesn't go there?

bvj191jgl7bBsqF5m posted:

Tag yourself I'm the $90 Patagucci hat

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

i feel like this is a dumb as gently caress rhetorical path to go down. dumbass

Trapick posted:

The 2nd and 3rd shooting might need some more nuance because of that, but if Rosenbaum assumes someone is a mass shooter because they're open carrying (where it's legal to do) and hasn't shot anyone, he should probably loving hide and say "hey dude put down the gun" and not try to take it from Rittenhouse. Also lol at "let someone take away your gun", sure, that's a great recipe for success.

Reik posted:

Here's a hint: how does rittenhouse get in to a conflict if he doesn't go there?

vyelkin posted:

What he says in the video, immediately after being asked why he's out there in front of the business with his illegally-obtained rifle, is "our job is to protect this business." In what world is brandishing a firearm to "protect a business" not a threat to escalate property damage into deadly force?

That's what I mean when I say that the rest of what he says in the video doesn't really matter. He can claim that the rifle is only there to protect himself in harm's way, but the actual fact of him being present "protecting the business" with his rifle means he thinks just doing that is putting himself in harm's way and he wants to be able to kill people if they come after the business, just like he said he wanted to do in the video taken several weeks earlier where he says he wishes he had his gun so he could shoot people leaving a CVS.

Hatebag posted:

Very shocked that the guy defending the nazi murderer is not engaging honestly

VitalSigns posted:

Gonna go point an AK around at people in the grocery store until someone tries to make me stop then blam blam blam, what am I supposed to do, let them that's a great recipe for success

For all I know I'm surrounded by crazy people who knows what they are capable of

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

i feel like this is a dumb as gently caress rhetorical path to go down. dumbass