|
I Before E posted:I don't think they should have cut all three, but paring it down to one and really focusing on that one for comic relief would probably have led to a more interesting set of gags. The gags would get stronger and you'd probably be able to get them some development, too, but you lose out on the relevance of a spider-multitude and get less chances to flex animation skill. It'd be a tradeoff, but an interesting one. I vote Spider-Ham for that pick personally.
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 03:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 19:46 |
|
|
With all the Spider-people they’re intimating for the next film, I’m worried that Miles will get a bit lost in the mix. Maybe he should get a solo film at some point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 12:34
|
|
|
The_Doctor posted:With all the Spider-people they’re intimating for the next film, I’m worried that Miles will get a bit lost in the mix. This'd be my wish in a world where studios are willing to throw money around a lot more and creators time is infinite. So we get a solo Miles Morales story that's more like a traditional Spider-Man story where his supporting cast appear more, we see what his rogues gallery is in a world where the older Spiderman had created a lot of people who have grudges against Spider-Men and new threats have emerged, maybe just Spider-Woman appears since they had a good budding friendship/potential future relationship thing going, etc. Then we also get the Spider-verse sequel that is probably the one thing we're actually getting where it expands on that crazy worlds colliding feeling and we have more Spider-people and probably a bunch of villains and stuff, it's still great but there's less time for texture and depth for certain characters because there's only so much time in a movie. I think they actually suggested they might do a Spider Woman spinoff as well with more of the women Spider characters joining her for an adventure but that seemed like a thing that gets announced when hype is high and then falls into development hell so who knows if we actually see it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 12:54
|
|
|
thebardyspoon posted:maybe just Spider-Woman appears since they had a good budding friendship/potential future relationship thing going, etc. Then he's playing equal billing to her. Let Miles have his own thing!
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 13:24
|
|
|
Better a spider-verse sequel than a clone saga adaptation. Miles needs a solo movie where he has the signature suit beginning to end. Gwen is worth a spinoff. Peter B had a pretty good ending and should be restricted to cameos. The other three only work as quirky supporting cast. I know absolutely nothing about Miguel and I don't see how he stands out as futuristic when Spiderman is inherently science-fiction.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 13:24
|
|
|
The_Doctor posted:Then he's playing equal billing to her. Let Miles have his own thing! I don't think that true at all and thanks for making GBS threads on my idea that I was posting in support of yours but since we're both positing completely hypothetical ideas anyway I'll drop it there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 13:32
|
|
|
...are you ok?
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 15:36
|
|
|
So I've been thinking, and I think you can can count ITSV as an honorary Christmas movie a la Die Hard, since it's expressly set in winter and it of course has Spidey Bells.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 15:59
|
|
|
Inspector Gesicht posted:Miles needs a solo movie where he has the signature suit beginning to end. Gwen is worth a spinoff. Peter B had a pretty good ending and should be restricted to cameos. The other three only work as quirky supporting cast. I know absolutely nothing about Miguel and I don't see how he stands out as futuristic when Spiderman is inherently science-fiction. I imagine Miles and Gwen are the dual protagonists going forward, which is fine by me because I really like them both and think their stories are connected. Also, if there's one lesson I wish Sony would learn, it's that planning solo films for literally every character they have spreads the IP too thin. I'd rather have a really robust series of multi-character Spider-Verse movies than a dozen watered-down spinoffs for everyone that all mostly suck. Sony keeps doing that poo poo. Before Amazing Spider-Man shat the bed, they were going to make distinct Spider-Man, Silver Sable & Black Cat, Sinister Six, Silk, and Madame Web movies. Now, we're getting more Venom, Morbius, Spider-Woman, maybe Kraven the Hunter, and those aren't even touching the MCU Spider content. Just make one good series, Sony.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 20:05
|
|
|
Yvonmukluk posted:So I've been thinking, and I think you can can count ITSV as an honorary Christmas movie a la Die Hard, since it's expressly set in winter and it of course has Spidey Bells. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2020 22:06
|
|
|
Yvonmukluk posted:So I've been thinking, and I think you can can count ITSV as an honorary Christmas movie a la Die Hard, since it's expressly set in winter and it of course has Spidey Bells. Not just Spidey Bells, there's the Very Spidey Christmas EP as well.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2020 00:45
|
|
|
Yvonmukluk posted:So I've been thinking, and I think you can can count ITSV as an honorary Christmas movie a la Die Hard, since it's expressly set in winter and it of course has Spidey Bells. I can dig it, absolutely a wintery film anyway. Blonde Peter is such an interesting idea, that instead of having him be much like the 616 Spider-man (present-day, rather than the apparently aged up version that is Peter B Parker) they made him this near-perfect version, one who could confide his identity to his loved ones, found financial security, and was hugely popular. They pretty much take away everything that makes him interesting besides a powerset. Might not really work to follow him as a protagonist but making him appear as an apparently unattainable ideal for Miles and a trigger for insecurity from PBP (great choice to make him look like Ben Riley) was near genius. Pine makes a great established Spidey, which we'd probably never see in a live action movie since they always start out with him as a teen, albeit a teen who looks about thirty sometimes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2020 00:47
|
|
|
Inspector Gesicht posted:I know absolutely nothing about Miguel and I don't see how he stands out as futuristic when Spiderman is inherently science-fiction. It's mostly the setting, although some of his powers work differently due to his origin (having part of his genetic code merged with spider DNA in a sabotaged experimental procedure). Instead of a spider-sense his vision is enhanced, allowing him to see in total darkness, much farther with clarity than a normal person and perceive things at great speeds that would just be a blur to others; he also has highly sensitive and selective hearing. Miguel's upper canines are slightly elongated into fangs which produce a powerful paralytic venom, and instead of being able to stick to surfaces with whatever magic effect most other spider-people do, he physically latches onto them with small claws on his hands and feet. And finally, spinners just above Miguel's wrists in his upper forearms produce organic webbing, though functionally it's about the same as modern Spidey's synthetic webbing where it counts. Although speaking of science fiction, his costume is made of unstable molecules like the modern-day Fantastic Four's and lets him use his claws and fangs without ripping it up, and the web cape contains modest anti-gravity technology which allows him a measure of gliding/air control and a parachuting effect that slows his descent in freefall.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2020 07:06
|
|
|
It seems implied that Miles' powers may owe more to 2099 than typical, given the Alchemax mark on the spider that bites him, and that he's got additional offensive and defensive abilities.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2020 08:00
|
|
|
Miles extra powers make him way more fun to play as than Pete, too, in their respective games. I just end up liking Miles more in everything hes in, really.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2020 10:51
|
|
|
The next MCU Spider-Man movie seems to be pretty Peter focused but I'd love to see this idea included somehow. https://twitter.com/marcbernardin/status/1342245852975300608?s=19
|
|
#
?
Dec 25, 2020 02:10
|
|
|
The 4k UHD Blu-Ray of this is currently $12 on Amazon.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2021 03:48
|
|
|
Is Homeward Bound the confirmed subtitle?
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2021 04:46
|
|
|
hiddenriverninja posted:Is Homeward Bound the confirmed subtitle? I assume you’re talking about MCU spidey? I don’t think anything’s been confirmed for that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2021 14:09
|
|
|
It’s a movie about Peter getting lost in the woods with his spider pals trying to get home. He lost his phone you see.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2021 18:13
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:It’s a movie about Peter getting lost in the woods with his spider pals trying to get home. “Peter (B Parker)!” 
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2021 20:14
|
|
|
Come on! Peter Barker was just there!
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2021 22:48
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/spiderverse/status/1384276847035174920
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 00:23
|
|
|
Of those three, I'm only familiar with Joaquim Dos Santos for his dope work on Justice League Unlimited and Avatar stuff. But yeah, I'm super excited for this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2021 00:56
|
|
|
Alright, let’s do this two more times… https://twitter.com/sonyanimation/status/1467294398413262850
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:04
|
|
|
The_Doctor posted:Alright, let’s do this two more times… let's loving go.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:06
|
|
|
The_Doctor posted:Alright, let’s do this two more times… Dooooooooooooooope
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:11
|
|
|
hiddenriverninja posted:let's loving go.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:17
|
|
|
That Indian Spider-man's spot there?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:24
|
|
|
Jesus Christ that animation swap looked fuckin' amazing
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:27
|
|
|
The animation/art style in the second half of that is absolutely incredible
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:34
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 03:16
|
|
|
Why's it gotta be almost a year out tho.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 03:42
|
|
|
They gave my girl her Chucks. I love it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 04:54
|
|
|
I love that they made Miles subtly older. Broader shoulders, new haircut. My boy growing up!
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 13:31
|
|
|
immoral_ posted:Why's it gotta be almost a year out tho. This way it comes out in the 60th anniversary year of Spider-Man. I can’t think of a better celebration.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 21:50
|
|
|
Looks cool. Lord and Miller wrote this one as well, should be p good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 21:59
|
|
|
HOW DARE  https://twitter.com/discussingfilm/status/1516949854148255744
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2022 03:23
|
|
|
I have faith that they'll use the extra time wisely and it'll be even more dope
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2022 03:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 19:46 |
|
|
Its because they need to bring in Ron Howard because the film feels a bit jokey, you know?
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2022 04:50
|
|
