|
gbut posted:To me it looks like the roof base is pushing the walls outwards because there are no cross beams to hold it together. It's this, hence the internal mortar gaps growing
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2021 23:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 14:59 |
|
|
We’re still talking about the guy with the bullet up his butt right?
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2021 23:23
|
|
|
Well his mortar gap probably can't grow any more.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2021 23:39
|
|
|
DeeplyConcerned posted:wouldn't shoving a giant hunk of lead up your rear end lead to severe lead poisoning? I don't think solid metallic lead is all that dangerous. I mean, if he kept lead ben wa balls up his rear end for weeks on end that could be problematic, but a single jaunt with an antique mortar round is more likely to cause mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat rather than lead poisoning.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2021 23:44
|
|
Kenning posted:I don't think solid metallic lead is all that dangerous. I mean, if he kept lead ben wa balls up his rear end for weeks on end that could be problematic, but a single jaunt with an antique mortar round is more likely to cause mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat rather than lead poisoning. OSHA IV: mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2021 23:46
|
|
|
BitBasher posted:OSHA IV: mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2021 23:47
|
|
|
 Definitely where you want to stand when the lift gets stuck and you have to fiddle with it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 4, 2021 23:54
|
|
|
BitBasher posted:OSHA IV: mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 00:04
|
|
|
nvm: wrong thread
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 00:17
|
|
|
BitBasher posted:OSHA IV: mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 00:23
|
|
|
BitBasher posted:OSHA IV: mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 00:30
|
|
|
Kenning posted:I don't think solid metallic lead is all that dangerous. I mean, if he kept lead ben wa balls up his rear end for weeks on end that could be problematic, but a single jaunt with an antique mortar round is more likely to cause mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat rather than lead poisoning. thanks. my, uh, friend will be really glad
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 00:39
|
|
|
Kenning posted:I don't think solid metallic lead is all that dangerous. I mean, if he kept lead ben wa balls up his rear end for weeks on end that could be problematic, but a single jaunt with an antique mortar round is more likely to cause mechanical damage to the rear end in a top hat rather than lead poisoning. whats the transdermal absorption of cordite is the real question
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 00:42
|
|
|
guy gets zapped by freezer door: https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_r3kzuxsb7W1r0uzl6.mp4 https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_r3jr2nex541qigfjt.mp4 https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_r3laprGVK11qigfjt.mp4
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 01:25
|
|
|
ekuNNN posted:guy gets zapped by freezer door: The reaction of the guy who immediately kicked the door off suggests that he knew his store had a spicy freezer door and hadn’t bothered to fix it or warn anyone.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 01:32
|
|
|
It looked to me more like he immediately recognized a zap situation, not necessarily that he knew that freezer would do it
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:13
|
|
|
ekuNNN posted:guy gets zapped by freezer door: sucks but hey, sometimes all you got is a two-prong outlet. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 02:19
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/idiotworkers/status/1467086177370972164
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 04:39
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 04:59
|
|
|
My friend worked at a stable and this basically has happened at least once to everyone exactly like that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 05:24
|
|
|
Getting covered in horse poo poo is one of the least disturbing things I've seen in this thread.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 05:33
|
|
|
bttf remake looking low budget
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 05:35
|
|
|
This is illegal (you have to fly over the stadium, not through it) and apparently the event is under investigation by the military and the FAA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvrNs-kOVYo cockpit video https://i.imgur.com/OTcdPeH.mp4
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 05:44
|
|
|
Tunicate posted:bttf remake looking low budget 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 05:54
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:This is illegal (you have to fly over the stadium, not through it) and apparently the event is under investigation by the military and the FAA After 7 years of fixing hosed up aircraft inherited from the TN Guard (we finally bone-yarded them in 2017) I wouldn't have trusted any of them to stay in the air at all ever. I'd like to imagine the entire crowd got misted with 5606 from the shithook. spookykid fucked around with this message at 06:14 on Dec 5, 2021 |
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 06:05
|
|
|
nomad2020 posted:It reminds me about how they used to train pilots to be real gentle about terrain warnings, teaching them to be real cautious about their speeds and such during the avoidance maneuvers. Nowadays they train pilots to immediately upon warning jump on their controls and ride the edge of their stall warnings the whole way up to safe altitude.  How many accidents are caused by planes with in-flight mechanical failures or pilot error setting improper flight configurations that cause a plane to perform below expected parameters? What if a malfunctioning control surface is causing the plane to fight with itself? Pilot makes a sudden adjustment to climb and the tailfin sends him into a stall at the worst possible time. Or how many times has autopilot caused pilots to not realize the wind conditions they were dealing with when they suddenly took the controls? Why climb immediately? What about those dead idiots trying to reach the 4.10 club in a CRJ-200 that burned out their engines trying to maintain a climb-rate without considering how hard that would be on the engines at higher altitudes? Pilots who, through willful ignorance, critical failures of control surfaces, or severe weather are not aware of what their plane is doing when they disengage the autopilot to climb? Gentle corrections seems like good advice to me, but I'm not a pilot so  Sagebrush posted:"Ride the edge" of the stall warnings indeed. This reminds me of another OSHA-related thing, where the FAA changed the standards for training new pilots due to essentially alarm fatigue. I'm confused because you say "slow flight at the minimum controllable airspeed without having the horn sound" and then "This means the maneuvers aren't quite as knife-edge as they used to be" which I take to mean they aren't as risky, knife-edge maneuvers because they are flying at higher airspeeds.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 06:30
|
|
|
Sounds like the speed required for that exercise is a little higher than it used to be so as to not set off the stall alarm.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 06:35
|
|
|
This entire video - stick with it (or just jump to 8:00). https://youtu.be/2UKzntNnXp8 Proud of my Portuguese motherland! orange sky fucked around with this message at 06:54 on Dec 5, 2021 |
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 06:51
|
|
|
spookykid posted:After 7 years of fixing hosed up aircraft inherited from the TN Guard (we finally bone-yarded them in 2017) I wouldn't have trusted any of them to stay in the air at all ever. If you shoot a full pod of 2.75" FFARs through the goalpost it should count as 19 points for the home team.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 07:10
|
|
|
Sanctum posted:So they disable the alarm for the exercise? Or they fly at speeds high enough not to start the alarm? In the new task you are flying faster. The original task had you perform the slow flight maneuvers while keeping the stall horn sounding. The horn starts to go off about 10 knots before the stall, and a Cessna 172 stalls at 40 knots, so you'd be flying 45-50 to do it properly. In the new task you must fly as slowly as possible without letting the horn sound, so you'd be flying 51-55 ish. At this higher airspeed the controls aren't as mushy, and you have more of a margin before actually stalling the plane. So technically the new maneuver is a little easier and a little less risky.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 07:11
|
|
|
orange sky posted:This entire video - stick with it (or just jump to 8:00). "Ill be honest this doesn't feel very... solid" "But it also feels like what's the worst that could happen?" 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 07:16
|
|
|
Sanctum posted:Why would they recommend immediately climbing at the highest safe rate? The ground proximity warning system large airplanes use has escalating "stages" it'll go through as the airplane gets closer to terrain or an obstacle, and crews are trained how to respond to them. The first audio warning the crew gets will be something saying "CAUTION, TERRAIN!", or "TERRAIN AHEAD!" which will then escalate to "TOO LOW, TERRAIN!" and "TERRAIN, TERRAIN, PULL UP!". If you just yank back on the yoke in response to a GPWS alert, there's a decent chance you'll put the airplane into an accelerated stall, so the procedure is generally something like "disengage the autopilot (if it wasn't already off), smoothly but quickly pitch the nose up to a certain point (usually something like 10-15 degrees), and add full power while doing so". Unless the airplane is flying down a box canyon or something, GPWS alerts should be early enough that those steps are sufficient to clear the terrain that triggered the alert. Stall warning devices on small airplanes generally can't be disabled from the cockpit, so the idea is to keep the airplane at an an airspeed just above where the stall warning goes off. Larger airplanes use a stick shaker and pusher for stall protection (the yoke starts vibrating once the airplane gets near a stall, and then get automatically shoved forwards if the crew ignores the shaker and gets closer to the stall), which typically will have some kind of way to override or disable the system if it starts going off when it's not supposed to.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 07:32
|
|
|
The best cockpit recording I've heard was where the warnings escalated from "sink rate" straight to "50"Sanctum posted:Why would they recommend immediately climbing at the highest safe rate? I imagine it's a best compromise. The terrain warning is literally "You are flying towards certain doom while not prepared to land, woop woop, pull up" E: The highest terrain you'll find is at 29,000ft. 410 club members need not worry. nomad2020 fucked around with this message at 07:40 on Dec 5, 2021 |
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 07:35
|
|
|
New back the the future movie lookin good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 10:06
|
|
|
Sanctum posted:Yeap that's an OSHA nightmare. 7m30s in 9:15 and 12:40 are my favourites.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 11:50
|
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/kv1h86y.gifv
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 12:53
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/cctv_idiots/status/1467054091088052227
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 13:04
|
|
|
spookykid posted:I'd like to imagine the entire crowd got misted with 5606 from the shithook.  The chemtrails we deserve. Sanctum posted:Why would they recommend immediately climbing at the highest safe rate? The ground has a Pk of 1.0.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 14:00
|
|
|
All this GPWS talk reminded me of this banger: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FwwBYzU2gE
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 16:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 14:59 |
|
|
orange sky posted:This entire video - stick with it (or just jump to 8:00). 😬 Even ignoring possible structural issues with an abandoned well (how solid is that brickwork and could it collapse on top of you?), basic confined spaces training 101 is never enter an area like that without testing the atmosphere, there's all sorts of situations where you could end up with some sort of suffocating odorless heavier-than-air gas in there, which is an exact recipe for those accidents where one guy passes out and then the guy who goes in to get him also passes out.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2021 18:13
|
|
