|
ruckus is rock solid, much better than unifi. it is also extremely expensive.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2021 22:03 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 00:09 |
|
I still shill for microtik.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2021 22:23 |
|
Canine Blues Arooo posted:I still shill for microtik. MikroTik for routing/switching/simple VPNs if you can tolerate the hilarious hostile latvian support and buggy code, but their wifi tech has not keep up with any new standards (they can’t even don 802.11ac wave 2 except in their new beta poo poo) im using tp-link’s omada line of business APs for wifi now with a controller, rock solid and a lot of features for the price (802.11k/v fast roaming, continuously updated firmware and new features, etc) edit: a hardware dedicated controller (which can be powered off a poe switch) + two APs and one of their poe switches ran me less than $300 total Asymmetric POSTer fucked around with this message at 00:38 on Dec 11, 2021 |
# ? Dec 11, 2021 00:35 |
|
i got owned by a 0day on my old mikrotik and they opened the http proxy on my router and i got on all the open proxy lists and for a month i couldnt browse netflix, amazon, ebay etc because they just block everything on that list. gently caress mikrotik. yeah i guess its on me for not janitoring my router but still
|
# ? Dec 11, 2021 00:39 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:i got owned by a 0day on my old mikrotik and they opened the http proxy on my router and i got on all the open proxy lists and for a month i couldnt browse netflix, amazon, ebay etc because they just block everything on that list. gently caress mikrotik. yeah i guess its on me for not janitoring my router but still https://newsnationusa.com/news/technology/cyber-security/over-300000-mikrotik-devices-found-vulnerable-to-remote-hacking-bugs/
|
# ? Dec 11, 2021 00:42 |
|
my edge is an openbsd vm and my switch is a cisco gigabit switch that isn't noticeably loud that work was throwing out
|
# ? Dec 11, 2021 00:47 |
|
im on the gs108 switch i bought for hausbus. it runs on 12v. it never breaks. it's silent. it just works and i love it
|
# ? Dec 11, 2021 00:49 |
|
my router is a vyos vm on proxmox i have to use a whole pc for my router if i want to bypass my isp router, its a wierdo config that uses an sfp module that syncs at 2.5Gb the only devices that can sync at 2.5Gb on sfp are a specific broadcom 10gb nic with modded drivers and $600+ ubiquiti switches
|
# ? Dec 11, 2021 05:27 |
|
lol i've wondered about that what router is it
|
# ? Dec 11, 2021 19:39 |
|
the isp one that is
|
# ? Dec 11, 2021 19:39 |
|
I’m on bell fibre and the isp router is a home hub 3000 that seems proprietary to bell. They have a new 4000 model with 10gb nic so it’s no longer bottlenecked on a 1.5gb plan, but it has an integrated media converter so you can’t remove the sfp module like the 3000.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 05:28 |
|
1Gbit ought to be enough for anyone
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 10:59 |
|
that’s the other thing if you use a normal 1gb media converter you’ll max out at ~700mbit because of the link speed mismatch. which is why I spent so much time and money on this project
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 11:34 |
|
Tankakern posted:1Gbit ought to be enough for anyone I have a book on fiber optics (from the 90s early 2000s) that basically says exactly this
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 14:42 |
|
haha perplx: you should write up your findings somewhere, i'll think it'll be relevant for many of us when ftth isps start rolling out >1gbps speeds in general which network gear producer has switches with 2.5 gbps ports that doesn't cost a fortune i wonder, most isp's uses off the shelf components for stuff like that
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 15:08 |
|
I didn’t discover anything new, it’s all documented in this thread https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r32230041-Internet-Bypassing-the-HH3K-up-to-2-5Gbps-using-a-BCM57810S-NIC
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 17:51 |
|
on a raspberry pi note I recently started using moode on an rpi with rigelian as the controller and man does this poo poo rule. works OOB with my USB dac, no real configuration. people still out here paying three, four digits for music streamers when a 3b can do the same exact thing
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 18:13 |
|
i guess theres no accounting for the whole "the usb port on my $4999 Jupiter FuckBox 9000 has a much warmer soundstage" thing tho
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 18:14 |
|
the more money you spend, the better the placebo effect works
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 18:40 |
|
Perplx posted:I didn’t discover anything new, it’s all documented in this thread https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r32230041-Internet-Bypassing-the-HH3K-up-to-2-5Gbps-using-a-BCM57810S-NIC cool
|
# ? Dec 12, 2021 22:48 |
|
have been driven into a situation where we'd like to do some kernel introspection, systemtap is the only real option for us due to the age of our kernels in local testing it looks fine, but i'm extremely gunshy about deploying it at scale. anyone have any experience doing so? we're staying within the "safe zone" of systemtap, ie no guru mode, and our kernel-side code is extremely simple, but bugs in systemtap or the kernel could obviously still gently caress us and unfortunately even a single kernel lockup would be a Bad Time in our environment
|
# ? Dec 26, 2021 11:00 |
|
im guessing you can't just make the case to move to something new enough to support ebpf in related news i finally got the kubernetes ebpf tool to stop being a butt and then promptly realized that my use case (adding some additional logging to some go code on the fly) is kinda hamstrung by no magic support for go structs like delve has
|
# ? Dec 26, 2021 11:19 |
|
CMYK BLYAT! posted:im guessing you can't just make the case to move to something new enough to support ebpf us being able to upgrade to something new (here a very liberal definition of new) is dependent on this project
|
# ? Dec 26, 2021 13:22 |
|
my homie dhall posted:have been driven into a situation where we'd like to do some kernel introspection, systemtap is the only real option for us due to the age of our kernels do it in phases then. do real testing not just "yup script seems to do something"
|
# ? Dec 26, 2021 21:08 |
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:do it in phases then. do real testing not just "yup script seems to do something" yeah, we'll certainly roll it out in stages and test it under synthetic load, etc. unfortunately in this part of the shop everything is pets so there's a limited amount of confidence we can gain by doing so
|
# ? Dec 27, 2021 05:03 |
|
I would simply be responsible for cattle
|
# ? Dec 27, 2021 08:37 |
|
bumo
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 01:27 |
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 07:11 |
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 08:06 |
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 13:40 |
|
ive been working in networking adjacent poo poo for a couple years I do not like it
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 14:20 |
|
didn't deploy the systemtap poo poo, think it was for the best. our environment still sucks so much poo poo though, it's unbelievable, we have just recently managed to mostly move off of a kernel version that was released when I was in high school.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 14:39 |
|
i luv 2 network
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 14:49 |
|
thread ttl expired
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 16:00 |
|
wanna here a funny tcp joke?
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 16:02 |
|
some kinda jackal posted:thread ttl expired
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 17:06 |
|
Mr. Crow posted:wanna here a funny tcp joke? I've got a pretty good UDP joke, but i'm not sure if you'll get it
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 19:07 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:I've got a pretty good UDP joke, but i'm not sure if you'll get it id tell you a joke about NAT, but id have to translate it first
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 19:18 |
|
that'd be cool though. Ive also got a joke about TCP replay attacks but you may have heard it before
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 19:22 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 00:09 |
|
i have a good ipsec joke it's just ipsec. all of it.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2023 22:15 |