Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Capt.Whorebags
Jan 10, 2005

CommieGIR posted:

Also, new climate denial strategy: Conservatives want to outlaw 'Woke Capitalism' that discriminates against fossil fuels

https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kb84z/woke-capitalism-discriminates-against-fossil-fuels-conservative-lawmakers-say

Not new here in Australia. Coal fanatics in the government and lobby groups want the taxpayer to be a "lender of last resort" for fossil fuels. Occasionally they try to push for "clean coal" bullshit.

The biggest coal spruikers are in the party that is supposedly free market but is addicted to ideological intervention.

"Let the free hand of the market decide"
*banks refuse to finance poor investments in fossil fuels*
"....no. Not like that."

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Saukkis
May 16, 2003

Unless I'm on the inside curve pointing straight at oncoming traffic the high beams stay on and I laugh at your puny protest flashes.
I am Most Important Man. Most Important Man in the World.
Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options - UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE
https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/LCA-2.pdf

quote:

5.1 Discussion

The overarching objective of this report is to assess the lifecycle environmental impacts of electricity generation
options. This has been performed by performing an LCA on updated life cycle inventories of select technologies.
Specifically, hard coal, natural gas, hydropower, concentrated solar power, photovoltaics, wind power, as well as
nuclear, have been evaluated regarding the following indicators: climate change, freshwater eutrophication, ionising
radiation, human toxicity, land occupation, dissipated water, as well as resource use.

Zudgemud
Mar 1, 2009
Grimey Drawer

Saukkis posted:

Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options - UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE
https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/LCA-2.pdf

It's fun to read these reports because coal just tops basically all metrics of bad.
Greenhouse gases? Check!
Water use? Check!
Human toxicity? Check!
Ionizing radiation? Check!

Even for land usage it is only the second worst after solar.

Monaghan
Dec 29, 2006

Zudgemud posted:

Even for land usage it is only the second worst after solar.

Does this include all the infrastructure to keep a coal plant running, like a coal mine? I'm never sure how they measure that.

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

Monaghan posted:

Does this include all the infrastructure to keep a coal plant running, like a coal mine? I'm never sure how they measure that.

If you're strip mining half of East Germany or lopping off hilltops, I would expect coal to be extremely bad. If you're operating a mineshaft, probably less bad though the latter's impact is probably underestimated since we generally fail to give a gently caress about any underground ecosystems that David Attenborough's camera team can't squeeze into.

For solar and similarly for wind the land use is disputed based on whether you count the total area within a solar/wind farm or just the cross section of the stilts holding up the panels and turbines. As a non-specialist ecological guesstimate I'd say that a wind farm's impact on the area inbetween the stilts is probably moderately bad but not ridiculously so since you're going to exclude some key larger species + generate narrow but heavy impact on some specific birds and bats while retaining many smaller species. A solar farm is terrible because it's basically a parking lot with some lawn. For that matter, the unbuilt area within the fence around a nuclear power plant is probably also going to lose key larger species but avoid the other impacts of wind.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice
Could you build a solar farm on top of like a hydroponics-esque green house?

Or maybe raise up a solar farm on a platform that's like a secured grating so sunlight can eke through?

Pander
Oct 9, 2007

Fear is the glue that holds society together. It's what makes people suppress their worst impulses. Fear is power.

And at the end of fear, oblivion.



Raenir Salazar posted:

Could you build a solar farm on top of like a hydroponics-esque green house?

Or maybe raise up a solar farm on a platform that's like a secured grating so sunlight can eke through?

Not at scale without introducing new problems that need solving or inefficiency that defeats the purpose.

Total Meatlove
Jan 28, 2007

:japan:
Rangers died, shoujo Hitler cried ;_;

Pander posted:

Not at scale without introducing new problems that need solving or inefficiency that defeats the purpose.

It seems like with the right planning, agrivoltaics does introduce a mutually benefit feedback cycle;

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0364-5

Evaporative cooling from plants below reduces panel temperature - increasing efficiency, panel shade reduces the amount of burn-out and requirements for irrigation, plants are sheltered and more productive as a result.

Capt.Whorebags
Jan 10, 2005

Solar and wind are relatively low impact on grazing land in Australia, but that’s probably because the grazing alone would do pretty much the same amount of damage.

Farmers love wind turbines because they get regular income during drought years and sheep/cattle graze right up to the base of them. Less common, but I’ve seen similar press about solar with grazing land.

Although the clearing of land for construction of wind farms is getting airplay right now: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-12-12/queensland-wind-farms-clearing-bushland/100683198

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

Saukkis posted:

Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options - UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE
https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/LCA-2.pdf

Nuclear's coming of pretty well on most scores unless I am missing somthing.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

His Divine Shadow posted:

Nuclear's coming of pretty well on most scores unless I am missing somthing.

Yeah for the most part Nuclear is getting some pretty high scores, largely because the plants last longer, emit less overall lifetime emissions, and tend to be incredibly cheap to operate once they are completed. That's before we get to energy density and safety being a higher concern therefore they tend to be safer overall.

MomJeans420
Mar 19, 2007



Europe better hope for a warm winter

https://twitter.com/JavierBlas/status/1472553090024984580?s=20

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

CommieGIR posted:

Yeah for the most part Nuclear is getting some pretty high scores, largely because the plants last longer, emit less overall lifetime emissions, and tend to be incredibly cheap to operate once they are completed. That's before we get to energy density and safety being a higher concern therefore they tend to be safer overall.

Yeah Nuclear cost prohibitive factor is financing which uh, is not a real cost.

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Hope the Euro winter energy crisis spawns a bigger than ever push for renewables in those markets.

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

Grouchio posted:

Hope the Euro winter energy crisis spawns a bigger than ever push for renewables in those markets.

It will on account of rendering current investments unfathomably profitable.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.
I guess it was too much to hope for that things would get better. Wood boiler purchase next

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Grouchio posted:

Hope the Euro winter energy crisis spawns a bigger than ever push for renewables in those markets.

No, everyois blaming renewables for these prices

ilmucche
Mar 16, 2016


How is the price determined? Is it a supply/demand thing? Would Germany stopping being idiots and turning their nuclear plants back even help?

Aethernet
Jan 28, 2009

This is the Captain...

Our glorious political masters have, in their wisdom, decided to form an alliance with a rag-tag bunch of freedom fighters right when the Federation has us at a tactical disadvantage. Unsurprisingly, this has resulted in the Feds firing on our vessels...

Damn you Huxley!

Grimey Drawer

MiddleOne posted:

Yeah Nuclear cost prohibitive factor is financing which uh, is not a real cost.

The cost of financing is effectively the opportunity cost of allocating capital to a nuke rather than elsewhere modified by expected returns against risk. This is extremely real.

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

Aethernet posted:

The cost of financing is effectively the opportunity cost of allocating capital to a nuke rather than elsewhere modified by expected returns against risk. This is extremely real.
Look at state borrowing rates for a laugh

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Aethernet posted:

The cost of financing is effectively the opportunity cost of allocating capital to a nuke rather than elsewhere modified by expected returns against risk. This is extremely real.

Again, if the goal is to fight climate change: We gotta stop pretending there needs to be a profit motive. Because otherwise we are hosed.

Dante80
Mar 23, 2015

CommieGIR posted:

Again, if the goal is to fight climate change: We gotta stop pretending there needs to be a profit motive. Because otherwise we are hosed.

Phanatic
Mar 13, 2007

Please don't forget that I am an extremely racist idiot who also has terrible opinions about the Culture series.

CommieGIR posted:

Again, if the goal is to fight climate change: We gotta stop pretending there needs to be a profit motive. Because otherwise we are hosed.

Again, opportunity costs exist even in the utter absence of profit motive.

Aethernet
Jan 28, 2009

This is the Captain...

Our glorious political masters have, in their wisdom, decided to form an alliance with a rag-tag bunch of freedom fighters right when the Federation has us at a tactical disadvantage. Unsurprisingly, this has resulted in the Feds firing on our vessels...

Damn you Huxley!

Grimey Drawer

evil_bunnY posted:

Look at state borrowing rates for a laugh

Yes, Governments should take advantage of historically low interest rates to invest in more infrastructure than they are at present. But if you treat this pool of capital as unlimited, those interest rates will quickly rise.

Aethernet
Jan 28, 2009

This is the Captain...

Our glorious political masters have, in their wisdom, decided to form an alliance with a rag-tag bunch of freedom fighters right when the Federation has us at a tactical disadvantage. Unsurprisingly, this has resulted in the Feds firing on our vessels...

Damn you Huxley!

Grimey Drawer

Phanatic posted:

Again, opportunity costs exist even in the utter absence of profit motive.

Also this.

Kaal
May 22, 2002

through thousands of posts in D&D over a decade, I now believe I know what I'm talking about. if I post forcefully and confidently, I can convince others that is true. no one sees through my facade.

CommieGIR posted:

Again, if the goal is to fight climate change: We gotta stop pretending there needs to be a profit motivemake it profitable. Because otherwise we are hosed.

If people intend to take the climate crisis seriously, they need to put it higher on the priority list than ending capitalism. Because if we're going to wait for the Grand Socialist Revolution before investing in critical green technology, then it's never going to happen. The problem is too serious to attach a bunch of political requirements to it that make it even more difficult to achieve.

The advances in clean energy over the last two decades have occurred because the technology became more affordable and could leverage the existing system, rather than seeking to overturn it.

Skyrocketing fossil fuel prices are a good thing, and imposing carbon taxes on top of them is also necessary, because it showcases the clear economic advantages of clean energy generation like nuclear, wind, solar, hydro, and thermal that can thrive in that economic environment. France is actively encouraging this sort of green renaissance, by out-competing Russian gas and still charging Germany and other European states through the nose. That money not only funds the French investment in nuclear power that Macron is championing, but has given German political parties pause for thought about their own commitment to green technology.

Sextro
Aug 23, 2014

We’re better off extinct than surviving in a capitalist system.

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.

Phanatic posted:

Again, opportunity costs exist even in the utter absence of profit motive.

... as in time to going online.

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

Phanatic posted:

Again, opportunity costs exist even in the utter absence of profit motive.

Given the general pattern of public underinvestment I don't give a gently caress. We don't live in a world where we have to choose between public investment in building train tracks, nuclear reactors, or more solar panels because there's literally no spare production capacity or capital available. We live in a world where we are doing gently caress all.

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

Phanatic posted:

Again, opportunity costs exist even in the utter absence of profit motive.

Sure, but it's the opportunity cost of planners, nuclear engineers and boatloads of concrete. Money is not a real restrictive factor at all, read up on how government financing works. Capital cost is never the restrictive factor for government investments in the developed world.

On the contrary, wind power has real limitations as even with production capacity skyrocketing every year there's still so much pent-up demand in the system that money doesn't help.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.
Olkiluoto 3 is active! :toot: Not yet producing power for the grid, that'll happen in february.

https://svenska.yle.fi/a/7-10010571

Didn't find an english source for it. OL3 will stand for 15% of finnish electricity generation.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

His Divine Shadow posted:

Olkiluoto 3 is active! :toot: Not yet producing power for the grid, that'll happen in february.

https://svenska.yle.fi/a/7-10010571

Didn't find an english source for it. OL3 will stand for 15% of finnish electricity generation.

Here's an article in English on it.

bad_fmr
Nov 28, 2007

His Divine Shadow posted:

Olkiluoto 3 is active! :toot: Not yet producing power for the grid, that'll happen in february.

https://svenska.yle.fi/a/7-10010571

Didn't find an english source for it. OL3 will stand for 15% of finnish electricity generation.

Here:
https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/europes-biggest-nuclear-reactor-receives-permission-to-start-tests/

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.
That article only seemed to say they had gotten approval, but they're beyond that stage now, the reactor is actively fissioning material now, actual electrical production will start in february 2022 however.

suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!
https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Europe-s-first-EPR-reaches-criticality

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

The Social Democrat's Verdict on Nuclear: The Phase-Out is Final

quote:

Germany will pull the plug on three of its last six nuclear power stations on Friday, another step towards completing its withdrawal from nuclear power as it turns its focus to renewables. The government decided to speed up its phasing out of nuclear power following Japan's Fukushima reactor meltdown in 2011 when an earthquake and tsunami destroyed the coastal plant in the world's worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl 25 years earlier.

The reactors of Brokdorf, Grohnde and Gundremmingen C, run by utilities E.ON and RWE, will be shut down on Friday after three-and-a-half decades in operation. The last three nuclear power plants — Isar 2, Emsland and Neckarwestheim II — will be turned off by the end of 2022. The phase-out of an energy deemed clean and cheap by some is an irreversible step for Europe's biggest economy, facing ambitious climate targets and rising power prices. "For the energy industry in Germany, the nuclear phase-out is final," said Kerstin Andreae, the head of energy industry association BDEW.

The six nuclear power plants contributed to around 12 percent of electricity production in Germany in 2021, BDEW preliminary figures showed. The share of renewable energy was almost 41 percent, with coal generating just under 28 percent and gas around 15 percent. Germany aims to make renewables meet 80 percent of power demand by 2030 through expanding wind and solar power infrastructure. The new government, which plans to step up climate protection efforts, stood by the nuclear power phase-out in its coalition agreement.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Grouchio posted:

The Social Democrat's Verdict on Nuclear: The Phase-Out is Final

And they are burning more coal and gas to make up the difference. And will likely miss their climate goals for the next few years.

Ironically, its driving Japan and others to do the exact opposite.

A GIANT PARSNIP
Apr 13, 2010

Too much fuckin' eggnog


A fun trade war with Russia would probably reverse that real quick.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

A GIANT PARSNIP posted:

A fun trade war with Russia would probably reverse that real quick.

I mean if Germany was going to do anything in response to Russian aggression as far as energy, they would've already done so. They are fully hooked.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

A GIANT PARSNIP
Apr 13, 2010

Too much fuckin' eggnog


CommieGIR posted:

I mean if Germany was going to do anything in response to Russian aggression as far as energy, they would've already done so. They are fully hooked.

Germany doesn't get to decide this unilaterally.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply