|
Durzel posted:https://twitter.com/jakubkrcmar/status/1470681751144255494?s=20
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 13:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 15:36 |
|
|
I love the the intangible idea of web 2.0 still offered many tangible technologies that benefitted people. Going from old school HTML stuff to the wave of PHP, CSS, and then even more advanced and beneficial stuff. But web 3.0 is apparently a new wave because of a tech that offers no tangible benefit at large, no one cares to learn how to use, and suffers at making a point of what it actually does and can be used for. This is the future people.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 14:01
|
|
|
Let the first person start selling actual Disney poo poo in nfts and then we'll see
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 14:07
|
|
|
syntaxfunction posted:I love the the intangible idea of web 2.0 still offered many tangible technologies that benefitted people. Going from old school HTML stuff to the wave of PHP, CSS, and then even more advanced and beneficial stuff. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 14:07
|
|
|
Sombrerotron posted:The distilled essence of web3: Some men just want to see the world shred.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 14:13
|
|
|
orange sky posted:Let the first person start selling actual Disney poo poo in nfts and then we'll see NFT people are dumb but they’re not dumb enough to poke the bear. They’re just doing what all great capitalists do: gently caress over the little guy and hope your lawyers can drag out a lawsuit longer than the other guy can afford.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 15:04
|
|
|
syntaxfunction posted:I love the the intangible idea of web 2.0 still offered many tangible technologies that benefitted people. Going from old school HTML stuff to the wave of PHP, CSS, and then even more advanced and beneficial stuff. As far as I can see Web 3 so far consists of creating artificial scarcity to monetise digital assets while we all gently caress around in Zuckerbergs poo poo Second Life reboot , unless I’ve missed something.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 15:06
|
|
|
If anyone needs a decent explainer for both how crypto and NFTs work and also how they’re dumb to send to relatives and other non-tech folks, this is pretty decent and not too technical.
Kerbtree fucked around with this message at 15:24 on Dec 14, 2021 |
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 15:16
|
|
|
syntaxfunction posted:I love the the intangible idea of web 2.0 still offered many tangible technologies that benefitted people. Going from old school HTML stuff to the wave of PHP, CSS, and then even more advanced and beneficial stuff. Are we really going to call this poo poo web 3.0? Is it different in any meaningful way?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 15:24
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:Are we really going to call this poo poo web 3.0? It's different in all sorts of ways (all of them bad)
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 15:59
|
|
|
Also it's been a branding technique since at least the Holy Roman Empire to proclaim your particular thing to be a successor to a thing people like, regardless of whether or not it actually is.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:12
|
|
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:pretty sure they literally do this The NFTs were with us the whole time!?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:13
|
|
|
Durzel posted:https://twitter.com/jakubkrcmar/status/1470681751144255494?s=20 Can someone reply to him with that thread about the guy pleading for his apes back Party Boat posted:lol I got nauseous just picturing the smell in there
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:19
|
|
|
Sombrerotron posted:The distilled essence of web3: I argue that this is quite the opposite because they have a clear product and mission statement and tangible results of such
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:32
|
|
|
"We've invented a magical digital place where anything a 3d designer and programmer can imagine we can pipe directly into your eyeballs stereographically. Once it exists there is no limit to the duplication. If the real world is not yet post scarcity, the digital world surely is." "Ok, but how do I own things there?"
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:33
|
|
|
apparently, using the names of celebrities to sell NFTs isn't confined just to living celebrities anymore
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:35
|
|
|
Oh my God
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:41
|
|
|
Brb digging up the digital corpse of Jesus Christ himself to sell bible passage NFTs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:43
|
|
|
Does islam forbid nfts on the same grounds as unfair interest
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:48
|
|
|
EorayMel posted:Does islam forbid nfts on the same grounds as unfair interest I feel like it violates the spirit of the rule at the very least.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:54
|
|
|
There Bias Two posted:Brb digging up the digital corpse of Jesus Christ himself to sell bible passage NFTs. There is no corpse of Jesus. He just peaced out and ascended to heaven. Just sell bible NFTs anyhow, who's going to enforce copyright, the catholics?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 16:59
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:apparently, using the names of celebrities to sell NFTs isn't confined just to living celebrities anymore I just caught on that. drat that's just bad. At least everyone is showing their disgust in the comments,.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:00
|
|
|
I’m pretty sure someone already is selling passages from the Bible NFTs. Well to be more specific a hyperlink to a text file with a bible passage.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:00
|
|
|
Durzel posted:https://twitter.com/jakubkrcmar/status/1470681751144255494?s=20 I love how he admits straight up that scarcity is an illusion and art assets are infinitely copyable and the only thing you can do is try to undercut the copies in a race to the bottom but don't worry, this actually means that artists will finally be able to realize the profits from their labor that they deserve
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:02
|
|
|
Somebody should just post a bunch of Disney poo poo as NFTs so Disney legal can burn everything to the ground.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:02
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:apparently, using the names of celebrities to sell NFTs isn't confined just to living celebrities anymore I assume the kids that were being sued for mishandling his estate while he was alive are involved in this.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:03
|
|
|
CRUSTY MINGE posted:There is no corpse of Jesus. He just peaced out and ascended to heaven. Yeah, but then you get a question of which books to include in the Bible NFT, and before you know it, there's another Crypto-Reformation. Main Paineframe posted:apparently, using the names of celebrities to sell NFTs isn't confined just to living celebrities anymore NFTs are certainly developing a reputation, in much the same way a man who insists on bringing his emotional support Bull to every china shop in town develops a reputation.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:05
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Dictionarycom/status/1470771245239132166
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:10
|
|
|
Hammerite posted:It's different in all sorts of ways (all of them bad) such as
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:14
|
|
|
One of the more common things I’ve seen in the last 3 years is young people coming into money from dead people, trusts, or their parents just giving them money/jobs and then instantly wanting to turn that money into crypto poo poo. It’s like they think money is old-fashioned idiot stuff, and fake money you can’t use is the future. Even though money-money is bankrolling their entire everything and the fake money isn’t convertible. So I’m not surprised if the kids managing his estate want to string up the corpse of their grandpa like a puppet to promote NFT poo poo. There is no limit to the absurdity and stupidity of crypto people. It is completely limitless, and they all 100% are convinced without any doubt that they will be incredibly rich because of it. Recently I was at a dinner recently and a financial advisor friend of mine very earnestly told a friend’s boyfriend (25 or so) that he absolutely should not do anything with cryptocurrencies ever, he will lose money on it and he needs to get away from it. The guy just laughed an unsettling amount, all alone, for like 30 seconds straight and everyone at the dinner stared at him wide-eyed as it was apparent this guy was clearly going through a breakdown or crisis of some sort. After the laughing faded out and everyone was basically horrified, he pulled his phone out and said he just bought $10,000 of bitcoin and then left rather abruptly. Like, these people are loving broken. I don’t know what to say further, but they are absolutely broken.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:17
|
|
|
All i know is the liquor store i go to isn't going to let me buy wine or gin with cyberbucks so what's the point
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:21
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:such as Shageletic posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/fancysandwiches/status/1468249416473718792
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:22
|
|
|
Pretty sure there's a long history of third-generation+ wealth being completely broken failchildren who can't squander their inherited wealth fast enough.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:28
|
|
|
jokes posted:Recently I was at a dinner recently and a financial advisor friend of mine very earnestly told a friend’s boyfriend (25 or so) that he absolutely should not do anything with cryptocurrencies ever, he will lose money on it and he needs to get away from it. The guy just laughed an unsettling amount, all alone, for like 30 seconds straight and everyone at the dinner stared at him wide-eyed as it was apparent this guy was clearly going through a breakdown or crisis of some sort. After the laughing faded out and everyone was basically horrified, he pulled his phone out and said he just bought $10,000 of bitcoin and then left rather abruptly. This is a trend I feel like I'm noticing a lot. Actual people experienced long-term in finance know things about volatility, pump-and-dump, and bubbles, and so either keep crypto at a distance or at most dip a toe in it and pay close attention to its volatility. Young people and internet-poisoned people doing Baby's first investment, meanwhile, treat Crypto like a magic money-printing machine, becoming near-perfect marks. Even the Libertarians I know, who have more favorable views than most on cryptocurrency, keep investing in crypto at a distance, at least as far as I know. If Wall Street is good at anything, it's grinding up the gullible, the zealous, and the stupid into financial sausage.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:30
|
|
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:Pretty sure there's a long history of third-generation+ wealth being completely broken failchildren who can't squander their inherited wealth fast enough.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:42
|
|
|
So it's not real?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 17:55
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:So it's not real? Yes, but inasmuch as it refers to a coherent set of ideas, if the thing were real and as represented by its proponents, it would be bad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 18:02
|
|
|
Can we not ask these lunatics to just fork their branch of the Internet onto their own hardware? They like forks right, thats crypto vernacular?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 18:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/scottniswander/status/1470773160706555909?s=21
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 18:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 15:36 |
|
|
hotdog feet posted:Somebody should just post a bunch of Disney poo poo as NFTs so Disney legal can burn everything to the ground. Law talking people answer me this: I mint a Disney nft. I sell it for $50. Disney sues me. I reject any and all attempts at a settlement out of court because I know I will lose and it will create a precedent against my posting enemies. I make it go to trial. I lose. I appeal -- with the full intent of losing again -- and lose again at trial. I appeal again and either get denied without merit or lose again at trial ad nauseum. Is this allowed? Am I allowed to bring a case that I want to intentionally lose in order to burn down someone else's house?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2021 19:12
|
|
