|
Elon is either a very good grifter or someone who could've been a very good grifter.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:12 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 19:52 |
|
Money doesn’t equal intelligence, but some people never understand that (usually because it’s easier to just flit about life thinking the elite are there because they’re better, since critical thinking usually causes stress, consternation, etc.) Sometimes it’s just random, dumb luck like anyone who made money by buying and holding bitcoin for 10 years. Elon Musk may or may not be smart but he’s at least demonstrably an rear end in a top hat, and that’s more than enough to write him off (and probably anyone who likes him) completely. Being born into a family that owns a gem mine in South Africa definitely didn’t hinder him in any way. He’s at least been extremely lucky.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:15 |
|
Xanderkish posted:I recall reading that intelligent people are more likely to believe bullshit like aliens sightings and psychics because they're better able to convince themselves of it. Not sure how I feel about that, but it does have a logic to them. A person can also he like the Elon Musk or Kanye West kind of stupid genius, where they can be simultaneously incredibly talented AND batshit stupid. People who think they're smart (which is not necessarily the same as smart people) are often just as susceptible as anyone else to tricks and misdirection, but they're even less likely to reexamine their initial reactions or admit that they might have been misled. Elon isn't a genius. He's a marketer, a con artist. A liar who's good at selling themselves can easily portray themselves as a genius.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:23 |
|
Xanderkish posted:I recall reading that intelligent people are more likely to believe bullshit like aliens sightings and psychics because they're better able to convince themselves of it. Not sure how I feel about that, but it does have a logic to them. A person can also he like the Elon Musk or Kanye West kind of stupid genius, where they can be simultaneously incredibly talented AND batshit stupid. Not more likely to believe, harder to persuade out once they do believe because they're much more adept at rationalizing around any contrary evidence. Turns out intelligence doesn't mean you're some perfect logic robot who always objectively understands your own motivations. By the same token falling for scams like this doesn't necessarily require someone to be smart or dumb (though NFT stuff in particular seems designed to filter heavily for morons), just motivated to believe in the get-rich-quick scheme. MLMs don't target housewives because housewives are stupid, they're a rich vein because they access to money but are alienated from the moneymaking process, like the idea of making their own income but can't get a real job after years out of the workforce, so give them a readymade kit that looks like what salespeople do and tell them they're small business owners and they'll fight to the death for the illusion. The target for crypto is dudes who got in at the lower end of tech or like to think of themselves as tech-savvy because they're extremely Online, never saw the fabled millions that they were promised Google would be paying them and never actually learned how to make anything useful in their lovely CS classes. Now someone's telling them that they can quit their bullshit dead-end career and become Visionary Venture Capitalists swapping absolute bullshit just like Bezos and Musk, because they're just so good at computers (Twitter) and the only field they've managed to master with confidence (memes) is actually super valuable and important. The smart ones will fight with every resource at their disposal for the illusion they aren't losers after all and the dumb ones are furnished with an endless supply of one-liners and colorful image macros to derail inconvenient trains of thought. A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 23:40 on Dec 14, 2021 |
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:33 |
|
orange sky posted:I just had dinner with someone I consider an intelligent person, but I might have to review that opinion. They apparently bought multiple "nft metaverse planes", and are playing a "click to win game" where they login everyday and click some buttons to get money back in coins. Direct quote - "it started recently so its not going to blow up immediately - I'll probably be able to make money off of it before it goes tits up". Looked at website, saw the big Gameplay tiles that appear to depict Asteroids and Space Invaders, but with NFT planes and cartoon cats. Said to myself "Surely a supposedly intelligent person doesn't look at Asteroids and Space Invaders and think this will be the big metaverse game that is 'going to blow up'. What is the actual game?" Looked at videos for CryptoPlanes on youtube. All of them are the same: person goes into CryptoPlanes website, looks at planes they can buy and sell (which are just a dumb card with 5 stats), then starts looking at market charts and their investment whitepaper. THERE IS NO GAME. Not even the crappy Asteroids and Space Invaders clones they show on their website! The only 'game' that exists for CryptoPlanes is basically Cookie Clicker, except you have to pay to click and maybe you can sell your cookie on the in-game market to a bigger fool. Star Citizen, eat your heart out.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:33 |
|
Star citizen never getting into the NFT grift absolutely blows my mind.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:38 |
|
CRUSTY MINGE posted:There is no corpse of Jesus. He just peaced out and ascended to heaven. Just because the Jesus corpse doesn't exist doesn't mean we can't make an NFT of it.
|
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:40 |
|
the Church moves very slowly but I'm confident we'll be seeing 13 separate Jesus foreskin NFTs being sold simultaneously by 2100
|
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:42 |
|
Seriously why even bother with the art portion of the NFT? It clearly doesn’t matter to the grift
|
# ? Dec 14, 2021 23:53 |
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:Not more likely to believe, harder to persuade out once they do believe because they're much more adept at rationalizing around any contrary evidence. Turns out intelligence doesn't mean you're some perfect logic robot who always objectively understands your own motivations. a very good post. I'm now selling the NFT of post 519973048 for 3 ETH on Opensea. Hellblazer187 posted:Kanye yes, but what's Elon's talent? Identifying markets that are dominated by lovely rent-seekers and head-up-their-rear end oligopolies. Paypal, Tesla, and SpaceX all were/are super successful because they did things the incumbents didn't want to do because they were lazy and stupid. Paypal he sold at the right time, since then the competition has stepped up and the shine has worn off. Tesla the shine is starting to wear off already, and that's why they're pushing unfinished AI onto the roads. And SpaceX still looks like visionary genius because the MIC is the shittiest rent-seeker and head-up-its-rear end oligopoly it's possible to be.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 00:01 |
|
Gutcruncher posted:Seriously why even bother with the art portion of the NFT? It clearly doesn’t matter to the grift It does in that it’s branding. Without the pictures, lovely though they are, you are just yelling that the emperor has no clothes. And that doesn’t let people lie to themselves about these things having value.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 00:07 |
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:By the same token falling for scams like this doesn't necessarily require someone to be smart or dumb (though NFT stuff in particular seems designed to filter heavily for morons), just motivated to believe in the get-rich-quick scheme. MLMs don't target housewives because housewives are stupid, they're a rich vein because they access to money but are alienated from the moneymaking process, like the idea of making their own income but can't get a real job after years out of the workforce, so give them a readymade kit that looks like what salespeople do and tell them they're small business owners and they'll fight to the death for the illusion. The target for crypto is dudes who got in at the lower end of tech or like to think of themselves as tech-savvy because they're extremely Online, never saw the fabled millions that they were promised Google would be paying them and never actually learned how to make anything useful in their lovely CS classes. Now someone's telling them that they can quit their bullshit dead-end career and become Visionary Venture Capitalists swapping absolute bullshit just like Bezos and Musk, because they're just so good at computers (Twitter) and the only field they've managed to master with confidence (memes) is actually super valuable and important. The smart ones will fight with every resource at their disposal for the illusion they aren't losers after all and the dumb ones are furnished with an endless supply of one-liners and colorful image macros to derail inconvenient trains of thought. This is a pretty insightful take. Also https://twitter.com/AltcoinGordon/status/1470121126722428934
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 00:12 |
|
Much as I hate brands paying some 30 year olds 40k a year to give sick burns online all day, I have never been bothered by a dictionary brand doing it.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 00:14 |
|
Gutcruncher posted:Seriously why even bother with the art portion of the NFT? It clearly doesn’t matter to the grift They do to the bag holders.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 00:22 |
|
ikanreed posted:Much as I hate brands paying some 30 year olds 40k a year to give sick burns online all day, I have never been bothered by a dictionary brand doing it. it has to be one of the least exploitative industries right? compared to say Wendy's or Pepsi or whatever.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 00:23 |
|
saw this on the twitter and it made me think of you guys https://twitter.com/JacobOracle/status/1470860401785061376?s=20
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 01:27 |
|
If bitcoin exchanges can naturally spring forth from magic card auction sites, then surely crypto defenders can spring forth from brother fuckers.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 01:34 |
|
Gutcruncher posted:Seriously why even bother with the art portion of the NFT? It clearly doesn’t matter to the grift the blockchain poo poo is too offputting to most other demographics and outside of founding a crypto religion there's little else techbros hold in quite the same contempt A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 02:22 on Dec 15, 2021 |
# ? Dec 15, 2021 01:51 |
|
https://twitter.com/Applebees/status/1470484078646411264
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 02:01 |
|
Cowcaster posted:saw this on the twitter and it made me think of you guys lol in the previous screenshot the tether-bot says: "Ask me what would happen to the entire crypto market if USDT was worth 1 cent. Horrible things"
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 02:01 |
|
gently caress didn't loop the animation
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 02:03 |
|
jokes posted:Star citizen never getting into the NFT grift absolutely blows my mind. That's like a month away, I am sure. They've been selling JPEGs for a decade now, they just need time to build the jankiest Blockchain in history. My wife is on a call for her MBA class and four of the five people were telling one of her classmates that BTC is a scam and the one kept trying to defend it. Granted, this class includes an investment advisor who IMs members of the class telling them to get into very specific cryptos ALL THE TIME
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 02:23 |
|
Nybble posted:coinmarketcap is reporting that Bitcoin's market cap is in the quintillions, and a lot of other exchanges have similar numbers. Guess ghost TiTty was right all along…man, am I embarrassed (and poor!).
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 03:43 |
|
I don't get why people like Kanye or think he is a musical genius - he's always seemed like a very style-over-substance celebrity to me, which I suppose is analogous to the essence of crypto.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 04:39 |
|
CaptainSarcastic posted:I don't get why people like Kanye or think he is a musical genius - he's always seemed like a very style-over-substance celebrity to me, which I suppose is analogous to the essence of crypto. Speaking as someone who knows 95% of the lyrics to My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy by heart, I will fight you on this.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 05:16 |
|
Xanderkish posted:Speaking as someone who knows 95% of the lyrics to My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy by heart, I will fight you on this. BOUND
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 05:20 |
|
Xanderkish posted:Speaking as someone who knows 95% of the lyrics to My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy by heart, I will fight you on this. It's okay, you can like bad music. Just don't make an NFT out of it, I guess.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 05:45 |
|
coinmarketcap was apparently hacked
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 05:47 |
|
Someone mentioned that artists complained about their works being stolen and were lectured that they should have made NFTs themselves. This makes me think about how people react to being provided with new information. When I read a book I try to put all preconceptions out of my mind and conscienciounsly read it and make a judgement about it after I finish. But I think some people definitely, when they read a book are only capable of seeing what they want to see. And then there are even some people that decide what world-shattering epiphanies the book is going to give them in advance before they read the first page.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 05:50 |
|
Strong Sauce posted:coinmarketcap was apparently hacked Temporarily embarrassed millionaire? I'm a permanently embarrassed billionaire!
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 06:25 |
|
Question related to all the legal talk from last page: A lot of the conversation about Disney suing someone for selling an NFT of Disney IP talks as if selling an NFT for crypto is a real transaction and not a transfer of fake internet coins. What would be the difference between that and say, me promising to send you a link to a JPG of mickey mouse in exchange for 500 WoW gold? There are places online where you can sell wow gold for USD, but I have a hard time imaging anyone at Disney legal would give a poo poo. I'm really curious if there are any legal precedents that clarify this a bit more. Is simply the idea that crypto "might" be worth "something" mixed with Disney's IP enough to imply that there was some sort of fraudulent transaction, vs. the fact that wow gold has never claimed to be anything but wow gold and not some sort of alternative currency?
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 07:42 |
|
The Dark Wind posted:Question related to all the legal talk from last page: The conversation started with someone speculating about minting an NFT, but then shifted to making new versions of mickey mouse and then hosting those somewhere else with vague promises about ownership. As far as I can tell all the legal issues are with the rehosting, recombining, and promising and not with the NFT itself.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 07:51 |
|
A legal battle around Disney characters as NFTs concludes in a cease and desist on the image hosting company storing the images NFTs themselves remain unaffected as a judge rules that they are simply hyperlinks and have no relation to the original images
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 08:40 |
|
So I guess my Yahoo finance bugged out earlier? Not seeing any posts about it but I got a notification earlier tonight that it had jumped 10% and then I looked and saw this: Checked back a few min later and it was normal again. I thought I was hallucinating. It was really weird.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 09:24 |
|
lol, hello i'm tango alpha delta and i'm a Tango Alpha Delta Coin Trillionaire. You can be too if you give me money. holy poo poo i feel icky now.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 09:27 |
|
That's normal and good for Bitcoin actually.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 09:28 |
|
Ultimately all IP cases come down to the willingness of the IP owner to push its legal rights. Disney probably doesn't give enough of a poo poo to stop you from selling anything for WoW gold, but that doesn't mean a copyright wasn't infringed. And indeed, copyright law doesn't require you to show that something is being sold for oodles of dollars, merely that the activity was an unauthorized duplication and for which statutory damages can apply. If I rip Blurays to a media server and let all my friends stream it, that's still a copyright violation whether I let them watch for free, pay with WoW gold, or charge $5 a month. (The existence of high monetary value exchanges makes it more likely it's worth suing for damages and not merely sending the DMCA take down letter, which is effectively free to someone like Disney.) And yes, the NFT itself is such a legal nonentity that no right is being infringed if you mint an NFT, per se. But invariably there's all sorts of ancillary infringing activity that surrounds the NFT, and there's an arguable claim that because the NFT seller purports to convey some sort of "ownership" interest you're daring the original rights holder to step in just to ensure that no, get your loving mitts off of Mickey.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 10:07 |
|
drowningidiot posted:So I guess my Yahoo finance bugged out earlier? Not seeing any posts about it but I got a notification earlier tonight that it had jumped 10% and then I looked and saw this: Oh poo poo salt shakeup was right beyond his wildest dreams.
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 12:58 |
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:you would be spending many tens of thousands of dollars to establish the legal precedent that copyright infringement is illegal You would be setting the precedent that NFTs are copyright infringement. At this point that's debatable since they don't convey any rights or even actually store the image. https://twitter.com/FlyingRottenR/status/1470737590894706694/photo/1
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 12:58 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 19:52 |
|
Fuckin Keanu man
|
# ? Dec 15, 2021 13:02 |