(Thread IKs:
Nuns with Guns)
|
DrVenkman posted:People finding Sarkeesian's Letterboxd has been a gold mine. Insane the elevated position she got because she learned to point at things and go 'that's sexist' with absolutely zero media literacy. Yardbomb posted:As much as I dislike people dragging her up again and again for all eternity, this one's just bizarre too lmfao
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 15:20 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 00:07 |
|
"The othering of villainy and 'crime'" [The crime is Anton Chigurh putting holes in people with a suppressed shotgun]
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 15:28 |
|
lol
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 15:33 |
|
Oh my goodddddd So insufferable and deluded lmao
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 15:34 |
|
Hahahaha oh my god
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 15:49 |
|
#brave
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 15:51 |
|
ahahahaha
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 15:57 |
|
Here's what critical about her comment; she won't link to those reviews. She isn't highlighting those voices. I've looked for those reviews, since she's been unhelpful, but the biggest complaint about it has been that Riz Ahmed can hear and so it was a bad thing to cast him. The very few reviews I have seen from deaf people seem to highlight that it gets a lot right about and is sensitive while being realistic.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 16:33 |
|
Yardbomb posted:As much as I dislike people dragging her up again and again for all eternity, this one's just bizarre too i wasn't gonna say anything about her Opinions for similar reasons, but then i read this loving travesty of a review, jesus loving christ what the fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 16:36 |
|
Is it actually her letterboxd account? Those are some bad takes about movies, drat.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 16:44 |
|
[opens thread] [sees Anita Sarkeesian letterboxd reviews no one asked for] Hey, remember when I said this thread sucked? [closes thread] (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 16:46 |
|
It's pretty fun to laugh about really dumb reviews, it's the reviewer thread!
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 16:47 |
|
nine-gear crow posted:[opens thread] You’re missing good content
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 16:48 |
|
nine-gear crow posted:[opens thread] Eh, it's fine for a chuckle or two, she is a media critic and apparently mods are fine with it. Hopefully it doesn't become a moral high ground discussion about the xenophobia of white liberal feminism.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 16:49 |
|
lmbo
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 18:11 |
|
DrVenkman posted:People finding Sarkeesian's Letterboxd has been a gold mine. Insane the elevated position she got because she learned to point at things and go 'that's sexist' with absolutely zero media literacy. i am amused because i loving called this for a long time by just reading her twitter and her various reviews that while she did some genuinely good poo poo, she was always weirdly prudish and sex negative with lots of weird white lady "woke" poo poo hangups. least Carolyn is cool and does good streams. like again, bully for her for going the poo poo she went through. but poo poo like this and her mandalorian meltdown make me lol that her private reviews are amusing as gently caress. DrVenkman posted:Here's what critical about her comment; she won't link to those reviews. She isn't highlighting those voices. that would take actual effort though. she deems it nice enough to SAY she cares and use their opinions as a cudgel and a justification. like half the "allies" of folks with physical issues. Dapper_Swindler fucked around with this message at 18:32 on Jan 2, 2022 |
# ? Jan 2, 2022 18:22 |
|
For me it's going to be a mild chuckle at some bad takes, and a long weary sigh at seeing some of the worst people in the world now loudly farting that they are somehow vindicated.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 19:26 |
|
Bug Squash posted:For me it's going to be a mild chuckle at some bad takes, and a long weary sigh at seeing some of the worst people in the world now loudly farting that they are somehow vindicated. They'd think they were vindicated no matter what. It's impossible for them to ever believe they're wrong. The thing that made the backlash against Sarkeesian so strange was how mild and normal her takes were, yet somehow they got talked about as an insane radical critic looking too deeply into things.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 19:32 |
|
Dias posted:Is it actually her letterboxd account? Those are some bad takes about movies, drat. Uh, I'm actually seconding this question: It seems kind of weird, given the history of her internet infamy, that a public figure like Anita Sarkeesian would open a Letterboxd account under her real name and leave a bunch of two-to-three paragraph reviews on a bunch of movies? Do we have any sort of outside confirmation this is actually her account and not the work of someone who still has her living rent free in their head? These reviews honestly read way too much like a parody of what Sarkeesian's detractors think she sounds like
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 20:05 |
|
https://twitter.com/anitasarkeesian/status/1355779026846056452?t=KmsnWtcZNyw8UT6s7kiSmQ&s=09 laugh away lads
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 20:08 |
|
If anyone else has been spacing out during this discussion here's a new Crowbcat video on Back 4 Blood. I always enjoy how he lets buggy games speak for themselves. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdRLNUGmFC8 Also it's been a while since i've dipped into Left 4 Dead 2 but holy poo poo i forgot just how gory it is. Arc Hammer fucked around with this message at 20:49 on Jan 2, 2022 |
# ? Jan 2, 2022 20:38 |
|
DrVenkman posted:People finding Sarkeesian's Letterboxd has been a gold mine. Insane the elevated position she got because she learned to point at things and go 'that's sexist' with absolutely zero media literacy. This makes me want to see In The Mood For Love Even More, honestly (and Chungking Express, though the info about the original cuts/ Blu-Rays disappearing is depressing. ) This reminds me of something, though: Jamie Faith posted:So Ashley Lynch made this bad take (as she does) Not exactly the same, but in a similar vein. fun hater posted:https://twitter.com/anitasarkeesian/status/1355779026846056452?t=KmsnWtcZNyw8UT6s7kiSmQ&s=09 The follow-up tweet: https://twitter.com/anitasarkeesian/status/1356131807431823364 'don't expect much.'
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 20:40 |
|
BigRed0427 posted:Everyone just log the gently caress off Twitter.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 20:52 |
|
nine-gear crow posted:[opens thread] No, this was why this thread was originally invented actually. I remember.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 22:28 |
|
Stumbled on a rather nice little channel, Too Many Tapes. He likes to collect old, obscure VHS shows, and does old school TGWTG-style riff/reviews, just more fun and tolerable than those used to be. There's a lot of weird Christian kids shows, weird secular kids shows, and the occasional random video essay. Pretty great if like something light and fun but not totally brainless. Here's a review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zccnHICrGA He only has a thousandish subs, so it'd be nice to get him more attention.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 22:29 |
|
I knew Sarkissian's arrogant vibe ticked me off the wrong way back in 2013. Glad to be extremely validated nine years later that she was the wrong person to lead a crusade. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 22:36 |
|
Grouchio posted:I knew Sarkissian's arrogant vibe ticked me off the wrong way back in 2013. Glad to be extremely validated nine years later that she was the wrong person to lead a crusade. She wasn’t leading a crusade, she just did some extremely mild videos and got a hate campaign against her
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 22:52 |
|
Grouchio posted:I knew Sarkissian's arrogant vibe ticked me off the wrong way back in 2013. Glad to be extremely validated nine years later that she was the wrong person to lead a crusade. The crusade being "some video games are sexist"?
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:12 |
|
Grouchio posted:I knew Sarkissian's arrogant vibe ticked me off the wrong way back in 2013. Glad to be extremely validated nine years later that she was the wrong person to lead a crusade. lol wtf
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:12 |
|
I knew Grouchio's lovely posting ticked me off the wrong way back in 2014. Glad to be extremely validated eight years later that he was the right person to put on my ignore list.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:18 |
|
DrVenkman posted:Same thing happened with the Criterion DO THE RIGHT THING, where Spike Lee and Ernest Dickerson redid the colouring, and removed the golden tint, taking the movie from taking place on the hottest day of the year to one that's just a bit overcast. Annoyingly they insisted it's how the movie was always supposed to look. I'm pretty sure the Blu-Ray fixed this in the end at least. It's honestly a massive bug-bear of mine. Like, a film maker wanting to go back and tinker with their films isn't an issue. It's their creative work, so fair enough, but, like, make the originals that the audience remembers fondly available as well, for gently caress's sake.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:19 |
|
Grouchio posted:I knew Sarkissian's arrogant vibe ticked me off the wrong way back in 2013. Glad to be extremely validated nine years later that she was the wrong person to lead a crusade. yeah how dare a woman have Opinions. crusade is when a woman has Opinions
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:23 |
|
I think Anita is not especially insightful but then maybe it’s not so confusing why a more insightful woman never took this horseshit on
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:25 |
|
I thought her overall point she was trying to make was good but she would often shoot herself in the foot by choosing just the worst examples she could find. No I can't remember any specific examples off the top of my head now but I just remembered sometimes she'd pick a game or a scene from a game that I felt hurt her credibility
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:30 |
|
Only crusade we need is against Crypto and NFTs.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:32 |
|
Anita Sarkeesian was just smart enough to produce her totally normal and fine 101 level videos but not smart enough to foresee the shitstorm that would result and/or realize she could not successfully ride that wave without being crashed against the rocks. So the quality of her letterboxd reveiws lines up with that. You know whose letterboxd is good? GetFiscal.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:39 |
|
thetoughestbean posted:She wasn’t leading a crusade, she just did some extremely mild videos and got a hate campaign against her
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:45 |
|
Grouchio posted:I knew Sarkissian's arrogant vibe ticked me off the wrong way back in 2013. Glad to be extremely validated nine years later that she was the wrong person to lead a crusade. Bug Squash posted:For me it's going to be a mild chuckle at some bad takes, and a long weary sigh at seeing some of the worst people in the world now loudly farting that they are somehow vindicated.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:46 |
|
Macaluso posted:I thought her overall point she was trying to make was good but she would often shoot herself in the foot by choosing just the worst examples she could find. No I can't remember any specific examples off the top of my head now but I just remembered sometimes she'd pick a game or a scene from a game that I felt hurt her credibility Yeah this was usually my takeaway with her work. A lot of the examples she'd pick in the Tropes VS Women in Video Games series would often feel like the opinion of someone who watched a trailer, rather than someone who played the game or even watched a Let's Play or something. I remember a montage in the Violence against Women episode where they bizarrely chose to show female characters in sandbox games being killed by the player, as if this was an egregious sin and not as if the male characters, various monsters, hell the player's dog, could also be killed as arbitrarily. This is really a lukewarm criticism of an already lukewarm video series, but that's the real tragedy of her work, isn't it? Like she got rocketed to the forefront of feminist media criticism because she was harassed and not because she was doing anything radical or new.
|
# ? Jan 2, 2022 23:49 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 00:07 |
|
deleted
Max Wilco fucked around with this message at 22:59 on Jan 3, 2022 |
# ? Jan 3, 2022 00:03 |