|
FrozenPhoenix71 posted:Waiting for the Green one to be even moderately strong and just shove 4 in a deck with Slogurk, Wrenn & Six, and Life from the Loam It's gonna be like +2/+2 for 2 mana.
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 16:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 21:44 |
|
|
Jabor posted:Back in OG Kamigawa, Channel was only on Spirits, and it did something related to an ability that the creature side had. So there was definitely a thematic connection between the two halves. So it was kind of a proto-evoke that didn't affect etb triggers?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 16:52
|
|
|
Macdeo Lurjtux posted:So it was kind of a proto-evoke that didn't affect etb triggers? Evoking is still casting though, channel is an activated ability and can't be countered by cards that counter spells
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 16:56
|
|
|
FrozenPhoenix71 posted:Waiting for the Green one to be even moderately strong and just shove 4 in a deck with Slogurk, Wrenn & Six, and Life from the Loam 2G sorcery speed rampant growth is my guess
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 19:14
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:Basically every magic mechanic is kicker.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 19:29
|
|
|
Channel is a neat way to get around the drawback of legendary lands. Already got the land out? Well the one in your hand is a spell now
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 19:40
|
|
|
the drawback of legendary lands with channel is that their ability is useless in Land Commander, the hot new format I just made up
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 20:14
|
|
|
kalel posted:the drawback of legendary lands with channel is that their ability is useless in Land Commander, the hot new format I just made up I'm the land commander, twisted land commander
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 20:36
|
|
|
kalel posted:the drawback of legendary lands with channel is that their ability is useless in Land Commander, the hot new format I just made up wow total fail on wotc, what idiots!
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 21:17
|
|
|
I feel like there's nothing that the red land could do that wouldn't be a significant upgrade to burn decks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 21:40
|
|
|
Ultima66 posted:I feel like there's nothing that the red land could do that wouldn't be a significant upgrade to burn decks. What if it kicks you in the crotch.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 21:42
|
|
|
Ultima66 posted:I feel like there's nothing that the red land could do that wouldn't be a significant upgrade to burn decks. There is a lot a red land could do that might never see a burn deck.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 21:47
|
|
|
I think with the Ramanup ban a couple years ago they could skew fairly conservative with how much burn they'll put on a land that goes to the face with damage. Could end up using reds exile topdeck use or lose card advantage mechanic instead.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 21:49
|
|
|
Ultima66 posted:I feel like there's nothing that the red land could do that wouldn't be a significant upgrade to burn decks. just Cycling RR would be significant, don't be so negative
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 21:55
|
|
|
The red one is probably going to be like "3R: target creature can't block this turn, costs 1 less for each legendary permanent you control"
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 21:56
|
|
|
would a land with an overcosted Falter as the ability be overpowered?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:04
|
|
|
Goa Tse-tung posted:just Cycling RR would be significant, don't be so negative That's what I'm saying, I'm being positive. Overcosted Falter is huge, overcosted face damage is absurd, overcosted exile top 2 play them until end of next turn is absurd, overcosted discard X cards draw X cards is still absurd. It most likely doesn't do damage to creatures since that'd be so similar to the white one but of course that'd be absurd even at 4 mana deal 2 or something. It'd have to have like a 6 mana base cost and also do something like destroy a nonbasic land for it to not be incredible in burn.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:10
|
|
|
Put Raging River on the Red one.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:11
|
|
|
Overcosted Shatter target Token
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:17
|
|
|
Pablo Nergigante posted:I'm the land commander, twisted land commander Welcome, Lord Windgrace
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:19
|
|
|
3R sure strike
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:19
|
|
|
1R and it orders you a pizza from Domino's
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:23
|
|
|
Pablo Nergigante posted:1R and it orders you a pizza from Domino's The pizza costs one dollar leas for each legendary permanent
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:27
|
|
|
thetoughestbean posted:The pizza costs one dollar leas for each legendary permanent I'm liking this
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:28
|
|
|
Gruel Bard Class Free Pizza Deck tearing up the meta.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 22:30
|
|
|
Running a budget modern league in my city right now, which means that every deck has to be both modern legal, and costless than $100 according to mtggoldfish. So far there's a lot of innovation, and me playing a meme deck
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 23:24
|
|
|
Owlbear Camus posted:Gruel Bard Class Free Pizza Deck tearing up the meta. This made me wonder how powerful an untapped dual land cycle would be who's only downside is they are legendary lands. How many would it make sense to run?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 23:30
|
|
|
Mike N Eich posted:This made me wonder how powerful an untapped dual land cycle would be who's only downside is they are legendary lands. How many would it make sense to run? typed duals? I feel like that matters a lot. If they're fetchable and there's a way to fetch them in the format, then 1-2 are all you need
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 23:36
|
|
|
Mezzanon posted:Running a budget modern league in my city right now, which means that every deck has to be both modern legal, and costless than $100 according to mtggoldfish. Post the
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2022 23:51
|
|
|
Mezzanon posted:Running a budget modern league in my city right now, which means that every deck has to be both modern legal, and costless than $100 according to mtggoldfish. How good is burn?
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2022 00:51
|
|
|
DangerDongs posted:How good is burn? Good but not as good as you think because it’s priced into mono red (if you want to keep eidolon in the budget), and nobody has shocks and fetches or thoughtseizes. Pablo Nergigante posted:Post the  https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/4495592#paper
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2022 04:32
|
|
|
Seismic Swans!?
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2022 05:35
|
|
|
Mezzanon posted:Good but not as good as you think because it’s priced into mono red (if you want to keep eidolon in the budget), and nobody has shocks and fetches or thoughtseizes. Ahhh, the lack of self-damage would be a big loss. I definitely didn't factor that in. Let us know what did well, the premise is interesting. I could see some odd-ball tribal decks coming out in full force like zombies.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2022 05:52
|
|
|
Saffronolive.dec format lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2022 06:44
|
|
|
I bet you could trim living end to under $100 if you just keep it to 3 living ends, 7 cascade cards, and the shittiest jund manabase you can imagine.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2022 15:33
|
|
|
That's how I played Modern back when I started playing MtG a few years ago. I never had flashy fetches and shocks or anything like that, I just used fastlands and painlands and just substituted expensive cards for cheaper ones. It worked pretty well overall.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2022 15:36
|
|
|
A Moose posted:I bet you could trim living end to under $100 if you just keep it to 3 living ends, 7 cascade cards, and the shittiest jund manabase you can imagine. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 6, 2022 22:57
|
|
|
A Moose posted:I bet you could trim living end to under $100 if you just keep it to 3 living ends, 7 cascade cards, and the shittiest jund manabase you can imagine. You need blue mana for living end. A lot of it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 00:35
|
|
|
Paul Zuvella posted:You need blue mana for living end. A lot of it. Living end was jund back in the day before they printed a bunch of good cyclers in AKT.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 03:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 21:44 |
|
|
Paul Zuvella posted:You need blue mana for living end. A lot of it. Like they said, the shittiest Jund manabase imaginable
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 03:46
|
|