|
Phuzzy posted:I didn't watch WK, does Narita still look like a 20 years younger Shibata? that he does
|
# ? Jan 5, 2022 14:46 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 20:18 |
|
Seriously it was like watching a fighting game where both players have selected the same guy. (it was also really loving good and Narita looked great)
|
# ? Jan 5, 2022 14:50 |
|
Yeah, if you're paying attention, sure, you can tell Narita's not going anywhere near the head, and didn't even get off the belly-to-belly suplex, but the story was him giving Shibata a run for his money until the last couple of minutes when the master just outlasted the pupil and beat the young man to death.
|
# ? Jan 5, 2022 16:53 |
|
Big brain take on AEW running the west coast later this year:quote:Business wise, wasn't the theory that the poor ratings for the live West Coast feed hurting the Dynamite rating? Why would you run where the interest is lower and reward the fans for not tuning in?
|
# ? Jan 5, 2022 21:16 |
|
https://twitter.com/Grecco/status/1478829966594871297?s=20
|
# ? Jan 5, 2022 21:55 |
|
Nao Ishikawa vs the Bucks? I thought this was the bad takes thread.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 01:33 |
|
Power Windows posted:Nao Ishikawa vs the Bucks? Stalker vs Cutler is the only match I care about
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 03:34 |
|
https://twitter.com/seahawkstml/status/1478913609283559425 https://twitter.com/KevinC1347/status/1478917021110882305
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 03:46 |
|
bebaloorpabopalo posted:https://twitter.com/seahawkstml/status/1478913609283559425 Literally came here to post that.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 03:49 |
|
It's not your classic bad take but even as someone who likes Marko, it's wild that someone would think and post this https://twitter.com/wylddstallyns/status/1478924643062923266?s=20 I'M LITERALLY SOBBING
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 04:58 |
|
Ganso Bomb posted:It's not your classic bad take but even as someone who likes Marko, it's wild that someone would think and post this "my current hyperfixiations are bill and ted, the lost boys, and aew" That ones gonna be a wild ride. I wish them well.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 05:01 |
|
https://twitter.com/borisluchas/status/1478659989430538244 Check the bio for a treat.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 05:06 |
|
https://twitter.com/borisluchas/status/1478814536580968448?t=WrhYyW_2CVtSg4kJMTjyBw&s=19 What
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 05:08 |
|
MassRafTer posted:https://twitter.com/borisluchas/status/1478659989430538244 lol bron has maybe a 20% chance at lasting 6 months on the main roster and melo a 0% chance, he's 5'10
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 05:17 |
|
JUNGLE BOY posted:lol bron has maybe a 20% chance at lasting 6 months on the main roster and melo a 0% chance, he's 5'10 Bron is the most born ready WWE guy they've had since debut Brock, and i don't say that lightly. It's going to be amazing to see how they gently caress it up.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 05:20 |
|
Ganso Bomb posted:It's not your classic bad take but even as someone who likes Marko, it's wild that someone would think and post this I mean this is fine? This is the kind of exaggerated rhetoric you see from stan culture all the time lmao. Let zoomer stans mark out in their own way, even if it's Extremely Cringe like this.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 07:03 |
|
Ganso Bomb posted:It's not your classic bad take but even as someone who likes Marko, it's wild that someone would think and post this I think this person is using hyperbole
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 08:22 |
|
Thanks for the spoilers
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 09:04 |
|
Ganso Bomb posted:It's not your classic bad take but even as someone who likes Marko, it's wild that someone would think and post this
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 09:16 |
|
MassRafTer posted:Check the bio for a treat. JORDAN BELFORT!?!
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 09:17 |
|
Ganso Bomb posted:It's not your classic bad take but even as someone who likes Marko, it's wild that someone would think and post this I really appreciate that you let those of us who hadn't had a chance to watch the show live what the outcome of the main event was. Cheers, mate.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 09:20 |
|
Elephant Ambush posted:Thanks for the spoilers What bad takes were you expecting immediately after the aew show that didn't have anything to do about aew? I get it if it was the wwe thread but come on Edit: I had the first hangman/danielson match spoiled that it was going an hour in the wwe thread. That annoyed me. This is the thread where something happens and you laugh at the stupid reactions people have. It's not the same thing right? Am I crazy? Sex Farm fucked around with this message at 09:41 on Jan 6, 2022 |
# ? Jan 6, 2022 09:34 |
|
shame on you guys for spoiling that match that aired on live television 7 hours ago
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 10:30 |
|
Poasty posted:What bad takes were you expecting immediately after the aew show that didn't have anything to do about aew? I get it if it was the wwe thread but come on How hard is it to just put it behind spoiler tags? It should be a courtesy to put something that spoils the outcome of something that is less than 12 hours or so old behind spoiler tags, mate. STONE COLD 64 posted:shame on you guys for spoiling that match that aired on live television 7 hours ago You are so going to poo poo when you discover that there are different timezones. edogawa rando fucked around with this message at 10:41 on Jan 6, 2022 |
# ? Jan 6, 2022 10:38 |
|
edogawa rando posted:You are so going to poo poo when you discover that there are different timezones. he went to poo poo quite a while ago.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 10:42 |
|
How do people dodge spoilers on social media all day and then get surprised that the wrestling nerds are posting about the popular wrestling show in the wrestling forum?
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 10:52 |
|
edogawa rando posted:How hard is it to just put it behind spoiler tags? It should be a courtesy to put something that spoils the outcome of something that is less than 12 hours or so old behind spoiler tags, mate. How hard is it to not go into the "people overreacting to wrestling" thread immediately after a wrestling event you don't want spoiled? Impossible to say!
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 10:54 |
|
We are 'this' close to people in this forum screencapping eachother's posts for this thread and getting probated.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 10:57 |
|
Yeah bad judgment by me
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 10:59 |
|
Poasty posted:How hard is it to not go into the "people overreacting to wrestling" thread immediately after a wrestling event you don't want spoiled? Impossible to say! Putting something behind spoiler tags outside of the spoilers thread for people who hadn't had a chance to view the thing people are overreacting to is literally impossible, apparently.If only there were some sort of tag that could be used to put such things behind a black bar which obscures the text.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 11:01 |
|
I don't think I've ever seen anything spoiler tagged in this thread. We'd have to tag the whole thing, it's always spoilers.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 11:02 |
|
Penguin Patrol posted:I don't think I've ever seen anything spoiler tagged in this thread. We'd have to tag the whole thing, it's always spoilers. So what exactly is the harm in erring on the side of caution and spoiler-tagging something that gives away the outcome of a broadcast that not everyone has had a chance to view? Because the way some people are getting offended at the very suggestion, apparently it is a very bad thing. The poo poo takes still get posted, and people won't have stuff spoiled. What's the problem I'm missing? edogawa rando fucked around with this message at 11:13 on Jan 6, 2022 |
# ? Jan 6, 2022 11:09 |
|
Saw a bunch of new posts and thought I'd get some cool bad takes I can look at to feel smart about myself instead we get the spoiler discourse from the feedback thread a few weeks ago again. Some people just don't care about spoilers at all and think everyone who would like to go into a show blind is a nerd and needs a wedgie. I'll just say that those are weirdos with no regard for the experience of others because it's really easy to just not. That said, I usually don't care about spoilers too much, with some exceptions. But when I go into this thread I expect spoilers so when I get spoiled that's mea culpa.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 11:42 |
|
edogawa rando posted:So what exactly is the harm in erring on the side of caution and spoiler-tagging something that gives away the outcome of a broadcast that not everyone has had a chance to view? Because the way some people are getting offended at the very suggestion, apparently it is a very bad thing. What's the cut off, though? Do we still tag this match tomorrow because someone was saving it for the weekend? Typically the assumption with widely available tv is it's no longer s spoiler after airing, any more than the score for a football game is after the game has ended.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 11:43 |
|
Gaz-L posted:Typically the assumption with widely available tv is it's no longer s spoiler after airing, any more than the score for a football game is after the game has ended. lol You know other timezones exist right? At the earliest, I can watch dynamite 14 hours after it finished airing due to sleep and work. Generally giving it a day would be nice. That said, I still don't care about if it's done in this thread or not, I read it fully aware that something might come up. And sometimes I don't read it. Depends on how excited I am to see something without knowing how it ends.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 11:52 |
|
FullMetalJackoff posted:We are 'this' close to people in this forum screencapping eachother's posts for this thread and getting probated. Gonna screencap this post so hard
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 11:54 |
|
Get a load of this guy
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 12:07 |
|
IGgy IGsen posted:Get a load of this guy Lol loser
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 12:08 |
|
That guy's a moron. Wrestling is great, actually.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 12:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 20:18 |
|
Hey people, it's me, the person who made this post. If you look at the timestamp you'll see I made this in June. Since then opinions have changed. I'm a different man now and I was a fool to think wrestling is good. Please respect my privacy.
|
# ? Jan 6, 2022 12:15 |