|
Which horse film is your favorite? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Black Beauty |
|
2 | 1.06% |
| A Talking Pony!?! |
|
4 | 2.13% |
| Mr. Hands 2x Apple Flavor |
|
117 | 62.23% |
| War Horse |
|
11 | 5.85% |
| Mr. Hands |
|
54 | 28.72% |
| Total: | 188 votes | ||
|
Yeah SSI says they expect it to get somewhat worse this month but top out. https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/ssi-forudser-mellem-25000-og-55000-smittetilfaelde-i-slutningen-af-januar Somewhere between 25000 and 55000 a day. On the basis of their prior worst case was WAY high (no blame, it's a worst case for a reason) I expect it to be closer to 25k.
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 08:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 23:10 |
|
|
Illuminti posted:Hardly. It's not great but 800,000 cases and 274 people in the ICU isn't really civilisation ending. has any modelling that says cases will magically drop ever actually been correct? people can't even all get tested, there's disruptions all over the place already and ICU numbers are doubling about every week. and do you really think NSW has 6000 spare beds? NSW records 35,054 COVID-19 cases as Premier admits health system is under pressure quote:Many sectors are experiencing disruption due to the high positivity rates and today 325 childcare centres are closed in NSW due to staff testing positive. NSW doctor challenges Premier's claim health system in 'strong position' to deal with COVID-19 surge quote:The doctor, however, said she has seen colleagues experiencing "enormous burnout", which she claimed had forced some to quit their jobs or enter an early retirement. ‘People will die’: doctors warn Covid surge is filling up NSW hospitals quote:Hospitals in NSW are much closer to capacity due to surging Covid cases than is being admitted by officials, warn doctors and nurses, with one saying the system has “never been this bad”. https://twitter.com/SkyNewsAust/status/1478153133729533954?s=20 too stretched thin to give COVID infected healthcare workers sick leave https://twitter.com/VicGovDH/status/1478635895485976576?s=20 maybe im just more a screamer than you, but seeing all this from ~100k cases from two weeks ago makes me extremely worried when NSW has 380k and is jumping by ~35k a day... and that's just the cases the struggling testing system can find
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 08:32
|
|
|
freebooter posted:But then you just have to slap them back on again in February? I dunno, I really don't find it that burdensome to wear on one the tram or at the supermarket, I reckon it would be more sensible to just say "look they're here to stay" since they'll probably be with us for the rest of the decade. Nobody will remember their golden age of four weeks of mask-free shopping at Floreat Forum a year from now. i think your posts have convinced mark mcgowan freebooter posted:I wouldn't say I oppose mask mandates but I think they have way less effect than people seem to think they do, purely because the same people who won't wear a mask of their own accord will also happily flout the law. Similarly, you can go ahead and repeal a mask mandate (like New South Wales did yesterday) but people who'd prefer to mask will still mask.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 08:36
|
|
|
Anecdotally, as Victoria has slalomed between COVID-zero and plague pit, I've seen mask compliance wander between 20% and 95%, and the only time it ever particularly matched government announcements was when they were widely adopted in June 2020 after being made mandatory everywhere. I don't think WA's decision to temporarily repeal or not actually matters much re: virus transmission, I just think it's an odd choice if you're supposed to be gearing up for reopening in four weeks anyway. edit - to be really clear, my position on masks is that they are good, they obviously help reduce transmission, and mask mandates have a limited but positive effect on reducing transmission because the number of people who would obey them (but wouldn't wear one otherwise) is non-zero and the burden on the citizen is also virtually zero, therefore they are worthwhile. There's just a lot of people - especially in the US and especially in this thread - who seem to think they're a panacea, to the point I've seen people argue that if the US government mailed an N95 to every citizen they could end the pandemic within weeks, which is obviously ridiculous. Re: hospitals I'm more worried about the smaller states that often have healthcare crises even without COVID like Tas, SA and WA than I am about NSW or Vic - if it was likely we were going to see the hospitals "collapse" (i.e. COVID patients being turned away, people lying in corridors) they'd have gone way stronger on quasi-lockdown measures already rather than just shutting nightclubs. Tasmania has an outbreak on King Island and Queensland has remote Aboriginal communities hoping that the wet season cuts them off from spreaders, that kind of poo poo has much more ominous potential than huge rich well-resourced cities like Melbourne and Sydney. Fritz the Horse posted:don't worry you're fine just wearing masks as normal, please see this CDC graphic which includes your exact facial hair style for some reason Fun fact: the Hitler mo was quite popular before he tainted it forever, reason being that lots of WWI soldiers adopted it because it didn't interfere with a gas mask seal freebooter fucked around with this message at 09:39 on Jan 7, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 09:33
|
|
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/66381449/CDC_infographic.0.png)
|
edit: goddamnit ~triple post~ to bring you an article about this very topic just got released (about the earlier modelling posted) https://www.theguardian.com/austral...t-case-scenario quote:Almost all of the 12,500 beds across public and private hospitals in New South Wales will be occupied – by both Covid cases and regular patients – when pressure from the state’s Omicron outbreak peaks in late January, if worst-case scenario modelling is realised. quote:NSW’s public hospital bed capacity is about 9,500, and on Thursday, 8,000 of these beds were occupied by 1,600 patients with Covid and 6,400 people receiving treatment for other illnesses. so 12500 is the absolute max beds if you combine private+public. assuming that means we also have the staff, equipment and logistics to manage this (like being able to magically cordon off the infectious from the heart attack patients). 8000 are currently already occupied, which leaves 4500 beds. their worst case scenario is 6000 so by their own modelling, things will be hosed. they assume enough people will vacate the beds for a baseline of 6000 (discharged or die i assume), but that's still only 2000 leeway  my basic bitch exponential trend line shows NSW hitting 4500 in hospitals around 3rd week of jan. their modelling prediction is that "healthcare pressure" will peak in 3rd or 4th week. with a lag from cases to hospitalisations of 1-2 weeks, that means they need new cases to start dropping really goddamn soon. if you think their baseline of 6000 non-covid patients is correct, then they'd have an extra week or so. currently, NSW thinks 50% of cases are omicron. perhaps their model ingrates the assumption of omicron being x% milder to give the "realistic" trend line and they're really confident in it because otherwise i'd be screaming if i were them. cherry: quote:McMullen also cautioned that the modelling only illustrates hospital bed capacity and doesn’t show likely emergency room levels, which continue to bear the brunt of the pressure. crepeface fucked around with this message at 10:05 on Jan 7, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 09:50
|
|
|
double post
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 09:55
|
|
|
Sharks Eat Bear posted:Had a similar question myself, wondering if there are any tips if you have facial hair like this?   This you? Your previous style was a problem, but you are good to go now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 10:34
|
|
|
Illuminti posted:Hardly. It's not great but 800,000 cases and 274 people in the ICU isn't really civilisation ending. Not being able to access a hospital isn't civilisation ending - most people around the world, poor people in the USA and a few people in Australia just live with that normally irrespective of covid. It's also probably not something we should handwave away and tell people to keep perspective when it is foisted upon the whole of society. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 11:04
|
|
|
so how u Aussies feeling now that you're living what you've been watching from afar lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 11:31
|
|
|
Illuminti posted:Hardly. It's not great but 800,000 cases and 274 people in the ICU isn't really civilisation ending.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 12:04
|
|
|
Google Butt posted:so how u Aussies feeling now that you're living what you've been watching from afar lol loving embarrassed about our government. We really did have everything.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 12:11
|
|
|
The Artificial Kid posted:As of September NSW only had around 800-900 fully staffed ICU beds according to a survey of ICU bosses. And those beds are usually needed for ordinary disease processes that aren’t COVID. New biweekly report from DK medical quality group rkkp.dk, who track ICU bed availability in Denmark out today (https://www.rkkp.dk/kvalitetsdatabaser/databaser/dansk-intensiv-database/resultater/) DK opened up 15 or so more ICU beds, I suspect we will see more opened in the next report in 2 weeks. A year ago they had 400 ICU beds open. So there's surge capacity in equipment and space, but nurses and doctors, no idea. pre:03 January 331 ICU beds, 76 COVID, 32 available 27 December 316 ICU beds, 71 COVID, 62 available 20 December 317 ICU beds, 60 COVID, 59 available 13 December 319 ICU beds, 64 COVID, 39 available 06 December 310 ICU beds, 67 COVID, 10 available <-- squeaky bum time here 29 November 318 ICU beds, 61 COVID, 25 available
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 12:23
|
|
|
Nooner posted:i did a big fart and a bunch of diarrhea sprayed out in my pants does that mean i have covid No, it just means you treat your pants the same way you post on the forums.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 12:30
|
|
|
Oh the report has ICU admission data including booster data, comorbidities, etc. https://www.rkkp.dk/siteassets/resultater/covid-19-rapport/dansk-intensiv-covid-19-rapport_06_januar_2022_v1.pdf 329 ICU patients from 1 Nov to 31 Dec - 142 unvaccinated, 10 1-shot, 122 2-shot, 24 boosted (!!!) - 152 unvaxxed or 1-shot - 65.8% male, average age 56 (42 - 68), BMI 30, 57% on vent average 9 days, 11% dialysis, 5% ECMO - 122 with 2 shots - 66.4% male, average age 73 (64-78), BMI 29, 49% vent on average 9 days, 11% dialysis, no ECMO - 24 boosted - 70.8% make, average age 73 (70-78), BMI 30, 67% vented average 10 days, 17% dialysis, no ECMO Outcomes: - unvaxxed/1-shot: 52% discharged, 21% CU, 19% hospital, 18% dead - 2 shots: 37% discharged, 11% ICU, 14% hospital, 39% dead - boosted: 25% discharged, 25% ICU, 13% hospital, 38% dead ICU = still in ICU hospital = in hospital outside ICU The co-morbidity data for the boosteds is a bit grim. Of the 24, all were 70-78, 10 were immunosuppressed, 18 with hypertension, 9 with ischæmic heart disease, 9 had active cancer, etc. Only 2 of 24 lacked one or more comorbidities. Hospital admissions were 5-7 days median for the whole cohort. Interestingly admission to ICU was median 1 day after hospital admission, so my ICU theory was wrong. Rust Martialis fucked around with this message at 12:45 on Jan 7, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 12:40
|
|
|
Google Butt posted:so how u Aussies feeling now that you're living what you've been watching from afar lol Bad that we idiotically decided to bring this upon ourselves, but weirdly relieved that people in other countries are no longer talking about how smart the Australian government is. The zero covid regimes were never going to last not because zero covid is impossible but because we all knew on some level it was an uncharacteristic level of competence for us.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 12:44
|
|
|
It was loving heartbreaking watching you guys repeat the mistakes the UK government has been amply demonstrating for years
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 12:59
|
|
|
gently caress me, I'm still looking at the ICU data from Nov/Dec. I had assumed that the "unvaccinated" would have included kids since they weren't eligible in DK until recently, but no: the youngest person admitted to ICU in DK in the last 2 months was 42. The unvaccinated were all between 42 and 68. If you had 2 shots, you were 64 or older. Boosted, 70. So it sounds like all the 142 unvaccinated were eligible for 2 shots forever. But they didn't get it. 54% of them had zero comorbidities. 27 of them died in the ICU. The only thing that I can take away is it looks like zero kids went to ICU in the last 2 months. Hoping they're just not excluded from the dataset.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 13:05
|
|
|
so of all the things i think are being mishandled in the U.S. right now, i think the biggest scandal right now should be how the U.S. is treating non-MRNA vaccinations. my time in the novavax trial/subreddit has shown me there are many kinds of people who do not want to get vaccinated with mRNA vaccines. they include: * people who will never get any vaccine because they are hardcore andrew wakefield followers * people who will never get the mRNA vaccines for batshit reasons, like thinking bill gates personally implanted 5g chips in them, but might get another vaccine * people who won’t get an mRNA vaccine for earnest caution that may be overindexed but which is anchored in something legitimate, like fear of certain side effects (for example, it is true, it turns out, that if you are under 40, the mRNA vaccines are something like 4x more likely to give you myocarditis than a covid infection is likely to give you myocarditis, which you can debate the risk/significance of but, you know, is indeed showing up in the data) some of these people have gotten J&J, but some have also looked at the J&J data and said what the rest of us have said this whole time — it's not as effective. some people are worried about this being new tech or 5g or blood clots too, the same thing as above. the point being we have since developed protein subunit vaccines (like novavax and corbevax, and the cuban vaccines), deactivated vaccines (like covaxin), that have shown really strong results + less bad side effects. but rather than say “well, as your doctor, i recommend you get a pfizer, but here are your option, and the important thing is to be vaccinated,” we are just saying “well we have developed the best vaccines with our revolutionary technology so just take them you idiot" and it’s the height of counterproductive capital-S Scientist arrogance that the FDA has been e.g. sitting on the covaxin data for ages 2+ for like 3 months now without doing a drat thing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 13:11
|
|
|
Google Butt posted:so how u Aussies feeling now that you're living what you've been watching from afar lol In Melbourne, so been living with it mostly the whole time anyway ModernMajorGeneral posted:Bad that we idiotically decided to bring this upon ourselves, but weirdly relieved that people in other countries are no longer talking about how smart the Australian government is. - Delta leaks in - Go into lockdown - Cases keep rising in spite of lockdown because Delta's just too infectious - "Australia gave up" - ????
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 13:17
|
|
|
hey dumbass, we know you still believe that lockdowns don't work because victoria hosed theirs up despite a million people telling you how they were flawed over and over, but modernmajorgeneral is talking about australia, not just melbourne. feds/NSW definitely brought it on themselves and then hosed over everyone else (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 13:35
|
|
|
Petey posted:so of all the things i think are being mishandled in the U.S. right now, i think the biggest scandal right now should be how the U.S. is treating non-MRNA vaccinations. your link posted:We estimated extra myocarditis events to be between 1 and 10 per million persons in the month following vaccination, which was substantially lower than the 40 extra events per million persons observed following SARS-CoV-2 infection. I think you're backwards on which side has 4x higher myocarditis incidence. I do think the broader point about how non-mRNA vaccines are treated in discourse is relevant, but more on the global scale where we just need to get as many vaccines as we can out there than on the domestic front where it's about convincing people to take our plentiful vaccines, and people misrepresenting the data certainly doesn't help there.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 14:48
|
|
|
The U.S. should approve inactivated virus vaccines, but only because none of the first generation vaccines are sufficient for herd immunity and U.S. authorities are unwilling to use serious sticks or serious carrots to get people vaccinated. If either of these were not true, then I would say “No. You cannot approve inferior vaccines simply because people are squeamish about the word ‘mRNA’.”
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 14:59
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:The U.S. should approve inactivated virus vaccines, but only because none of the first generation vaccines are sufficient for herd immunity and U.S. authorities are unwilling to use serious sticks or serious carrots to get people vaccinated. Isn't the FDA's responsibility to approve drugs that are safe and effective? If it was a case of inactivated virus vaccines being only 30% effective or something I'd agree, but as long as they have a useful level of effectiveness, it's not the FDA or any other drug approval ministry's job to pick winners.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:08
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:The U.S. should approve inactivated virus vaccines, but only because none of the first generation vaccines are sufficient for herd immunity and U.S. authorities are unwilling to use serious sticks or serious carrots to get people vaccinated. If antivaxxers were worried about mRNA alone, they’d have gotten J&J half a year ago. Not being vaccinated is a personality trait for them now. There are those who fold once they’re told “get vaxed or get fired” and there are those who are so reflexively antagonistic that they would rather get sick and die rather than do the thing everyone around them told them to do for a year now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:16
|
|
|
enki42 posted:Isn't the FDA's responsibility to approve drugs that are safe and effective? If it was a case of inactivated virus vaccines being only 30% effective or something I'd agree, but as long as they have a useful level of effectiveness, it's not the FDA or any other drug approval ministry's job to pick winners. They take many factors into account. See the FDA's approval and subsequent rapid rescinding of approval of the anti dementia drug that cost tens of thousands of dollars and had significant side effects. Clinical effectiveness did not change between those two decisions last year.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:17
|
|
|
freebooter posted:Fun fact: the Hitler mo was quite popular before he tainted it forever, reason being that lots of WWI soldiers adopted it because it didn't interfere with a gas mask seal It's only tainted forever in the western world. There's lots of places where people don't think about Hitler when they see a toothbrush moustache.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:25
|
|
|
fosborb posted:They take many factors into account. See the FDA's approval and subsequent rapid rescinding of approval of the anti dementia drug that cost tens of thousands of dollars and had significant side effects. Clinical effectiveness did not change between those two decisions last year. The whole benefit vs risk analysis can be quite complex and can absolutely take into account the existing treatment landscape. If something is the only drug available for a serious and lethal disease for example they might be more willing to live with more harsh side effects that would have been showstoppers if another drug existed that did not have those side effects. That being said delays in approval can often be the result of companies sending in absolute garbage submissions or unclear data and the FDA talking behind the scenes with them to try and get them to unfuck their submission. However, the FDA guidance doc for COVID vaccine EUA (which is a different standard than full approval) does mention the following: FDA posted:Based on this declaration and determination, FDA may issue an EUA after FDA has determined that So it could also be a case of a company aiming for a quicker EUA when they now that there's plenty of approved and available alternatives they should have gone for a regular approval. Mr Luxury Yacht fucked around with this message at 15:35 on Jan 7, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:25
|
|
|
MadJackal posted:If antivaxxers were worried about mRNA alone, they’d have gotten J&J half a year ago. Covid is a hoax so all vaccines are genetic!!! But yeah oddly enough I have actually seen people wait for, then get the J&J. Which... okay I guess? Like they're vaxxed now, and happy to get a J&J booster, which not the most effective getting a booster the same as first vax, but at that point, fine. whatever. The anti-vax movement is a massive mix of conspiracy theories and mis-information, many I don't think there is anything you could realistically do convince them have a shot, but others more on the fringe sometimes if you know them and what their specific head worms are, it can sometimes be possible to convince them to have the J&J shot or something.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:30
|
|
|
fosborb posted:They take many factors into account. See the FDA's approval and subsequent rapid rescinding of approval of the anti dementia drug that cost tens of thousands of dollars and had significant side effects. Clinical effectiveness did not change between those two decisions last year. Sure, but I don't think they usually do things like say "this drug meets all our safety and effectiveness standards, but this other one is better so too bad".
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:47
|
|
|
enki42 posted:Sure, but I don't think they usually do things like say "this drug meets all our safety and effectiveness standards, but this other one is better so too bad". Especially galling given the lack of anything for <5yos.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:51
|
|
|
enki42 posted:Sure, but I don't think they usually do things like say "this drug meets all our safety and effectiveness standards, but this other one is better so too bad". I think this more: 1. What's already available can affect the benefit part of benefit vs. risk calculation in some cases (moreso it nothing else is available or existing medications are inferior) depending on what's the risks or side effects of the medication are. 2. If it's for an EUA instead of a regular approval they absolutely might because if a superior alternative is widely available everywhere what's the emergency need for approval? Looking at Covaxin in particular I could see some complications from the fact that they submitted a small (526 study subject) bridging study as their sole approval data. Said trial compared antibody levels of the study subjects to those of the larger phase 3 trial conducted on only 18+ participants. Considering Covaxin hasn't previously been submitted for 18+ approval (and isn't as far as I can tell in the US) and said larger study hasn't been reviewed by the FDA previously it's a bit of an odd and risky strategy. Mr Luxury Yacht fucked around with this message at 16:08 on Jan 7, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 15:53
|
|
|
Fritz the Horse posted:don't worry you're fine just wearing masks as normal, please see this CDC graphic which includes your exact facial hair style for some reason i refuse to shave my hulihee
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 16:02
|
|
|
Fritz the Horse posted:don't worry you're fine just wearing masks as normal, please see this CDC graphic which includes your exact facial hair style for some reason Dr. Elsa Schneider: 
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 16:10
|
|
|
the holy poopacy posted:I think you're backwards on which side has 4x higher myocarditis incidence. No, I did the same thing that you did, when I first looked at it. You have to look at the age stratification down below. I did get the number wrong though. It's a bit lower than infection for Pfizer, about 2x as high for Moderna. quote:Subgroup analyses by age showed that the increased risk of events associated with the two mRNA vaccines was present only in those aged under 40 years. For this age group, we estimated 2 (95% CI 1, 3) and 8 (95%CI 4, 9) excess cases of myocarditis per 1 million people receiving a first dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively, and 3 (95% CI 2, 4) and 15 (95%CI 12, 16) excess cases of myocarditis per 1 million people receiving a second dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively. This compares with ten (95% CI 7, 11) extra cases of myocarditis following a SARS-CoV-2 positive test in those aged under 40 years. Of course, myocarditis is not the only thing to worry about, nor am I trying to say that you shouldn't get an mRNA vaccine (if I didn't enter the Novavax trial, I was very ready to be a Moderna Man). Just my point that there are things out there "in the data" that someone can index on. Platystemon posted:The U.S. should approve inactivated virus vaccines, but only because none of the first generation vaccines are sufficient for herd immunity and U.S. authorities are unwilling to use serious sticks or serious carrots to get people vaccinated. FWIW, I don't think we have the evidence that the protein subunit vaccines are inferior to the mRNAs. The Novavax performance against both the wildtype and alpha published in the NEJM look to be at worst comparable to, and possibly better than, the mRNAs, with a better safety profile. I'm unaware of data for Corbevax. My understanding is that the primary benefit of the mRNA (and adenoviral) platform was at the point of production: instead of needing to produce tons of proteins and adjuvant (which is what appears to have slowed Novavax so much), you could put "instructions to produce" the proteins, and use the recipient's body as the spike factory. That was a really great innovation to get vaccines into the arms of the most vulnerable as quickly as possible. It doesn't mean it's necessarily the best long-term platform for vaccination. MadJackal posted:If antivaxxers were worried about mRNA alone, they’d have gotten J&J half a year ago. As I said in my original post, this is overly simplistic. There are certainly people like this. There are other people who got a J&J primary series but don't want an mRNA booster. There are other people, mostly under 40, who have read about the myocarditis + blood clot risks and said okay, I'm going to be careful and wait for a protein subunit that has been an increasingly long time coming. A friend from college was advised by his doctor not to get an mRNA vaccine and wait for novavax (he ended up getting J&J when his work mandate hit). It is true that vaccines are going to face an increasing problem in getting approved now that we can't run trials on naive populations in the U.S. It would help if other countries ran these trials and then we took their data seriously in cases where it is published, but we generally don't. There's a clear bias toward innovative therapies for their own sake I think — like, we're not approving some of these vaccines but we're approving Molnupiravir? Petey fucked around with this message at 16:22 on Jan 7, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 16:11
|
|
|
We have to weigh the costs of school closures against the benefits of having all the kids get COVID from each other within 2 days of school being open and then schools immediately shutting down.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 16:15
|
|
|
Denmark - 7 January 2022 Number is down 25% which I really was hoping to see. Given the 6-7 day lag on hospitalizations, I expect that to stay high for several days. Hoping number continues to drop tomorrow. Worried the case count is big enough even without big parties like Christmas and New Years to keep growing though. Kids back in school. That may also drive up infections but kids don't seem to get very sick - exactly one person 10-19 and two aged 0-9 have died of COVID in Denmark out of 3,343 deaths. pre:Denmark Covid Cases ----------------------------------- Jan 07 18,261 new cases, 1482 reinfections, 186 new hospitalizations (755 total), 78 ICU (-4), 53 Vent (+4), 10 dead Jan 06 25,995 new cases, 2027 reinfections, 161 new hospitalizations (756 total), 82 ICU (+2), 47 Vent (-2), 11 dead Jan 05 28,283 new cases, 2083 reinfections, 204 new hospitalizations (784 total), 80 ICU (+3), 49 Vent (+2), 15 dead <-- NYE + Xmas ow Jan 04* 23,372 new cases, 1701 reinfections, 229 new hospitalizations (792 total), 77 ICU (+4), 47 Vent (+1), 15 dead <-- spike in hospital wow Jan 03* 8,801 new cases, 532 reinfections, 169 new hospitalizations (770 total), 73 ICU (-3), 46 Vent (-4), 5 dead Jan 02 7,550 new cases, 404 reinfections, 163 new hospitalizations (709 total), 76 ICU (+3), 50 Vent (+1), 15 dead Jan 01 20,885 new cases, 1049 reinfections, 139 new hospitalizations (647 total), 73 ICU (+0), 49 Vent (+0), 5 dead Dec 31 17,605 new cases, 1090 reinfections, 177 new hospitalizations (641 total), 73 ICU (-2), 49 Vent (-1), 11 dead Dec 30 21,403 new cases, 1123 reinfections, 178 new hospitalizations (665 total), 75 ICU (-2), 50 Vent (-2), 9 dead Dec 29 23,228 new cases, 1205 reinfections, 173 new hospitalizations (675 total), 77 ICU (+6), 52 Vent (+2), 16 dead Dec 28 13,000 new cases, 670 reinfections, 177 new hospitalizations (666 total), 71 ICU (+1), 50 Vent (+4), 14 dead Dec 27 16,164 new cases, 639 reinfections, 115 new hospitalizations (608 total), 70 ICU (-1), 46 Vent (-2), 7 dead Dec 26 14,844 new cases, 644 reinfections, 123 new hospitalizations (579 total), 71 ICU (-2), 43 Vent (+1), 13 dead Dec 25 10,027 new cases, 463 reinfections, 86 new hospitalizations (522 total), 73 ICU (-1), 44 Vent (+5), 10 dead Dec 24 11,229 new cases, 527 reinfections, 134 new hospitalizations (509 total), 74 ICU (+2), 39 vent (+1), 14 dead Dec 23 12,487 new cases, 613 reinfections, 158 new hospitalizations (541 total), 72 ICU (+6), 38 vent (+1), 15 dead Dec 22 13,386 new cases, 531 reinfections, 126 new hospitalizations (524 total), 66 ICU (-1), 37 vent (+2), 14 dead Dec 21 13,558 new cases, 501 reinfections, 121 new hospitalizations (526 total), 67 ICU (+1), 35 vent (+2), 17 dead Dec 20 10,082 new cases, (no reinf. data), 85 new hospitalizations (581 total), 66 ICU (+3), 33 vent (-2), 8 dead Dec 19 8,212 new cases Dec 18 8,594 new cases Dec 17 11,194 new cases Dec 16 9,999 new cases Dec 15 8,773 new cases, ??? reinfections, 96 new hospitalizations (508 total), 66 ICU (+0), 43 vent (-3), 9 dead Dec 13 7,799 new cases, ??? reinfections, 61 new hospitalizations (480 total), 64 ICU (-1), 42 vent (0), 9 dead Dec 12 5,989 new cases, ??? reinfections, 82 new hospitalizations (468 total), 65 ICU (+5), 42 vent (+6), 9 dead Dec 08 6,629 new cases, ??? reinfections, 72 new hospitalizations (461 total), 66 ICU (-1), 38 vent (-1), 7 dead Dec 01 5,120 new cases, ??? reinfections, 88 new hospitalizations (439 total), 35 ICU (+1), 35 vent (+1), 14 dead pre:03 January 331 ICU beds, 76 COVID, 32 available 27 December 316 ICU beds, 71 COVID, 62 available 20 December 317 ICU beds, 60 COVID, 59 available 13 December 319 ICU beds, 64 COVID, 39 available 06 December 310 ICU beds, 67 COVID, 10 available <-- squeaky bum time here 29 November 318 ICU beds, 61 COVID, 25 available Since yesterday, rates per 100,000 population. pre:Unvaccinated Partial Full Unvaccinated Partial Full 07 JAN New cases: 413.9 365.6 272.3 Hospitalizations: 41.3 30.6 10.2 06 JAN New cases: 566.3 561.1 398.6 Hospitalizations: 40.4 33.9 10.3 05 JAN New cases: 586.9 576.8 445.9 Hospitalizations: 43.0 30.6 10.5 04 JAN* New cases: 512.2 533.3 390.8 Hospitalizations: 43.6 28.9 11.0 03 JAN* New cases: 165.6 153.7 135.7 Hospitalizations: 42.2 23.4 10.5 02 JAN New cases: 152.8 150.7 124.7 Hospitalizations: 41.4 18.7 9.5 01 JAN New cases: 437.8 413.6 331.2 Hospitalizations: 38.6 18.4 8.6 31 DEC New cases: 341.1 334.2 300.2 Hospitalizations: 37.8 20.7 8.6 30 DEC New cases: 409.2 391.5 345.5 Hospitalizations: 39.4 21.1 8.9 29 DEC New cases: 443.6 446.0 377.4 Hospitalizations: 40.1 18.5 9.1 28 DEC New cases: 237.3 208.2 210.2 Hospitalizations: 40.5 16.9 8.6 27 DEC New cases: 304.4 324.9 263.3 Hospitalizations: 40.0 15.8 7.8 26 DEC New cases: 310.4 274.9 241.2 Hospitalizations: 39.0 15.4 7.3 25 DEC New cases: 181.6 162.1 161.5 Hospitalizations: 33.9 16.0 6.8 24 DEC New cases: 184.1 173.0 182.1 Hospitalizations: 34.5 14.9 7.1 23 DEC New cases: 237.1 202.6 197.9 Hospitalizations: 35.4 16.2 7.5 22 DEC New cases: 257.1 198.1 211.7 Hospitalizations: 34.2 15.3 7.3 21 DEC New cases: 270.1 226.2 207.8 Hospitalizations: 32.9 14.3 7.5 20 DEC New cases: 201.2 154.4 149.0 Hospitalizations: 34.0 15.6 7.7 17 DEC New cases: 252.1 199.3 172.9 Hospitalizations: 31.0 14.9 6.8 15 DEC New cases: 216.0 153.3 121.6 Hospitalizations: 31.3 11.7 6.7 13 DEC New cases: 215.3 131.3 100.8 Hospitalizations: 29.8 11.5 6.6 08 DEC New cases: 193.5 126.9 80.9 Hospitalizations: 27.5 8.7 6.5 01 DEC New cases: 162.4 102.1 59.84 Hospitalizations: 24.6 11.3 6.1 25 NOV New cases: 134.7 120.9 52.97 Hospitalizations: 21.9 7.2 5.9 pre:1.77% on 1 December 4.8% on 6 December 10% on 8 December 22% on 12 December 37% on 14 December 50% on 17 December 60% on 20 December 70% on 21 December 74% on 22 December 81% on 24 December 84% on 26 December 86% on 27 December 92% on 29 December 93.6% on 01 January Sources: https://covid19.ssi.dk/overvagningsdata/download-fil-med-overvaagningdata https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/242ec2acc014456295189631586f1d26 https://covid19.ssi.dk/virusvarianter/delta-pcr Rust Martialis fucked around with this message at 16:20 on Jan 7, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 16:16
|
|
|
Fritz the Horse posted:don't worry you're fine just wearing masks as normal, please see this CDC graphic which includes your exact facial hair style for some reason Goons are excited to see goatees and soul patches are kosher.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 16:38
|
|
|
crepeface posted:hey dumbass, we know you still believe that lockdowns don't work because victoria hosed theirs up despite a million people telling you how they were flawed over and over, but modernmajorgeneral is talking about australia, not just melbourne. feds/NSW definitely brought it on themselves and then hosed over everyone else Isn't that his point though It's so infectious you can do everything perfectly and still catch it if the person/state/province/country next to you is a twat
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 17:21
|
|
|
Alctel posted:Isn't that his point though Even China has seen a bump (of less than 300 per day). Meanwhile in America https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1479262149507792897?s=20 https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1479247340875788291?s=20 https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1479277594461839362?s=20 It’s crazy that we thought covid under Trump was god awful and yet with vaccines Biden is still worse at controlling this thing. At least the free tests will be available soon (after you google it and request it online). virtualboyCOLOR fucked around with this message at 17:33 on Jan 7, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 17:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 23:10 |
|
|
Karl Barks posted:Goons are excited to see goatees and soul patches are kosher. Doing the Zappa here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 7, 2022 17:30
|
|
