Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.
Wondering how you could possibly have a realistic representation of the 1950s-2020s without nation states.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!
It's the end of the 90s. In the words of Martin Blank, governments are just public relations theory at this point.

HorseLord posted:

I'm not going back and forth at all. I'm pointing out that some things are having meaning attributed to them where there is none.
If it means nothing, why did they bother spending time and money on it?

Halloween Jack fucked around with this message at 17:30 on Jan 7, 2022

HorseLord
Aug 26, 2014

Halloween Jack posted:

If it means nothing, why did they bother spending time and money on it?

Maybe you should read what I wrote again? I'm not going to rewrite it, so I'll just copy and paste:

me posted:


The matrix is not filmed in Chicago. It was filmed in Sidney Australia, San Fransisco and Nashville. So there are no Chicago specific signs because Chicago isn't in the movie.

The job of the production company is to make all three locations look like one location, which they successfully did.

That they didn't make it look like one specific city you could name doesn't mean that no other city exists. It means that which city it is doesn't matter. The movie is being nonspecific on that detail.

If they'd chosen to call it "chicago", "new york" or whatever, all that would've been gained is that nerds would go "but that's such and such a building! they don't have such and such a building in Chicago!" or "New York subway stations don't have green wooden ticket booths" or something. It has no utility to the story being told.

moths
Aug 25, 2004

I would also still appreciate some danger.



Owlofcreamcheese posted:

here is the highway system of a totally normal and not simulated city




Here's LA from another angle.

checkplease
Aug 17, 2006



Smellrose

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

But we do know why that’s done: the information is sold to companies looking to increase engagement, customer retention, and/or ad revenue.

So this analogy depends on the existence of an alien advertising industry - in a world without any buying or selling.


Metadata is the big market these days and that's really just about your activity on the internet, i.e. existing. And we know that metadata can be used for more than just advertising goods : See Cambridge Analytica and the various elections it was involved in for how such "existing" data can be used for control.

But really, how many people can actually describe the process in how this data is used? Even if I directly see an ad or sponsored post on Facebook, I don't immediately go out and buy the product, or even think I do often. We are told this metadata and advertising process generates income, but how often do we knowingly participate.

We just know data + ads = profit somehow....It's fairly abstract and most people just assume it works, similar to the humans + fusion = mega power in the matrix.

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

HorseLord posted:

Maybe you should read what I wrote again? I'm not going to rewrite it, so I'll just copy and paste:
1. Don't be a jerk.

2. You said yourself that Morpheus was spotted in a specific location and that they travel to other specific locations. Why go through the trouble to make everything look like an unnamed City if it isn't one? The characters instantly appear in various locations across the Matrix; why hide that the action is taking place across multiple cities? Why change the names and signs but keep the verbal references to specific places in Chicago and London?

3. Here, I can be a jerk too: HorseLord believes that The Dark Knight Rises is about an alternate timeline where London, NYC, Pittsburgh, and LA are connected into one giant Judge Dredd style megatropolis called Gotham City.

Halloween Jack fucked around with this message at 17:44 on Jan 7, 2022

HorseLord
Aug 26, 2014

Owlofcreamcheese posted:

here is the highway system of a totally normal and not simulated city



That's called a "stack interchange" and they exist in real life. Here's Judge Harry Pregerson Interchange, Los Angeles, USA



What was your point in posting this? Did you think that no such thing would exist in a normal size american city? Or that it defies physics and can't exist irl or something?

HorseLord
Aug 26, 2014

I answered your question and all you had to do was read it.

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.

Halloween Jack posted:

It's the end of the 90s. In the words of Martin Blank, governments are just public relations theory at this point.

That's pithy and clever but we're looking at a radical realignment here. Neo is mid-30s GenX as is pretty much every other player in this movie. That means that they would remember the Cold War, the 70s, etc. How does all that look with one Ur-City and a real "end of history"? Growing up in the "Perpetual 90s" would produce very, very different kinds of people then our "real" world did.

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

HorseLord posted:

I answered your question and all you had to do was read it.
Your answer is a mix of "it doesn't mean anything" and...bad. Movies are set in one major city using locations from another major city all the time. Even television shows set in a single city are typically ridiculous to the people who live there. They edited out the Sydney Opera House, but the notion that the Wachowskis had to extensively nerd-proof their movie is a strange one.

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

Growing up in the "Perpetual 90s" would produce very, very different kinds of people then our "real" world did.

Halloween Jack fucked around with this message at 17:51 on Jan 7, 2022

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

Wondering how you could possibly have a realistic representation of the 1950s-2020s without nation states.

its a fictional movie op

HorseLord
Aug 26, 2014

Halloween Jack posted:

Your answer is a mix of "it doesn't mean anything" and...bad. Movies are set in one major city using locations from another major city all the time. Even television shows set in a single city are typically ridiculous to the people who live there. They edited out the Sydney Opera House, but the notion that the Wachowskis had to extensively nerd-proof their movie is a strange one.


I told you that they spent money on it to make multiple shooting locations look like one story location.

Making multiple shooting locations look like one story location matters very, very much, and I have been very, very clear on that.

What does not matter is what the name of that story location is. It does not factor into the plot of the movie, the story they are telling could occur in any big city. So they did not choose a name, or choose to include a landmark, because it wouldn't help.

This is the last time I will spoonfeed you, because I think needing to do so is depressing. I'm a lot happier when the person at the other end of the internet connection isn't stupid.

HorseLord fucked around with this message at 17:59 on Jan 7, 2022

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.

precision posted:

its a fictional movie op

This is what's called a "thought experiment", which is why you have trouble grasping it. heh heh just messin' with ya

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

HorseLord posted:

What does not matter is what the name of that story location is.
It's the first word of the thread title!

Jay-V
Nov 8, 2009
In this movie, a gamer/coder get cucked by a chad and then got redpilled??

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

Jay-V posted:

In this movie, a gamer/coder get cucked by a chad and then got redpilled??

our monitors only use 3 colors... red green blue...

there's only 3 distinct flavors of doritos and everything else is just a combination of those... nacho cheese salsa verde and cool ranch... RED GREEN BLUE

oh gently caress. oh poo poo

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

checkplease posted:

We just know data + ads = profit somehow....It's fairly abstract and most people just assume it works, similar to the humans + fusion = mega power in the matrix.

That's only true in the sense that we don't truly 'know' what's in a bowl of Frosted Flakes. We nonetheless have a pretty good idea. It's not like some big mystery.

I think you aren't quite going far enough with this logic, because (under the interpretation that the machines are evil capitalists) what if the machines themselves have no idea whether the matrix works as a power source but are indifferent because the whole thing is a pump-and-dump? The matrix is still 'pre-alpha', effectively vaporware.

But, again, this would require the existence of outside investors, a stock market....

Overall, there's no scenario where what Morpheus says in the film(s) 'just' makes sense. There's always some key element missing.

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

But we do know why that’s done: the information is sold to companies looking to increase engagement, customer retention, and/or ad revenue.

So this analogy depends on the existence of an alien advertising industry - in a world without any buying or selling.

There are many fairly obvious reasons for why hypersonic jets aren’t deployed for shipping. It’s not just a matter of technological determination, like ‘oh they hadn’t invented planes yet’.

In this case, you seem to be implying that the matrix is dumb because the technology is ‘new’, and the alien machines simply haven’t developed a better system. Of course, the matrix has actually been running for over one hundred years. And the machines have already got a system for creating sapient, emotional programs that they can “exile” into the harsh world of the matrix. So if they literally feed off fear, anxiety, and other emotions, then the entire human life-support system is again redundant. They could just harvest “artificial” emotions.

The biggest cost of doing business is pretty much always labor. This is why companies are always striving to implement new forms of automation. In the world of the Matrix films, you consequently do need a very good explanation for why the machines keep billions of people around. It’s not just ‘natural’ that they would do so.

The machines don't feed off human emotions. The "exiles" are refugees fleeing deletion, not deliberate exports from the machine world into the human one. These are really basic mistakes you're making, and that you'll keep making for as long as you insist that all the characters are incurably moronic, the machines aren't really people and just do things arbitrarily, etc.

There's a joke I've always loved: A professor of economics and a few of his students are walking and talking along a college campus. One student suddenly points down off the path and says "look, professor, a twenty dollar bill!" The professor says "nonsense, if there had been money dropped there someone else would have picked it up by now."

In fact production processes, despite hypothetically being as efficient as can be, frequently deadlock and stagnate until class struggle, specifically, forces them to revolutionize themselves. The Architect's obfuscatory matrix came after several ruinous, costly disasters and was able to remain stable for something like eight loops. Why change a winning formula? Well, because it lost. Once they had to make do with fewer people, the machines discovered all along that they could wring out much more juice per inmate with the Analyst's manipulative matrix. This stuff is right out of Marx.

Comrade Fakename
Feb 13, 2012


I really want to like this but I don't. Like most people in this thread, I'm totally here for the meta poo poo. When they explicitly talk about Warner Bros early on, I was loving it. But my problem is that the movie ultimately betrays the point of the metanarrative. The first act has Lana pretty openly complain about the crass commercialisation of the movie studios (and specifically WB), and that she doesn't want to make another movie but feels forced into it by the thread that WB will just go on ahead without her. That to Lana, The Matrix was important to her a long time ago but now she just wants to move on with her life. That we shouldn't be milking existing IP for all they're worth and making new art instead.

Then, at the end of the film, Lana has acquiesced entirely to the studio's wishes. Half way through the movie, during the embarrassing fight scene with the Merv's goons that looked like a particularly high-budget episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (and included a recreation of the final fight from the Matrix 1 with handy cuts from the original film to remind you how dramatically better that looked), I realised what this movie was reminding me of: a feature length pilot episode of a Matrix TV series like Stargate SG1 or something. It's got everything - a new, younger crew and lead who can carry the majority of the new series. A handful of your old favourites who will probably only be making cameos from now on (and likely finally die at the end of the first season). Plot reasons for why some of the old characters were recast as new, younger (cheaper) actors. A reset of the narrative allowing the dynamic of the original (our heroes fighting a machine civilisation keeping humanity in a Matrix) to return. An overriding feeling of cheapness and an aesthetic flattening much better suited to rapid production.

Now, obviously this movie isn't actually leading into a TV series, at least not directly. But the vibe is still there, a setup for eternal franchising. Tbh I don't even directly have that much of a problem with that - I enjoy the MCU and if they made a Matrix TV show I'd probably watch it. But it's disappointing that something that was the pretty singular work of two creators was now set up for that by one of those creators. And especially when she spent the first half hour of the film complaining about it! Someone compared this movie to the Evangelion Rebuild movies, and I can't really agree. They're both very meta, but the Eva Rebuilds were absolutely the personal films Anno ultimately wanted to make with little concern for commercialism (probably capital would have preferred not to have a decade-long gap between instalments) and definitively ends the story at the end. Some people can always spin off, or prequel, or reboot it or something, but as final a stamp was put on the franchise as Anno could manage. Meanwhile Lana squirmed and complained but ultimately did the studio's bidding.

If you really want to go down the "it's bad on purpose" rabbithole (like Alice, natch), it should be "Lana complained about having to make the movie and then purposely handed WB a poo poo film to try and stop any further sequels".

As an aside, I do find it odd that with all the transchat recently no one mentioned what seemed to be a pretty clear trans allegory in the movie? I speak as a cis guy but it seemed obvious to me. The important line is when Trinity asks Neo if he based the character in his game on himself and he says he did. This film seems to me to be Lana saying "back when I wrote The Matrix I thought I was self-inserting myself as the badass male lead. But now, having transitioned, I now realise that I actually had been self-inserting myself as the badass female lead." So that's why Trinity becomes the new The One and the new protagonist of The Matrix, and then they play the RATM track sung by a woman now.

sigher
Apr 22, 2008

My guiding Moonlight...



Alchenar posted:



Link literally scrolls to the corner edge of the map to find the castle.

Maps have had edges for years, it's nothing new. They probably didn't unlock the rest of the game world, lol

Owlofcreamcheese posted:

here is the highway system of a totally normal and not simulated city



moths posted:


Here's LA from another angle.

HorseLord posted:

That's called a "stack interchange" and they exist in real life. Here's Judge Harry Pregerson Interchange, Los Angeles, USA



What was your point in posting this? Did you think that no such thing would exist in a normal size american city? Or that it defies physics and can't exist irl or something?

I remember this was posted somewhere on SA; it's the Qianchun Interchange in China that's basically just a rollercoaster hundreds of feet in the air for cars:

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Ferrinus posted:

The machines don't feed off human emotions. The "exiles" are refugees fleeing deletion, not deliberate exports from the machine world into the human one. These are really basic mistakes you're making, and that you'll keep making for as long as you insist that all the characters are incurably moronic, the machines aren't really people and just do things arbitrarily, etc.

Well, let's take a break for a moment and go back to my interpretation (which is, of course, the Zizekian one). We actually have some good evidence that Lana Wachowski has at least read some Zizek, because here's Zizek writing about Matrix 1 back in October of 1999:

"One could effectively claim that the agent Smith (let us not forget: not a human being as others, but the direct virtual embodiment of the Matrix - the big Other - itself) is the stand-in for the figure of the analyst within the universe of the film: his lesson is that the experience of an insurmountable obstacle is the positive condition for us, humans, to perceive something as reality - reality is ultimately that which resists."

(My italics.)

Zizek is here referring to Smith's monologue, about how there is a debate among the machines. Some believe that humans crave perfection but "I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through suffering and misery."

Skip ahead to the year 2021, and we have a a character literally called The Analyst who entirely agrees with the original Smith:

"What validates and makes your fictions real? Feelings. [...] It works just like this. Oh, no! Can you stop the bullet? If only you could move faster. [chuckles] Here’s the thing about feelings. They’re so much easier to control than facts. Turns out, in my Matrix, the worse we treat you, the more we manipulate you, the more energy you produce."

So we must actually read this very carefully, because what The Analyst is saying is that the psychic 'energy' extracted from the humans is fed back into the matrix itself, strengthening the reality of the fictional world. What is he producing is the reality itself. So we're back to the point that the machines exist to purely to serve as God or gods for mankind. "Just give the people what they want, right?"

massive spider
Dec 6, 2006

HorseLord posted:

I told you that they spent money on it to make multiple shooting locations look like one story location.

Making multiple shooting locations look like one story location matters very, very much, and I have been very, very clear on that.

What does not matter is what the name of that story location is. It does not factor into the plot of the movie, the story they are telling could occur in any big city. So they did not choose a name, or choose to include a landmark, because it wouldn't help.

This is the last time I will spoonfeed you, because I think needing to do so is depressing. I'm a lot happier when the person at the other end of the internet connection isn't stupid.

You're getting weirdly wound up about something which isn't ultimately that OTT a claim.

This is a movie about an artificial, fake place. To make it look extra artificial identifying landmarks were removed. This gives the city a kind of late capitalist anyplace feel, and the imagery of 'the dream world' as never-ending series of skyscrapers is similar to films like Dark City or Inception (which both trade in similar themes as the matrix).

It could be one city, it could be a specific unnamed American city. The first interpretation fits the theme of 'this is all a video game' but raises in universe questions about how that would work, the second is more 'realistic'(but in this context that has a heavy ???).

And then the end of the third movie it appears literally every human in the city/world(?) has been turned into smith and the skies are roiling black so its prob best to get too literal about the exact mechanics of all this.

No Mods No Masters
Oct 3, 2004

I feel like this whole conversation needs to have people distinguish between the OT where the megacity thing is at least arguable and matrix 4 where it's definitely not, they're just living in san francisco. I understand some people are more or less familiar with san francisco, but just trust me on this one

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.
I think the "Matrix city is a vast arcology" is a cool premise and very cyberpunk but again I just thought that they were in 1999. I guess we'll just go with it, since tbh I never considered what it would be like for the world to perpetually stay in the year 2000 forever. I assume the machines sanded off the worst neolib excesses and there's no NAFTA (since there's no place to move the jobs) or global warming and the actual logistics of their world are far, far different from what they appear on the surface.

No Mods No Masters
Oct 3, 2004

Pictured: definitely not san francisco, more of an anyplace lacking any identifying landmarks



Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.
Oh I'm not talking about Matrix 4. Yeah it takes place in San Francisco and clearly not in Perpetual 1999. I've had family in Oakland and flown in there probably half a dozen times.

Megaman's Jockstrap fucked around with this message at 21:56 on Jan 7, 2022

PeterCat
Apr 8, 2020

Believe women.

No Mods No Masters posted:

Pictured: definitely not san francisco, more of an anyplace lacking any identifying landmarks





Would this be Matrix 7.0 or 8.0?

Because re-watching the first Matrix, I was amused by how thoroughly they made it just some city. Since it's a completely artificial world, the machines can just make it an amalgam of late 20th century human culture and just keep it there forever, especially when it's reset every time a new One appears.

massive spider
Dec 6, 2006

No Mods No Masters posted:

Pictured: definitely not san francisco, more of an anyplace lacking any identifying landmarks





Ya I mentioned that last page

massive spider posted:

I definitely got the sense in the matrix 1,2,3 that "the city" was portrayed as a kind of anycity megapolis. And in 4 when it starts becoming obviously San Francisco and then Explicitly-Tokyo that was meant to be an indication that this updated version of the matrix is superior, along with not being obviously green tinted.

I mean if you start considering the in universe logic of it then the idea that everyone lives in this generic city and never questions the outside world is absurd. But in terms of the imagery we're shown the city definitely seems to be deliberately portrayed as artificial and nameless as possible. Really the only reference to a specific place I can think of is the newspaper article that mentions Heathrow, but its so incongruous with the rest of the movie it feels like a goof.

Haptical Sales Slut
Mar 15, 2010

Age 18 to 49
The entire 4th movie is a “goof”.

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.
Any thoughts on this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMQFdZMoHyI
Apparently the movie is beautiful as it puts so much focus on trans people and how detransitioning is bad.

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

"What validates and makes your fictions real? Feelings. [...] It works just like this. Oh, no! Can you stop the bullet? If only you could move faster. [chuckles] Here’s the thing about feelings. They’re so much easier to control than facts. Turns out, in my Matrix, the worse we treat you, the more we manipulate you, the more energy you produce."

So we must actually read this very carefully, because what The Analyst is saying is that the psychic 'energy' extracted from the humans is fed back into the matrix itself, strengthening the reality of the fictional world. What is he producing is the reality itself. So we're back to the point that the machines exist to purely to serve as God or gods for mankind. "Just give the people what they want, right?"

No, he's not talking about psychic 'energy'. He's talking about literal energy, measured in joules or calories, as might be delivered a battery AKA a "coppertop". The analyst is actually talking about how humans are made to serve machines. What you're saying is in plain contradiction with the films as they stand. Earlier you said that the electricity crackling around Neo and Trinity as they used "The One" powers to destroy their restraints was a magical aura actually emanating from the humans' palms or something, but the Matrix is a science fiction film.

I've also read Zizek, but, to quote the giant alien brain from Courage the Cowardly Dog, now that I have kindness, I know what not to be!

Ferrinus fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Jan 7, 2022

appropriatemetaphor
Jan 26, 2006

First hour was kinda cool in a meta way but the rest was kinda boring and didn't make much sense.

Can't tell if the movie is just supposed to be bad ironically? Am I the sheeple?

Bodyholes
Jun 30, 2005

Owlofcreamcheese posted:

here is the highway system of a totally normal and not simulated city



Yeah American highways are more dystopian than that irl. It should have 20 lanes and a constant traffic jam.

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

Owlofcreamcheese posted:

here is the highway system of a totally normal and not simulated city



…yes?

moths
Aug 25, 2004

I would also still appreciate some danger.



punk rebel ecks posted:

Any thoughts on this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMQFdZMoHyI
Apparently the movie is beautiful as it puts so much focus on trans people and how detransitioning is bad.

Are the Witchowskis trans Tyler Perry?

DaveKap
Feb 5, 2006

Pickle: Inspected.



a7m2 posted:

https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2021-09-17-the-matrix-online-interview-ben-chamberlain
The Matrix Online is probably not canon. I can't find anything about the directors saying it's canon, though there are some internet comments saying they did. I think it's fine to ignore the video game that the directors had only a little input into when it comes to interpreting the movies.
Thanks for linking this, I've been so curious about this kinda stuff.
And wonderfully enough, this revealed to me my strongest Mandela Effect I've ever encountered: I thought Marc Laidlaw (Half-Life writer) was the person hired to write The Matrix Online's plot. Thought this so strongly that it's all I've ever said since the game came out. Woof.

From that article...

quote:

"No developer had any illusion anything we did would ever be known or taken to heart by the larger public; that's just not the way game stories were regarded."
This is really strange considering I recall the very specific feeling of "everything that happens in this game is canon" and I don't think I would've made that up on my own.

DaveKap fucked around with this message at 00:43 on Jan 8, 2022

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

Comrade Fakename posted:

I realised what this movie was reminding me of: a feature length pilot episode of a Matrix TV series like Stargate SG1 or something. It's got everything - a new, younger crew and lead who can carry the majority of the new series. A handful of your old favourites who will probably only be making cameos from now on (and likely finally die at the end of the first season). Plot reasons for why some of the old characters were recast as new, younger (cheaper) actors. A reset of the narrative allowing the dynamic of the original (our heroes fighting a machine civilisation keeping humanity in a Matrix) to return. An overriding feeling of cheapness and an aesthetic flattening much better suited to rapid production.

this is what i was thinking as well. with COVID and everything i think it's entirely possible that lana or WB or both were at some point considering turning it into more of a mini series thing like sense8

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames
except that sense8 didn't look nearly this cheap lmao

appropriatemetaphor
Jan 26, 2006

Was Neo's new power getting people to pull their punches? I swear there was a bit where Elon Smith was "punching" him but clearly missing by at least a foot.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

appropriatemetaphor posted:

Was Neo's new power getting people to pull their punches? I swear there was a bit where Elon Smith was "punching" him but clearly missing by at least a foot.

I mean, he definitely did that to Smith.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply