Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Residency Evil
Jul 28, 2003

4/5 godo... Schumi

Inner Light posted:

REITs did better than a broad index or nah? SP500 was a 28% gain YOY in 2021.

VGSLX was up 40% last year. REITs had a bonkers year.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

80k
Jul 3, 2004

careful!

SA-Anon posted:

So reading about Series I bonds...

Pros:
-Currently 7% interest for inflation
-Can cash it after 1 year
-Only leave the interest behind on the last... 3 months (if cashing it before 20 years)?

This actually sounds... pretty good?

However, on that note. If the base interest rate goes up, what happens?

I-Bonds are essentially the best safe bonds you can buy right now for the following reasons:
  • They yield much more than comparable TIPS. As a comparison, 5-year TIPS yields -1.37% real. 30-year TIPS yields -0.22% real. I-Bonds are 0% real rate.
  • You get a lot of the benefit of a long-term bond with the risk of a short-term bond. Why? If real rates drop or remain, you can keep holding. If real rates rise, you have a very cheap put option (3 months worth of interest) within 5 years, and after 5 years you can sell without penalty. Treasuries could lose a lot more value.
  • I-Bonds are tax deferred until they mature or until you redeem. TIPS are taxable every year. But of course, this is only true if you have additional money you want to save beyond what you can put in tax-advantaged IRA/401k's, etc.

moana
Jun 18, 2005

one of the more intellectual satire communities on the web

Residency Evil posted:

Any chance you can discuss this a bit more in this thread? You probably see these investments in client’s portfolios. Do they not perform well individually or in aggregate? I would imagine there’s some premium to having illiquidity in an investment. Is it simply the fact that many of the same caveats apply with picking individual stocks?
REITs are fine as an index, I have lots in my Roth account. But yes, with the ptp syndicates, it's basically picking active managers and our clients had crappier returns than just picking an index REIT. I imagine a lot of that has to do with the fact that the really good active managers don't need outside people investing in their funds, same as with regular stock funds.

The biggest issue I saw in my short time dealing with these types of things were the LPs that poo poo out huge amounts of capital gains at random times, and the K1s that didn't come in until May, causing a bunch of issues with underpaid taxes and a complete inability to plan for taxes properly since the gains don't get reported until after year end. They can sell the properties at any time and you have no say in it,, you're just an LP along for the ride. The tax reporting is a nightmare, tracking basis is a nightmare, your CPA will hate you and rightfully will charge you an arm and a leg to deal with it.

https://www.thetaxadviser.com/issues/2019/apr/publicly-traded-partnerships-tax-treatment-investors.html

Read it all, be careful what you invest in, know that you're probably not going to do better than an index and despite their promises of reportable active tax losses, you may have weird years of gains that gently caress up all the benefits.

Guinness
Sep 15, 2004

moana posted:

The biggest issue I saw in my short time dealing with these types of things were the LPs that poo poo out huge amounts of capital gains at random times, and the K1s that didn't come in until May, causing a bunch of issues with underpaid taxes and a complete inability to plan for taxes properly since the gains don't get reported until after year end. They can sell the properties at any time and you have no say in it,, you're just an LP along for the ride. The tax reporting is a nightmare, tracking basis is a nightmare, your CPA will hate you and rightfully will charge you an arm and a leg to deal with it.

In my more naive years I invested in a few publicly traded LPs without fully realizing what I was getting into. They are a massive loving pain in the rear end.

Every year I was held up on filing my taxes waiting on schedule K1s to arrive just before the filing deadline, and then having to decipher the drat things and get surprised by their effects on my taxes was a nightmare. Despite good gains I sold out all of them just to be done with the god drat hassle of it all.

I learned way too much about obscure tax reporting rules than I ever wanted to know. I got to deduct fun things like "oil and gas exploration expenses" and "natural resource depletion", as well as pay for surprise capital gains for the "sale of mineral rights". I got to claim foreign tax exemptions on income streams I didn't even know I had. I also paid federal income tax on income streams I didn't even know I had. Because when you're a "partner" of an LP it all flows in to your personal tax return.

Thankfully and annoyingly it was all chump change dollar amounts with an overall minimal impact to my taxes, but I had to deal with it regardless. Stuff like TurboTax nominally supports filing K1s, but in actuality it's a no-man's land. Every year I had to dive in to the actual forms manually and debug and fix poo poo in order to file. I don't even know if I did it all correctly but I'm too small of a fish to audit and I don't even care if I over/underpaid by $20 or whatever.

0/10 absolutely do not recommend. I guess maybe if it's in your IRA to avoid the tax nightmare, but that aside these things are complicated and you probably don't understand what you're getting into.

Good loving riddance, and thanks for triggering those repressed memories. DON'T DO IT.

Guinness fucked around with this message at 08:46 on Jan 12, 2022

moana
Jun 18, 2005

one of the more intellectual satire communities on the web
Yeah, like my boss was a cpa for years and still could not decipher some of the poo poo they did on the K1. Stuff in the wrong boxes, the classification codes completely wrong or more likely just labelled as ZZ, "other" aka "we aren't going to tell you wtf this is, you figure it out by going back through the last five years of basis history". Crucial information buried as a comment to an optional box on the third page of the K1 notes, like not even in the schedule itself. Just horrendous reporting. And that's just the K1, the annual reports of performance were equally obfuscated.

Edit: anyone with one of these was automatically extended to October, there was no way we would ever get it done for April.

ChineseBuffet
Mar 7, 2003

Guinness posted:

I guess maybe if it's in your IRA to avoid the tax nightmare

I believe that you have to be very careful with this because some of these can generate UBTI or other things you don't want in an IRA.

Residency Evil
Jul 28, 2003

4/5 godo... Schumi

moana posted:

REITs are fine as an index, I have lots in my Roth account. But yes, with the ptp syndicates, it's basically picking active managers and our clients had crappier returns than just picking an index REIT. I imagine a lot of that has to do with the fact that the really good active managers don't need outside people investing in their funds, same as with regular stock funds.
...
Read it all, be careful what you invest in, know that you're probably not going to do better than an index and despite their promises of reportable active tax losses, you may have weird years of gains that gently caress up all the benefits.

The tax losses are something I'm particularly interested in, but it sounds like that may not be even a guarantee. :sigh:

Guinness posted:

In my more naive years I invested in a few publicly traded LPs without fully realizing what I was getting into. They are a massive loving pain in the rear end.

Every year I was held up on filing my taxes waiting on schedule K1s to arrive just before the filing deadline, and then having to decipher the drat things and get surprised by their effects on my taxes was a nightmare. Despite good gains I sold out all of them just to be done with the god drat hassle of it all.

I learned way too much about obscure tax reporting rules than I ever wanted to know. I got to deduct fun things like "oil and gas exploration expenses" and "natural resource depletion", as well as pay for surprise capital gains for the "sale of mineral rights". I got to claim foreign tax exemptions on income streams I didn't even know I had. I also paid federal income tax on income streams I didn't even know I had. Because when you're a "partner" of an LP it all flows in to your personal tax return.

Thankfully and annoyingly it was all chump change dollar amounts with an overall minimal impact to my taxes, but I had to deal with it regardless. Stuff like TurboTax nominally supports filing K1s, but in actuality it's a no-man's land. Every year I had to dive in to the actual forms manually and debug and fix poo poo in order to file. I don't even know if I did it all correctly but I'm too small of a fish to audit and I don't even care if I over/underpaid by $20 or whatever.

0/10 absolutely do not recommend. I guess maybe if it's in your IRA to avoid the tax nightmare, but that aside these things are complicated and you probably don't understand what you're getting into.

Good loving riddance, and thanks for triggering those repressed memories. DON'T DO IT.

moana posted:

Yeah, like my boss was a cpa for years and still could not decipher some of the poo poo they did on the K1. Stuff in the wrong boxes, the classification codes completely wrong or more likely just labelled as ZZ, "other" aka "we aren't going to tell you wtf this is, you figure it out by going back through the last five years of basis history". Crucial information buried as a comment to an optional box on the third page of the K1 notes, like not even in the schedule itself. Just horrendous reporting. And that's just the K1, the annual reports of performance were equally obfuscated.

Edit: anyone with one of these was automatically extended to October, there was no way we would ever get it done for April.

Thanks guys, that's a good perspective. The tax stuff has always been something that I've read about as being a potential PITA, but chalked it up to people being whiny ("How hard could it be?"). I'll continue staying away and ask this question again in a few years. :v:

Chad Sexington
May 26, 2005

I think he made a beautiful post and did a great job and he is good.
Perhaps an unpopular opinion in this thread: REITs are lame because they are helping price an entire generation out of home ownership. I guess you could get into commercial REITs, but they are also not super great for small businesses either.

Now to return to figuring out where to put my 2022 Roth IRA contributions, which will be likely be in index funds that are also invested in morally questionable companies.

incogneato
Jun 4, 2007

Zoom! Swish! Bang!
Partnership taxation can be one of the most complex areas of the US tax code. I know nothing about the investment options you're discussing, but I know enough about taxes that I'd personally avoid partnership tax issues if possible.

pmchem
Jan 22, 2010


Chad Sexington posted:

Perhaps an unpopular opinion in this thread: REITs are lame because they are helping price an entire generation out of home ownership. I guess you could get into commercial REITs, but they are also not super great for small businesses either.

Now to return to figuring out where to put my 2022 Roth IRA contributions, which will be likely be in index funds that are also invested in morally questionable companies.

there's a lot of diversity in "REITs". two of the three biggest US REITs build and manage nationwide cell tower networks. not exactly relevant to home ownership or small businesses.

GoGoGadgetChris
Mar 18, 2010

i powder a
granite monument
in a soundless flash

showering the grass
with molten drops of
its gold inlay

sending smoking
chips of stone
skipping into the fog

Chad Sexington posted:

Perhaps an unpopular opinion in this thread: REITs are lame because they are helping price an entire generation out of home ownership. I guess you could get into commercial REITs, but they are also not super great for small businesses either.

Now to return to figuring out where to put my 2022 Roth IRA contributions, which will be likely be in index funds that are also invested in morally questionable companies.


pmchem posted:

there's a lot of diversity in "REITs". two of the three biggest US REITs build and manage nationwide cell tower networks. not exactly relevant to home ownership or small businesses.

Yeah - and single family homes are notoriously bad Investments, so reit funds tend to be about 15% residential at most. Boring old retail office industrial and Specialty are the real cash cows

feelix
Nov 27, 2016
THE ONLY EXERCISE I AM UNFAMILIAR WITH IS EXERCISING MY ABILITY TO MAKE A POST PEOPLE WANT TO READ

Chad Sexington posted:

Perhaps an unpopular opinion in this thread: REITs are lame because they are helping price an entire generation out of home ownership. I guess you could get into commercial REITs, but they are also not super great for small businesses either.

Now to return to figuring out where to put my 2022 Roth IRA contributions, which will be likely be in index funds that are also invested in morally questionable companies.
Being centered around the single family home is one of the biggest fundamental problems with American society so helping that dream die is cool and good. Condos are fine

a dingus
Mar 22, 2008

Rhetorical questions only
Fun Shoe
I put a portion of my savings into a REIT when I was saving to buy a house. The thought was that it would track real estate prices so I'd at least have a chunk of money following the market. I took it out once I bought a house. Not sure if dumb or not but it was like $10k in limbo so who knows.

GoGoGadgetChris
Mar 18, 2010

i powder a
granite monument
in a soundless flash

showering the grass
with molten drops of
its gold inlay

sending smoking
chips of stone
skipping into the fog
For reference, VGSLX / VNQ (Vanguard's REIT, no idea if it's the best/worst/decent) holds

Specialty at 37% - Data centers, wireless and broadcast equipment, golf courses, self-storage, movie theaters, casinos, farmland.... (tiny whisper) private prisons and mental health facilities. Specialty REITs should be broken into more categories as they have a ton of overlap, represent over a third of the entire sector, and can also include combinations of the other categories.
Residential at 15% - Note that residential is overwhelmingly apartments, mobile homes, and student housing. See note at the bottom about single-family
Industrial at 12% - Warehouses, distribution, factories, etc
Retail at 10% - everything from a freestanding Starbucks grocery stores and regional malls
Office at 7% - everybody knows office buildings
Healthcare at 7% - lots of overlap with office but also hospitals, senior living, nursing etc
RE Services at 5% - Property management, developers, mortgage REITs, etc
Diversified at 3% - All of the above, but most common combos are Retal/office/industrial, and medial/office. Diversified REITs and Specialty REITs have a lot of overlap but most choose to qualify as Specialty
Hotels & Resorts at 2% - A ton of hotels & resorts end up in "Specialty" REITs so this is understating them by a substantial amount

I rounded everything so that only adds up to 98%

A note about Single-family holdings. There are only two major holdings in the benchmark that VGSLX tracks.

Invitation Homes is about 1.3% of VGSLX and owns 80,000 mid-grade homes, primarily in CA, WA, CO, Vegas, AZ, TX, FL, and the deep-deep south
American Homes 4 Rent is about 0.6% of VGSLX and owns low quality homes in 22 states. They own about 60,000 homes, primarily in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte NC
There are a handful of other companies with single-family exposure that altogether represent less than 0.5% of VGSLX, including Zillow and Redfin

Single-family homes have high expenses, low net income, and their value is primarily from appreciation & eventual resale. They aren't helpful for the typical REIT goal of providing dividends, but they are VERY helpful in letting REITs do some clever accounting. Their low net income, high expenses, and high depreciation are a godsend to the balance sheet. REITs are required by law to pay 90% of their taxable income as dividends to shareholders, but being able to load some depreciation and capital expenditures lets them control the size of their dividends when they have a strategic need to.

So tl;dr, REITs barely interact with single-family homes and are primarily broadcast equipment, self-storage, apartments, data centers, retail, office, industrial

GoGoGadgetChris
Mar 18, 2010

i powder a
granite monument
in a soundless flash

showering the grass
with molten drops of
its gold inlay

sending smoking
chips of stone
skipping into the fog

a dingus posted:

I put a portion of my savings into a REIT when I was saving to buy a house. The thought was that it would track real estate prices so I'd at least have a chunk of money following the market. I took it out once I bought a house. Not sure if dumb or not but it was like $10k in limbo so who knows.

Comparing the largest REIT benchmark to home values and the two largest SFR invesetors over the past 5 years,

VGSLX +34%
National Median Home Values +50%
American Homes 4 Rent +101%
Invitation Homes +111%

runawayturtles
Aug 2, 2004
Quick question: As mentioned here in the past, I rolled an IRA from a brokerage into my 401k last year. I did this by selling all investments in the IRA, having a check sent to me, and mailing the check plus a form to the 401k provider. A month later they mailed me another check for $.07, from interest on the cash while the check was in the mail. I assumed at the time that I could just ignore that check, instead of going through the same paperwork again just for $.07. Was I correct?

withak
Jan 15, 2003


Fun Shoe
Tax calculations are rounded to the nearest dollar.

fatman1683
Jan 8, 2004
.
I think I might have over-contributed to my IRA last year. Will Vanguard twig to this at some point and tell me how much I'm over and how much I need to withdraw before April 15th? Or do I have to figure it out on my own?

Valicious
Aug 16, 2010
I’m opening a Roth i401k,and trying to figure out what Vanguard fund to choose. I’m 35, no debt, no kids, house paid off if any of that matters.
My Roth IRA is 100% stocks (planning on just adding I Bonds each year) in the form of Advantis ETFs. Given that SCV has historically outperformed growth and the S&P, is there a real benefit to allocating according to market weight?
For reference, this is my planned IRA.

AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 30%
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Val ETF 14%
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF 12%
AVLV Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF 30%
AVIV Avantis International Large Cap Val ETF 14%

80k
Jul 3, 2004

careful!

Valicious posted:

I’m opening a Roth i401k,and trying to figure out what Vanguard fund to choose. I’m 35, no debt, no kids, house paid off if any of that matters.
My Roth IRA is 100% stocks (planning on just adding I Bonds each year) in the form of Advantis ETFs. Given that SCV has historically outperformed growth and the S&P, is there a real benefit to allocating according to market weight?
For reference, this is my planned IRA.

AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 30%
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Val ETF 14%
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF 12%
AVLV Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF 30%
AVIV Avantis International Large Cap Val ETF 14%

My small/value/internation/EM weighting is similar to yours. It's fine. Market weighting is fine too. The most important thing is to pick a strategy you can stick with. A lot of people abandoned value and international last year because they couldn't handle it. They then justify it by saying they are simplifying their portfolio or "I agree with Bogle", but it's just weakness and performance chasing. If you won't do that, then you can go anywhere from market weighting to extreme factor tilting and anywhere in between.

CubicalSucrose
Jan 1, 2013

Phantom my Opera and call me South Park: Bigger, Longer, & Uncut

Valicious posted:

I’m opening a Roth i401k,and trying to figure out what Vanguard fund to choose. I’m 35, no debt, no kids, house paid off if any of that matters.
My Roth IRA is 100% stocks (planning on just adding I Bonds each year) in the form of Advantis ETFs. Given that SCV has historically outperformed growth and the S&P, is there a real benefit to allocating according to market weight?
For reference, this is my planned IRA.

AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF 30%
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Val ETF 14%
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF 12%
AVLV Avantis US Large Cap Value ETF 30%
AVIV Avantis International Large Cap Val ETF 14%

A 100% equity market-weighted Vanguard fund is VTI.

Baxate
Feb 1, 2011

80k posted:

My small/value/internation/EM weighting is similar to yours. It's fine. Market weighting is fine too. The most important thing is to pick a strategy you can stick with. A lot of people abandoned value and international last year because they couldn't handle it. They then justify it by saying they are simplifying their portfolio or "I agree with Bogle", but it's just weakness and performance chasing. If you won't do that, then you can go anywhere from market weighting to extreme factor tilting and anywhere in between.

If only holding VTI or VT works for that person then thats fine, but yeah having at least some international or other diversification at least gives you something you can buy thats cheap relative to the US market. With US going up so much the last couple of years, I've been putting a larger portion of my money into ex-US funds just to keep up with my target allocation because its constantly lagging behind. But I feel good about that because I don't feel like I'm overpaying for US stocks.

I assume at some point in the future, things will reverse. It's only been like 2 weeks so this is meaningless, but YTD VXUS has outperformed VTI :shrug:

runawayturtles
Aug 2, 2004
Or maybe the small cap value cat is now out of the bag and it's just priced in. No one will be able to tell for a long time.

I still like the idea of a value tilt though, just because I like the idea of value investing.

drainpipe
May 17, 2004

AAHHHHHHH!!!!
I always think about the following article whenever the question of whether the value premium is dead or if international is still worth investing in pops up: https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/The-Long-Run-Is-Lying-to-You.

TLDR: much of the overperformance of US vs international or growth vs value can be attributed to increased valuations of US growth stocks over time. Thus, it's not that the US has significantly performed better than international on fundamentals, but that US stocks has gotten more expensive. This obviously makes the past performance of US stocks great and is awesome when you are holding those stocks from the beginning, but it's not a good thing to rely on going forward. The same story goes with growth vs value.

I hold both international and small cap value as diversifiers, but in reasonable quantities (about 45% of my equities between the two of them) so that if their underperformance continues, it's not the end of the world.

Valicious
Aug 16, 2010
I’m not sure I want 60% of my portfolio to be in the US, so I may fiddle with the percentages. Something like Market Weight with AVLV -3%, AVIV +3% or something

80k
Jul 3, 2004

careful!

runawayturtles posted:

Or maybe the small cap value cat is now out of the bag and it's just priced in. No one will be able to tell for a long time.

I still like the idea of a value tilt though, just because I like the idea of value investing.

I dunno... if SCV was out of the bag in the mid 2000's, it's been put back in and stomped deep into the bag with a vengeance. The value spread vs growth is the largest in history (even more than the late 90's). And that spread is also extremely large overseas. Don't quote me, but I think Europe has an even bigger growth value spread than the US right now.

Omne
Jul 12, 2003

Orangedude Forever

Turns out my job offers a Roth 401k option (in addition to the traditional 401k. I know the decision criteria is around tax rate - if my taxes are higher now than I expect at retirement, Roth makes more sense. But how can we know today what tax rates will be in 30 years?

CubicalSucrose
Jan 1, 2013

Phantom my Opera and call me South Park: Bigger, Longer, & Uncut

Omne posted:

Turns out my job offers a Roth 401k option (in addition to the traditional 401k. I know the decision criteria is around tax rate - if my taxes are higher now than I expect at retirement, Roth makes more sense. But how can we know today what tax rates will be in 30 years?

It's the opposite. If today's tax rate is higher, you want trad for the bigger tax benefits now.

In many cases it's a pretty tough guess. In some cases it's clearer though.
1) High income today and retiring early? Trad makes sense since you can do Roth conversions at negligible tax rates before RMDs and Social Security.
2) Nearing a more traditional retirement age and expecting a pretty sizeable combo of RMDs, Social Security, and/or one or more other pensions? Then Roth might be a clearer winner.

Between that it's kind of a crapshoot. One approach is to try and get some sort of balance across your entire set of Roth vs Trad retirement accounts to ensure you're not making exactly the wrong decision, with the understanding you won't be optimal

SpelledBackwards
Jan 7, 2001

I found this image on the Internet, perhaps you've heard of it? It's been around for a while I hear.

Turns out that more I-Bonds were purchased in just December than had ever been purchased in an entire year before
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-14/demand-explodes-for-inflation-protected-savings-bonds-in-u-s

quote:

Americans Stampede Into Inflation-Linked Bonds, Smashing Records

Series I savings bond sales totaled $2.78 billion in December

Full-year record had been $1.76 billion back in 2018

quote:

The December figure is $1 billion more than the previous full-year record, which came in 2018, when a jump in oil prices drove inflation toward 3%. Annual inflation is running now at a four-decade high of 7%, the result of booming consumer demand and supply-chain snarls sparked by the pandemic.

Kylaer
Aug 4, 2007
I'm SURE walking around in a respirator at all times in an (even more) OPEN BIDENing society is definitely not a recipe for disaster and anyone that's not cool with getting harassed by CHUDs are cave dwellers. I've got good brain!

SpelledBackwards posted:

Turns out that more I-Bonds were purchased in just December than had ever been purchased in an entire year before
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-14/demand-explodes-for-inflation-protected-savings-bonds-in-u-s

278,000 people making maximum purchases, unless I dropped a zero somewhere. Compared to the total population and the total amount of money being invested it's still a very small amount.

quote:

the result of booming consumer demand and supply-chain snarls sparked by the pandemic

:thunk:

Upgrade
Jun 19, 2021



I currently work full time at a job that does not offer a 401k. I'll max my Roth IRA this year and that's it for tax advantaged accounts. I've started adjuncting a course at a local university, which allows part time employees to invest in a 403b. Can I just use all of the money I get from treaching in a year (around $6000 post tax) and plow that into a 403b, on top of my IRA?

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


Isn't there some kind of program - I thought it was Betterment.com - that gave me some kind of Birds Eye View or Dashboard of all of my accounts, stocks, investment plans and savings?

Kylaer
Aug 4, 2007
I'm SURE walking around in a respirator at all times in an (even more) OPEN BIDENing society is definitely not a recipe for disaster and anyone that's not cool with getting harassed by CHUDs are cave dwellers. I've got good brain!

Upgrade posted:

I currently work full time at a job that does not offer a 401k. I'll max my Roth IRA this year and that's it for tax advantaged accounts. I've started adjuncting a course at a local university, which allows part time employees to invest in a 403b. Can I just use all of the money I get from treaching in a year (around $6000 post tax) and plow that into a 403b, on top of my IRA?

Yes, this is a workable and good plan, assuming you don't need that money right now. And remember, you can contribute pre-tax money to the 403b, so the amount will likely be higher than 6k. Unless you particularly want to make Roth contributions.

CubicalSucrose
Jan 1, 2013

Phantom my Opera and call me South Park: Bigger, Longer, & Uncut

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

Isn't there some kind of program - I thought it was Betterment.com - that gave me some kind of Birds Eye View or Dashboard of all of my accounts, stocks, investment plans and savings?

Personal Capital can do this, it's free. Spreadsheets are also free.

spf3million
Sep 27, 2007

hit 'em with the rhythm

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

Isn't there some kind of program - I thought it was Betterment.com - that gave me some kind of Birds Eye View or Dashboard of all of my accounts, stocks, investment plans and savings?

Morningstar x-ray has a basic free function where you enter all of your funds and the number of shares of each and it spits out your cumulative allocations.

Upgrade
Jun 19, 2021



Kylaer posted:

Yes, this is a workable and good plan, assuming you don't need that money right now. And remember, you can contribute pre-tax money to the 403b, so the amount will likely be higher than 6k. Unless you particularly want to make Roth contributions.

OK, I am stupid. If I contribute my entire pre-tax salary... then taxes just aren't paid? Social security, income, etc? Can you do that?

drainpipe
May 17, 2004

AAHHHHHHH!!!!
FICA is always paid but not paying income tax now is kinda the point.

Gucci Loafers
May 20, 2006

Ask yourself, do you really want to talk to pair of really nice gaudy shoes?


CubicalSucrose posted:

Personal Capital can do this, it's free. Spreadsheets are also free.

Now this is exactly what I was looking for... Thank you!

Edit - If only this supported Treasury Direct and would finish linking my Fidelity Account. :argh:

Gucci Loafers fucked around with this message at 23:06 on Jan 15, 2022

dexter6
Sep 22, 2003

Crosby B. Alfred posted:

Now this is exactly what I was looking for... Thank you!

Edit - If only this supported Treasury Direct and would finish linking my Fidelity Account. :argh:
I’ve found that personal cap has some periodic outages related to different banks. But Fidelity is one of the ones that works most of the time with them so just give it some time.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

cheese eats mouse
Jul 6, 2007

A real Portlander now
FYI when you hit a certain net worth personal capital WILL call you to try to poach off you. I told them to stop calling me and they haven’t since.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply