|
I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 Just one thing Something she really cared about and campaigned on
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 01:42 |
|
|
I remember 2004 when George W told his base that he would stop gay marriage forever and lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:38
|
|
|
it was her turn
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:39
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 "You will never have single payer healthcare in this country"
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:39
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 she would tell wall street to cut it out
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:40
|
|
|
she promised us the dynamic and very good in traffic Tim Kaine
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:41
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 her winning and getting to be president
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:42
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 I remember she had that website she was really proud of?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:43
|
|
|
ex post facho posted:
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:44
|
|
MANY SUCH CASES!
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 ez bitch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DXDU48RHLU
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:44
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 No one will ever know because it would have required going to her website to find out
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:47
|
|
|
someusername posted:I feel that I have gone from very much hating Mr Trump, to ironically enjoying his antics because there was nothing else pleasurable in this bleak existance but to stare into the piss sea of absurdity, to admiring him for at least enraging my enemy who pretends to be a friend but fucks my sister when I'm not around, to wanting Trump to gently caress my sister. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:49
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 girl power
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:50
|
|
|
bi crimes posted:girl power the girl in question being hillary herself, of course
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:55
|
|
|
she was going to nationalize pokemon
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 05:58
|
|
|
Pokemon Go to the Proles
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 06:02
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 she stood for it being her turn
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 06:25
|
|
|
jemand posted:Wait what? I didn't know anything about this. A reasonably well respected constitutional lawyer wrote an article about how at the time Kamala was born children of migrant workers born in the US didn't automatically qualify for citizenship and there isn't really an answer for if Kamala qualifies for the presidency. https://www.newsweek.com/some-questions-kamala-harris-about-eligibility-opinion-1524483 Instead of actually engaging with the question it instantly turned into a insane check mark vs alt right poo poo flinging escapade. It should be noted this was written in August 2020 well before the election.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 07:07
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 Attempting to compromise with the Fight For $15 by offering $12
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:17
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 Bernie Sanders Should Not Be President
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:19
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 Killing Gaddaffi was good. Also I think she still supported the Iraq war.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:21
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 fueling the birther movement when obama was beating her in the 2008 election
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:28
|
|
|
CaptainACAB posted:Killing Gaddaffi was good. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:29
|
|
|
yeah it was horrible especially because mummar had more drip than any human alive. hillary was jealous. oh yeah also while you can criticize him for a lot of things, his libya was actually a prosperous and stable nation which had a standard of living even the CIA admits was on par with italy, but they wanted to sell oil in euros to avoid the crushing siege warfare america implements on its adversaries, which was unacceptable to hillary, saudi and israel, so he had to die. there are now open air slave markets in the streets of tripoli.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:33
|
|
|
porfiria posted:What year are Democrats going to get destroyed in? Yes
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:35
|
|
|
CaptainACAB posted:yeah it was horrible especially because mummar had more drip than any human alive. look this issue is multifaceted, 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:45
|
|
|
i forgot gadaffi was always a devoted anti-imperialist and backed groups as diverse as the PLO, IRA, RAF and ANC. gadaffi and castro are two mandela would consistently cite as friends and staunch supporters of the ANC, even after he had to moderate to avoid offending the white libs. people got so loving mad when mandela told them that castro and gadaffi "supported them to the hilt" and he would not accept the narrative that these men were his enemies. it ruled. CaptainACAB has issued a correction as of 09:11 on Jan 17, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 08:55
|
|
|
i say swears online posted:look this issue is multifaceted, was that mural originally a big titty hillary?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 10:46
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 No fly zones lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 11:09
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I want you to name one thing Hillary stood for in 2016 Not wanting this country to go backwards
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 11:12
|
|
|
LastInLine posted:I think it's a bad idea to compare anyone to Hillary simply because she's hated in a way and to such a degree that she's unique in history. I'm not certain any lessons are to be learned because no one else is the target of such loathing. imo the one lesson is that if you're a universally despised public figure, deserved or not, you should probably not be the nominee
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 11:22
|
|
|
Hillary campaigned on the historicity of a woman president, or at least that's the only thing her constituency really cared about. It's bad enough to lose by sucking or everyone just hating you, but Hillary lost the primary in 08 because her campaign didn't understand how caucuses work, and she lost '16 because they forgot how the Electoral College works. And these are the people who expect us to believe they're they're the most qualified.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 11:22
|
|
|
cagliostr0 posted:A reasonably well respected constitutional lawyer lmao That guy lost all his various jobs as a lawyer and professor because he was a stop the steal lawyer after the 2020 election. Also you're that guy who tried to dunk on marx earlier in this thread.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 11:45
|
|
|
Noob Saibot posted:Not wanting this country to go backwards lol that's good tell another
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 14:43
|
|
|
Noob Saibot posted:Not wanting this country to go backwards go back to D&D
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 14:52
|
|
|
Noob Saibot posted:Not wanting this country to go backwards That's the best and only thing she could come up with when campaigning to be the most powerful person in the world? LOL edit: she didn't actually campaign so this post gives her way too much credit sombrero has issued a correction as of 15:28 on Jan 17, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 14:55
|
|
|
cagliostr0 posted:A reasonably well respected constitutional lawyer wrote an article about how at the time Kamala was born children of migrant workers born in the US didn't automatically qualify for citizenship and there isn't really an answer for if Kamala qualifies for the presidency. Thanks I hate it. Not because of any love lost to Kamala, just because I didn't know this was a thing and that others born in the US were denied citizenship. Since the severe repercussions of being stateless or not having legal standing in the place you were born, possibly even place your parents were born, is so vast I believe that humane international law would be as expansive as possible. Minimal to no exceptions to birth citizenship, no restrictions on passing parental citizenship down based on gender or age etc. I.e I remember the reason Obama's location of birth matters was because his teenage mother literally wasn't old enough to reach the "parent must have lived in the US for five years after age 15" clause the law then required in order for blood citizenship to be extended so it hinged on soil citizenship. That's insane. To this day there still are several nations not permitting citizenship to pass through the mother at all, any age. Also insane. Maybe except diplomats and a few other cases, but if you are at risk go to jail for felony theft of assault in a nation than you are clearly subject to that nation's jurisdiction. Anyway, this being hellworld and since rolling back citizenship to non-whites as much as possible is clearly a GOP project now, I would not be surprised if Trumps Supreme Court rules Kamala isn't natural born citizen. And it would be funny.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 14:58
|
|
|
It's not even going to get that far, because the Republican congress will impeach her for it and actually have a case. After they've already impeached Bare Shelves Biden that is.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 15:01
|
|
|
sombrero posted:That's the best and only thing she could come up with when campaigning to be the most powerful person in the world? LOL i mean their entire party's mo is lying about campaign promises and chiding people who mention them so a vague fart in a bag of a policy designed to make people huff patriotism and nothing else sounds about right
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 15:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 01:42 |
|
|
30.5 Days posted:lmao Yeah this lawyer just reads as insane. Exactly what specific "lack of jurisdiction" effects come from being on a temporary visa? I also always understood that line in the 14th amendment to be referring to Native Americans born on sovereign reservations, or i suppose, diplomats. I'd also believe it I guess if there's a birth midair on an internationally arriving plane that has not yet touched down. I understand that's when jurisdiction on any crimes committed in air switches, so it stands to reason birth citizenship could be similarly restricted. I could be wrong about some of those details but there's major handwaving around this "jurisdiction" issue with no concrete examples of why it matters. Those examples are insanely easy to come by for diplomats and things occurring on sovereign reservations. Pener Kropoopkin posted:It's not even going to get that far, because the Republican congress will impeach her for it and actually have a case. After they've already impeached Bare Shelves Biden that is. Ahaha, yes, thank you for the reminder. NONE of that matters at all, one bit. No need bothering to get my brains to emit some partially coherent thoughts, I should just read thread title again, & lmao. jemand has issued a correction as of 15:16 on Jan 17, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2022 15:10
|
|