|
Hillary Clinton didn't campaign in the Midwest because she's a forward-thinking political genius playing 4D chess and she didn't want the Republicans to think that her campaign thought the Midwest was vulnerable. Donald Trump campaigned in the Midwest because it made him feel good when rallies full of Midwesterners chanted "lock her up," and he won.
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 01:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 22:55 |
|
|
that prick really should have locked her up
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 01:56
|
|
|
On election day, be sure to hold your nose and vote blue no matter who! Also, that means you like them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 01:59
|
|
|
the democrat party sucks rear end
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:03
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:On election day, be sure to hold your nose and vote blue no matter who! “Biden is the better candidate because his policy decisions are less likely to kill me. He might not make progressive changes but at least I’ll be safer.” *More Americans die under Biden than Trump* Well… Nevertheless…
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:19
|
|
|
bi crimes posted:the democrat party sucks rear end https://twitter.com/Mediaite/status...ingawful.com%2F
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:25
|
|
|
they have both
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:27
|
|
|
Fame Douglas posted:"Akshually, those voters aren't worth as much as those other ones" might be a fine rationale for the electoral college, but it doesn't strengthen your argument at all.  there is no argument nincompoop, just straight facts, sorry you can't handle them
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:28
|
|
|
This is definitely true but not the way they mean it
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:44
|
|
|
quote:The former aide to Bill Clinton recounted an essay he’d read by activist and former politician Andrew Young, who had detailed the hard work he and others put into mobilizing support for civil rights legislation in the 1960s.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:49
|
|
|
Fame Douglas posted:The US electoral system being undemocratic garbage doesn't mean she wasn't popular. You're saying she should have pandered to a minority. Signing in to the ‘democrats are going to get destroyed in 2022’ thread in the year 2022 to defend Abuela’s actions in 2016, thus doing a great job showing why the democrats are going to be destroyed in 2022.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 02:56
|
|
|
gimme the GOD drat candy posted:that prick really should have locked her up
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 03:07
|
|
|
gimme the GOD drat candy posted:that prick really should have locked her up
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 03:09
|
|
|
can't criticize leaders who dont exist
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 03:26
|
|
|
Arizona famously loves MLK and never did anything weird on today
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 03:32
|
|
|
gimme the GOD drat candy posted:that prick really should have locked her up Not one but two elections in a row where the winning party talked about locking the loser up and they aren't doing it. The first president to send the losing candidate to gitmo will be god emperor for life.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 03:32
|
|
|
Fame Douglas posted:The US electoral system being undemocratic garbage doesn't mean she wasn't popular. You're saying she should have pandered to a minority. 'popular' 
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 03:32
|
|
|
the democrats
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 03:37
|
|
|
sombrero posted:That's the best and only thing she could come up with when campaigning to be the most powerful person in the world? LOL Lmao if you think the president of America is the most powerful person in the world, or even America.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 03:57
|
|
|
Homeless Friend posted:'popular' the more she opens her mouth to blame others for her shortcomings, the more popular she becomes  its also not like the voting tally was indicative of popularity for the simple fact that it was just a tally for a presidential race, not much other viable choices to really indicate popularity so conflating the popular vote with that is utter loving nonsense~
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 04:02
|
|
|
Homeless Friend posted:'popular' lol wow the benghazi hearings really did mortally wound her presidential campaign
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 04:17
|
|
|
"we need to get to work" is a wake-up call to all the elected officials people voted in to do that in 2020, right? (not me, i wrote in Bernie for president and left the downticket blank except for some city issues)
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 04:31
|
|
|
Nothus posted:lol wow the benghazi hearings really did mortally wound her presidential campaign it was a mixture of Ben Ghazi and that she is deeply unlikable and the more people see of her the less they like. people liked the idea of Hillary Clinton, not the reality
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 04:54
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1483151874224177157?s=20 this is the greatest piece of Biden media yet, and Kamala is the perfect hype woman
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 04:55
|
|
|
Homeless Friend posted:'popular' kinda interesting that even in the early clinton years with limbaugh/gingrich ascendant, she never went underwater until just before the 2016 primary debates
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 04:58
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1483151874224177157?s=20 what a loving weird take.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 04:58
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:it was a mixture of Ben Ghazi and that she is deeply unlikable and the more people see of her the less they like. people liked the idea of Hillary Clinton, not the reality i don’t particularly like the clintons but it’s also true that gop leveled their fury at her for like decades and i think it’s important to recognize that i mean also yes she was a hideous, lazy campaigner and coming down with some pneumonia or whatever didn’t help. the campaign was still lost on her moves. i say swears online posted:kinda interesting that even in the early clinton years with limbaugh/gingrich ascendant, she never went underwater until just before the 2016 primary debates true tho imo that’s because she was less of a direct threat.
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 04:58
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:what a loving weird take. whats weird about rating black men's deaths at your personal expense and political gain?  martin, listen jack, his death was a clip and run, that's a two number two, n-number one george floyd sacrificed himself *leans into mic, weird whisper* for nine minutes *increases volume* cmon man! shootemintheleg
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:02
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:what a loving weird take. MMHMM
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:02
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:Hillary campaigned on the historicity of a woman president, or at least that's the only thing her constituency really cared about. You can't expect them to devote mental energy towards things like "how causes work" or "how the electoral college works" when they're busy using their brilliant minds to craft brilliant policy 24/7
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:02
|
|
|
As a person who would actually be enacting policy HRC would be pretty much identical to Obama or Bill, so yes in theory she should probably be as popular as they are She's not, and part of that is almost certainly due to misogyny, and from the right wing calling for her head for decades which itself was partly due to misogyny, and yes that definitely isn't fair But if we chose Presidents based on what was fair or who would be the best at doing it, the Clintons wouldn't have even gotten close to it in the first place. Before you are allowed to be President you have to be good at a very specific and hosed up kind of politics, and HRC repeatedly proved that she was not, similar to how Joe Biden had to run like five times to become President and now that he finally he is President he is heralding the end of his own party as a major political entity
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:07
|
|
|
mediaphage posted:i don’t particularly like the clintons but it’s also true that gop leveled their fury at her for like decades and i think it’s important to recognize that I think that she actually did a pretty good job diminishing the effect that ridiculous slander thrown at her by the GOP had in the minds of people. What that slander did succeed at though was make her insular and secretive and paranoid, where any criticism leveled at her elicited the same response whether it be Did You Kill Seth Rich or Your Minimum Wage Plan Sucks. She lost because she was a deeply boring unapproachable person and ran entirely on further cementing the status quo and refused to even consider any ideas that weren't focus grouped extensively with her third way team of disconnected sycophants. she motivates and excites no one. Everyone saw through her ridiculous pandering. Donald Trump on the other hand is literally the exact opposite of all of those things. He leaned into scandals, just openly supported anything anyone suggested, and wanted to smash the whole system (while somehow also sustaining the part you like best). I'd be shocked if he had lost
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:10
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:I think that she actually did a pretty good job diminishing the effect that ridiculous slander thrown at her by the GOP had in the minds of people. What that slander did succeed at though was make her insular and secretive and paranoid, where any criticism leveled at her elicited the same response whether it be Did You Kill Seth Rich or Your Minimum Wage Plan Sucks. She lost because she was a deeply boring unapproachable person and ran entirely on further cementing the status quo and refused to even consider any ideas that weren't focus grouped extensively with her third way team of disconnected sycophants. she motivates and excites no one. Everyone saw through her ridiculous pandering. generally agree though i don’t know how much she mitigated anything; the people who ended up voting for her did because they were mostly never going to vote for trump anyway anyway does anyone really think she’s going to run again? honestly? i’m not sure she’s still that relevant otherwise
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:13
|
|
|
Business Gorillas posted:"we need to get to work" is a wake-up call to all the elected officials people voted in to do that in 2020, right? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:23
|
|
|
mediaphage posted:anyway does anyone really think she’s going to run again? honestly? i’m not sure she’s still that relevant otherwise i guarantee that she's surrounded herself with people who tell her she needs to run and the only reason she didn't in 2020 was fresh loser stink and the entire field of hopefuls going "gently caress OFF!" in unison
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:33
|
|
|
saying you wrote in kam in 2020 is a great way to troll khive
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:33
|
|
|
I loving hate this worthless party of feckless self-enriching shitbags so loving much. the fact they're gonna be destroyed in 2022 brings me no solace
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 05:52
|
|
|
My only incentive to vote dem is I want legal weed in Minnesota
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 06:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 22:55 |
|
|
are going to get destroyed in 2022
|
|
#
?
Jan 18, 2022 07:24
|
|