(Thread IKs:
Nuns with Guns)
|
Mokinokaro posted:The Gamera folks are well aware their movies are inherently goofy and embrace that because the movies are intended for kids more than Godzilla as I understand it. It's also kinda cool just how broad the appeal has been over the years - one got made in Denmark back in the early 60s, called Reptilicus.
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 03:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 05:17 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEVrogZOJzA grahh
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 04:01
|
|
|
I've been watching Godzilla retrospectives recently (https://www.youtube.com/c/BigActionBill) and one thing he mentions is how the Toho production teams would regularly swing between "Godzilla is a kid's movie" and "Godzilla is a serious film" until finally settling mostly on the latter past the Shōwa period.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 05:15
|
|
|
Which one did they think the Jet Jaguar team-up was?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 05:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SuedeBlade/status/1486922532267511816?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 05:53
|
|
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:It's also kinda cool just how broad the appeal has been over the years - one got made in Denmark back in the early 60s, called Reptilicus. MST3k did Reptilicus and a Korean one called Yongary as part of their Netflix revival. Both are a lot of fun.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 11:14
|
|
|
Mokinokaro posted:MST3k did Reptilicus and a Korean one called Yongary as part of their Netflix revival. Both are a lot of fun.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 11:32
|
|
|
The original MST3K did Gorgo, the British/american co production, too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 13:11
|
|
|
So how does this tie in to the DBZ YouTuber talking about the new rule they can only claim things in Japanese?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 14:19
|
|
|
Dawgstar posted:So how does this tie in to the DBZ YouTuber talking about the new rule they can only claim things in Japanese? Unfortunately ShoPro is situated outside Japan while Toei is inside Japan, so not the same situation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 16:24
|
|
|
Another update https://twitter.com/SuedeBlade/status/1487086231544496129?s=20&t=JbKnvGCPqu1DU9xyd8ubpA
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 16:42
|
|
|
So the issue here is this guy was doing youtube videos recapping the Pokemon Sword/Shield season of the anime, and the company who makes it (ShoPro) is directly legally bullying and fining him? https://twitter.com/SuedeBlade/status/1486930528196456449 That is pretty hosed up, and I guess points to how lucky Totally Not Mark was that Toei was not only going directly through Youtube's internal claims systems, but then broke the rules of the claims system when they didn't get what they wanted. I wonder if stuff like this is what Toei will resort to going forward?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 17:03
|
|
|
Nuns with Guns posted:So the issue here is this guy was doing youtube videos recapping the Pokemon Sword/Shield season of the anime, and the company who makes it (ShoPro) is directly legally bullying and fining him? Suede isn't doing videos on Sword/Shield, he's all the way back in Johto, the Gold/Silver era.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 17:18
|
|
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:Huh, I didn't know that. I'll have to look into that. Warning, comedy song if you're not into that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiJylMyfu9I
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 17:24
|
|
|
Nuns with Guns posted:So the issue here is this guy was doing youtube videos recapping the Pokemon Sword/Shield season of the anime, and the company who makes it (ShoPro) is directly legally bullying and fining him? The only way to avoid this insanity in the future is to just show absolutely nothing of the japanese property you are talking about.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 17:30
|
|
|
You'd think so, but there were multiple TotallyNotMark videos where Toei made claims despite absolutely no footage or art being included.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 18:02
|
|
|
host your own videos, people!
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 19:11
|
|
|
The solution is just kill anime.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 19:15
|
|
|
DoctorWhat posted:You'd think so, but there were multiple TotallyNotMark videos where Toei made claims despite absolutely no footage or art being included. Auralnauts mentioned once in a video that they got claimed by John Williams (or whoever represents him) for their video which was specifically about removing the score from Star Wars.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 21:31
|
|
|
fun hater posted:host your own videos, people! A totally achievable and economical thing to do. I know you have absolute seething contempt for any artist who relies on income from advertising or corporate mercy under any circumstances, and you're right that advertising is a moral and social poison and also a total pyramid scheme... but c'mon.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 22:07
|
|
|
Gonna get my own video hosting and party like it's 2009! ...It's scarcely worth it really, isn't it
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 22:27
|
|
|
brian david gilbert regales us with the greatest story ever told.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iTAkRHGbuM
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 22:31
|
|
|
DoctorWhat posted:A totally achievable and economical thing to do. I know you have absolute seething contempt for any artist who relies on income from advertising or corporate mercy under any circumstances, and you're right that advertising is a moral and social poison and also a total pyramid scheme... but c'mon.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 22:42
|
|
|
haha what posted:brian david gilbert regales us with the greatest story ever told.... Genuinely in my feelings about this one, folks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 22:46
|
|
|
DoctorWhat posted:A totally achievable and economical thing to do. I know you have absolute seething contempt for any artist who relies on income from advertising or corporate mercy under any circumstances, and you're right that advertising is a moral and social poison and also a total pyramid scheme... but c'mon. i said it p brusquely initially and off the cuff but i have a lot more sympathy for people at the center of this specific type of hell because it is almost entirely out of your hands despite the fact that people creating under fair use in their country of origin are in the right. youtube will not take a stand against any company that may jeopardize its bottom line unless they are backed into a corner. unfortunately i think we have reached the point where the options are "cheap", "easy", and "without third part interference" and we can only pick 2.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 23:44
|
|
|
We can barely pick one.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2022 23:55
|
|
|
haha what posted:brian david gilbert regales us with the greatest story ever told.... be sure to turn on subtitles, it may help you appreciate one line a bit more if you missed it
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 00:02
|
|
|
The blockchain is like the lifestream, if you think about it
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 00:44
|
|
|
DoctorWhat posted:A totally achievable and economical thing to do. I know you have absolute seething contempt for any artist who relies on income from advertising or corporate mercy under any circumstances, and you're right that advertising is a moral and social poison and also a total pyramid scheme... but c'mon. *Peggle 2 guy voice* Channel Awesome.....2!!!!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 02:38
|
|
|
It's called Nebula and it's already had a huge TERF crisis.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 02:42
|
|
|
DoctorWhat posted:We can barely pick one. Professional hat on: I can give you two. Not the cheap one. But video hosting is pretty turn-key these days.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 02:55
|
|
|
Come host on bitchute! *Opens arms to the multitude of explicit neo-nazi videos on the very front page*
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 03:10
|
|
|
I know a great site for content creators called RedTube
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 06:17
|
|
|
tracecomplete posted:Professional hat on: I can give you two. legit interested: what the ballpark for someone with 0 audience to host their own videos for a blog or something? is that a thing that can be guessed
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 06:24
|
|
|
You can pay Venmo for professional hosting. Linkara also paid for non-Youtube hosting for some of his videos as a mirror for a while.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 06:35
|
|
|
fun hater posted:legit interested: what the ballpark for someone with 0 audience to host their own videos for a blog or something? is that a thing that can be guessed Video hosting is file hosting, so if you are really basic you can just offer your videos for download rather than streaming, so basic Web hosting. And I think you can just embed them with html(or a JavaScript videoplayer), though how good that works I don't know. But since a lot of the audience is watching on phones with apps rather than browsers it might be limiting. Hel fucked around with this message at 06:58 on Jan 29, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 06:52
|
|
|
DoctorWhat posted:It's called Nebula and it's already had a huge TERF crisis. “TERF War” was right there…
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 06:58
|
|
|
fun hater posted:legit interested: what the ballpark for someone with 0 audience to host their own videos for a blog or something? is that a thing that can be guessed If nothing else, you can always use archive.org, aka the one place I was sure I could find an upload of Jan Misali's essay "Who Wrote Caramelldansen?" while that DMCA controversy was happening slash might still be happening.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 07:24
|
|
|
Embedding video for someone without much of an audience is trivial. Won't have different quality levels and whatnot out of the box, but it's not that hard. It's just <video /> tags pointing at video file on a server. Browsers can handle everything on their own. The hard part comes when the audience is no longer trivial or uses weird devices that can't decode the video. If you're using some kind of CDN, which you have to, you are looking at transfer costs of a few cents per GB. A 2GB video with 10 000 views may cost 1800€ to serve. (Extreme napkin maths here)
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 12:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 05:17 |
|
|
DoctorWhat posted:You can pay Venmo for professional hosting. Linkara also paid for non-Youtube hosting for some of his videos as a mirror for a while. Isn't that what Chuck from SF Debris has to do?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2022 12:27
|
|