|
Sandweed posted:Ubi also hosed up and used a marketplace where you can't buy anonymously so the cryptobros couldn't pump the price up with fake sales. This seems to be the same reason the GBTC trust trades at a discount to the bitcoins it holds. Turns out if you have to use your name and REAL MONEY to buy crypto, the price is complete garbage. If you get to wash trade and use "fully backed" stable coins, the price soars. WHAT COULD IT POSSIBLY MEAN?!
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 15:21 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 03:59 |
|
coelomate posted:WHAT COULD IT POSSIBLY MEAN?! Whatever it is, it's good for bitcoin.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 15:35 |
|
https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy/status/1487343389536313344
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 16:09 |
|
cheetahs never win
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 16:19 |
|
m'eth
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 16:28 |
|
Debate and/or discuss:Disruptor posted:I'm out. This place is beyond anything remotely approaching rational or constructive.
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 17:27 |
|
It's been over 10 years...
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 17:41 |
|
EorayMel posted:Debate and/or discuss: We should release an NFT of Cryptothread ragequits
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 19:26 |
|
Chalks posted:gamers just don't understand. this means you can sell your weapons for real money! sell the weapons to who, ubisoft? loving aquaman??
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 19:29 |
|
Wheany posted:sell the weapons to who, ubisoft? loving aquaman?? excuse me, aquaman wants actual weapons, not this virtual bullshit
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 19:34 |
|
Programmer Humor posted:That part got me interested into checking out the technical details of how contracts are actually stored on the chain. Surely this kind of thing could be avoided if you just took some time to read through the actual contract. actually that's not decompiled (or you'd not have meaningful names), that's the result of the contract owner submitting the source code to etherscan or some other chain explorer website, and then the website compiles the source and checks that the bytecode matches what's on the network it's not bad decompilation, it's just that the code is that confusing
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 19:57 |
|
Programmer Humor posted:That part got me interested into checking out the technical details of how contracts are actually stored on the chain. Surely this kind of thing could be avoided if you just took some time to read through the actual contract. So the end user of these tokens have no practical way of checking if the contract that they're "signing" actually is what the writer says it is? That's insane!
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 22:04 |
|
The Wisest Moron posted:So the end user of these tokens have no practical way of checking if the contract that they're "signing" actually is what the writer says it is? That's insane! You just analyse it line by line. Who here knows what #include does?
|
# ? Jan 29, 2022 22:46 |
|
The Wisest Moron posted:So the end user of these tokens have no practical way of checking if the contract that they're "signing" actually is what the writer says it is? That's insane! trustless!
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 01:55 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/Justin_Ling/status/1487578846413172740 Discuss
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 02:04 |
|
Bitcoin is the next unvaxxed sperm.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 02:12 |
|
why my towel smell like pfizer
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 02:27 |
|
Nein!
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 03:08 |
|
https://twitter.com/curator1of1/status/1487364584516239369
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 03:49 |
|
I'm betting on piss yellow and poo poo brown.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 03:52 |
|
see that monkey picture over there? i own a recipt that says that i own all the e2caa2 on it
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 03:53 |
|
This is the laziest one yet. Effectively minting one pixel images.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:04 |
|
Lol. Lmao. https://twitter.com/curator1of1/status/1487554608671117315
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:08 |
|
HappyHippo posted:This is the laziest one yet. Effectively minting one pixel images. no you don't mint an nft of a colour, you buy the rights to that colour and if any nfts that use that colour you somehow get money from it
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:10 |
|
as ever, you have to marvel at the ingenuity of monetizing something without considering if anyone would actually pay to use it
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:12 |
|
look, if you mint a photo as an nft you just have to pay like 16 million people a penny each what's the issue
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:18 |
|
today has already been pretty annoying for canadagoons stuck in the capital, like me knowing this is out there, the collision of the online bullshit I pay attention to the news bullshit I pay attention to, genuinely makes me want to become a terrorist.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:23 |
|
smart contracts: code is law, sorry for your loss https://old.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/sfz4kw/did_i_just_lose_half_a_million_dollars_by_sending/
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:32 |
|
what the gently caress is "wrapped ethereum", feel like i should've heard of it already from some twitter thread of a cryptobro complaining that his girlfriend didn't appreciate getting fake money as an anniversary present even though he wrapped it properly
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:48 |
|
njsykora posted:what the gently caress is "wrapped ethereum", feel like i should've heard of it already from some twitter thread of a cryptobro complaining that his girlfriend didn't appreciate getting fake money as an anniversary present even though he wrapped it properly
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:52 |
|
well you know how there are a zillion coins on the ethereum network like tether, elon and elontotallynotascam? eth the coin itself is in a different class than those coins so smart contracts have a harder time doing interactions between eth and all those coins so someone wrote a smart contract that converts between "real" eth and "wrapped" eth coins that follow the standard all other coins use (ERC-20) so you can do stuff like lose all your tokens AND all your eth in one single transaction basically what this dude did wrong was picking the "transfer" function call instead of the "withdraw" function call, and now the contract owns BOTH his real eth AND his wrapped fake eth
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:57 |
|
now that's the world class efficiency the block chain is known for!
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 04:58 |
|
The colors thing reminds me of a failed blockchain project a while back, when bitlords were trying to push this revolutionary new computational model, where your programs on the chain call back to other programs as building blocks, and of course pay royalties for their use, all the way back to the "programs" that supply the bytes 0-255. What was left unsaid is that ofc the founders wanted to own those programs and collect royalties for all computation anyone ever does, forever. Just the laziest, dumbest rent seeking scheme ever.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 07:04 |
|
I see that usdc has picked up the tether slack
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 07:16 |
|
quote:transaction fees for settled trades are redistributed to Color NFT owners based on the proportion of colors used in the traded NFT. they'll premine R, G, and B
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 07:20 |
|
we'll leave C, M, Y, and K to those print plebs
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 07:21 |
|
zzz posted:The colors thing reminds me of a failed blockchain project a while back, when bitlords were trying to push this revolutionary new computational model, where your programs on the chain call back to other programs as building blocks, and of course pay royalties for their use, all the way back to the "programs" that supply the bytes 0-255. no it wasn't bytes, it was individual bits, a single computer would just be asked, 1 or 0, and then it would all be combined together to form perfect blockchain generated code
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 08:01 |
|
Setting up an online marketplace where people can own unicode characters and send messages to each other and whenever they do they have to give royalties to the people who own all the characters they used. this is a revolutionary new blockchain venture in the field of monetisation. imagine, you could be the owner of the letter e and people will have to give you royalties every time they send a message using the letter e! which is something they will definitely do, a lot, because you see,
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 13:26 |
|
Hmm. Whoso owns that glyph will abhor my utilization of that facility.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 13:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 03:59 |
|
my L, a, b, coins will pwn your lousy coin gamuts
|
# ? Jan 30, 2022 14:39 |