|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKJ4Thgk1Js
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 15:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 20:17 |
|
|
BonoMan posted:Apparently part of the story is that she 'arrives' at that voice as part of her persona (since it's rumored she was faking the voice). You get glimpses of it in that trailer, but I don't think we hear it full on maybe. Not sure. Oh it's not rumored it's discussed in Bad Blood and there are clips of her normal voice. I remember thinking I was nuts during Theranos's rise because her voice was so obviously put on and none of the media ever mentioned it. I don't think it even "came out" until Bad Blood was published.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 15:20
|
|
|
Hell yes
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 15:28
|
|
|
Looking promising
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 15:45
|
|
|
First off, that is very effective trailer. drat. Second, I'm not one to notice much when it comes to differences in cameras, as far as digital vs. film, and how they shoot and all that. I just tend to not see much of a difference. But even I can see something is different about that movie. The colors are just...god drat. Especially the greens. And the way the light looks at the end of the tunnel? I'm just guessing it's digital, because that doesn't seem possible with film? But again, I don't know what I'm talking about. But that looks amazing. I need to take a class on this for fun or something, because I find it fascinating in the rare cases that I do notice it, I just have a terribly untrained eye. I've learned a little bit from YouTube channels like Movies with Mikey, but that can only take you so far. thrawn527 fucked around with this message at 16:01 on Feb 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 15:58
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59MJfJPP5eo
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 19:17
|
|
|
I'm not familiar with the story, but this looks cool! It's weird to see Zac Efron playing a dad now. Also, why didn't the trailer use the titular Prodigy song? For shame.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 20:39
|
|
|
The poster is a skull. https://twitter.com/A24/status/1491095184012378114
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 21:26
|
|
|
good lord hell yes
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 21:30
|
|
|
A24 have a preternatural gift for marketing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 21:34
|
|
|
clown shoes posted:The poster is a skull. At least it's subtle. I wonder if there's a site out there that keeps track how man "the poster is a skull's" there are out there.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 21:34
|
|
|
Rageaholic posted:I'm not familiar with the story, but this looks cool! It's weird to see Zac Efron playing a dad now. Also, why didn't the trailer use the titular Prodigy song? For shame. There is a slow and moody cover just waiting to be used too! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPI3b9iPSN0
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 21:49
|
|
|
I didn’t love Devs, and felt Annihilation was partly spectacular and partly a let down. Here’s hoping Alex Garland nails it this time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 21:56
|
|
|
For some reason every time I read Alex Garland I think Andrew Niccol. It means that the way my brain processes any news of a new Garland project is: I get excited because it's something from the creator of Gattaca, disappointed because I remember what his careers was like after Gattaca, then excited again because I remember who the news is actually about.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 22:29
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:For some reason every time I read Alex Garland I think Andrew Niccol. It means that the way my brain processes any news of a new Garland project is: I get excited because it's something from the creator of Gattaca, disappointed because I remember what his careers was like after Gattaca, then excited again because I remember who the news is actually about. I liked Lord of War
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 22:40
|
|
|
Rageaholic posted:I'm not familiar with the story, but this looks cool! It's weird to see Zac Efron playing a dad now. Also, why didn't the trailer use the titular Prodigy song? For shame. As someone born within a month of Drew Barrymore I feel it is important to share this 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 22:49
|
|
|
BonoMan posted:I wonder if there's a site out there that keeps track how man "the poster is a skull's" there are out there. When in doubt, check letterboxd - https://letterboxd.com/dahveedgr/list/movie-posters-skulls/ e: that one has all skull related posters it seems, this one is just hidden but maybe misses some https://letterboxd.com/scarylibrary/list/movie-posters-with-hidden-skulls/
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 22:57
|
|
|
EL BROMANCE posted:When in doubt, check letterboxd - https://letterboxd.com/dahveedgr/list/movie-posters-skulls/ Wow. Sometimes the internet works for good.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 23:25
|
|
|
Letterboxd is the only good pure website on the internet
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 23:33
|
|
|
lol it's missing two that I have personally worked on http://www.impawards.com/2012/posters/chernobyl_diaries_ver2.jpg kiimo fucked around with this message at 23:39 on Feb 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2022 23:36
|
|
|
kiimo posted:lol it's missing two that I have personally worked on Gorgeous.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 00:02
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:I didn’t love Devs, and felt Annihilation was partly spectacular and partly a let down. Here’s hoping Alex Garland nails it this time. That initial Annihilation teaser made me buy the books which are just wonderful. The movie was… not.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 01:33
|
|
|
I love the movie, but I didn't at first. I'm glad it went for something a bit different than the books.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 01:47
|
|
|
Funny. I bought the trilogy immediately after watching the movie.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 03:50
|
|
|
ozmunkeh posted:That initial Annihilation teaser made me buy the books which are just wonderful. The movie was… not. i found the one person who doesn't like Annihilation what the heck. that movie owns
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 04:34
|
|
|
BeanpolePeckerwood posted:I love the movie, but I didn't at first. I'm glad it went for something a bit different than the books. So much of the book is nearly unfilmable but the film really nails the atmosphere and weirdness of the book in its own way without needing to be a faithful adaptation. The same goes for Under the Skin.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 04:36
|
|
|
precision posted:i found the one person who doesn't like Annihilation I, too, did not like Annihilation.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 04:38
|
|
|
Cacator posted:So much of the book is nearly unfilmable but the film really nails the atmosphere and weirdness of the book in its own way without needing to be a faithful adaptation. The same goes for Under the Skin. Yeah I loved the books. But they are very sort of... lovecraftian in that way they are intentionally written to describe things unimaginable. I thought Annihilation was a fantastic reimagining of the Southern Reach Trilogy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 04:44
|
|
|
Annihilation seemed pretty cold and uninvolving and the characters were just there to be take out one by one. It's the same reason why I generally don't like slasher movies. But it was cool the slasher in the movie was basically not understandable. And it did look hella good. Maybe I should give it a rewatch
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 08:29
|
|
|
Annihilation was a good, but not great movie. Which is a far cry away from a bad movie, but many fans of the books consider them great, so it’s ultimately tinged by a feeling of disappointment that’s hard to shake.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 09:00
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb5ELWi-ekk
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:23
|
|
|
God dammit. That actually looks pretty good. The last one was sooooo loving bad, though. Like, irredeemably bad. edit: I have to remember that this is how Jurassic Park always gets me. They cut a good trailer, and they gently caress me over with the actual movie. Original movie excluded, of course.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:25
|
|
|
thrawn527 posted:God dammit. That actually looks pretty good. How the end of the 2nd one leads to… this will be fun to see them try to explain.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:26
|
|
|
It sucks that looks fun. I hope it has the same idiotic mean energy of the first
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:26
|
|
|
Maybe they'll just pull a Cars 3 and pretend that 2 doesn't exist.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:30
|
|
|
This one is clearly because of 2 lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:30
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:This one is clearly because of 2 lol Well I mean find a different way to explain how the dinosaurs got out of course. Some sort of prologue that just erases 2.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:31
|
|
|
Nah. I think it’s cowardly to erase a previous film. Get creative and deal with it
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:34
|
|
|
Are the kids back too?
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 15:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 20:17 |
|
|
It's probably due to my absolutely loathing of the first JW movie (and as a result, not bothering with the second) as well as my bias that these things work best as tense horror movies rather than dumb action movies, but that does not look good to me. I'd be happy for it to turn out great so I could go enjoy a neat dinosaur movie, though.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 16:00
|
|