|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:What about it reads like a confession? Ah, I misunderstood psk31 and am posting from a nice bubble bath ☺️ And this is a perfect snipe, gently caress you
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 18:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 11:17 |
|
|
Radio stuff is just all craziness and I'm glad I don't have to deal with any of it. Speaking of SDR, I can't wait for some spyware to be found creating adhoc c&c networks over licensed bands. It's going to happen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 18:32
|
|
|
RFC2324 posted:Ah, I misunderstood psk31 and am posting from a nice bubble bath ☺️  Now I want a bubble bath. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 18:51
|
|
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:Ah, you thought it was something like ROT13? I just parsed psk as 'preshared key' which implies encryption to me. Also, I recommend. I tried the dr teals elderberry stuff and it smells so nice
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 18:58
|
|
|
I suppose if you used a digital signature on your messages, you could ensure that they were all authentic while they were all still sent in the clear. Other people receiving the signal could also ensure they were authentic if the public keys were available to them. Not sure if that meets the letter of the law but would make me feel better if I had to go that way.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 19:18
|
|
|
Guy Axlerod posted:I suppose if you used a digital signature on your messages, you could ensure that they were all authentic while they were all still sent in the clear. Other people receiving the signal could also ensure they were authentic if the public keys were available to them. Not sure if that meets the letter of the law but would make me feel better if I had to go that way. This was literally a conversation I had with someone trying to say Blockchain can do this... Or it can be a document that proves, say, you own your car or house. He could not explain how it would be better than gpg, or how the latter was better thanthe current system of "i have a piece of paper, and the state has records" other than "omg government in my affairs!!!" Small defense, hes only 23, but drat
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 19:29
|
|
|
It's more useful in real time stuff if you have a public system of trust that you can check it against that is faster than submitting a request to the government but we have that too and it's called ssl certs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 19:36
|
|
|
Guy Axlerod posted:I suppose if you used a digital signature on your messages, you could ensure that they were all authentic while they were all still sent in the clear. Other people receiving the signal could also ensure they were authentic if the public keys were available to them. Not sure if that meets the letter of the law but would make me feel better if I had to go that way. That's what PADES does for files or eidas for messages and is the standard in most European countries
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2022 19:49
|
|
|
Got another Have I Been Pwned notification. Looks like its just old stuff recycled.
Pablo Bluth fucked around with this message at 15:03 on Feb 15, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2022 20:51
|
|
|
At least it didnt faill into the hands of the sadness-team. That would be way worse.
|
|
#
?
Feb 14, 2022 22:45
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/zebpalmer/status/1492742757185556483?s=21 happy monday
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 01:42
|
|
|
PoC||GTFO 0x21.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 17:56
|
|
|
Maybe some context on what's in that 60MB PDF?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 18:01
|
|
|
it's poc or gtfo. it's gonna have some cool exploits in it ranging from "writing up a novel thing" to basically CS research. if that's the sort of thing that interests you, click on it and wait 90 seconds and then look at the table of contents
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 18:11
|
|
|
It's also a ZIP file, and a PCAP-NG packet capture. A summary of the summary:
And these three I'm just going to quote verbatum, because they're actually wizardry: quote:Suppose that you have a bit of raw firmware that
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 18:18
|
|
|
Achmed Jones posted:it's poc or gtfo. it's gonna have some cool exploits in it ranging from "writing up a novel thing" to basically CS research. if that's the sort of thing that interests you, click on it and wait 90 seconds and then look at the table of contents Oh it's like a magazine. Wanted to make sure it wasn't an actual POC of a turing-complete PDF that's going to steal my bank account info and send it to the mods.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 18:19
|
|
|
Its a zine OP
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 19:14
|
|
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:
Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 19:24
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:Its a zine OP What is this, 1997?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 19:27
|
|
|
tagesschau posted:Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should.  KillHour posted:What is this, 1997?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 19:35
|
|
|
BlankSystemDaemon posted:Science doesn't know the meaning of should. "Should we do this?" is only asked if the answer needs to be "yes, because it will secure us more funding".
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 20:19
|
|
|
tagesschau posted:Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should. generally speaking I think people intend to refer to
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 21:30
|
|
|
KillHour posted:What is this, 1997? What, you don't like fun?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 21:41
|
|
|
And now for peak comedy: https://twitter.com/web3isgreat/status/1493640197732458505?s=20&t=z5P5k5hwtjIxqkk8Xk8Wbw
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 22:12
|
|
|
How is that different from someone buying up 51% of your stocks and declaring themselves director of the board? I mean, other than the fact that real companies try to prevent that from happening.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 22:25
|
|
|
KillHour posted:How is that different from someone buying up 51% of your stocks and declaring themselves director of the board? I mean, other than the fact that real companies try to prevent that from happening. DAO's assume the code cannot be wrong, so if the code is okay with it, its okay. Because nobody EVER exploits code.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 22:29
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:DAO's assume the code cannot be wrong, so if the code is okay with it, its okay. Right, but that's how laws / company charters work too. Laws have exploits - they're called loopholes. It's just that those things are slow and actually have humans to both write and interpret them. It's kind of like HFT, except now with legal frameworks (or in this case, self-governing rules). I'm not saying it's not loving dumb. I'm just saying it's not new, outside of the normal trope of "x but with computers" Edit: It's almost like we shouldn't be inventing ways of making extremely important things happen so fast that nobody can possibly understand what is happening as it's happening. Double edit: This is also why in every Corporate-Libertarian Dystopia, corporations have their own police force to shoot anyone trying this poo poo. Triple edit: BRB, founding a company where if you can find all 9 of the phylacteries I've hidden around the world behind cryptic puzzles, you become the CEO for no apparent reason other than it sounds cool. KillHour fucked around with this message at 22:38 on Feb 16, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 22:32
|
|
|
DAOs need to hire cryptobouncers, easy peasy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 22:41
|
|
|
When the gently caress did libertarians secretly win and found a new reality where laws and regulations don't matter as long as you can say "but it's different because computers"?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 22:45
|
|
|
KillHour posted:When the gently caress did libertarians secretly win and found a new reality where laws and regulations don't matter as long as you can say "but it's different because computers"? 1980ish, give or take a decade
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 22:48
|
|
|
KillHour posted:Right, but that's how laws / company charters work too. Laws have exploits - they're called loopholes. It's just that those things are slow and actually have humans to both write and interpret them. It's kind of like HFT, except now with legal frameworks (or in this case, self-governing rules). if you want to do this with a law or a company charter you have to put your real name on the record, and you can't take the cash you stole by doing it and immediately launder it for free with a service built into the economy for that explicit purpose who are you going to shoot? the guy doing this is just a hexadecimal code if he wants to be
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 22:55
|
|
|
Cup Runneth Over posted:if you want to do this with a law or a company charter you have to put your real name on the record, and you can't take the cash you stole by doing it and immediately launder it for free with a service built into the economy for that explicit purpose Give it time - IBM's Corporate Security division will get your information from Facebook as part of their data sharing agreement so they can figure out you're the xxWeedlordBonerHitlerxx who stole their money and raid your lovely capsule apartment.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:02
|
|
|
KillHour posted:Give it time - IBM's Corporate Security division will get your information from Facebook as part of their data sharing agreement so they can figure out you're the xxWeedlordBonerHitlerxx who stole their money and raid your lovely capsule apartment. You're not getting it man. You can make a new crypto wallet address whenever you want and it only has a funny name like that if you give it one. Anonymity is literally built into the platform, it was part of the whole point. That includes anonymity in taking over your dumbass decentralized organization by literally buying votes, and then draining all its accounts. There's no one to go after, they don't even have to live in your country. They run it through a mixer and then twenty fresh new wallets and then send it to a cartel in exchange for a dozen crates of AKs they resell on the black market. Good luck finding them. But as crypto nuts are so fond of defending the buying-votes thing with, if they invested that money into your DAO to buy the governance tokens then why shouldn't they have a bigger say in what it does than you? There's no problem here because it was clearly the will of the organization to give all its money to that guy. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:23
|
|
|
I thought mixers were generally ineffective at hiding meaningful transfers. Have they gotten better?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:25
|
|
|
Cup Runneth Over posted:You're not getting it man. You can make a new crypto wallet address whenever you want and it only has a funny name like that if you give it one. Anonymity is literally built into the platform, it was part of the whole point. That includes anonymity in taking over your dumbass decentralized organization by literally buying votes, and then draining all its accounts. There's no one to go after, they don't even have to live in your country. They run it through a mixer and then twenty fresh new wallets and then send it to a cartel in exchange for a dozen crates of AKs they resell on the black market. Good luck finding them. Yeah except for all the companies that you have to trust to make that security happen. Your browser, your OS, your ISP, your SSL cert provider.... In our future dystopia, everyone will have all the dirt on you, don't worry.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:36
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:I thought mixers were generally ineffective at hiding meaningful transfers. Have they gotten better? AFAIK from the article I read it's not super effective laundering, you're still able to track whether currency is "dirty" if you try hard enough and banks won't take it, but it's nonetheless hilarious that money laundering is just a free service built into the currency. Anyway, that's why you trade it to the cartel for tangible goods instead of selling it on an exchange. Eventually it will end up with some sucker who didn't know any better and they will be unable to get rid of it. https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/skxpr7/blockfi_horrible_loan_experience_fortune_lost/ KillHour posted:Yeah except for all the companies that you have to trust to make that security happen. Your browser, your OS, your ISP, your SSL cert provider.... The Internet (and probably our species) will go extinct long before that happens, which probably won't be that long.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:37
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:I thought mixers were generally ineffective at hiding meaningful transfers. Have they gotten better? The biggest ones have gotten better, and they aren't the ones that are based on dumb smart contracts and funny money in, funny money out on a fixed schedule later, blah blah blah The effective, large mixers are in eastern europe, they're integrated with organized crime, and they require a conventional, real-world trust relationship. Bear in mind that these are large modern criminal services and their methodologies aren't going to be public. Potato Salad fucked around with this message at 23:43 on Feb 16, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:40
|
|
|
Ransomware is truly becoming a last-gen game the more and more money gets pumped into the crypto sphere. Why hold data hostage in exchange for money when you can just take the money directly, and no one can do anything about it? Cybergangs are gonna get in on this, mark my words.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:43
|
|
|
Swapping your dirty bitcoins for someone else's dirty bitcoins doesn't seem like it actually helps unless you're such a small-timer that law enforcement doesn't actually care to investigate. The feds were able to trace the bitcoins from the bitfinex hack even though they went through a whole bunch of mixers, exchanges, and other cryptocurrencies (including supposed privacy coins).
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 11:17 |
|
|
The Bitfinex cash--fiat--was also laundered by stupid people lacking the sense or connections to do it right. Had they approached Deutsche Bank, they'd be unencumbered by legal trouble right now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 23:51
|
|