|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:What was the LA market rating They didn’t make the top 10.
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 20:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 08:17 |
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:They didn’t make the top 10. Clearly the NFL needs a Chargers/Rams Super Bowl.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 20:42
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Clearly the NFL needs a Chargers/Rams Super Bowl. Cowboys / Patriots
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 20:54
|
|
|
Cincinnati — 46.1/84 Detroit — 45.9/79 Pittsburgh — 45.6/74 Columbus — 45.4/80 Kansas City — 44.6/76 Milwaukee — 44.0/75 Cleveland — 44.0/78 Boston — 42.6/74 Philadelphia — 42.3/71 Jacksonville — 41.3/73 Los Angeles — 36.7/77 I work remotely for an LA based company and I was the only one in my 8 person team who watched the Super Bowl. I'm in Seattle.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 21:00
|
|
|
It was like 85 degrees in LA on Sunday. Beach day.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 21:04
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:It was like 85 degrees in LA on Sunday. Beach day. I like the mid day west coast Super Bowls but the time can't help too
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 21:14
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:They didn’t make the top 10. It's not like the Raiders were playing, let's be fair
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 21:33
|
|
|
The nfl being so horny for the LA marketshare always makes me think of college conferences taking in North east schools lime rutgers, Boston college, etc thinking that'll break them into the north east/new York market and jokes on them there is no market to be had. The north east doesn't care about college football, at all.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 22:42
|
|
|
Getting 36.7% of LA is probably more people than 46.1% of Cinci in absolute numbers.
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 22:50
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:Getting 36.7% of LA is probably more people than 46.1% of Cinci in absolute numbers. 'probably' lol. no doubt whatsoever about that one. although I'm not sure that's how you read those ratings numbers, like what is the second number? either way, according to reports it was the most-watched super bowl in five years. not quite as record-breaking as I kind of expected but pretty drat good still
|
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 23:25
|
|
|
Play posted:'probably' lol. no doubt whatsoever about that one. The first number, the rating, is the fraction of households watching broadcast x. The second, the share, is the fraction of households with a tv on that were watching broadcast x. Share is always higher than rating. Especially for things like super bowls where people get together to watch them. go for a stroll fucked around with this message at 23:46 on Feb 15, 2022 |
|
#
?
Feb 15, 2022 23:43
|
|
|
go for a stroll posted:The first number, the rating, is the fraction of households watching broadcast x. The second, the share, is the fraction of households with a tv on that were watching broadcast x. Share is always higher than rating. Especially for things like super bowls where people get together to watch them. So if you went by share alone LA would be in fifth, not bad. And share seems to make more sense as a rating because it's basically how well did the program compete against people that were actually watching TV at all.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 00:01
|
|
|
Pretty good for two no-name quarterbacks
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 00:42
|
|
|
Didn’t the rating in LA go down in 2022 compared to 2019?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 00:57
|
|
|
King Hong Kong posted:Didn’t the rating in LA go down in 2022 compared to 2019? patriots weren't in it this time
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 01:20
|
|
|
HappyHippo posted:Getting 36.7% of LA is probably more people than 46.1% of Cinci in absolute numbers. Of course it is but no one has ever measured ratings this way.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 01:35
|
|
|
of course they do, advertisers care about the total number of eyeballs seeing a commercial, which is why people always speculate about leagues rigging things in favor of large markets
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 01:39
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Of course it is but no one has ever measured ratings this way. Yes but the NFL cares about total viewership for the purposes of selling ads, so it's not exactly a failure as far as they're concerned to only get that share in such a large market. Of course I'm sure they'd like even more.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 01:42
|
|
|
Ok, a better point to figure out then. Was this super bowl played in LA featuring an LA team measurably more watched than any other Super Bowl within the LA market?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 01:49
|
|
|
It's still crazy to me and apparently only me how that last desperation throw for Burrow while being spun around and dragged to the ground by a monster almost worked for a first down. For a given version of almost at least, like it had no business even going in sort of the right direction.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:03
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:It's still crazy to me and apparently only me how that last desperation throw for Burrow while being spun around and dragged to the ground by a monster almost worked for a first down. for a fraction of a second I thought the nearby guy would catch it too
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:17
|
|
|
I’m not sure what the “b-b-but the market share!” stuff is supposed to signify, really. Kroenke got his stadium and another ring, and the NFL got to go all-in on associating the glitz and glam of Hollywood with their brand. I doubt either of them are fretting about only pulling 36% of Angelenos.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:20
|
|
|
Freaquency posted:I’m not sure what the “b-b-but the market share!” stuff is supposed to signify, really. Kroenke got his stadium and another ring, and the NFL got to go all-in on associating the glitz and glam of Hollywood with their brand. I doubt either of them are fretting about only pulling 36% of Angelenos. This is a league that stresses the gently caress out over getting only most of the money instead of all of the money so yes they care.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:22
|
|
|
Whatever you say I guess. I haven’t seen anything that makes me think the NFL saw this as anything but a win and it seems more like some weird complex where you want to see the NFL lose out big on the move to LA, but maybe Goodell is actually sweating bullets about this and it’s all about to collapse. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:27
|
|
|
And for the record gently caress both Stan Kroenke and the NFL
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:28
|
|
|
It’s funny that the NFL isn’t as successful as it almost certainly has hoped.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:34
|
|
|
Was there any news on Burrow’s injury?
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:35
|
|
|
Henrik Zetterberg posted:Was there any news on Burrow’s injury? He died of a broken heart
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:35
|
|
|
Henrik Zetterberg posted:Was there any news on Burrow’s injury? He still lives in Ohio.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:37
|
|
|
Henrik Zetterberg posted:Was there any news on Burrow’s injury? Reports on NFL Network are that he won’t need surgery.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 02:47
|
|
|
Henrik Zetterberg posted:Was there any news on Burrow’s injury? The Burrow cannot fail, he can only be failed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 03:01
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:It's still crazy to me and apparently only me how that last desperation throw for Burrow while being spun around and dragged to the ground by a monster almost worked for a first down. I bet Joe Mixon would have been able to make a play on it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 03:20
|
|
|
I don’t disagree at all with the approach on 2nd and 3rd down but I can’t for the life of me understand why the 4th down call was a straight up drop back pass.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 04:24
|
|
|
Just like the 2011 Super Bowl where Brady clearly injured his non throwing shoulder and was not quite himself the rest of the game Burrow hurt his knee and while not bad enough to take him out of the game hosed him enough to limit that last drive.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 04:33
|
|
|
Cthulu Carl posted:The Burrow cannot fail, he can only be failed. Specifically by his O line.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 04:50
|
|
|
davecrazy posted:Just like the 2011 Super Bowl where Brady clearly injured his non throwing shoulder and was not quite himself the rest of the game Burrow hurt his knee and while not bad enough to take him out of the game hosed him enough to limit that last drive. Christ I thought I was the only person on earth to remember that this happened. Brady started the game 20/23 199 yards and 2 TDs 0 INTs. Then took a bad sack and the offense didn’t score another point.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 05:23
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:I don’t disagree at all with the approach on 2nd and 3rd down but I can’t for the life of me understand why the 4th down call was a straight up drop back pass. It was a shotgun pass.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 05:51
|
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Christ I thought I was the only person on earth to remember that this happened. Brady started the game 20/23 199 yards and 2 TDs 0 INTs. Then took a bad sack and the offense didn’t score another point. https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/16/brady-played-down-the-stretch-in-2011-with-separated-left-shoulder/ Apparently he injured it week 16 then Tuck crunched him in the Super Bowl and that was that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 05:58
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:It was a shotgun pass. Oh you’re right. Well that’s even dumber unless there was a QB draw as an option that simply got blown up by the Rams d-line.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 06:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 08:17 |
|
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Oh you’re right. Well that’s even dumber unless there was a QB draw as an option that simply got blown up by the Rams d-line. Burrow’s leg was hosed up.
|
|
#
?
Feb 16, 2022 06:09
|
|