Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Barrel Cactaur
Oct 6, 2021

SaTaMaS posted:

What are cap-and-trade fantasies?

The Neolib version of bringing freedom to EE in the 90s through capital investment and free trade. Democracy sold separately batteries not included.

It's the idea that markets define society rather than being an outgrowth of it, and so installing top level economic neoliberal capitalism would transform EE into the western Europe in the 50s and cure all those problems. Instead it made authoritarian oligarchy because government institutions were very weak.

As to the rest of it there's been an eternal line of Russia whisperers who until December we're always wrong.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Blurred
Aug 26, 2004

WELL I WONNER WHAT IT'S LIIIIIKE TO BE A GOOD POSTER

Shes Not Impressed posted:

Ukrainian Ambassador to UN speaking now at general assembly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2MoQnBYCqU

Wow, he is really going for it here, explicitly comparing Russia to the Third Reich.

He used a line something like, "if the leader of Russia wants to kill himself, he doesn't need to use nuclear weapons. He can follow the example of the guy in Berlin, May 1945".

EDIT: Now questioning the legitimacy of the ascension of Russia as successor to the Soviet Union to the UNSC.

Blurred fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Feb 28, 2022

Algol Star
Sep 6, 2010

Alchenar posted:

This is a really long thread but I think unfortunately has it right:

https://twitter.com/defencewithac/status/1498199000733949963

Sorry to bring this guy up again but I thought it was essentially open knowledge and widely accepted now that the purpose of this invasion is nothing to do with securing borders against NATO or buffer zones, but it's essentially purely imperialistic? That Putin thinks the tsarist empire is the goal they should be shooting for and that Ukraine is Russia and has no business being its own country. Its quite an important assumption because you can't predict how the Russians are going to proceed / how the war will go without this and a lot of his predictions go against a Russian goal of acquiring the entirity of Ukraine. The territorial acquisitions he states would be a strategic loss for Russia especially now that the rest of Ukraine will be pushed further away from them. Its also hard to say how the war is going for Russia without thinking of their goals, if the aim really is to absorb Ukraine the war is going horribly and probably self defeating long term. If they just wanted a land corridor or a buffer zone then they may be doing fine despite underperforming. I have no qualifications either though so I may be talking out of my rear end.

Also I'll take his economic predictions with a grain of salt given he is a brexiteer who thinks brexit has been a smashing economic success.

distortion park
Apr 25, 2011


Alchenar posted:

Okay here's a thing that give a little bit of hope: it makes absolutely no sense for Ukraine to be targetting Buks unless they have some aspiration for exploiting the resulting degredation in anti-air capabilities.

Could also be that they are just super expensive bits of hardware. I can't find costs online but am confident they are orders of magnitude more expensive than any other set of vehicles in the Russian battle groups.


I'm sure there's a good reason but I don't get why the drones are able to get so close. Are they too small to be visible to the radars on these sorts of anti air systems?

Shifty Pony
Dec 28, 2004

Up ta somethin'


fatherboxx posted:

Long insurgency (which is guaranteed with massive arms shipments through Polish border) on top of economy in freefall is a nightmare scenario so I dont think map painting would make anyone in Russian command happy.

That's what kind of got me about the tweet saying that non-mechanized units with man portable AT systems are only good for sitting there and getting wiped out. Perhaps in a straight up battle but in an overall conflict the prospect of thousands of easily concealable weapons that lets anyone within half a kilometer (or two kilometers for the javelin) turn one of your vehicles (front line or support, AT rockets work fantastically against fuel carriers) into scrap if your soldiers drop their guard for less than four seconds is terrifying. You cannot secure against it.

ronya
Nov 8, 2010

I'm the normal one.

You hate ridden fucks will regret your words when you eventually grow up.

Peace.
An argument:

https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch/status/1498189698858205184

by the author of this earlier thread:

https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch/status/1473362460673515527

Trump
Jul 16, 2003

Cute

Shifty Pony posted:

That's what kind of got me about the tweet saying that non-mechanized units with man portable AT systems are only good for sitting there and getting wiped out. Perhaps in a straight up battle but in an overall conflict the prospect of thousands of easily concealable weapons that lets anyone within half a kilometer (or two kilometers for the javelin) turn one of your vehicles (front line or support, AT rockets work fantastically against fuel carriers) into scrap if your soldiers drop their guard for less than four seconds is terrifying. You cannot secure against it.

They've been having a hard time utilizing them because of the insane mud in many areas. That makes them easy targets or abandoned.

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


Ukrainian UN ambassador bringing up the legitimacy of the Russian Federation to the entire general assembly and if they were voted in in 1991 lol

Heliosicle
May 16, 2013

Arigato, Racists.

SaTaMaS posted:

What are cap-and-trade fantasies?

Google translates it to:

"And finally, the most important thing. An armed conflict with Ukraine is currently fundamentally not in Russia's national interests. Therefore, it is best for some overexcited Russian experts to forget about their hatred fantasies. And in order to prevent further reputational losses, never remember again."

No idea if that's more correct than cap-and-trade though.

JerikTelorian
Jan 19, 2007



Blurred posted:

Wow, he is really going for it here, explicitly comparing Russia to the Third Reich.

He used a line something like, "if the leader of Russia wants to kill himself, he doesn't need to use nuclear weapons. He can follow the example of the guy in Berlin, May 1945".

EDIT: Now questioning the legitimacy of the ascension of Russia as successor to the Soviet Union to the UNSC.

And now we're getting the "Russia isn't actually a valid member of the UN and shouldn't be considered the continuation state for their UNSC seat"

Interested to see how the Russian delegation responds

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1498323686495039489?s=20&t=bpnmVhkBPNnkN-tQ8TQ6iw

https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1498324120425189388?s=20&t=bpnmVhkBPNnkN-tQ8TQ6iw

"Putin must continue to refuse a ceasefire. Here's why:" energy

Sir Bobert Fishbone
Jan 16, 2006

Beebort

JerikTelorian posted:

And now we're getting the "Russia isn't actually a valid member of the UN and shouldn't be considered the continuation state for their UNSC seat"

Interested to see how the Russian delegation responds

He's raised that point in a couple of the UNSC meetings last week, too. I think the RU ambassador has generally just ignored it.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

The acoup blog guy is also tweeting
Oh, thanks! This one really hits it on the head.

https://twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1498177599553605632

Framboise posted:

I really hate that loving Marco Rubio is one of the more accurate sources of information right now.
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > (CW: War) Ukraine v Russia: I hate that loving Marco Rubio is an accurate source of info right now

SaTaMaS
Apr 18, 2003

distortion park posted:

Could also be that they are just super expensive bits of hardware. I can't find costs online but am confident they are orders of magnitude more expensive than any other set of vehicles in the Russian battle groups.


I'm sure there's a good reason but I don't get why the drones are able to get so close. Are they too small to be visible to the radars on these sorts of anti air systems?

Drones were able to get past Oerlikon GDF Skyguard and Patriot missile systems to attack the Saudi Aramco oil facilities in Saudi Arabia.

El Grillo
Jan 3, 2008
Fun Shoe

distortion park posted:

I'm sure there's a good reason but I don't get why the drones are able to get so close. Are they too small to be visible to the radars on these sorts of anti air systems?
Yeah I'm pretty interested in this too.

Also would be interesting to know how many of those kinds of drones Ukr has. The news is reporting that there's a 3km long line of armour almost at Kyiv. No word yet on whether there have been major attempts to stop the advance with air power but I suppose we assume they would be doing that.

ZombieLenin
Sep 6, 2009

"Democracy for the insignificant minority, democracy for the rich--that is the democracy of capitalist society." VI Lenin


[/quote]
Holy gently caress, listening to the Ukrainian UN ambassador read the text message taken off the phone of a Russian soldier who was KIA was moving.

This poo poo is a disaster just as much for those Russian soldiers as it is for the Ukrainians. There are a lot, and there are going to be even more, grieving people in Russia right now.

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

Imagine trying to negotiate with nekulturny Ukrainians. Impossible!

https://twitter.com/francska1/status/1498276394849218561?cxt=HHwWgsC5payc-copAAAA

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Shes Not Impressed posted:

Ukrainian UN ambassador bringing up the legitimacy of the Russian Federation to the entire general assembly and if they were voted in in 1991 lol

yeah they were laying the groundwork for this last week/over the weekend

nobody ever officially approved russia as the heir to the ussr seat, everyone just assumed it was

that said its funny but the point of the security council vetos is basically "does this country have the actual power to tell the rest of the security council to go gently caress itself, so we shouldn't pass resolutions that cannot be enforced" not "is this a good and deserving country" and russia's nuclear arsenal says it does have the ability to ignore the rest of the council (as the inability of nato to directly intervene shows), so realistically it should keep the seat

William Bear
Oct 26, 2012

"That's what they all say!"

JerikTelorian posted:

And now we're getting the "Russia isn't actually a valid member of the UN and shouldn't be considered the continuation state for their UNSC seat"

Interested to see how the Russian delegation responds

This is a pretty silly argument (what is Ukraine's position on the French 5th Republic as successor state to the French 4th Republic?), but it's sure to annoy Russian diplomats.

distortion park
Apr 25, 2011


El Grillo posted:

Yeah I'm pretty interested in this too.

Also would be interesting to know how many of those kinds of drones Ukr has. The news is reporting that there's a 3km long line of armour almost at Kyiv. No word yet on whether there have been major attempts to stop the advance with air power but I suppose we assume they would be doing that.

At least 18 according to Wikipedia. Wonder if Turkey have shipped them some more.

Idk if this is an accurate representation but pretty lol at the crying about the economics
https://twitter.com/VeraMBergen/status/1498322250189217796?t=qaqOSqyl0bQ9-u8CElY1Eg&s=19

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



Sir Bobert Fishbone posted:

He's raised that point in a couple of the UNSC meetings last week, too. I think the RU ambassador has generally just ignored it.

yeah it has real One Weird Trick energy, when I last checked most of the Professional Diplomat Types online are like "you know, it's an interesting argument and international law is really complicated, but..."

Pook Good Mook
Aug 6, 2013


ENFORCE THE UNITED STATES DRESS CODE AT ALL COSTS!

This message paid for by the Men's Wearhouse& Jos A Bank Lobbying Group

William Bear posted:

This is a pretty silly argument (what is Ukraine's position on the French 5th Republic as successor state to the French 4th Republic?), but it's sure to annoy Russian diplomats.

I assumed they weren't making this argument in seriousness, basically to piss off Russians who are claiming rights to Ukraine based on the empire of the loving Romanovs.

Youth Decay
Aug 18, 2015

Ynglaur posted:

Oh, thanks! This one really hits it on the head.

https://twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1498177599553605632

Horses are better at moving through mud than tanks and trucks. The Polish cavalry shall have its revenge!

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


eke out posted:

yeah it has real One Weird Trick energy, when I last checked most of the Professional Diplomat Types online are like "you know, it's an interesting argument and international law is really complicated, but..."

It's catnip to poli sci/ international affairs people like me.

Aramis
Sep 22, 2009



the popes toes posted:

Imagine trying to negotiate with nekulturny Ukrainians. Impossible!

https://twitter.com/francska1/status/1498276394849218561?cxt=HHwWgsC5payc-copAAAA


Cookie-cutter clean-shaven business men in suits (with matching ties!) being an ideal representation of "culture" and "tradition of statehood" is some Jason Patrick Bateman poo poo.

Aramis fucked around with this message at 17:01 on Feb 28, 2022

JerikTelorian
Jan 19, 2007



eke out posted:

yeah it has real One Weird Trick energy, when I last checked most of the Professional Diplomat Types online are like "you know, it's an interesting argument and international law is really complicated, but..."

Yeah I can't imagine that it matters much; 30 years of tacitly accepting it is I think support enough. Still, it has to rankle people.

The Russian Ambassador is flying. This translator is doin work trying to keep up.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch/status/1498294142841020421

he is a good follow.


Ynglaur posted:

Oh, thanks! This one really hits it on the head.

https://twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1498177599553605632

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > (CW: War) Ukraine v Russia: I hate that loving Marco Rubio is an accurate source of info right now

yeah. like shits nuts.

D34THROW
Jan 29, 2012

RETAIL RETAIL LISTEN TO ME BITCH ABOUT RETAIL
:rant:

If Ukraine demilitarizes, what's to stop Big Daddy Vladdy from coming in three or four years down the road, once it's complete, and saying, "Yeah, this is ours now. No more Ukraine, is Mother Russia once more."


EDIT: Real poo poo, I think the only reason Putin is being such a hardass on this "security" bullshit is so that he can accuse Ukraine of being unreasonable and point to the refusal to "denazify" (:psyduck:) as evidence of Nazis in the Ukrainian government. Then he can continue this farce and say he just wants to denazify Ukraine himself.

I can't wrap my brain around his thought processes. I'm trying. I just fuckin' can't.

D34THROW fucked around with this message at 16:58 on Feb 28, 2022

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?
https://twitter.com/antiputler_news/status/1498303748392771588?s=20&t=ekf468M42fxmPYguakV6PA

NTRabbit
Aug 15, 2012

i wear this armour to protect myself from the histrionics of hysterical women

bitches





"We'll stop shooting Ukrainians if NATO forces Ukraine to give us everything we want instead" sure thing big Vlad

Grouchio
Aug 31, 2014

Let's see how the next few weeks of economic collapse change Russia's tune.

Somaen
Nov 19, 2007

by vyelkin

the popes toes posted:

Imagine trying to negotiate with nekulturny Ukrainians. Impossible!

https://twitter.com/francska1/status/1498276394849218561?cxt=HHwWgsC5payc-copAAAA



Guys on the right came right from the war, guys on the left came from their comfy chairs from which they're sending others to the war

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

William Bear posted:

This is a pretty silly argument (what is Ukraine's position on the French 5th Republic as successor state to the French 4th Republic?), but it's sure to annoy Russian diplomats.

not really. the seat is, officially, the USSR's seat. the USSR didn't transition into russia: the union collapsed, and the soviet socialist republics all became independent. russia just took the seat because it was always the real power in the ussr and is the country that kept all the nukes, but there is a big difference there than recognizing or disputing the continuity of government of the same country - the seat belongs to the country, not the government, and the ussr no longer exists. not just legally, but in reality: the borders are dramatically different (which is what putin is so upset about).

but again at the end of the day the security council vetos are pragmatic, not moral (despite the pretense it was a reward for the victors of WWII), and pragmatically russia is indeed the heir of the part of the USSR that really matters for security council veto membership: ability to end the world if invaded.

the other hand
Dec 14, 2003


43rd Heavy Artillery Brigade
"Ultima Ratio Liberalium"

JerikTelorian posted:

And now we're getting the "Russia isn't actually a valid member of the UN and shouldn't be considered the continuation state for their UNSC seat"

Interested to see how the Russian delegation responds

It’s a terrible legal case, but it’s a clever threat trying keep Russia from doing things (e.g. tac nukes) that show it’s completely removed itself from international consensus on what is or isn’t appropriate in war.

International law is basically Calvinball, but removing Russia from the Security Council is only really possible if it goes so far off the rails that even China wants them out. I think this is just a threat to try & keep them in line with int’l norms on war.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Okay to make up for my last link of Random Twitter Dude, here is War on the Rocks with Michael Kofman:

https://warontherocks.com/2022/02/interpreting-the-first-few-days-of-the-russo-ukrainian-war/

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013


loving lol, only Crimea, not even LDNR.


the popes toes posted:

Imagine trying to negotiate with nekulturny Ukrainians. Impossible!

https://twitter.com/francska1/status/1498276394849218561?cxt=HHwWgsC5payc-copAAAA


Surely Ukraine is more cultured because it did not send a disgraced culture warrior and a sex pest to broker a ceasefire

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

D34THROW posted:

If Ukraine demilitarizes, what's to stop Big Daddy Vladdy from coming in three or four years down the road, once it's complete, and saying, "Yeah, this is ours now. No more Ukraine, is Mother Russia once more."

nothing. that's the real sticking point in any attempt to negotiate peace: russia's word is worthless, and what they are asking for would compromise the ability to force them to keep their word.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Proper Russians should have beards anyway. Curse that europhile Peter-not-so-Great.

NTRabbit
Aug 15, 2012

i wear this armour to protect myself from the histrionics of hysterical women

bitches




JerikTelorian posted:

Yeah I can't imagine that it matters much; 30 years of tacitly accepting it is I think support enough. Still, it has to rankle people.

The Russian Ambassador is flying. This translator is doin work trying to keep up.

The UN tacitly accepted Taiwan in the Chinese seat for 22 years until they didn't anymore

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

William Bear
Oct 26, 2012

"That's what they all say!"

Pook Good Mook posted:

I assumed they weren't making this argument in seriousness, basically to piss off Russians who are claiming rights to Ukraine based on the empire of the loving Romanovs.

I want to know whose fault this situation is. Did Lenin start it, or is this Peter the Great's doing?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5