Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
1337JiveTurkey
Feb 17, 2005

Baronjutter posted:

The fact that the tractors often have russian invasion markers spray-painted onto the sides makes me assume these are not plucky locals stealing russian tanks, but russians simply stealing local tractors to rescue their own.

Presumably they'd retrieve them in a direction that can actually fix the problem rather than driving them to the nearest town in a vehicle which is basically a glass box on top.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
Its possible that Ukrainians are using the Z mark as a way to confuse the Russians

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

Despera posted:

Its possible that Ukrainians are use the Z mark as a way to confuse the Russians

That's how you get friendly fire'd

TulliusCicero
Jul 29, 2017




This woman posting 4chan memes appears to have severe Brain Problems

*checks profile*

Ohhh

Owling Howl
Jul 17, 2019

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Shhhh I don't think that Ukraine is going to lock down the cities in a final city state hurrah. Id think the overwhelming force would cause most people's sanity to weigh weiwring a Russian armband over being killed and starved to death in a terror bombing campaign.

I suppose they must be in the process of distributing the armbands in Kharkiv about now.

Haramstufe Rot
Jun 24, 2016

Antigravitas posted:

Germany used its defense budget to make flying Tigers, the 100 billions should be enough to add a McKinsey consultant to every tank.

you mean the combat helicopter we made that doesn't have guns?

hobbez
Mar 1, 2012

Don't care. Just do not care. We win, you lose. You do though, you seem to care very much

I'm going to go ride my mountain bike, later nerds.

thunderspanks posted:

the camera push into his moobs and triple chin at the end really sell it

I didn’t think there could be a worse individual then Putin in this situation

Yet here we are

We must defeat him

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

Morol posted:

I think it is this guy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cA9cGUGr00. He got fatter

They're probably keeping this all hat and no cattle jackass away from the real fighting so he can keep doing his dumb yeehaw bullshit for the cameras.

Play
Apr 25, 2006

Strong stroll for a mangy stray

Doesn't the 'Z' indicate that this is being towed by a Russian tractor?

Despera posted:

Its possible that Ukrainians are using the Z mark as a way to confuse the Russians

Ah, I suppose that is possible

kaaj
Jun 23, 2013

don't stop, carry on.

KitConstantine posted:

This seems like a lot of planes, though I'm sure Russia has a ton more. Hopefully they can get in the air pretty soon

https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPR/status/1498392795605868546?t=qRCGlAy12RdI_fglgfEnsg&s=19

That's a hefty amount, what close to 1/3 of what Ukraine started with? Still a fraction of what Russia has, but not a non-trivial amount, assuming the pilots are well trained and ready.

Randarkman
Jul 18, 2011


Sure it's been stolen? Tractor's got the same Z marking as the tank.

Kraftwerk
Aug 13, 2011
i do not have 10,000 bircoins, please stop asking

Vahakyla posted:

Conventional war is very very very different from the type of asymmetric/peacekeeping/peace enforcement/police action-wars we are used to seeing Americans partake in. Conventional war is a meat grinder for both sides, unlike Afghanistan where you patrol the hills for the weekly contact and one wounded.

Yeah, this is a real and big war against a country capable of putting up resistance at slightly below parity shot for shot. There are many many more Russians than there are Ukranians in this fight and the Ukranians are forced to leverage every imaginable advantage to hold out as long as possible.

I think the strategy here is to completely destroy the Russian economy to foment internal unrest within Russia while delivering as many possible casualties in sufficient enough time that people decide they don't want to fight anymore. If the war drags on for about a month or longer it's very likely Ukraine will be annexed and there will be a slow burning insurgency that will produce the gradual sort of death toll we're accustomed to in a US led occupation.

We are right in the middle of a war getting snippets and random shots in the fog of war with extraordinarily good OPSEC at least on the part of the Ukrainians.

If we were sitting in London or New York right now in September 1939 we would be hearing about stuff like the Battle of Wizna and how small amounts of Polish soldiers are holding against an enormous group of Germans. There is no question the individual bravery and elan of Ukranian troops is helping contribute to their successes in the battle but the strategic situation will gradually degrade and 40 years from now people will be looking at these events through the same time-compressed lens as the German blitzkrieg over Poland.

The German blitzkrieg feels fast because we already know what is going to happen from start to finish and can read about it in 2 paragraphs. For lack of better language- we are witnessing day by day how the sausage is made and the time that passes feels much longer to our direct experience than what we can imagine was like being in Warsaw or London back in WW2.

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

kaaj posted:

That's a hefty amount, what close to 1/3 of what Ukraine started with? Still a fraction of what Russia has, but not a non-trivial amount, assuming the pilots are well trained and ready.

If the Ukrainian Air Force has the slightest clue what they're doing (and I see no evidence to the contrary) they'll have plenty of surplus pilots, because you always have more pilots than you have planes.

Red
Apr 15, 2003

Yeah, great at getting us into Wawa.

TulliusCicero posted:

Really running on fumes here Moscow

Next they will say feeding Ukranians is an act of War against Russia

Retweeting Ukraine memes will be a war crime in a week.

Randarkman
Jul 18, 2011

Kraftwerk posted:

Yeah, this is a real and big war against a country capable of putting up resistance at slightly below parity shot for shot. There are many many more Russians than there are Ukranians in this fight and the Ukranians are forced to leverage every imaginable advantage to hold out as long as possible.

Again no, that's very likely not true. Not at this point, not with the limited size of the Russian invasion force.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




https://twitter.com/ArmedForcesUkr/status/1498381064565317638

They're claiming a drone raid on a convoy - 96 tanks, 8 fuel tanks, in a deployment logistics hub. Also, some artillery and Grads. The location should be here:

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

Maybe getting a shitload of your most idealized troops all killed at once so their bodies can all be shipped back at the same time wasn't the best idea

https://twitter.com/howardamos/status/1498394833538457604?t=oblf50J2zfoqhg8lSxf9Mg&s=19

Play
Apr 25, 2006

Strong stroll for a mangy stray

KitConstantine posted:

This seems like a lot of planes, though I'm sure Russia has a ton more. Hopefully they can get in the air pretty soon

https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPR/status/1498392795605868546?t=qRCGlAy12RdI_fglgfEnsg&s=19

This is meaningless without knowing how many pieces of plane you need to make a whole plane :colbert:

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

cinci zoo sniper posted:

https://twitter.com/ArmedForcesUkr/status/1498381064565317638

They're claiming a drone raid on a convoy - 96 tanks, 8 fuel tanks, in a deployment logistics hub. Also, some artillery and Grads. The location should be here:



Got Russian tanks
In your neighborhood?
Who ya gonna call?
Bayrakatar!

Rapulum_Dei
Sep 7, 2009
Never mind Switzerland- FIFA and UEFA have sanctioned the big R. Wew lad.

Peanut Butler
Jul 25, 2003



Randarkman posted:

Sure it's been stolen? Tractor's got the same Z marking as the tank.

the russian tank is being stolen from it's rightful owner: the deepest ocean

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

I'll be rude and answer my own question, I came across a Guardian article (I hope Guardian is allowed :ohdear:) that paints a pretty bleak picture of the Russian people's reaction today (Monday). A lot of redundant information for people who follow this thread, but here's some quotes from "ordinary people":

Guardian posted:

As markets opened in a panic on Monday, many Russians rushed to local cashpoints in Moscow to retrieve their savings before the damage got any worse.

“It said they had dollars so I came here immediately,” said Alexei Presnyakov, 32, pointing to an app for Russia’s Tinkoff Bank, indicating he could withdraw hard currency. About 20 people were queued in line. “Yesterday [the rate] was 80 [to the dollar]. Today it’s 100. Or 150.”

“I just made a spontaneous decision today that I would ask [out of work] and go around until I took out all my money,” he said. “Before it was worth zero.”

Within minutes, however, the word traveled down the queue: the dollars were gone.

Nearly half the queue walked off. “Who needs roubles?” one woman said sarcastically as she walked away.

[...]

But that did little to calm the frayed nerves at the Metropolis Mall in Moscow, where there were signs that Russians were rushing to turn their cash into consumer goods before prices leapt up. At an M.Video, a popular electronics store, one employee said that rouble prices for iPhones were “the same for now” but that “they could change any minute.” “I’d buy now,” he said.

If there was shock on the streets, then the mood among the business community was even more dour. Several owners of mid-sized companies said that the invasion and subsequent isolation of Russia had made their businesses unprofitable overnight.

One, the owner of an advertising services company with 100 employees, said that he was about to announce to his employees this afternoon that he is leaving the country for Armenia with his wife and two sons.

“I’m going to tell them that we are going into a crisis that we have never experienced before,” he said. “It’s like flying on a plane with no engines or the engines are on fire.”

[...]

Another business owner with hundreds of employees in the food and beverage and tourism industries felt that he was completely in the dark about the future under Vladimir Putin.

“We have no loving clue what he will do next,” he said. “No one in the business community has a clue any more. Everyone is so depressed. I have experienced so many economic crises here, the pandemic being the latest.

“But there was always a reason to keep on fighting for your business,” he said. “Now, I don’t see the light at the end of the tunnel any more. Even if peace is achieved, the damage is done. How do we reverse it?”

Coquito Ergo Sum
Feb 9, 2021

BIG FLUFFY DOG posted:

In russias defense (lol) this is a reevaluation of current doctrine war Like railroads in us civil war or Calvary in ww1 because it’s looking like tanks are p obsolete with how much anti tank tech has advanced

pre-script: I just got off of two days of screaming in a defense forum at Boomers who think that airstrikes have decided and will decide all future wars so this isn't as grouchy as it sounds and it's not directed at you personally or anything. I know you were mostly telling some jokes. This post is more of just a conversation starter.

I'll push back on this. Tanks have been shuffled around doctrinally for the past 70 years depending on the tank, the country, the theater, etc., but a big armored box with a cannon that can pinpoint a target up to 2000m, has tons of thermal and night optics as well as radio equipment, serves as mobile cover for infantry, has a coaxial MG or cannon that can shirk off 99% of handheld weapons is still useful. It's just that most nations find out that doctrine isn't universal. What works on the steppes of Ukraine in 1941 may not work in Pacific Island jungles of the same year. And what worked in those theatres definitely won't translate well to the mountains of Korea or Afghanistan, or the jungles of Vietnam, or the Deserts of Iraq, or yeah even the steppes again 1942-45 or in 2022. I remember reading in every war, even after WW1, that the tank would go the way of the dodo, but every time there's a war, we keep building and deploying and upgrading the things because they're big armored boxes that are full of useful poo poo.

As far as Anti-tank tech, goes:

- Stuff like common RPGs/recoilless weapons are on the low end, and most MBTs of modern nations (discounting stuff like foreign-market T-62s) can wave them off. Russian T-90s have so much counter-ATGM tech slapped to them that the mere bulk of said equipment could probably deflect a common RPG round. There are plenty of stories of Abrams, Challengers, better T-series, etc. tanks just surviving dozens of these types of weapons at no real cost save for crew anxiety. These rockets can admittedly extremely devastating in urban areas or ambush situations, but so can a machine gun to a bunch of unprotected infantry or a high caliber rifle to a BMP, and I don't see us saying that infantry and IFVs/APCs are outmoded. The stronger and more modern of these these types of AT rockets require thorough training to even score a hit past 100m, and just look at the average picture of Ukraine.

-More nasty stuff like Javelins can do the job, but it remains to be seen if they can work their magic during standup firefights between comparable forces. These types of weapons can require more support than the above recoilless weapons.

-ATGMs like TOWs, Kornets, etc. can do the job but have the same faults as the above plus requiring tripod or vehicle mounts, plenty of training, and other problems.

-Air support was supposed to be the death of the tank but the fighting in Ukraine and all of the AA domes make air support patchier than we've been accustomed to since conflicts like Desert Storm. Against a comparable military, you really have to start doing the cost analysis of your jet+pilots+weaponry along with all of the people they're talking to back at base, and compare that to the cost of the squad of MBTs they have to loiter over.

-To top it all off, these weapons require a good chunk of planning, recon, and outright luck in order to be placed in the right place at the right time. You could be expecting a tank to come over the hill at your 12:00 and place your Kornet there to greet it, but what if it's now coming over the other hill to your 2:00 and is unloading its coax and cannon at you?

Overall, a tank is a big, fast hunk of steel with big guns and useful tech in it and it doesn't require roads. Tanks are going to stay and I think Ukraine in 2022 is going to result in them being prioritized again.

Coquito Ergo Sum fucked around with this message at 21:54 on Feb 28, 2022

Despera
Jun 6, 2011
I mean youve seen the lines on the road. Doubt the russians would be bringing tractors with the invasion. Though could be a russian sympathizer.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
https://twitter.com/FedorovMykhailo/status/1498392515262746630

Is interesting. If you were going to run a guerilla insurgency then having an internet connection that Russia can't really monitor or disconnect could be pretty useful.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Would steve1989 eat Russian rations expired in 2015?

https://twitter.com/ALF_rednecks/status/1498365532134854661?t=UL2elChs5awstKD1zCQNJw&s=19

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth

Rappaport posted:

I'll be rude and answer my own question, I came across a Guardian article (I hope Guardian is allowed :ohdear:) that paints a pretty bleak picture of the Russian people's reaction today (Monday). A lot of redundant information for people who follow this thread, but here's some quotes from "ordinary people":

Why wouldn't The Guardian be allowed? They're an excellent, reputable newspaper.

Antigravitas
Dec 8, 2019

Die Rettung fuer die Landwirte:

Haramstufe Rot posted:

you mean the combat helicopter we made that doesn't have guns?

I was trying to make a joke based on the fact that the tank and the helicopter share a name.

Though, the original purpose of the Tiger seems to be relevant again all of a sudden (as a missile carrier against tanks).

slowdave
Jun 18, 2008


Considering he's eaten a hardtack from the Civil War, maybe.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Rappaport posted:

I'll be rude and answer my own question, I came across a Guardian article (I hope Guardian is allowed :ohdear:) that paints a pretty bleak picture of the Russian people's reaction today (Monday). A lot of redundant information for people who follow this thread, but here's some quotes from "ordinary people":

Disallowed news sources are like Stormfront, don't worry about linking stuff. Expect to get yelled at if you try linking Russia Today or some other brazen propaganda rubbish, though.

Saint Celestine
Dec 17, 2008

Lay a fire within your soul and another between your hands, and let both be your weapons.
For one is faith and the other is victory and neither may ever be put out.

- Saint Sabbat, Lessons
Grimey Drawer

Coquito Ergo Sum posted:


-More nasty stuff like Javelins can do the job, but it remains to be seen if they can work their magic during standup firefights between comparable forces. Like heavier SACLOS ATGMs, they require a constant sight on target during travel time and can direct a lot of attention to the person firing them, as well as everyone standing around that person.



I thought the big advantage of Javelin/NLAW is that they are fire and forget and don't need constant sight on target?

Upgrade
Jun 19, 2021



Prior to this how was the Russian military regarded by experts?

Charlotte Hornets
Dec 30, 2011

by Fritz the Horse

Bet the milk powder tastes good

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

Play posted:

This is meaningless without knowing how many pieces of plane you need to make a whole plane :colbert:

Actually it's the various Ukrainian grubhub orders. Fried breast and wing of MiG is good eatin'.

WaltherFeng
May 15, 2013

50 thousand people used to live here. Now, it's the Mushroom Kingdom.
One day we'll get mecha versus tank combat just like in my japanese animes

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

How are u posted:

Why wouldn't The Guardian be allowed? They're an excellent, reputable newspaper.

Yeah the Guardian is fine as long as you recognise that the bottom bar for submitting an article to their Opinion section doesn't exist. The actual news reporting is decent.

Coquito Ergo Sum
Feb 9, 2021

Saint Celestine posted:

I thought the big advantage of Javelin/NLAW is that they are fire and forget and don't need constant sight on target?

Ah, I hosed up and accidentally mixed two deleted bullet points together. My bad.

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!
Facebook are now going to actively restrict Russian media orgs (in Europe not the US lol).

https://twitter.com/nickclegg/status/1498395147536527360

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Saint Celestine posted:

I thought the big advantage of Javelin/NLAW is that they are fire and forget and don't need constant sight on target?

You're correct. Both NLAW and Javelin are fire-and-forget. They might be thinking of British Javelin, which is an older SACLOS launcher.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Coquito Ergo Sum posted:

-More nasty stuff like Javelins can do the job, but it remains to be seen if they can work their magic during standup firefights between comparable forces. Like heavier SACLOS ATGMs, they require a constant sight on target during travel time and can direct a lot of attention to the person firing them, as well as everyone standing around that person.
What about things like the NLAW? Minimal backblast so you can fire it from inside a building without cooking yourself, which makes it easier to hide / not draw attention; it's fire-and-forget so no need for constant line of sight; it's very light (12kg) so no need for tripods or anything like that; it's designed to do top-down attacks on much weaker turret armour. The main disadvantage vs bigger heavier stuff is a shorter range but that doesn't really matter in a city.

I don't think even a current-generation Western tank could survive a top-down hit on the turret, right? So all you're left with is trying to shoot the rocket down, and I don't know how practical that really is. Would be interested to know more, though!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5