|
Cimber posted:Ahh yes, having nuclear reactor crews be exhausted sounds like a great idea! US Navy says hi.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2022 21:01 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 00:17 |
|
The reactors are shut down, yes, but there's still spent fuel on-site which requires cooling. If they keep losing power or the cooling otherwise stops, they're going to have a disaster on hand.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2022 21:07 |
|
Isn’t the cooling just a bunch of rods sitting in a pool of water
|
# ? Mar 15, 2022 21:09 |
|
Ajaxify posted:Is this the story you're referring to? https://www.businessinsider.com/germany-senior-wwii-nazi-tank-in-basement-fined-293000-2021-8 From a linked story about the same guy: quote:For Heikendorf's mayor Alexander Orth, the find is no surprise: "The man used it to trundle through Kitzeberg during the 1978 snow disaster." oh, just a nice old man... quote:Ten years later, local authorities were again tipped off after officials in Berlin searched the home for stolen Nazi art. During their search, they also came upon busts of Hitler, an Arno Breker bronze statue of a nude man that was reportedly once outside Hitler’s Reich Chancellery, mannequins outfitted in Nazi uniforms, swastika pendants, a V-1 rocket replica, and SS rune-shaped lamps.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2022 21:09 |
|
Naked Bear posted:The reactors are shut down, yes, but there's still spent fuel on-site which requires cooling. If they keep losing power or the cooling otherwise stops, they're going to have a disaster on hand. Not entirely. Not a disaster. The spent fuel can easily air cool if the ponds evaporate, its old enough. They would not melt down. Technically you only have to keep spent fuel actively cooled for 5 years or so before its moved into spent fuel drums. Chernobyl that's been a slow process since, really, nobody cares versus an active nuclear plant.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2022 21:27 |
|
Looks like the Russians are gonna gently caress around with an amphibious landing in Odesa https://twitter.com/CovertShores/st...ingawful.com%2F I wonder what they will find out? Perhaps that the water is 2 degrees Celsius? Or that the air is 0 Celsius? Whomst can say
|
# ? Mar 15, 2022 22:49 |
|
local to me, a guy who has been involved for years with a nonprofit that finds homes for street dogs in Ukraine, got a bullet proof vest from the local sheriff and flew to Poland for some crazy John le Carré underground doggy railroad poo poo. It's equal parts and https://thecourier.com/news/375510/findlay-man-rescuing-dogs-in-ukraine/ quote:A Findlay man is in Ukraine to rescue dogs from the war zone and get them to Poland today.
|
# ? Mar 15, 2022 22:49 |
|
CommieGIR posted:Not entirely. Not a disaster. The spent fuel can easily air cool if the ponds evaporate, its old enough. They would not melt down. A US company was actively providing casks and expertise for long-term storage before the conflict, yeah.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 00:15 |
|
Basticle posted:local to me, a guy who has been involved for years with a nonprofit that finds homes for street dogs in Ukraine, got a bullet proof vest from the local sheriff and flew to Poland for some crazy John le Carré underground doggy railroad poo poo. It's equal parts and I dated a girl for a long time who went to UF. Ohioans man
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 00:28 |
|
Basticle posted:Russian soldiers shoot dogs for fun, he said. Єдиний хороший росіянин - мертвий росіянин
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 00:28 |
|
"We are being ill fed!" Russian soldiers: "this is what we eat...."
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 00:29 |
|
Elviscat posted:A US company was actively providing casks and expertise for long-term storage before the conflict, yeah. The bigger issue is the pool does two things: Keeps the latent fission heat down, but also protects workers from excess radiation from the rods. Without the water, while the rods won't melt or anything, they'll be much more difficult to approach safely. But thankfully power was largely restored last I heard.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 01:20 |
|
You remember how we were talking about letters of marque earlier? Well... https://twitter.com/ScotlandDX/status/1503893185621278723?s=20&t=dnqeu2aonwNS0gNx0Y-2Kw
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 02:00 |
|
So Russias are just embracing their status as a rogue state and attacking everyone now?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 03:09 |
|
Tomn posted:You remember how we were talking about letters of marque earlier? Well... the fuckin balls on these guys lol
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 03:10 |
|
CommieGIR posted:Not entirely. Not a disaster. The spent fuel can easily air cool if the ponds evaporate, its old enough. They would not melt down. CommieGIR posted:The bigger issue is the pool does two things: Keeps the latent fission heat down, but also protects workers from excess radiation from the rods. Without the water, while the rods won't melt or anything, they'll be much more difficult to approach safely.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 03:17 |
|
I remember when some idiot American navy officer wrote an article about how we should hire PMC pirates to raid Chinese shipping and everyone thought it was an April fools day thing but he was 100% serious. Russia is just seems to be copying the dumbest and most unhinged ideas only the most idiotic and psychopathic NATO war hawks could come up with one handed but doing an even worse job.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 03:20 |
|
Tomn posted:You remember how we were talking about letters of marque earlier? Well... These might be old unless they attacked the queen again?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 03:27 |
|
Looks like the US is starting to send Ukraine the really fun toys https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1503915138449031169?s=20&t=3ixFiFLd3PFoIEzLZJ3AVQ
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 03:30 |
Herstory Begins Now posted:These might be old unless they attacked the queen again? They are old, it looks like a list of all ships hit, since they fit the definition of piracy
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 03:33 |
|
It’s not piracy if it’s done by a nation state, that’s just an act of war. But I always love posturing over NAVTEX, Turkey and Cyprus get into some nice pissing matches.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 03:47 |
|
Herstory Begins Now posted:These might be old unless they attacked the queen again? Once you mentioned it I went to look up Navtex archives myself and lemme tell you, it was kind of a bear finding it - ended up finding the message from some Latvian receiver online. Took some work but I managed to find two scrambled copies of the message received at different times. Notably, the second more damaged message preserves the bit that notes time and date of the message: 281750 UTC FEB 22, which is to say "February 28, 17:50 UTC, 2022." So yeah, apparently it's an old message, though it's possible that whoever tweeted that message only managed to receive it today. quote:2022-03-12 22:24:16 (LV) AREA: T quote:2022-03-04 02:20:15 (LV) AREA: C
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 04:04 |
|
https://i.imgur.com/Qne5f7l.mp4
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 05:25 |
|
CommieGIR posted:The bigger issue is the pool does two things: Keeps the latent fission heat down, but also protects workers from excess radiation from the rods. Without the water, while the rods won't melt or anything, they'll be much more difficult to approach safely. Yeah, if it's above ground like Indian Point I'd be worried about any type of explosion rupturing the fuel pellets themselves and spreading their Curie content into the atmosphere. If it's below ground and they're below the decay heat level where they'll melt in free air, and there's no concern of a criticality incident, it's really not a concern from a radiological standpoint, since the only areas where gamma radiation would be a concern is directly over the holding pool, if drained, anyways. The IAEA has said decay heat's low enough that even if power's lost the fuel is not expected to melt if it remains covered in water, which I'd expect from fuel that hasn't been critical in a year, much less several. Decay heat is a function of time squared after all.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 05:39 |
|
KitConstantine posted:Looks like the Russians are gonna gently caress around with an amphibious landing in Odesa As of yesterday it was said the Russian Army currently could not reach Odessa by land without severly exposing themselves and outrunning their logistics. So if they do perform an amphibious landing anytime soon it will most likely be unsupported. I am not sure they even have partial air superiority there. I cannot imagine them actually doing something so risky in light of all the f ups the past few weeks.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 06:43 |
|
A new video by Chris Cappy https://youtu.be/Igq2fqa7RY4
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 06:47 |
|
FrozenVent posted:It’s not piracy if it’s done by a nation state, that’s just an act of war. Is there a good account on Twitter to follow or website to read these things?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 07:09 |
|
KitConstantine posted:Looks like the Russians are gonna gently caress around with an amphibious landing in Odesa
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 08:53 |
Did this get posted? https://www.9news.com.au/world/russia-ukraine-update-ukraine-destroys-russian-helicopters/f7827408-25ca-4341-92d1-7ffb8a7ad124 Got at least 3 apparently
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 08:57 |
|
Comrade Blyatlov posted:Did this get posted? That article also mentions that a fourth Russian general was killed yesterday in Mauripol.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 09:15 |
psydude posted:That article also mentions that a fourth Russian general was killed yesterday in Mauripol. Jfc I missed that
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 09:29 |
Lmao https://twitter.com/oryxspioenkop/status/1503719897062420482?t=YeiE81YnBvJ-elPrc3RvVQ&s=19
|
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 09:55 |
|
Ukraine claiming they're launching/have launched several counter-offensives against the Russians, so I'm guessing the airfield attack is part of that broader effort. I wonder if they'll be able to break the siege of Mauripol? https://twitter.com/Podolyak_M/status/1504001010787921924
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 11:09 |
|
The window to launch any counter-offensive is soon closing. The next few weeks will be warm and sunny with temps not dropping below freezing at night, the North/East of the country is going to turn into a giant mud puddle. This also means the Russians have to try and close of Kyiv soon if the do intend on assaulting and taking the city. Otherwise they will be facing an even better equiped, manned, and prepared defense on all fronts.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 11:28 |
|
If the Russians are able to cut off the Ukrainian Army in the east, and encircle and start sieging Kharkiv and Mariopol, just exactly how bad would that be? Bad? Or completely catastrophic?
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 12:15 |
|
I don’t see how Ukraine would launch a successful counter offensive. Russia continues to slowly advance almost everywhere besides Kyiv they’re just doing it badly. Trying to launch a counter attack would just get in the way of Russias own gently caress ups while also giving Ukraine the potential to make all the same mistakes themselves. It’d be like the tet offensive, which despite popular memory was actually a complete military disaster where the NVA tried to fight like they were the US army against the US army. Does anyone know about Russian anti tank weaponry? I saw a video that said Russia doesn’t have any infantry weapons remotely as capable or any self-guided infantry weapon systems which makes it a weird situation where the Russian infantry likely cannot get a tank kill without a mobility kill first while Ukrainian troops can just fire off a NLAW or Javelin and run off and pop a tank.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 12:24 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:It’d be like the tet offensive, which despite popular memory was actually a complete military disaster where the NVA tried to fight like they were the US army against the US army. And yet it changed the US perception of the war so drastically that it effectively pulled the rug out from under the feet of the Johnson administration and eroded American resolve to win. Most of the counter offensives Ukraine has engaged in so far have been to retake key terrain and deny access to MSRs for the Russians. I doubt they're engaging in massive operations to throw the Russians out entirely.
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 12:39 |
|
https://twitter.com/PhilipinDC/status/1504033406971228164
|
# ? Mar 16, 2022 13:23 |
|
Bored As gently caress posted:If the Russians are able to cut off the Ukrainian Army in the east, and encircle and start sieging Kharkiv and Mariopol, just exactly how bad would that be? Both, it just depends for whom and the timeframe. On current information, also an 'if' that could be seen from space. SMEGMA_MAIL posted:I don’t see how Ukraine would launch a successful counter offensive. Russia continues to slowly advance almost everywhere besides Kyiv they’re just doing it badly. Trying to launch a counter attack would just get in the way of Russias own gently caress ups while also giving Ukraine the potential to make all the same mistakes themselves. It’d be like the tet offensive, which despite popular memory was actually a complete military disaster where the NVA tried to fight like they were the US army against the US army. The tweet says that it's the UA Air Force doing the counter attack, which probably means pasting any forward supply. If ground forces are involved, I'd agree with psydude that they'll be limited to pinching lines of communication & supply before the mud season gets started in earnest. UA's been doing a spectacular job bleeding the RU forces so far and I don't think they're likely to change practice. As for Russian infantry-portable AT weapons: On paper? Quite competent. In the field? Wadded up newspapers behind a nosecone. Now that they're cut off from any supplies of new electronics, expect that situation to get worse. I wonder how many hot showers the Russians are getting between two fresh-baked loaves of bread a day? IPCRESS fucked around with this message at 13:44 on Mar 16, 2022 |
# ? Mar 16, 2022 13:34 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 00:17 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:Does anyone know about Russian anti tank weaponry? I saw a video that said Russia doesn’t have any infantry weapons remotely as capable or any self-guided infantry weapon systems which makes it a weird situation where the Russian infantry likely cannot get a tank kill without a mobility kill first while Ukrainian troops can just fire off a NLAW or Javelin and run off and pop a tank. The Soviet Union was pretty advanced for their time in developing anti tank guided missiles (AGTMs) you can read all about it here. Of note regarding your question, is the Metis system, which you could consider as contemporary to the US M47 Dragon (the predecessor to the Javelin). Anything newer than the base Metis is probably not on hand for the Russians in significant numbers. And with this system, you need to guide it in on the launch unit through the wire the missile's pooping out as it flies, and you probably can't defeat a Ukrainian tank with it from the front or any parts of the side covered with ERA bricks (explosive reactive armor). Also, most missiles will now be old, their rubber gaskets all dried out, and troops might not have trained with them except for on a rusty mechanical simulator or an MSDOS-like computerized one. Also, the warhead itself might not be shelf-stable anymore, batteries for the guidance unit might be 'missing', all the stuff you can imagine with today's Russian Ground Forces. Meanwhile, a Javelin will happily fly a low-to-high-to-low profile guiding in all by itself based on the infrared signature acquired before launch, stop for tea at the sandbagged cope cage, and then detonate on the weaker top armor straight into the turret and ammo carousel. So yeah there's a huge capability gap between Ukrainian man-portable ATGMs and anything the Russians can bring to bear. Not that the tech itself is a sufficient condition for explaining lopsided engagements alone. For one, you mention NLAW, but there's a big difference between true guided missiles and good rockets (later types of RPG, NLAW). The latter are shorter-ranged, and best used in close terrain. Either side should have plenty of those and get good results when used properly, although NLAW is particularly advanced, but I'd gather the Ukrainians are the ones using them most succesfully in general, since they seem to be able to dictate the place, time, and tempo of confrontations for a variety of reasons.¹ There's also a class of weapons above those 'pure' man-portable ATGMs, like Konkurs (of which we've seen plenty over the last 10 years, it seems to work well) but you need to either lug it around with a couple of dudes and then put it on a tripod, or put it on top of a jeep-like vehicle or anything bigger; your armored troop carrier for example, or a dedicated tank-hunter vehicle. There should be a rough parity in capabilities between Ukraine and Russia based on the technical quality of the systems themselves - they use a lot of the same stuff for one - but again, a variety of reasons lead to different outcomes. ¹ For Russia: bad logistics, bad morale, bad leadership, bad tactics, bad maintenance, etc. All caused to some degree by a bad strategy in general. e: clarity Koesj fucked around with this message at 13:52 on Mar 16, 2022 |
# ? Mar 16, 2022 13:46 |