Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Collapsing Farts
Jun 29, 2018

💀
so many people didnt give the slightest gently caress about the pandemic in sweden

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

Cardiac posted:

Eh, also an actual professor.
LOL

Collapsing Farts posted:

so many people didnt give the slightest gently caress about the pandemic in sweden
It was great seeing people in restaurants the entire loving pandemic. Bastions of courage and moral integrity, the lot of ya.

V. Illych L. posted:

because we move a lot between polities with independent pandemic response levels and all it takes is for the goddamn dutch to slip up for a couple of weeks to lock all of europe down again

the chinese have a unified, centralised response and are much more willing to impose collective restrictions on people than we are. the chinese way would not be doable in europe without a fundamental shift in how government works here
The chinese also have lovely vaccine coverage in many cohorts IIRC, and a crappier vaccine to begin with.

evil_bunnY fucked around with this message at 09:32 on Mar 17, 2022

Potrzebie
Apr 6, 2010

I may not know what I'm talking about, but I sure love cops! ^^ Boy, but that boot is just yummy!
Lipstick Apathy

Collapsing Farts posted:

so many people didnt give the slightest gently caress about the pandemic in sweden

It's over, don't you know? Perhaps it never even was...

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off

Collapsing Farts posted:

so many people didnt give the slightest gently caress about the pandemic in sweden

The government really didn't inspire people to be careful and I'm sure that didn't help.

For example, Lövfen telling people not to go out xmas-shopping the was they used to and a couple of days later when he was caught xmas-shopping in a busy store was a really bad look.

Zulily Zoetrope
Jun 1, 2011

Muldoon
Just met up with an otherwise healthy, fully vaccinated 27-year-old friend who had her lungs so badly mangled by a bout of covid that she is now functionally asthmatic. Just like sometimes happens when you get the flu, y'know?

Really sucks that there is absolutely no way to prevent this from happening.

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

Zulily Zoetrope posted:

Just met up with an otherwise healthy, fully vaccinated 27-year-old friend who had her lungs so badly mangled by a bout of covid that she is now functionally asthmatic. Just like sometimes happens when you get the flu, y'know?

Really sucks that there is absolutely no way to prevent this from happening.

Better than that 26-year-old pregnant woman who died because she listened to Sundhedsstyrelsen about the vaccines, even though other countries had been recommending it for months, and then the hospital forgot to notify the family, I guess.

Groda
Mar 17, 2005

Hair Elf

SplitSoul posted:

Sundhedsstyrelsen

I thought that was like Strålskyddsstiftelsen, but for vaccines

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off
Migrationsverket was taken by suprprise by the number of refugee's they have to take care of

https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/11-000-flyktingar-registrerade-hittills-extraordinart-lage

It's amazing how this always happens

Kamrat fucked around with this message at 21:19 on Mar 17, 2022

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

They're cutting 2 billion in aid to Africa to finance Ukrainian refugees, because of course they are.

Potrzebie
Apr 6, 2010

I may not know what I'm talking about, but I sure love cops! ^^ Boy, but that boot is just yummy!
Lipstick Apathy

SplitSoul posted:

They're cutting 2 billion in aid to Africa to finance Ukrainian refugees, because of course they are.

Helping more when the need increases? Are you insane?! We can not afford that! Look here in The Budget, a thing that can never be amended (except when giving money to försvaret, car owners, house owners and corporations).

BonHair
Apr 28, 2007

Also, it's only possible to cut expenses, increasing revenue is impossible.

This is especially infuriating when property taxes have been hollowed out for years because they've been locked at 2001 property levels or so. And now they're gonna update the values but keep the total revenue the same as last year by lowering the tax rate.

Collapsing Farts
Jun 29, 2018

💀
Why do refugees go to Sweden when Norway is right there

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off

Collapsing Farts posted:

Why do refugees go to Sweden when Norway is right there

Sweden is easier to get to, it's like a wall between Norway and the rest of Europe, you can take a boat directly to Sweden from Poland.

But I agree with you, If I had a choice I'd rather go to Norway than Sweden.

endocriminologist
May 17, 2021

SUFFERINGLOVER:press send + soul + earth lol
inncntsoul:ok

(inncntsoul has left the game)

ARCHON_MASTER:lol
MAMMON69:lol
lol that svt is trying to be the bbc wrt the trans debate

Alhazred
Feb 16, 2011




endocriminologist posted:

lol that svt is trying to be the bbc wrt the trans debate

It's really depressing to witness how terfism grows stronger in Scandinavia. People are seriously arguing about trans people in bathrooms here.

Beeswax
Dec 29, 2005

Grimey Drawer
In Sweden there's an attempt by certain parts of the media to make trans exclusion (feminist or not) an issue but it doesn't really seem to be getting any traction. The actual TERFs are limited to organisations like Gardet who are an absolute shitshow of internal drama and have no cachet outside of their own tiny bubble

Beeswax fucked around with this message at 11:46 on Mar 18, 2022

teen witch
Oct 9, 2012
I don’t want to diminish a threat like transphobia in Sweden, is by comparison to US/UK brainworms, but yes, from my experience, terfs here seem more messy in a childish way. Other types of transphobes, however -

Still don’t like SVT entangling themselves with them.

teen witch fucked around with this message at 11:59 on Mar 18, 2022

Alhazred
Feb 16, 2011




Beeswax posted:

The actual TERFs are limited to organisations like Gardet who are an absolute shitshow of internal drama and have no cachet outside of their own tiny bubble

In Norway the terfs are associated with WDI and it's maddening that everyone is too polite to point out how batshit insane that organisation is. Like, one of their core beliefs is that porn hypnotize people into being trans and they're still taken seriously by the media.

Potrzebie
Apr 6, 2010

I may not know what I'm talking about, but I sure love cops! ^^ Boy, but that boot is just yummy!
Lipstick Apathy
Lol@Littorin letting the mask slip all the way revealing a good ol racist.

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/m-kommer-ansoka-om-natomedlemskap

If Moderaterna (and their lapdogs) wins a majority they will force us all to join NATO, like there wasn't reason enough not to vote for them.

Cardiac
Aug 28, 2012

Kamrat posted:

https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/m-kommer-ansoka-om-natomedlemskap

If Moderaterna (and their lapdogs) wins a majority they will force us all to join NATO, like there wasn't reason enough not to vote for them.

Like you were ever considering that in any case.
You ( and this thread) are not their target demographic.

Also, at this point we are basically one step away from S always being in favor of NATO instead of always opposed.
As always in Swedish politics, when there is a major course direction in Swedish politics, things can go quite fast.

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off

Cardiac posted:

Like you were ever considering that in any case.
You ( and this thread) are not their target demographic.

Also, at this point we are basically one step away from S always being in favor of NATO instead of always opposed.
As always in Swedish politics, when there is a major course direction in Swedish politics, things can go quite fast.

But does all M-voters want to join NATO? I think this will have a chance of splitting the party, I don't know if it's enough to make a dent however.

Edit: Not splitting as in breaking, I meant people voting for someone else and a lot of internal debates

jeebus bob
Nov 4, 2004

Festina lente
Even SD seem to be in favor of joining now so where are those voters going to go?

Feliday Melody
May 8, 2021

Feliday Melody posted:

I once saw a flowchart of the whole Swedish military. And the Home guard companies made it look like someone was playing solitaire in the corner because numbers wise the home guard is so huge compared to the rest of the military. But I can't find that chart online.

It's not used a lot because the rest of the military likes to downplay the home guard, even though the soldiers overwhelmingly has the same training as the regular military. Just not as modern support equipment. (as if assaulting a home guard position guarded with AK4s and KSP58s would be less daunting)

Found it.

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off

jeebus bob posted:

Even SD seem to be in favor of joining now so where are those voters going to go?

Well, L needs votes to stay in the game, maybe if they came out strongly against the idea or something. Not that I believe that will happen mind you.

luminalflux
May 27, 2005



Kamrat posted:

But does all M-voters want to join NATO? I think this will have a chance of splitting the party, I don't know if it's enough to make a dent however.

Edit: Not splitting as in breaking, I meant people voting for someone else and a lot of internal debates

It’ll probably pick up a lot of S voters who want to join NATO so it’ll likely be a net positive for M

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Has anyone talked about doing more to stop the spread of disinformation such as banning pro-Putin extreme left-wing parties in solidarity with Ukraine yet?

I'm an old school lefty from way back but Europe and our liberal democratic values are under attack and we should be united against Putin. Unfortunately Putin has hijacked certain talking points that are popular in extremist left-wing circles so I think it makes sense to temporarily, as a precaution, to restrict certain political activity for a few potentially pro-Putin parties until the authorities can figure out which left-wing parties are actively spreading Russian disinformation and stop it. It doesn't have to be a big deal. The authorities should just make sure that they aren't aiding or abetting "the enemy" so to speak. No one wants this less than me, I'm a Marxist but until the invasion by a fascist imperial power has been repelled and the attacks stop I think it would be a reasonable proactive thing to do considering the situation in Europe right now.

Sweden created a new Psychological Defense Agency to protect Sweden from foreign dis- and misinformation attacks but right now I feel like they and other government agencies are losing the battle. The agencies can only do so much when they have to cover so much space on the internet with so few people. Just look at what happened in the United States. We should be doing and we have a duty to do more to combat fake news and foreign interference.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

ted hitler hunter posted:

Has anyone talked about doing more to stop the spread of disinformation such as banning pro-Putin extreme left-wing parties in solidarity with Ukraine yet?

I'm an old school lefty from way back but Europe and our liberal democratic values are under attack and we should be united against Putin. Unfortunately Putin has hijacked certain talking points that are popular in extremist left-wing circles so I think it makes sense to temporarily, as a precaution, to restrict certain political activity for a few potentially pro-Putin parties until the authorities can figure out which left-wing parties are actively spreading Russian disinformation and stop it. It doesn't have to be a big deal. The authorities should just make sure that they aren't aiding or abetting "the enemy" so to speak. No one wants this less than me, I'm a Marxist but until the invasion by a fascist imperial power has been repelled and the attacks stop I think it would be a reasonable proactive thing to do considering the situation in Europe right now.

Sweden created a new Psychological Defense Agency to protect Sweden from foreign dis- and misinformation attacks but right now I feel like they and other government agencies are losing the battle. The agencies can only do so much when they have to cover so much space on the internet with so few people. Just look at what happened in the United States. We should be doing and we have a duty to do more to combat fake news and foreign interference.
I agree. Any party that does not support granting the queen full sovereignty over Scandinavia and abolishing democracy is too leftist.

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

ted hitler hunter posted:

Has anyone talked about doing more to stop the spread of disinformation such as banning pro-Putin extreme left-wing parties in solidarity with Ukraine yet?

I'm an old school lefty from way back but Europe and our liberal democratic values are under attack and we should be united against Putin. Unfortunately Putin has hijacked certain talking points that are popular in extremist left-wing circles so I think it makes sense to temporarily, as a precaution, to restrict certain political activity for a few potentially pro-Putin parties until the authorities can figure out which left-wing parties are actively spreading Russian disinformation and stop it. It doesn't have to be a big deal. The authorities should just make sure that they aren't aiding or abetting "the enemy" so to speak. No one wants this less than me, I'm a Marxist but until the invasion by a fascist imperial power has been repelled and the attacks stop I think it would be a reasonable proactive thing to do considering the situation in Europe right now.

Sweden created a new Psychological Defense Agency to protect Sweden from foreign dis- and misinformation attacks but right now I feel like they and other government agencies are losing the battle. The agencies can only do so much when they have to cover so much space on the internet with so few people. Just look at what happened in the United States. We should be doing and we have a duty to do more to combat fake news and foreign interference.

If this isn't actually a bit or SYQ, I'm personally a thousands times more worried about people like you than anybody parroting Putin speeches.

Unfortunately, something similar is already law in Denmark and punishable by up to 12 years in prison.

https://danskelove.dk/straffeloven/108

Star
Jul 15, 2005

Guerilla war struggle is a new entertainment.
Fallen Rib
No worries, I’m sure all leftists will still be there after the war and not, let’s say, purged

https://twitter.com/pawelwargan/status/1505250554141986817?s=21

BonHair
Apr 28, 2007

NATO being problematic should be basically uncontroversial, even if it's a talking point that Putin very much encourages. It's just complicated because both Russia and NATO are bad at the same time, even if they are opposed.

Feliday Melody
May 8, 2021

I am suspicious as hell of Pro-Russia leftists.

Even if you're a die hard tankie, you would still consider Putin as a usurper that pretty much dismantled all traces of socialism in Russia.

BonHair
Apr 28, 2007

Feliday Melody posted:

I am suspicious as hell of Pro-Russia leftists.

Even if you're a die hard tankie, you would still consider Putin as a usurper that pretty much dismantled all traces of socialism in Russia.

I honestly believe it's a conflation of anti imperialism and anti Americanism. Opposing American cultural hegemony is a good cause, but you can't just assume that anyone who shares that goal is an ally. Especially if it's a literal fascist state like Russia (or China).

KozmoNaut
Apr 23, 2008

Happiness is a warm
Turbo Plasma Rifle


The take I really don't understand is the "by defending their country, the Ukrainians are only prolonging the suffering".

It's literally an autocratic imperialist nation invading another sovereign nation, it's a textbook example of a justified defensive war.

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

KozmoNaut posted:

The take I really don't understand is the "by defending their country, the Ukrainians are only prolonging the suffering".

It's literally an autocratic imperialist nation invading another sovereign nation, it's a textbook example of a justified defensive war.

Inversely, I don't understand the "By funneling small arms into an unwinnable war, we're allowing Ukraine to obtain a better position in peace negations" take. The opposite could just as easily be true, they may have to surrender on worse terms once the dust of their cities settle, Bellingcat-sourced mega hi-scores notwithstanding. Similarly, having been at least somewhat politically conscious during the conclusion of Chechnya, the assumption that Russia will be sent slinking back to its own territory if you take out some tanks—it's a different kind of fight, sure, but hardly immaterial in terms of capability or how far they're willing to go. Whether it's justified has no bearing on how it will realistically progress and for my part, I'd just like to see fewer dead Ukrainian civilians.

But perhaps we are straying too far from the subject of crushing dissent, Putin style, in Scandinavia.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

SplitSoul posted:

Inversely, I don't understand the "By funneling small arms into an unwinnable war, we're allowing Ukraine to obtain a better position in peace negations" take.
We've already established that not everyone accepts the premise of the war being unwinnable.

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

A Buttery Pastry posted:

We've already established that not everyone accepts the premise of the war being unwinnable.

I do understand that position, though, I just find it hilariously divorced from reality and unworthy of serious engagement.

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

As long as the people doing the fighting believes as much it is reality.

KozmoNaut
Apr 23, 2008

Happiness is a warm
Turbo Plasma Rifle


People should to be able to defend their homeland against imperialist aggression, to the very best of their ability and with all the help they can get. The Ukrainians have shown again and again that they intend to fight hard to protect their sovereignty.

Considering the very likely consequences if Putin gets his way, I understand why.

The longer they hold out against Putin, the worse his position is, because he's overextending the Russian forces and (hopefully) causing widespread dissent due to the generally worsening conditions in Russia.

E: And what's the alternative? Rolling over and giving up?

KozmoNaut fucked around with this message at 21:55 on Mar 20, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SplitSoul
Dec 31, 2000

MiddleOne posted:

As long as the people doing the fighting believes as much it is reality.

If they really believe it in their hearts, they can win?

KozmoNaut posted:

People should to be able to defend their homeland against imperialist aggression, to the very best of their ability and with all the help they can get. The Ukrainians have shown again and again that they intend to fight hard to protect their sovereignty.

Considering the very likely consequences if Putin gets his way, I understand why.

The longer they hold out against Putin, the worse his position is, because he's overextending the Russian forces and (hopefully) causing widespread dissent due to the generally worsening conditions in Russia.

E: And what's the alternative? Rolling over and giving up?

I don't disagree, but having the right and having the capability are two entirely different things. I've never contested the first one.

Do you see widespread popular dissent toppling Putin forthcoming? How much time do you figure it will require compared to a military victory? Conceding entails some form of giving up, but I think the question is how much rolling is involved.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply