Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Arivia
Mar 17, 2011
I forgot to mention this, but for the goon who plays doom, make sure there's an updated version of GZDoom/dsdadoom/whatever other source ports you'd like before you swap. I know GZDoom was out of support on MacOS for awhile, and idk if Eternity has a MacOS build (so you'd miss out on Heartland), or DSDADoom for MBF21 maps, etc etc.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

Splinter posted:

Has me leaning towards going with a Mac Studio right now (saving ~$1.2k + cost of a quality TB dock compared to how I'd configure a 16") and then waiting to see how the redesigned laptop lineup plays out.

once I spec out an M1 Mac Mini the way I want it I may as well spend the extra $300-500 to get a Studio lol

Makes me wonder what the take rate on a hypothetical M2 Pro Mini to replace the still-for-sale space grey Intel Mini would be

Ultimate Mango posted:

I need to whinge that 4tb of storage on a Sudio costs like $1,000. I have basically filled my 3tb fusion drive on my 2015 27” iMac and I just don’t want to get an external raid array to store my files and apps.

I’m fine with 32Gb of ram (it’s what I have now), I just can’t see going from 3 down to 2tb let alone 1tb of storage.

Am I crazy? Should I just get a usb c external ssd and move some old folders and try to get by with 2tb? Just bite the bullet and get 4?

If the screen on my iMac weren’t dying I would wait for the Mac mini refresh but I don’t think I will make June and I can’t configure a regular mini with enough ram and disk.

And as for monitor chat, I’m going to be a total heretic and get some dell or lg ultrawide from Costco.

FWIW the 4 and 8TB models are supposed to be noticeably faster than the ones with smaller storage

Feedbacker
Nov 20, 2004

Well, I just pulled the trigger on the base model Macbook Pro 14", picking it up on Monday! I'll be upgrading from a 2009 Macbook Pro 13", bought new that year. Hoping to get another decade out of the new one!

Splinter
Jul 4, 2003
Cowabunga!

Ultimate Mango posted:

I need to whinge that 4tb of storage on a Sudio costs like $1,000. I have basically filled my 3tb fusion drive on my 2015 27” iMac and I just don’t want to get an external raid array to store my files and apps.

I’m fine with 32Gb of ram (it’s what I have now), I just can’t see going from 3 down to 2tb let alone 1tb of storage.

Am I crazy? Should I just get a usb c external ssd and move some old folders and try to get by with 2tb? Just bite the bullet and get 4?

If the screen on my iMac weren’t dying I would wait for the Mac mini refresh but I don’t think I will make June and I can’t configure a regular mini with enough ram and disk.

And as for monitor chat, I’m going to be a total heretic and get some dell or lg ultrawide from Costco.

One of the benefits of the Studio IMO is that since it's not meant to be portable, you can configure less storage and just add much cheaper external SSDs that are still very fast. I get that only having one drive to manage is nice, but IMO it's hard to justify the price premium just for that. Unless you truly need Apple SSD speeds for all your storage (most people don't), I'd plan on using externals. I'd even consider dropping to 1 TB instead of 2 TB if you can.

For reference, 2TB Samsung T7s are only ~$200 a pop for 1000 MB/s speeds.

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


ATP which is live right now is taking a chain saw to this thread (the conversations about 5K/versus cheaper options) about the monitors and I'm here for it.

LOL.

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

LionArcher posted:

ATP which is live right now is taking a chain saw to this thread (the conversations about 5K/versus cheaper options) about the monitors and I'm here for it.

LOL.

imagine giving a single flying gently caress what John Siracusa thinks :psyduck:


or Marco Arment lmao

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!
next you’re gonna tell me that Rene Ritchie has a very compelling and well-reasoned argument

FCKGW
May 21, 2006

Where would the 15” MacBook Air fit into the lineup price wise? Somewhere between the 13” and 14” Pro? Replacement for the 13” instead?

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


FCKGW posted:

Where would the 15” MacBook Air fit into the lineup price wise? Somewhere between the 13” and 14” Pro? Replacement for the 13” instead?

13, and 15 airs. 14 and 16 pros. One weird mid tier 13 inch MacBook also I guess?

Hasturtium
May 19, 2020

And that year, for his birthday, he got six pink ping pong balls in a little pink backpack.

Arivia posted:

I forgot to mention this, but for the goon who plays doom, make sure there's an updated version of GZDoom/dsdadoom/whatever other source ports you'd like before you swap. I know GZDoom was out of support on MacOS for awhile, and idk if Eternity has a MacOS build (so you'd miss out on Heartland), or DSDADoom for MBF21 maps, etc etc.

Thank you for the heads up! GZDoom’s supported, at least in a “we’re still working on it but it’ll work, probably” capacity. It looks like DSDA Doom’s supported on multiple platforms, but I don’t know how explicitly wedded it is to x86. If it leans on a lot of libraries the biggest challenge could be ensuring all of those are available (or compile-able) beforehand. We are at least at the point where raw hardware grunt can make up for a lack of assembly optimizations a lot of the time, and commenting those out doesn’t usually break stuff.. it just moves to a fallback path instead. If the Power9 machine I ordered last year ever gets here I’ll get to experience all the fun and magic of aarch64 with ppc64le, and then plenty to spare.

Comfy Fleece Sweater
Apr 2, 2013

You see, but you do not observe.

LionArcher posted:

ATP which is live right now is taking a chain saw to this thread (the conversations about 5K/versus cheaper options) about the monitors and I'm here for it.

LOL.

Siracusa owns, and the other 2 guys are good

I'll take their opinions any day over gooooooons

edit: wait, is Siracusa a goon? reveal yourself knave :tinfoil:

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:

Siracusa owns, and the other 2 guys are good

I'll take their opinions any day over gooooooons

edit: wait, is Siracusa a goon? reveal yourself knave :tinfoil:

He would never put up with our grammar, and there would be way more talk in here about destiny. Also, he’s significantly smarter than anyone I’ve seen in this thread (I’m including myself in this burn).

zachol
Feb 13, 2009

Once per turn, you can Tribute 1 WATER monster you control (except this card) to Special Summon 1 WATER monster from your hand. The monster Special Summoned by this effect is destroyed if "Raging Eria" is removed from your side of the field.
Is it actually the gooncensus that 8gb of ram is barely sufficient for "basic tasks"?

Ultimate Mango
Jan 18, 2005

zachol posted:

Is it actually the gooncensus that 8gb of ram is barely sufficient for "basic tasks"?

32Gb ride or die.

I think 16 on the new architecture is interesting but would still swap too much for the amount of porn chrome tabs most of us have open at once.

MadFriarAvelyn
Sep 25, 2007

zachol posted:

Is it actually the gooncensus that 8gb of ram is barely sufficient for "basic tasks"?

8 GB is fine for a machine that just does basic web browsing with a decent handful of tabs and otherwise light tasks (media playback, etc). I'd recommend 16 GB as an entry point to at least give you a bit of leg room in the future or if you plan on using it for gaming at all. 32 GB for professional use, minimum.

Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:

Siracusa owns, and the other 2 guys are good

While I can't comment on his opinions on Apple products, I used to work with Siracusa in the past and frankly some professional advice he gave me way back when really helped me in my career now so I can't fault the guy too much.

chaosbreather
Dec 9, 2001

Wry and wise,
but also very sexual.

zachol posted:

Is it actually the gooncensus that 8gb of ram is barely sufficient for "basic tasks"?

the amount of ram you should buy is as much as you can afford

right now "basic tasks" involve running a dozen copies of chrome thanks to electron, and there aren't going to be a sudden influx of developers who care about making efficient software any time soon

LODGE NORTH
Jul 30, 2007

Ironically, Chrome on macOS can probably make 8GB of RAM cripple to its knees if you open up too many tabs that aren’t just straight text and static images.

hatty
Feb 28, 2011

Pork Pro
Chrome is bad and should be avoided on any OS imo

Ultimate Mango
Jan 18, 2005

LODGE NORTH posted:

Ironically, Chrome on macOS can probably make 8GB of RAM cripple to its knees if you open up too many tabs that aren’t just straight text and static images.

For my old job regular chrome use fully taxed a 2019 MBP’s 16Gb of ram. Granted it was like 30 tabs for my regular work and not just text but yeah.

My new work is giving me the mid spec “standard” 16 MBP. It arrives tomorrow. I can’t wait.

zachol
Feb 13, 2009

Once per turn, you can Tribute 1 WATER monster you control (except this card) to Special Summon 1 WATER monster from your hand. The monster Special Summoned by this effect is destroyed if "Raging Eria" is removed from your side of the field.
That seems really weird. I'd expect 8gb to handle one significant program (Photoshop, modest video editing, a game), a couple streams of video, and maybe 20-30 active tabs without noticing even a hint of issues. Plus like also Discord and something else open at the same time, Atom or VS Code or whatever.
One of my PCs was running with only 8gb until a few months ago and it was able to do that? :confused:
Like obviously on a new computer today 16gb is the floor for me personally but a normal person should be able to, like, be learning video editing, with that program active, while also watching a tutorial and keeping other webpages open and not run into issues. Or is that what people mean by "basic tasks"?

TACD
Oct 27, 2000

hatty posted:

Chrome is bad and should be avoided on any OS imo
:hmmyes:

Including Electron

mediaphage
Mar 22, 2007

Excuse me, pardon me, sheer perfection coming through

zachol posted:

That seems really weird. I'd expect 8gb to handle one significant program (Photoshop, modest video editing, a game), a couple streams of video, and maybe 20-30 active tabs without noticing even a hint of issues. Plus like also Discord and something else open at the same time, Atom or VS Code or whatever.
One of my PCs was running with only 8gb until a few months ago and it was able to do that? :confused:
Like obviously on a new computer today 16gb is the floor for me personally but a normal person should be able to, like, be learning video editing, with that program active, while also watching a tutorial and keeping other webpages open and not run into issues. Or is that what people mean by "basic tasks"?

you totally can. 8gb is fine for a majority of users despite what people think. a bunch of web apps is probably pushing it.

if you afford it tho obv 16gb is freeing. i’d hit memory limits regularly in photoshop at 8 but i was working with large files. 32+ is nice if you work with large datasets (my so has and uses 128 in their imac).

anyway gently caress chrome

The Lord Bude
May 23, 2007

ASK ME ABOUT MY SHITTY, BOUGIE INTERIOR DECORATING ADVICE

Ok Comboomer posted:

once I spec out an M1 Mac Mini the way I want it I may as well spend the extra $300-500 to get a Studio lol

Makes me wonder what the take rate on a hypothetical M2 Pro Mini to replace the still-for-sale space grey Intel Mini would be

FWIW the 4 and 8TB models are supposed to be noticeably faster than the ones with smaller storage

I probably would have bought a pro mini instead of a max studio if such a thing had existed.

mediaphage
Mar 22, 2007

Excuse me, pardon me, sheer perfection coming through

The Lord Bude posted:

I probably would have bought a pro mini instead of a max studio if such a thing had existed.

supposedly coming in 2023

The Lord Bude
May 23, 2007

ASK ME ABOUT MY SHITTY, BOUGIE INTERIOR DECORATING ADVICE

mediaphage posted:

supposedly coming in 2023

Yeah but I couldn't wait that long, my PC died a week ago, I'm basically confined to an iphone and an ipad air 2 until my Mac Studio ships.

Binary Badger
Oct 11, 2005

Trolling Link for a decade


Snowy posted:

My dad needs to get a new iMac, his is nine years old and failing. He’s in his 80s and doesn’t do much more than internet, Netflix, and email but he does take a decent amount of photos and videos that end up on his computer.

I’d love to be able to tell him that he’d be ok with the base $1299 24” iMac but I’m not that well versed in macs. 256gb storage seems small but $200 extra to get to 512 feels steep. Maybe I should just get his phone to back up only to iCloud and transfer to the iMac.

Can any of you kind Mac people tell me if my nice ol dad really needs any upgrades to the base 24”?

You could buy an external drive with tons of room and spend 10 seconds configuring Photos to get its data there. Maaaaaybe get the 16 GB if you fear that one day he'll buy PhotoShop Elements or something with more oomph.

A couple of years ago I had to pick out an iMac for my mom and six months in she noticed I only splurged for 8 GB, she had friends over and one of them said 'Why 8 GB' (a loving bakery chef of all people) and I had to arrange selling it to another brother for his kids and getting a new one with 16 GB for mom, so I might just add that 16 GB is better if your dad has nosey Parker friends or if you think he'll tag you for not going for the next better option for your own fam

Last Chance
Dec 31, 2004

Binary Badger posted:


A couple of years ago I had to pick out an iMac for my mom and six months in she noticed I only splurged for 8 GB, she had friends over and one of them said 'Why 8 GB' (a loving bakery chef of all people) and I had to arrange selling it to another brother for his kids and getting a new one with 16 GB for mom, so I might just add that 16 GB is better if your dad has nosey Parker friends or if you think he'll tag you for not going for the next better option for your own fam

Deeply strange

Pingiivi
Mar 26, 2010

Straight into the iris!
I have a 2020 MBP M1 with 8 gigs of RAM and I've done some fairly heavy compositing and editing on this and haven't seen any issues.

anothergod
Apr 11, 2016

Did anyone in this thread actually pony up $1600 for the Studio Display?

Edit: when I used the phrase "actually pony up" I meant "did you trade money for goods" as opposed to "did you think about it"

anothergod fucked around with this message at 15:28 on Mar 24, 2022

The Lord Bude
May 23, 2007

ASK ME ABOUT MY SHITTY, BOUGIE INTERIOR DECORATING ADVICE

anothergod posted:

Did anyone in this thread actually pony up $1600 for the Studio Display?

I've more or less decided I'm going to. My Mac doesn't arrive till early may though so I'm going to pick one up closer to then. Just one last check I have to make is if it has any of the response time/smearing issues that the macbook pro display has - I'm guessing not because they didn't try and cram all those crazy specs in but I want to check first.

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

Pingiivi posted:

I have a 2020 MBP M1 with 8 gigs of RAM and I've done some fairly heavy compositing and editing on this and haven't seen any issues.

I just can't believe you've done heavy editing and compositing on 8 gigs of RAM. I think you may have a different definition of what "heavy" is.

Pingiivi
Mar 26, 2010

Straight into the iris!

BonoMan posted:

I just can't believe you've done heavy editing and compositing on 8 gigs of RAM. I think you may have a different definition of what "heavy" is.

I would say making a 30 minute animation in AE with around 200 comps is fairly heavy. I've also done post production for ~15 years so maybe I have a good workflow.

MeruFM
Jul 27, 2010

Pingiivi posted:

I would say making a 30 minute animation in AE with around 200 comps is fairly heavy. I've also done post production for ~15 years so maybe I have a good workflow.

we’ve also been working on computers that are not powerful enough for that kind of work for so long, there’s no expectations of good performance especially if you’ve worked for a long time. I remember rotoscoping using AE on a computer with 2gb memory in 2005.

Astro7x
Aug 4, 2004
Thinks It's All Real
You can do very heavy editing on any machine using ProRes Proxy media... it's possible. I wouldn't want to do it on a machine with 8GB of RAM, but it's possible.

BonoMan
Feb 20, 2002

Jade Ear Joe

Astro7x posted:

You can do very heavy editing on any machine using ProRes Proxy media... it's possible. I wouldn't want to do it on a machine with 8GB of RAM, but it's possible.

"Possible" and "doing it without any issues" are two totally different things.

Editing is one thing, but comping a 30 minute animation in After Effects with 200 comps. There's no way 8 gigs is enough to do that smoothly unless the comps are just super simple text layers or there's some way that Mac handles this that I'm completely alien too.

Pingiivi posted:

I would say making a 30 minute animation in AE with around 200 comps is fairly heavy. I've also done post production for ~15 years so maybe I have a good workflow.


I've been in the VFX/Motion Graphics industry for 15 years as well and 8 gigs of RAM would never cut it to work smoothly no matter the workflow. Unless I'm totally just missing something.

Edit: I see you're on the M1 (I missed that the first time) - I wonder if that is a factor. Just launching AE and doing a simple RAM cache would eat 8 gigs of RAM in literally seconds on any normal computer.

Does the M1 handle AE wildly differently?

BonoMan fucked around with this message at 16:18 on Mar 24, 2022

Baronash
Feb 29, 2012

So what do you want to be called?

BonoMan posted:

Does the M1 handle AE wildly differently?

Unlikely. The current release of AE isn't even native to Apple Silicon yet. It still runs through Rosetta.

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!
people talking like there weren’t tons of people doing this kind of work for school or business or personal reasons on loving iMacs and dual-core MBPs, and just struggling through it, killing hours of time if need be.

Wheres Wallace
May 5, 2009

:) keep on keepin' on :)
after careful consideration, i have decided to return the m1 mac mini in exchange for a spec'd out refurb 5k imac. shoutout to the SA mac hardware thread monitor discussion for showing me the way.

Lincoln
May 12, 2007

Ladies.

Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:

I don't want my butthole on the internet

This seems very shortsighted of you.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

22 Eargesplitten
Oct 10, 2010



Maybe he's a public figure, that could give his reputation a real brown eye.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply