Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug
The projection continues

https://twitter.com/NoLieWithBTC/status/1511332829254148102?s=20&t=RwaOxXiv0htINuWwunEkYQ

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Edit: Beaten by literal seconds!

Tennessee is about to pass a separate "straights only" version of marriage in the state with no age limits.

It's unclear what the point of this actually is, since priests aren't mandated to perform gay marriage ceremonies. It seems to mostly be a ploy to form a "real marriage" club for straights only and leave gays with the "old and broken" form of traditional marriage. But, it doesn't actually remove any rights from gay couples or give any new rights to straight couples (except for the right to marry minors younger than 17 with parental consent).

It's being voted out of committee this week where a majority of the committee members have already announced they support it.

A majority of the Tennessee House supports it in principle, but some have issues with the lack of age limits. If they amend the bill to include age restrictions, it will likely pass the Tennessee House. It is unclear what the Tennessee Senate will do.

https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1511333319648198658

quote:

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) – A proposal making its way through the state legislature would establish a common-law marriage between “one man” and “one woman.”

Opponents of the bill (HB 233) say it would eliminate an age requirement, and in some instances, open the door for a coverup of child sex abuse.

The bill’s sponsor, Tom Leatherwood (R-Arlington) said the law being considered would add a new marriage option for Tennesseans.

“So, all this bill does is give an alternative form of marriage for those pastors and other individuals who have a conscientious objection to the current pathway to marriage in our law,” Leatherwood said.

But missing from the bill are age requirements, opening the door for possible child marriages — something the bill sponsor acknowledged during a Children and Family Affairs subcommittee.

“There is not an explicit age limit,” Leatherwood said.

Rep. Mike Stewart (D-Nashville), who sits on the subcommittee the bill passed out of, said he doesn’t understand the motivation.

“I don’t think any normal person thinks we shouldn’t have an age requirement for marriage,” he said.

He added it could open up the possibility to cover up child sex abuse.

“It should not be there, as it’s basically a get-out-of-jail-free card for people who are basically committing statutory rape — I mean it’s completely ridiculous, so that’s another reason why this terrible bill should be eliminated,” Stewart said.

The Sexual Assault Center of Middle Tennessee released the following statement to News 2:

“The Sexual Assault Center does not believe the age of consent for marriage should be any younger than it already is. It makes children more vulnerable to coercion and manipulation from predators, sexual and other.”

According to UNICEF, approximately 300,000 girls and boys in the U.S. were married before reaching 18 years old between 2000-2018.

Under current Tennessee law, one can get married as young as 17 years old with parental consent.

The bill will be heard in the House Civil Justice committee Wednesday.

thechosenone
Mar 21, 2009

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Once Putin turns himself in to the ICC

I think the war's gonna have to be over before a hypothetical successor would then put him before that.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

thechosenone posted:

I think the war's gonna have to be over before a hypothetical successor would then put him before that.

(It was a joke because Putin is not going to turn himself in to the ICC and he will die in office.)

The ICC has no enforcement mechanism, so all it can do is issue judgements or wait for the person they convict to be out of power and have their own government decide to turn them in.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

(It was a joke because Putin is not going to turn himself in to the ICC and he will die in office.)

The ICC has no enforcement mechanism, so all it can do is issue judgements or wait for the person they convict to be out of power and have their own government decide to turn them in.

Looking forward to the Hitler-style jokes about Putin being the only one to end the war by killing Putin.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Lib and let die posted:

Looking forward to the Hitler-style jokes about Putin being the only one to end the war by killing Putin.

It will be heart disease or cancer in 20 years.

There isn't going to be a revolution, a democratic victory by an opponent, or World War III before Putin leaves office. And even if that somehow happened, Putin would never off himself. He'd just take his billions and go to exile in Belarus.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

It will be heart disease or cancer in 20 years.

There isn't going to be a revolution, a democratic victory by an opponent, or World War III before Putin leaves office. And even if that somehow happened, Putin would never off himself. He'd just take his billions and go to exile in Belarus.

Let me have this, dammit, Leon!

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Congress is hitting their 4/20 celebration a little early.

Three weed bills are getting voted on this week and next week.

1) Bill lifting restrictions on using marijuana for medical research.

It overwhelmingly passed the House today 343-75, with every Democrat and 123 Republicans voting in favor. All 75 against were Republicans.

It is expected to be filibustered in the Senate, but pass with Republican support. The Senate passed a slightly modified version by voice vote last week.

Biden says he would sign.

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1511338128774152197

quote:

The House passed bipartisan legislation on Monday that would facilitate scientific research into the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

Lawmakers voted 343-75 to approve the bill, with all of the votes in opposition coming from Republicans.

Passage of the legislation comes just three days after the House approved a broad marijuana legalization bill largely along party lines.

The latest measure approved by the House on Monday would streamline the process for scientists seeking to conduct medical marijuana research. It would also direct the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure that there is a supply of marijuana available for qualified researchers’ use.

Lawmakers argued it’s in consumers’ interest for researchers to learn more about the efficacy of marijuana for medical use, given that actions by 37 states — as well as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands — allow use of the drug for that purpose.

“These actions highlight the need for increased research about safety and efficacy of the marijuana products being consumed by millions of Americans,” said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone (D-N.J.).

Even opponents of legalizing marijuana for recreational use acknowledged that the federal government might as well allow research into medical marijuana with the majority of states permitting it.

“As a physician, I realize that if we’re going to have medical marijuana legal … in over three dozen states, we really ought to do research on it to see what it’s used for and what it can’t be used for,” said Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), who opposes recreational marijuana.

While most states allow marijuana for medical use, only 18 states, the District of Columbia and two territories permit adult, recreational use of the drug.

2) Full Decriminalization (MORE Act)

Passed the House with all but two Democrats in favor and 3 Republicans in favor.

The two Dems opposed were Henry Cueller (TX) and Chris Pappas (NH). Pappas says he doesn't oppose decriminalization, but that the bill won't pass the Senate and he wants the House to pass his version.

The three Republicans in favor were Matt Gaetz (FL), Brian Mast (FL), and Tom McClintock (CA).

It is expected to die in the Senate. 3 Senate Democrats are undecided, only 2 Republicans have said they will support, and multiple Republican Senators said they would filibuster.

quote:

The Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act, which removes cannabis from the list of scheduled substances and eliminates federal criminal penalties for marijuana possession, distribution, and production, ultimately passed by a 220-204 margin.

It also includes social justice-related provisions, including establishing a process for the expungement of cannabis-related criminal offenses.

3) Marijuana Banking Reform (SAFE Banking Act)

It passed the House earlier this year as part of the budget, but was stripped out in the Senate when Republicans objected.

This is the bill that is most unclear what is going on with it. They are going to vote in the House and likely pass it again, but it is not clear how many Republicans would support it in the Senate. Some have expressed support of the idea in general, but not this specific bill.

quote:

This bill generally prohibits a federal banking regulator from penalizing a depository institution for providing banking services to a legitimate cannabis-related business. Prohibited penalties include terminating or limiting the deposit insurance or share insurance of a depository institution solely because the institution provides financial services to a legitimate cannabis-related business and prohibiting or otherwise discouraging a depository institution from offering financial services to such a business.

Additionally, proceeds from a transaction involving activities of a legitimate cannabis-related business are not considered proceeds from unlawful activity. Proceeds from unlawful activity are subject to anti-money laundering laws.

Furthermore, a depository institution is not, under federal law, liable or subject to asset forfeiture for providing a loan or other financial services to a legitimate cannabis-related business.

The bill also provides that a federal banking agency may not request or order a depository institution to terminate a customer account unless (1) the agency has a valid reason for doing so, and (2) that reason is not based solely on reputation risk. Valid reasons for terminating an account include threats to national security and involvement in terrorist financing, including state sponsorship of terrorism.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1996

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 15:12 on Apr 5, 2022

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Not too surprising given the previous statements and reporting, but they are extending the student loan moratorium again. Official announcement likely coming tomorrow.

No set date confirmed, but it will be at least through August and they will probably extend it again through the election into next year.

There's still nebulous plans to keep extending it until they "do something" about student loan debt. No comment on what qualifies as "doing something" or when it would happen, so it will likely just end up with them kicking the can down the road until next year. Not the worst thing in the world, but don't plan on knowing if there are going to be any actions on student debt or when payments might start back up until at least the end of the year.

quote:

Biden administration expected to extend student loan pause this week

The Biden administration is expected to announce another extension to the student loan pause this week, multiple sources told The Hill.

The announcement could come as soon as Wednesday and would extend the moratorium on federal student loan payments and interest accrual past the current May 1 expiration date.

President Biden is facing pressure by a growing number of Democrats to continue the freeze for several more months, with nearly 100 lawmakers across both chambers citing inflation as justification.

The measure was first put in place during the pandemic as a way to offer relief to those struggling to make loan payments. While it’s unclear when the new extension would end, Biden has faced calls to allow borrowers to pause payments until after the midterms.

The president last extended the suspension in December. Loan payments were first put on hold in March 2020 under former President Trump and have since been extended five times.

The White House and Department of Education did not immediately respond to The Hill’s request for comment.

Whether Biden will act to forgive $10,000 in federal student loans per borrower is a looming question after he supported forgiving at least that much in the 2020 campaign. Progressives and activists pushed for more time to pay back debt publicly and privately this week and are seeking cancellation of an even larger sum.

Advocates and other Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), have pressed for $50,000 per person or to cancel debt entirely.

A year ago, Biden requested a memo from the Department of Education to determine his authority to forgive student debt through executive action. Since then, the administration has not publicly announced if the memo is complete.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Friday said a decision on the student loan pause needs to be made before May. She said the administration will “factor the impacts of economic data on ranges of groups of people, including students.”

Last month, White House chief of staff Ron Klain also signaled that the White House would extend the freeze. The Biden administration reportedly told companies in recent weeks to not send out notices about student loan payments resuming.

https://thehill.com/news/administration/3259485-biden-administration-expected-to-extend-student-loan-pause-this-week/

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 18:59 on Apr 5, 2022

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Not too surprising given the previous statements and reporting, but they are extending the student loan moratorium again. Official announcement likely coming tomorrow.

No set date confirmed, but it will be at least through August and they will probably extend it again through the election into next year.

There's still nebulous plans to keep extending it until they "do something" about student loan debt. No comment on what qualifies as "doing something" or when it would happen, so it will likely just end up with them kicking the can down the road until next year. Not the worst thing in the world, but don't plan on knowing if there are going to be any actions on student debt or when payments might start back up until at least the end of the year.

https://thehill.com/news/administration/3259485-biden-administration-expected-to-extend-student-loan-pause-this-week/

So they are going to be delaying having to make any permanent decision on it until after they've lost control of congress?

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Koos Group posted:

So they are going to be delaying having to make any permanent decision on it until after they've lost control of congress?

Isn't this being done via executive order?

Congress should absolutely do something, but I believe Biden can do this without Congress.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Koos Group posted:

So they are going to be delaying having to make any permanent decision on it until after they've lost control of congress?

Probably!

But, the permanent decision is what they can/will do executively. They already accepted that it is dead legislatively.

So, whatever they are both legally able to do and actually want to do will be on the DOE/White House and congress won't really matter anyway.

Extending the moratorium for another year isn't the worst thing in the world, but they are just kicking the can down the road over and over despite surely having some idea about what they actually want to do and can legally do at this point.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Koos Group posted:

So they are going to be delaying having to make any permanent decision on it until after they've lost control of congress?

That's a very doomeristic take, Koos. Presuming the Democrats plan to lose is far less optimistic than recognizing the absolute genius of the party and its consultant arm in using student debt relief extension as a fulcrum with which to apply pressure to voters in November of this year, The Most Important Election of Our Lifetimes (Redux Pt. II The Third). "We'd love to keep extending it indefinitely, or even better, to make it permanent, but you gotta vote for Officer Val Demmings!. Oh, you don't like her because she's a Retired Bae in Blue and you think cops are violent enforcers of the criminality of poverty and believe they should be forever kept far away from the levers of power? Gee, guess you don't really care about helping debt slaves!"

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

I wouldn't be shocked if it gets kicked until 2024. Biden obviously doesn't want to do this but the issue is important to the party. Either you use it to help win in 2024 or you hand the problem to a Republican who they assume would never support forgiving debt so then the Republicans get saddled with being the ones to actually restart things. Funny/Sad option of course is doing that and then having Republicans forgive the debt because they will get more from forgiving than not.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!! posted:

i mean, it's a TREMENDOUS dick move by senatorial standards to come out and say "yeah you're wholly qualified, but gently caress you I'm voting against you anyway because we disagree ideologically"

both the senate and the supreme court as institutions were designed with the understanding nobody in either would ever think that, let alone say it aloud as the justification for their actions

Oh I don't care about that part, the supreme court is a superlegislature, of course you shouldn't put people who are going to legislate wrong up there that's just common sense. You wouldn't ignore ideology when voting for a member of congress would you.

It's just how twisted his ideology is. A milquetoast public defender is objectionable, another racist rear end in a top hat who's going to rubberstamp South Carolina's voter suppression is aok

Yeah I know black Republicans exist, yeah I know race is imaginary and having dark skin doesn't automatically give him solidarity with African American communities etc etc but still jeezy pete

Manager Hoyden
Mar 5, 2020

Gumball Gumption posted:

I wouldn't be shocked if it gets kicked until 2024. Biden obviously doesn't want to do this but the issue is important to the party. Either you use it to help win in 2024 or you hand the problem to a Republican who they assume would never support forgiving debt so then the Republicans get saddled with being the ones to actually restart things. Funny/Sad option of course is doing that and then having Republicans forgive the debt because they will get more from forgiving than not.

The finance sector donated about 2.5x as much money to the Biden campaign during the 2020 election cycle, so I imagine he is about 2.5x more likely to stand against forgiveness than whatever republican we get in 2024

Koos Group
Mar 6, 2013

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

But, the permanent decision is what they can/will do executively. They already accepted that it is dead legislatively.

So, whatever they are both legally able to do and actually want to do will be on the DOE/White House and congress won't really matter anyway.

Extending the moratorium for another year isn't the worst thing in the world, but they are just kicking the can down the road over and over despite surely having some idea about what they actually want to do and can legally do at this point.

Ah, wasn't aware that there was that it didn't have a legislative chance.

While looking into that, I found two instances of relevant legislation. One is part of the stimulus, which removes taxation from loan forgiveness, so that someone doesn't have to pay several thousand dollars for having their loan forgiven. That already passed. The other is a bill that directs the Secretary of Education to forgive certain debts in a means-tested way. I don't understand why that one is necessary. Couldn't that be an executive order?

Edit: referring to this: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2034/text

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Manager Hoyden posted:

The finance sector donated about 2.5x as much money to the Biden campaign during the 2020 election cycle, so I imagine he is about 2.5x more likely to stand against forgiveness than whatever republican we get in 2024

Forgiveness wouldn't apply to private loans and finance companies aren't directly involved in federal student loans since Obamacare.

Ironically, some private student loan companies have been calling on Biden to forgive federal student debt and make the moratorium apply only to middle and low income households because high income people with expensive degrees, like doctors and lawyers, have a lot of supplemental private loans because federally subsidized loans have a cap on the total amount you can take, and they aren't looking for as many supplemental private student loans while their federal ones are paused.

Republicans have also been trying to get the moratorium ended since the end of last year over costs:

quote:

Republicans have been urging the Biden administration to restart student loan payments over concerns about the growing cost to taxpayers. The various extensions of the payment pause have cost more than $100 billion, according to Education Department estimates.

The galaxy brain play would be for Republicans to forgive all student debt, not issue any more federal student loans, and then have Medicaid expansion collapse after the funding source runs out.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Koos Group posted:

Ah, wasn't aware that there was that it didn't have a legislative chance.

While looking into that, I found two instances of relevant legislation. One is part of the stimulus, which removes taxation from loan forgiveness, so that someone doesn't have to pay several thousand dollars for having their loan forgiven. That already passed. The other is a bill that directs the Secretary of Education to forgive certain debts in a means-tested way. I don't understand why that one is necessary. Couldn't that be an executive order?

Edit: referring to this: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2034/text

That's what the whole legal question is about. The 1965 Higher Education Act says the Department of Education can unilaterally forgive debts, but the law also uses "all debts" and the three different types of student loans that existed then, but don't exist now, interchangeably. So, there is confusion about whether it "really" allows them to forgive all debts if they specifically mentioned only three kinds of debt.

Plus, congress has passed laws like this one allowing and directing the Secretary of Education to forgive some loans, so if congress has passed multiple laws directing the secretary to forgive loans, then Congress couldn't have intended for the 1965 Higher Education Act to allow the Secretary full discretion on forgiving any loans or why would they have passed all the following laws?

But, the plain reading of the law says "all debts," even if they also use it to mean those three specific types of loans in other passages. So, a literal reading would imply that he could.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Also, here is the official announcement.

Moratorium extended until September.

https://twitter.com/ZekeJMiller/status/1511399646568103938

Manager Hoyden
Mar 5, 2020

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Also, here is the official announcement.

Moratorium extended until September.

https://twitter.com/ZekeJMiller/status/1511399646568103938

Starting repayment even closer to the midterm is certainly a choice

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

Manager Hoyden posted:

Starting repayment even closer to the midterm is certainly a choice

They’ll get paused again

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Manager Hoyden posted:

Starting repayment even closer to the midterm is certainly a choice

According to Klain, they are going to extend the pause until they "do something" about student loan debt. They will almost surely kick the can down the road again by September.

So, expect frequent 4-month extensions and uncertainty for a while. A lack of clarity for multiple years is not the best way to handle it, but at least the federal government's inability to do anything is benefiting people for once.

Edward Mass
Sep 14, 2011

𝅘𝅥𝅮 I wanna go home with the armadillo
Good country music from Amarillo and Abilene
Friendliest people and the prettiest women you've ever seen
𝅘𝅥𝅮
Yeah, it's fairly obvious that Biden's going to extend it past the mid-terms, mainly so that young people will say "boy, that Joe Biden sure is great!" and vote for the Democrats.

I'll have MY student loans paid off in July, as the interest rate for those who do pay is at 0%, and I've been making inroads. :toot:

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Macron beat Le Pen by 33% in 2017.

He's polling 6% above her in the upcoming election.

A lot of people say they are casting protest votes for Le Pen over inflation, high energy prices, and Covid restrictions.

It is possible that a lot of that chunk doesn't actually follow through with voting for Le Pen as a protest if they don't like either, but 6% is within the realm of a Brexit-style upset, margin of error in polling, or slight surge/decline in turnout impacting the winner.

The French socialist party has completely collapsed, despite having the Presidency prior to Macron. They are polling in the single digits and the even more left-wing candidate from the "France Unbowed" party is in the low double digits. Even if they combined their vote total, they wouldn't make it to the runoff.

The center right French parties have all split and Le Pen is likely to make it to the runoff with only 21% of the vote.

https://twitter.com/cnni/status/1511419192750317573

Edit: Wrong thread, but a French exit from the E.U. and ending free trade with the U.S. would be a big deal for the U.S.

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 20:20 on Apr 5, 2022

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Edward Mass posted:

Yeah, it's fairly obvious that Biden's going to extend it past the mid-terms, mainly so that young people will say "boy, that Joe Biden sure is great!" and vote for the Democrats.

I'll have MY student loans paid off in July, as the interest rate for those who do pay is at 0%, and I've been making inroads. :toot:

And if that doesn't work and they lose the midterms the failure to forgive student loans is on voters and Republicans.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Politico has a briefing on HIT Strategies' focus groups of two of the Dems' strongest bases: Black voters & young voters.

Lots of "lying eyes" results:

quote:

Democrats are desperately trying to understand what’s roiling the electorate heading into a brutal midterm environment.

HIT Strategies has been conducting weekly focus groups to find out in real time how Americans are processing events in 2022. On Monday night we watched discussions with two different subgroups of partisan Democrats assembled by the firm: “Black Base, Always vote for Dems, Ages 25+” and “Youth Base; Always vote for Dems, Ages 25 – 39.”

There were significant differences within and between the two groups of nine voters. But there were some broad takeaways:

— A preoccupation with inflation and crime.
— Exhaustion with pandemic restrictions.
— Cynicism about politics.
— Deep frustration that President JOE BIDEN and Democrats have failed to deliver on their early promises.
— Sympathy for Ukraine mixed with a lack of enthusiasm for Biden spending too much time and money on the issue.
— Ambiguity about how important Jan. 6 should be for Democrats in the midterms.

These sentiments are captured in recent polling: Biden’s decline in approval from Black voters and millennials has been well documented, as of course has the rise in importance of inflation, crime and pandemic fatigue.

But watching the three-and-a-half hours of conversations, you notice a yawning gap between what Democrats here in D.C. are saying and what their most loyal voters are experiencing outside the Beltway. This was especially true on two big issues:

The economy: A cottage industry of White House officials and left-wing media critics who talk to each other on Twitter has convinced themselves that the media is responsible for the public’s overwhelming focus on the bad news of inflation rather than the good news of low unemployment and rising wages. The focus groups exploded that bit of Democratic self-deception.

When the voters were asked to describe how they feel about how things are going, they responded with words like “exhausted,” “uptight,” “unsure,” “concerned” and “anxious.”

A woman from the Boston area who went first mentioned rising gas and food prices, food shortages at her local Whole Foods, and the increasing cost of housing. “It just seems like everything is going up and there’s no end in sight,” she said.

In the other focus group, a Black man from the Houston area talked about trying to subsist on the $12- and $13-per-hour jobs he was being offered. “No one can live off of that, especially with inflation,” he said.

And so it went across hours of hours of conversation. Rising costs — of food, gas, education, medication and more — dominated.


The Biden record: After the Build Back Better bill collapsed, Biden and many Democrats began talking about last year’s two big wins: the American Rescue Plan and the bipartisan infrastructure law. But these two panels of base Democratic voters kept returning to what still needs to be done.

They had little positive to say about all the Covid money in the ARP or the new bridges that would be built with the infrastructure money.

A typical response came from a young white woman from Montana: “I think Democrats have just been really ineffectual.”

One young white man from the L.A. area was a bit more forgiving, but no less frustrated: “I’m not ready to blame the party as a whole because there are two bozos by the name of [JOE] MANCHIN and [KYRSTEN] SINEMA who really handcuffed the Build Back Better plan, and handcuffed pretty much almost every meaningful social piece of legislation that’s been proposed.”

One Black female participant said she didn’t feel much urgency about the midterms “because at this moment the Democrats [are] running the House and they’re not getting much done.”

Two other issues also generated noticeable attention from the groups: crime and the war in Ukraine.

Crime: It was impossible to ignore how much it came up. A Black man from New York complained about bail reform laws in that state leading to “repeat offenders” who get arrested and released and are “re-arrested in less than 24 hours.” A Black woman in the Philadelphia area wanted something done about gun violence and carjackings in the city by “repeat offenders.”

The white woman from Boston said she was reading a lot about “unprovoked attacks” on tourists in New York. “It’s out of control,” she said.

Ukraine: There was a divide between the first group of Black base voters and the second group of millennial white base voters. The Black voters were more openly skeptical about the wisdom of the recent $14 billion aid package for Ukraine. After hearing the price tag of the bill, one Black male Biden voter replied, “They need to take that money back and give it to Black people for reparations.”

I'd love to hear what the group said about America's Darkest Day, 1/6, Never Forget. :allears:

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
I'm sure if the Democrats went around talking about how terrible everything is it would be a real electoral boon for them.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Well, whistling Happy Days Are Here Again & pointing to bridge repairs ain't doing the trick, either.

On the bright side, voters have internalized the Rotating Villains strategy rather than the party's M.O. for the last decade-plus. Just a couple bad apples, nothing that Voting Harder can't fix!

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004

Mellow Seas posted:

I'm sure if the Democrats went around talking about how terrible everything is it would be a real electoral boon for them.

Who are you even arguing with?

This crime stuff is interesting. It and that article posted about Sacramento show how there's really no winning. Our national myth of law and order runs too deep.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Mellow Seas posted:

I'm sure if the Democrats went around talking about how terrible everything is it would be a real electoral boon for them.

Highlighting the good things and not emphasizing the bad things is an obvious thing that everyone does.

The problem, as it relates to the economy, is that wages did outpace inflation for almost everyone for the first 9 months of the Biden administration. People really were better off in almost every scenario in June. But, for the last 5 months, inflation has outpaced wage growth by about 2%. So, people are actually losing ground. They haven't actually lost a ton of ground on net, but nobody cares about the net difference when it has been 5 months in a row of reduced real income and people don't know when it is going to stop. The economy is obviously not worse than it was in 2009, but the uncertainty and no end in sight makes people feel way worse than a single large instance of economic collapse.

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Willa Rogers posted:

On the bright side, voters have internalized the Rotating Villains strategy rather than the party's M.O. for the last decade-plus. Just a couple bad apples, nothing that Voting Harder can't fix!

Actually voters never believed in "rotating villains" because it's a stupid contrarian conspiracy theory, which is only held dear by terminally online weirdos and supported by no actual evidence, hth

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Highlighting the good things and not emphasizing the bad things is an obvious thing that everyone does.

The problem, as it relates to the economy, is that wages did outpace inflation for almost everyone for the first 9 months of the Biden administration. People really were better off in almost every scenario in June. But, for the last 5 months, inflation has outpaced wage growth by about 2%. So, people are actually losing ground. They haven't actually lost a ton of ground on net, but nobody cares about the net difference when it has been 5 months in a row of reduced real income and people don't know when it is going to stop. The economy is obviously not worse than it was in 2009, but the uncertainty and no end in sight makes people feel way worse than a single large instance of economic collapse.
The harsh reality of the price increases is something Democrats have to contend with, and offer a plan to address, but... it's been months since anybody pretended it wasn't a problem. It's just, you have to strike a balance between acknowledging the problem exists and sending a message that there are positive signs. It seems like some people want the Democrats to fall on their swords and say "everything is awful, and it's all our fault," lest they contradict voters, which is a great way to lose the election by even more than they would otherwise.

Mellow Seas fucked around with this message at 21:17 on Apr 5, 2022

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

I love how "actually fixing the problems making things suck" is off the table

We have to say everything is fine, because obviously just admitting this sucks is going to make us look bad

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004

Mellow Seas posted:

Actually voters never believed in "rotating villains" because it's a stupid contrarian conspiracy theory, which is only held dear by terminally online weirdos and supported by no actual evidence, hth

Way to pretend we haven't been over this repeatedly, make no arguments much less new ones, and just call a bunch of posters stupid. Real persuasive.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Mellow Seas posted:

Actually voters never believed in "rotating villains" because it's a stupid contrarian conspiracy theory, which is only held dear by terminally online weirdos and supported by no actual evidence, hth

Nah, it's real, as the Dems showed during the crafting of the ACA when the Senate voted to pass reforms like drug-price controls with GOP ayes but Reid stripped the reforms from the bill anyway, because Obama had already promised PhRMA they wouldn't be in the final bill.

Also how Menendez & a bunch of House Dems killed meaningful drug-price controls from BBB. The party's rot goes way beyond Sinema & Manchin.

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Willa Rogers posted:

Nah, it's real, as the Dems showed during the crafting of the ACA when the Senate voted to pass reforms like drug-price controls with GOP ayes but Reid stripped the reforms from the bill anyway, because Obama had already promised PhRMA they wouldn't be in the final bill.

Also how Menendez & a bunch of House Dems killed meaningful drug-price controls from BBB. The party's rot goes way beyond Sinema & Manchin.
It's not some kind of revolutionary idea that sometimes a politician will want to send a message that they support something that they actually don't.

But "rotating villains" brings that idea to absurd and unsupportable levels. Where it gets silly is when you claim that anything that can't pass with 50 votes also wouldn't pass with 52 or 55 or even more (so might as well just let Republicans win all the elections, to "send a message"). Or when you say that the President spent months lobbying for a policy he secretly wanted to fail the entire time.

I don't need a conspiracy theory to tell me that Bob Menendez and Henry Cuellar are pieces of poo poo.

Mellow Seas fucked around with this message at 21:26 on Apr 5, 2022

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

The average rental price of a one-bedroom apartment is now a whopping $1684/month, requiring an annual salary of $60,000 by the common 3x metric used by landlords & property managers.

Mellow Seas posted:

Or when you say that the President spent months lobbying for a policy he secretly wanted to fail the entire time.

Can you be a little more explicit in what you're referring to here? I don't recall Obama spending months lobbying for drug-price reforms after he made his secret deals with PhRMA to preclude him.

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Willa Rogers posted:

Can you be a little more explicit in what you're referring to here? I don't recall Obama spending months lobbying for drug-price reforms after he made his secret deals with PhRMA to preclude him.
This is the current events thread, so I'm talking about the current president. I'm not gonna go dig up a bunch of posts from over the last six months claiming that Biden signing the infrastructure bill without BBB passed first proves that he secretly didn't ever want BBB to pass, but I know that I read them.

If the only citations of "rotating villains" that came up here were about Obamacare negotiations from 13 years ago then you wouldn't have brought it up in the thread today in response to voters (correctly) blaming Manchin and Sinema for Biden's legislative problems.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Sinema also came right out and said there are more democrats hiding behind her skirts so we know rotating villain theory is true.

Hall passes are also a well-attested strategy.

But it doesn't actually matter now whether rotating villain theory is true or false (it's true). Anti-gerrymandering and other voter rights laws can't pass, whatever the reason, and since Democrats are cruising for a midterm shellacking and Republicans have gerrymandered themselves into control of enough states to overturn every electoral college vote if they want, we're looking at the last Democrat controlled federal government for our lifetimes. There's no need to primary bad dems anymore

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

Calling the theory "politicians talk to each other and make plans about how they vote to protect their image" a conspiracy theory is really stretching the term conspiracy theory. Great way to just attack any possibility you don't want to consider though.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply