|
Sickening posted:I hope that there is something missing from this as this seems kid of busted. Is there no limit to how often you can blitz? It seems really good but I wonder how many times I will be in a position to spend 2BB and 2 life and then not have the creature stick around in limited.
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 16:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 06:20 |
|
|
Kashuno posted:It seems really good but I wonder how many times I will be in a position to spend 2BB and 2 life and then not have the creature stick around in limited. Wait, maybe I am reading it wrong. Is the 2bb and the life interchangeable or both required?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 16:41
|
|
|
Sickening posted:Wait, maybe I am reading it wrong. Is the 2bb and the life interchangeable or both required? I think (and hope) it has to be both.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 16:42
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:It seems really good but I wonder how many times I will be in a position to spend 2BB and 2 life and then not have the creature stick around in limited. you get a card out of it. repeatable 2bb+2 life = card seems pretty good even if your opponent has a 4/4 fatty sitting around waiting to block
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 16:43
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/twoduckcubed/status/1514478467865268229
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 16:48
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:you get a card out of it. repeatable 2bb+2 life = card seems pretty good even if your opponent has a 4/4 fatty sitting around waiting to block Don’t forget you get a card when it dies as part of the blitz ability too
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 16:49
|
|
|
Arivia posted:Don’t forget you get a card when it dies as part of the blitz ability too That's what evilweasel is saying. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 17:04
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:you get a card out of it. repeatable 2bb+2 life = card seems pretty good even if your opponent has a 4/4 fatty sitting around waiting to block That seems borderline good in standard constructed. Paying 2 life to blitz a vanilla 3/2 seems busted as gently caress though and that is the clarification I was seeking anyway.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 17:17
|
|
|
 This is for EDH I guess? It's mythic but seems worse than Pull from Tomorrow in 1v1.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 17:20
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:you get a card out of it. repeatable 2bb+2 life = card seems pretty good even if your opponent has a 4/4 fatty sitting around waiting to block Eye of Vecna is a card that is currently in standard and lets you pay less mana and 2 life for a card every turn, and is completely irrelevant, so if this creature is going to see play it's relying heavily on being a recurring creature. Was Scrapheap Scrounger the last black(ish) creature that played around role like this in standard?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 17:26
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 17:54
|
|
|
With shield counters and some of the powerful deathrattle effects on stuff like NEO dragons, seems like the stock of O-ring removal and even blue tapdown removal might be on the rise.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 18:07
|
|
|
Last week the New Capenna spoilers were cool but kinda weak. This week they are both cool and appropriately strong. Gotta say I think they've hit the theme just right, the only thing I don't really like are the finger-guns.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 18:56
|
|
|
Idk if it's being the last set before rotation or my inexperience with 3 color cards but most of the set looks so bad. Too expensive, color wise or just the regular way. That said, every black two drop in standard, besides Adversary, suck rear end so Tenacious Underdog would go straight into my black aggro deck.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 19:03
|
|
|
I agree with you Wooper. Being the 8th set in standard so it needs some real powerhouses to affect the meta also. I mean, the set is cool but I'm not seeing any in your face must play cards on the level of goldspan dragon.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 19:17
|
|
|
Wooper posted:Idk if it's being the last set before rotation or my inexperience with 3 color cards but most of the set looks so bad. Too expensive, color wise or just the regular way. Fuzzy Mammal posted:I agree with you Wooper. Being the 8th set in standard so it needs some real powerhouses to affect the meta also. I mean, the set is cool but I'm not seeing any in your face must play cards on the level of goldspan dragon. three color faction sets are even easier to miss the mark on b4 u actually play them than other magic sets in general. but it does look slow. i think if theres any three color family deck that can make it into standard and be a powerhouse, then its probably obscura. obscura interceptor looks like it does a lot of good poo poo for 4 mana, and theres also the charm, void rend, raffine, maybe toluz and larcenist, etc  ^ a bit scary
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 19:51
|
|
|
If you kill it in response they don't get the remand effect, I guess?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 19:56
|
|
|
resistentialism posted:If you kill it in response they don't get the remand effect, I guess? yup. atp its a 4 mana removal spell magnet w/ a loot. but that still seems deece 2 me as the floor.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 19:57
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 20:23
|
|
|
holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 20:48
|
|
|
Big Ol Marsh Pussy posted:holy poo poo  woah
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 20:54
|
|
|
Eat poo poo, Priest of Ancient Lore
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 20:54
|
|
|
resistentialism posted:If you kill it in response they don't get the remand effect, I guess?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 20:56
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:Why wouldn't you? It's singular trigger, a difference in templating from the Exploits of Innistrad. drat, really? i assumed that "when it connives this way" meant that it had to resolve while the interceptor was still alive. if it just gets the spell no matter what, than its even scarier than i thought
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 21:38
|
|
|
Fucker posted:drat, really? i assumed that "when it connives this way" meant that it had to resolve while the interceptor was still alive. if it just gets the spell no matter what, than its even scarier than i thought It's probably templated like that so you can't stop the connive by removing the target spell
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 21:48
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:Why wouldn't you? It's singular trigger, a difference in templating from the Exploits of Innistrad. hmm maybe i'm parsing this sentence incorrectly, but the exploit trigger does go on the stack right, so even if you kill the creature you can still sac a creature (or choose not to) for the exploit effect
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 22:01
|
|
|
I was trying to figure out why people were so excited about a 4 mana pay 2 life 3/2 repeatable from the yard ball lightning guy till I reread Blitz and saw the card draw.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 22:02
|
|
|
Found some more cards in the basement of my parents’ house, mostly just junk commons from Torment but there was a Lotus Petal in there so hey
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 22:19
|
|
|
Barry Shitpeas posted:It's probably templated like that so you can't stop the connive by removing the target spell It’s templated that way so you don’t get the trigger if something else makes it connive like Raffine.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 22:29
|
|
|
It's like the Diregraf Horde trigger except they can't use "when you do" because it's the creature doing the conniving
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 22:37
|
|
|
 man big. Big lad
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2022 23:12
|
|
|
The Wicked ZOGA posted:
What a heckin chonker
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 00:23
|
|
|
The Wicked ZOGA posted:
Top tier joke. Maybe my favorite of the set.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 00:40
|
|
|
TotalHell posted:Top tier joke. Maybe my favorite of the set. Agreed
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 01:20
|
|
|
 pen is sword
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 01:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 01:51
|
|
|
Pablo Nergigante posted:Found some more cards in the basement of my parents’ house, mostly just junk commons from Torment but there was a Lotus Petal in there so hey Check for cabal coffers, it’s off it’s $100+ high due to MH2 reprint, but it’s still $28 which is sweet for an uncommon If you’ve got other cards from the era in the pile Standstill from odyssey is a $10 uncommon One of the times I returned to mtg from a break, just those two cards fished out of all my old draft chaff funded two new decks
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 02:08
|
|
|
in a 1v1, i have:   = my opponent has this card:  all cards are in play. there are two copies of boarded window i attack with delina and adeline. no challenges by my opponent. then i select adeline as the target creature of delina's ability. i roll a 1, i create a tapped and attacking copy of adeline. my opponent declares no blockers, in response, i cast something that destroys both his boarded windows... 2 abrades. how much damage does my opponent take? mostly unsure about the copy entering after attack has been declared. because it says, "whenever you attack" vs something like "whenever ~ attacks" which i know copies made during attack phase won't trigger. my guess is that the same rules apply and the language on adeline just allows you to optionally attack without including her in the attack to get a 1/1 token. but i do believe cavalcade triggers on the copy because the enchantment triggers when your creature is attacking. am i right or wrong on that? Strong Sauce fucked around with this message at 02:32 on Apr 15, 2022 |
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 02:27
|
|
|
14 damage total Cavalcade triggers to deal 2 Adeline creates a tapped and attacking 1/1 token You connect with a pair of 4/4 Adeline’s, a 3/2 Delina and a 1/1 token. The triggers are all set off when you declare the already existing creature an attacker so ninjas and those tokens don’t trigger Cavalcade damage. LeafHouse fucked around with this message at 02:36 on Apr 15, 2022 |
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 02:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 06:20 |
|
|
The only time you get an "attacks" event is when you declare attackers near the start of a combat phase. You "attack" if you declare at least one attacking creature, and a creature "attacks" if you declare it as an attacker.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2022 02:38
|
|