Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
XboxPants
Jan 30, 2006

Steven doesn't want me watching him sleep anymore.

LinkesAuge posted:

I mean that's the real problem with the scene. Why do the characters act like they are in the 20th century? That interaction makes more sense in a contemporary setting but it is once again just an awkward example of the writers being so in your face about what they are doing. Making it a thing that Adira even has to have this as "big reveal" or teach Stamets about pronouns is the bad part. Adira can't just be transgender, it has to be a whole storyline that makes it stand out and is a "crisis" situation at every point and the whole character is based on that one specific characteristic, it verges on tokenism (it's certainly the case with Gray).
That's what reactonaries are picking up on, it's the empty kind of "wokeism" that invites voices like that and has certainly a cynical motivation. It obviously is still better to have that representation but even better would be representation that goes a bit deeper than that and is actually able to reach people from a different angle.
You could have designed a great story about transgenderism that actually deals with bigotry but in Discovery Adira and Gray don't face any external threats or any discrimination, it's the complete opposite. Adira is your typical Wesley-type wonderkid that receives attention at every step (and doesn't even get told to shut up) and just as every such "teenage" character they are rarely received positively but they are attached to such a difficult topic in a story that doesn't have anything to say about it. There isn't a single obstacle for Adira or Gray in regards to their transgenderism (Gray being a "ghost" isn't related to it) and yet it still wants you to FEEL like there is because that's the reality of our society today (why is his non-binary identity something he has to "trust" someone else with, in the context of the setting that's like Wesley "trusting" Picard that he can tell him he likes girls. Why is that a thing?).
So yeah, it's an easy one for reactionaries to dislike because there isn't any meat to it and it DOES feel extremely forced at every step. It's certainly a wasted opportunity and while I do commend Discovery for more representation that one really didn't do anything. The thing is Discovery already did it a lot better with Stamets and Culber who are imo one of the better aspects of Discovery and also a reason why it's a lot harder for reactionaries to rally against them (it also shows that the writers are already confident enough with gay characters on TV shows to not fall into similar traps while Adira/Gray remind me of early gay characters in 90s/early 2000s shows).

I don't think you meant it to be in any way transphobic but you might want to know that "transgenderism" is a common dog-whistle phrase for transphobes and it's probably best to avoid it entirely. Although, you also repeatedly referred to Adira as "he" so I'm really not sure how much benefit of the doubt to give.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Typical Pubbie
May 10, 2011
There must be a malfunction in their universal translator. Ensign LinkesAuge, have your comm badge checked out. It might be damaged.

Charity Porno
Aug 2, 2021

by Hand Knit
I don't think when that poster mentioned the chud subreddit about Trek they were saying we should emulate that here, but here we are.

"They shouldn't even mention Adira's pronouns at all! And why aren't they doing entire stories about it?!"

The Grumbles
Jun 5, 2006

McSpanky posted:

Get off your loving high horse, you don't have a monopoly on the mental illness/neurodiversity experience. I've been dealing with major depression more than half of my life and I consider it far more inspirational to imagine a future where the brain is sufficiently understood that the vast majority of malfunctioning mental conditions are as easy to fix as the physical ones are than for someone to "respect my neurodiversity" by letting me wallow in misery as long as I'm not actively trying to harm myself, you arrogant rear end.

Yes hello first of all neurodiversity is emphatically something that should not be seen as an illness to be cured, but also I am not saying depression/psychosis/etc is the same as neurodiversity. But its a useful touchstone for this conversation because, similarly, there are autistic characters in Star Trek - who lead happy and fulfilling lives and who are not treated as patients in need of curing, and I think t hey are arguably correct in this depiction.

I'm not saying you or anyone who has experienced depressive or paranoid episodes (like me!) should be allowed to wallow in misery, I am saying that Star Trek has an established approach to how these things are managed, which implies that treatment for this stuff in the future isn't just taking a magic pill that 'rebalances the chemicals' , because something like depression is usually much more than just 'too much sad chemical' and involves behavioural stuff that you cant (and arguably shouldn't) just cure with a pill, but takes lengthy unpicking through talking therapies, counselling, and an entire societal structure that exists to support, uplift and care for its citizens. I think sci fi that goes 'take a pill to make sure you are happy' is no longer depicting a utopia.

I am sorry you are struggling with serious depression. I do however think you've misinterpreted what I'm saying as suggesting people who are struggling should continue to struggle.

The Grumbles fucked around with this message at 20:24 on Apr 18, 2022

John Wick of Dogs
Mar 4, 2017

A real hellraiser


I think Adira had more personal story and character development in a single 12 episode season than most TNG characters got in the entire series, and they're a minor character. From dealing with loss, integrating with a symbiote, finding family, and seeking mentors.

And Gray is not even a cast member as far as I'm aware so I don't think it's reasonable to expect him to be heavily featured. Even then his scenes of teaching Zora to process overwhelming sensation is great.

The Chairman
Jun 30, 2003

But you forget, mon ami, that there is evil everywhere under the sun

John Wick of Dogs posted:

I think Adira had more personal story and character development in a single 12 episode season than most TNG characters got in the entire series, and they're a minor character. From dealing with loss, integrating with a symbiote, finding family, and seeking mentors.

And Gray is not even a cast member as far as I'm aware so I don't think it's reasonable to expect him to be heavily featured. Even then his scenes of teaching Zora to process overwhelming sensation is great.

yeah, the stuff with Adira and Grey in season 4 was good, it just felt cordoned off from everything else that was happening

blastron
Dec 11, 2007

Don't doodle on it!


I can’t get over how 24th century medicine is so good that a doctor from 2024 can be handed a piece of medical equipment, point it hesitantly at the patient, and instantly cure a life-threatening ailment. Really underscores how half of Star Trek doctoring is applying 10 ccs of inaprovaline and picking the right blinky wand to wave. (The other half is extremely specialized isogenetic nanosurgery to turn a salamander back into a human.)

Brawnfire
Jul 13, 2004

🎧Listen to Cylindricule!🎵
https://linktr.ee/Cylindricule

Picard's brain shoots out of his cranium in a liquid jet.

HOLY poo poo screams Rios, HOW THE gently caress DID YOU gently caress THAT UP SO BADLY

Khanstant
Apr 5, 2007
wishgun

CPColin
Sep 9, 2003

Big ol' smile.
What'd Rios ask for, "some kind of stabilizer"? I thought for a second he was going to do some sleight of hand and press the Reset button on Picard's foot with a paperclip to make the Doc think she fixed him. Or is that what actually happened and I failed to pay attention again?

xerxus
Apr 24, 2010
Grimey Drawer
The Neural Oscillator is probably a tool that doesnt cause damage and doesn't require skill to operate. Rios was pretending it matters because he wanted an excuse to beam her on board and to eventually abduct her into the future.

Khanstant
Apr 5, 2007

CPColin posted:

What'd Rios ask for, "some kind of stabilizer"? I thought for a second he was going to do some sleight of hand and press the Reset button on Picard's foot with a paperclip to make the Doc think she fixed him. Or is that what actually happened and I failed to pay attention again?

He doesn't have a good robot body, he specifically requested the "already sick and dying body, except no on the brain thing I'm dying from, I hate it" option

blastron
Dec 11, 2007

Don't doodle on it!


CPColin posted:

What'd Rios ask for, "some kind of stabilizer"? I thought for a second he was going to do some sleight of hand and press the Reset button on Picard's foot with a paperclip to make the Doc think she fixed him. Or is that what actually happened and I failed to pay attention again?

No, he asked for a neural stabilizer directly, making extensive use of his Starfleet first aid training to vaguely identify the problem (unstable neurons of some sort) and pick the tool that sounds like it solves anything in that broad category of problems.

Epicurius
Apr 10, 2010
College Slice

LinkesAuge posted:

I mean that's the real problem with the scene. Why do the characters act like they are in the 20th century? That interaction makes more sense in a contemporary setting but it is once again just an awkward example of the writers being so in your face about what they are doing.

You could ask that about a lot of Star Trek. In TOS, why do Kirk and McCoy have a debate about the morality of providing arms to one side in a planetary war that's a blatant Vietnam analogy? In TNG, why does Tasha lecture Wesley about the dangers of drug addiction? In Voyager, why is there an episode where Seven suffers from false memory syndrome? In Enterprise, why is the third season about Earth being attacked by religious fanatics? These shows are set in the future, but are written by people in the present for people in the present, so they focus on issues that are important now, like, in this case, the question of a character's gender and self-identification,

CPColin
Sep 9, 2003

Big ol' smile.
I just cued it back up and Rios's line is, "Raffi, I need some kind of, uh, stabilizer, stat. It's for Picard... It's for his brain." Even worse than I remembered lol

Chef Boyardeez Nuts
Sep 9, 2011

The more you kick against the pricks, the more you suffer.
Oh good thing they busses Picard's failing brain to a clinic in the valley for an episode then.

Megillah Gorilla
Sep 22, 2003

If only all of life's problems could be solved by smoking a professor of ancient evil texts.



Bread Liar

CPColin posted:

I thought for a second he was going to do some sleight of hand and press the Reset button on Picard's foot with a paperclip to make the Doc think she fixed him.

I am so tickled by this idea.

If they had actually done something like that I would have laughed myself off my chair.

Wheeee
Mar 11, 2001

When a tree grows, it is soft and pliable. But when it's dry and hard, it dies.

Hardness and strength are death's companions. Flexibility and softness are the embodiment of life.

That which has become hard shall not triumph.

blastron posted:

I can’t get over how 24th century medicine is so good that a doctor from 2024 can be handed a piece of medical equipment, point it hesitantly at the patient, and instantly cure a life-threatening ailment. Really underscores how half of Star Trek doctoring is applying 10 ccs of inaprovaline and picking the right blinky wand to wave. (The other half is extremely specialized isogenetic nanosurgery to turn a salamander back into a human.)

In the future of the Federation computer technology is so advanced that everything is automated, it’s effectively Idiocracy with nobody actually knowing what they’re doing, everyone just presses big glowing buttons or talks to the computer which understands context well enough to handle just about anything. Chief O’Brien is a one of a kind asset who knows the order you have to swap the little cards around that fill every terminal, the future equivalent of unplugging your router and plugging it back in.

blastron
Dec 11, 2007

Don't doodle on it!


CPColin posted:

I just cued it back up and Rios's line is, "Raffi, I need some kind of, uh, stabilizer, stat. It's for Picard... It's for his brain." Even worse than I remembered lol

Ah, thus drawing on Seven’s knowledge from delivering medical supplies as part of the Fenris Rangers to identify the correct, uh, stabilizer, for Picard. For his brain.

Unrelatedly, I looked up the episode on Memory Alpha and discovered another one of its extremely specific quirks: a stubborn insistence on referring to characters by their last names, regardless of whether or not they’re used on screen at all. (Did you know that Raffi’s last name is Musiker? I didn’t!) This is right up there with their policy of showing characters at their latest point in their personal timeline, which results in Spock’s being from JJTrek, Icheb’s being of his grisly murder, and Tom Paris’s being literally a cartoon.

Crusader
Apr 11, 2002

DaveKap
Feb 5, 2006

Pickle: Inspected.



blastron posted:

Unrelatedly, I looked up the episode on Memory Alpha and discovered another one of its extremely specific quirks: a stubborn insistence on referring to characters by their last names, regardless of whether or not they’re used on screen at all. (Did you know that Raffi’s last name is Musiker? I didn’t!) This is right up there with their policy of showing characters at their latest point in their personal timeline, which results in Spock’s being from JJTrek, Icheb’s being of his grisly murder, and Tom Paris’s being literally a cartoon.
That certainly is one way to prevent discussion wars between people who think Kirk should be represented by the episode where he fights the Gorn vs the movie where he saves a whale.

Mx.
Dec 16, 2006

I'm a great fan! When I watch TV I'm always saying "That's political correctness gone mad!"
Why thankyew!



lol

Barry Foster
Dec 24, 2007

What is going wrong with that one (face is longer than it should be)

blastron posted:

Ah, thus drawing on Seven’s knowledge from delivering medical supplies as part of the Fenris Rangers to identify the correct, uh, stabilizer, for Picard. For his brain.

Unrelatedly, I looked up the episode on Memory Alpha and discovered another one of its extremely specific quirks: a stubborn insistence on referring to characters by their last names, regardless of whether or not they’re used on screen at all. (Did you know that Raffi’s last name is Musiker? I didn’t!) This is right up there with their policy of showing characters at their latest point in their personal timeline, which results in Spock’s being from JJTrek, Icheb’s being of his grisly murder, and Tom Paris’s being literally a cartoon.

Lmao

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 
I'm trying not to shitpost about Picard all the time but I was just thinking about the concept of this Watcher character. I'm really kind of stuck on the fact that it seems they went this direction for no other purpose than they wanted some callback to a character from the Old Scientists era, and they needed a reason for Laris-not-Laris to appear so Picard can make goo-goo eyes and probably have some kind of emotional scene (?) in the last few episodes.

I didn't watch a lot of TOS so maybe I'm missing some nuance around the concept of this Watcher thing, but I'm just struggling to see what value she is actually providing to Renee. It's a watch-an-important-person-from-afar type of situation which is, ok I guess, but that seems so incredibly limited if all she's doing is monitoring and not actually protecting. I'm going to be absurd for the sake of comedy but like, Renee slips in the tub or falls down a flight of stairs and not-Laris has a GTA style "WASTED" screen pop up on her mobile.

So yeah, maybe I just missed the whole point of what a Watcher is supposed to do, in a key moment of dialogue and my confusion could be resolved by a quick trip to memory-alpha but this has been going around 6am me's head.

I think I've given Picard more pre-Thursday thought than is deserved :haw:

Megillah Gorilla
Sep 22, 2003

If only all of life's problems could be solved by smoking a professor of ancient evil texts.



Bread Liar

DaveKap posted:

That certainly is one way to prevent discussion wars between people who think Kirk should be represented by the episode where he fights the Gorn vs the movie where he saves a whale.

Holy poo poo, you're right. That has to be why they do it. It's so stupid it has to be true.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

I think the charitable assumption is that there's some symmetry going on where Picard teaches Laris the value of interfering in other people's lives based on information you gained by illicitly spying on them, and the in the future Picard is going to realise that Laris was doing this to him and be grateful. Its messy and if you think about it too much the ethics of what is going on is not good.

There's also the question of what omnipitent power is empowering/directing the watchers to follow people who have a destiny that's important to the timeline, which Picard has directly called out once but then the show kinda forgot it and in a good show you would expect that it is far too late to be introducing entirely new entities like that but this show is entirely comfortable throwing new stuff into the mix all the way through.


e: like, if you tried to wrap up the plot based just on what's present in the story so far, then for the villain you need to find an entity with knowledge over space and time, who likes to observe and has a link to laris, and who is motivated to be opposed to Q in some way and could plausibly be involved in a scheme to depower him. That's Guinan. Guinan is the obvious villian and puppeteer behind the events of the show.

They're obviously not going to do that. The villain will be someone we meet in the last 5 minutes of episode 9.

Alchenar fucked around with this message at 12:11 on Apr 19, 2022

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 

Alchenar posted:

the future Picard is going to realise that Laris was doing this to him

This would be kind of a cool twist I guess

e: Plotwise, I guess. Not ethically.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Alchenar posted:

They're obviously not going to do that. The villain will be someone we meet in the last 5 minutes of episode 9.
God, that just gave me a PTSD flashback to the final season of Castle, where the villainous mastermind behind the ongoing plot arc was revealed as... some random guy who appeared in exactly one previous episode. "No, really, we planned it all in advance, we didn't just scrabble about at the last minute to find any character who might fit the bill, honest!"

Megillah Gorilla
Sep 22, 2003

If only all of life's problems could be solved by smoking a professor of ancient evil texts.



Bread Liar

some kinda jackal posted:

e: Plotwise, I guess. Not ethically.

"Hi, I've watched you every moment of your life and have used that information to make you fall in love with me. Uh, for your own good, naturally."

The real horrifying bit would be all the creeps crawling out from under the floorboards to say how romantic it was.

Aww, it's just like in my favourite movie - Twilight.

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 
Uh yeah I feel I need to clarify, the cool part MIGHT be the “future Laris is also a watcher” thing, not the “I’ve been stalking you and now we’re in love” thing :ohdear:

Typical Pubbie
May 10, 2011
Picard will turn out to be Laris's grandfather, thereby answering the question she posed to him in the beginning.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Tom Paris was always a cartoon to me

Epicurius
Apr 10, 2010
College Slice

some kinda jackal posted:

So yeah, maybe I just missed the whole point of what a Watcher is supposed to do, in a key moment of dialogue and my confusion could be resolved by a quick trip to memory-alpha but this has been going around 6am me's head.

In Assignment Earth, Gary Seven was an agent of this mysterious advanced alien race who was worried that humans would destroy themselves because their technology was advancing faster than their societal maturity. So Seven and other agents had the job of monitoring the earth and stopping threats to peace.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

DaveKap posted:

That certainly is one way to prevent discussion wars between people who think Kirk should be represented by the episode where he fights the Gorn vs the movie where he saves a whale.

So is Kirk's picture him lying dead at the Vasquez rocks then?

pik_d
Feb 24, 2006

follow the white dove





TRP Post of the Month October 2021

Payndz posted:

God, that just gave me a PTSD flashback to the final season of Castle, where the villainous mastermind behind the ongoing plot arc was revealed as... some random guy who appeared in exactly one previous episode. "No, really, we planned it all in advance, we didn't just scrabble about at the last minute to find any character who might fit the bill, honest!"

The Mentalist did this too with Red John

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

It would be brave and awesome to make Guinan the secret villain.

Taear
Nov 26, 2004

Ask me about the shitty opinions I have about Paradox games!

Professor Beetus posted:

So is Kirk's picture him lying dead at the Vasquez rocks then?

Almost, it's just him in Generations

some kinda jackal
Feb 25, 2003

 
 
Now that everyone is an android it's going to be revealed that the villain is actually Jean-Lore Picard

Hipster_Doofus
Dec 20, 2003

Lovin' every minute of it.

What is that space station-looking thing in the upper left of the third picture? Did they make that up just for the pinball machine lol?

Epicurius posted:

In Assignment Earth, Gary Seven was an agent of this mysterious advanced alien race who was worried that humans would destroy themselves because their technology was advancing faster than their societal maturity. So Seven and other agents had the job of monitoring the earth and stopping threats to peace.

Actually, Gary Seven deliberately hosed with a test missile, making it go off course and threatening some city or whatever, then detonating it in the nick of time, I guess for the purpose of giving us a good scare.

Also, yeah, said test missile was carrying a live warhead, but I guess they get a pass for that because otherwise it wouldn't have been nearly as dramatic (or as scary to the foolish 1960s humans).

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Chef Boyardeez Nuts
Sep 9, 2011

The more you kick against the pricks, the more you suffer.
Jean Luc Picard: "The Prime Directive is not just a set of rules. It is a philosophy, and a very correct one. History has proved again and again that whenever mankind interferes with a less-developed civilization, no matter how well intentioned that interference may be, the results are invariably disastrous."

Laris: so anyway, I'm posted in your prewarp planet to guide it's history.

jLp: cool

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply