Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
alex314
Nov 22, 2007

I recall a couple weeks ago someone did a map with comfirmed Russian casualties, and there was noone from Moscow. City alone has 12million residents, and there's about 20 million if you include metropolitan area. That's out of about 145 million total in Russian Federation. Updated map could be pretty useful propaganda tool "see, of 10.000 soldiers we have confirmed as dead or captured none are from Moscow, why are you letting Muscovites send your kids to death?"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

Tuna-Fish posted:

The big problem is that those ships are really, really bad. Totally loving counterproductive to keep floating level bad.

Are they those Littoral Combat Ships that no one actually wants?

The more I think about it the less I'm sure Ukraine benefits much from a surface fleet. Submarines might be of more use for them as their suspected presence would greatly hinder the easy movement of hostile ships. Combined with shore-based ASMs covering the coastal areas they could effectively blockade Sevastopol without being in any huge danger themselves (aside from other subs) as they could always withdraw to waters protected from surface vessels by missiles.

Dick Ripple
May 19, 2021

gay picnic defence posted:

I don't buy any of the arguments about demographic trends leading to this conflict.

Do you have an argument on why that is not the case?
They are not the sole or strongest reason for this conflict, but they do play a role. If you are interested I would suggest you look up just about anything recent by Peter Zeihan, as he makes a fairly compelling argument on why demographics do indeed play an important and strong role in this conflict.

Comstar
Apr 20, 2007

Are you happy now?

If Ukraine does this to Russian Hackers and spammers, I will join their armed forces myself and assist in putting an anti tank missile through each and every window.

Humphreys
Jan 26, 2013

We conceived a way to use my mother as a porn mule


NTRabbit posted:

The Littoral Combat Vessels that are being retired at half their service life because they're poo poo and falling apart, the US having tried to reinvent the wheel by designing 'light inshore combat vessels' on their own, rather than just asking any of the countries with fjords who mastered the concept some time ago.

They are falling apart due to not ticking certain boxes during the construction phase. Namely sacrificial anodes.

UCS Hellmaker
Mar 29, 2008
Toilet Rascal

gay picnic defence posted:

Are they those Littoral Combat Ships that no one actually wants?

The more I think about it the less I'm sure Ukraine benefits much from a surface fleet. Submarines might be of more use for them as their suspected presence would greatly hinder the easy movement of hostile ships. Combined with shore-based ASMs covering the coastal areas they could effectively blockade Sevastopol without being in any huge danger themselves (aside from other subs) as they could always withdraw to waters protected from surface vessels by missiles.

I wouldn't be surprised if almost the entire us submarine fleet is nuclear subs at this point though.

PerilPastry
Oct 10, 2012

Herstory Begins Now posted:

Russia has in 2 months done more to legitimize and make NATO seem necessary than anything else in 50 years

Killer robot posted:

I mean, given Russia's performance, not really to legitimize massive spending on huge militaries and next-generation weapon systems (vs just improving readiness from where some of Europe is now).

I'm now imagining Stoltenberg calling a press conference, announcing:
"In light of Russia's battlefield performance we are lowering the GDP pledge to 0.2 % in a spirit of fair play."

kronix posted:

I'm honestly pretty surprised that the sabre-rattling has stopped as much as it has. 6 weeks ago Russia was casually threatening everyone and the entire western world called their bluff. You could even make the argument that one of the reasons the west moved so quickly to supply arms to Ukraine was a result of the nuclear threats being thrown around.

Tigey posted:

TL/DR - Their nukes are the only real card they have left (after their army and economy are spent) - but they can't actually ever play it because WW3. So all they can do is threaten - both implicitly and overtly - their use, in the hope their decadent, cowardly and effeminate adversaries get nervous and make concessions. So get used to them mentioning nukes more and more.

Yeah, the first part's surprised me. Particularly Peskov (and just now Lavrov) out and out ruling the use of nukes over Ukraine.

As for the saber rattling increasing, if their current offensive doesn't go to plan I agree. And we're probably likely to see a good deal of it in response to Finland and Sweden joining NATO anyway. It's not like they have the force availability to deploy thousands of troops on garrison duty at the border as a response, so they'll probably do the old nuclear chest beating in a display of deterrence.

Gervasius
Nov 2, 2010



Grimey Drawer

UCS Hellmaker posted:

I wouldn't be surprised if almost the entire us submarine fleet is nuclear subs at this point though.

Entire USN, RN and French navy subs are 100% nuclear.

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

Dick Ripple posted:

Do you have an argument on why that is not the case?
They are not the sole or strongest reason for this conflict, but they do play a role. If you are interested I would suggest you look up just about anything recent by Peter Zeihan, as he makes a fairly compelling argument on why demographics do indeed play an important and strong role in this conflict.

Because it's easy to fix. Pay people to gently caress and have kids. Introduce a contraception tax.

Because the even thought the wrong numbers are going in the wrong direction they're a century at least away from reaching the point where raising an army like the current invasion is no longer possible..

UCS Hellmaker posted:

I wouldn't be surprised if almost the entire us submarine fleet is nuclear subs at this point though.


They could have the diesel-electric ones Australia decided not to get France to build.

SlowBloke
Aug 14, 2017

NTRabbit posted:

Yeah they'd be much better off getting the US and France to tack a couple more FREMM frigates onto the current order queue, and then grabbing a bunch of capable new small corvette designs from Germany or the nordic countries. Much more modern and capable, more suited to an inland sea, lower crew requirements.

Fincantieri is currently working on two FREMM hulls (replacements for F598 & F599), adding a couple to the queue now wouldn't be much of a hurdle esp if they go monkey model with electronics and vls cells(once the D657 is completed, the docks are likely going to downsize as per usual since the italian navy is not a big spender).

SlowBloke fucked around with this message at 11:05 on Apr 19, 2022

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Russia invokes its nuclear deterrent a lot more openly than the west does, but behind the sabre rattling rhetoric their argument is just classic MAD deterrence. There's also a big difference between a threat to deploy nuclear forces in an area and a threat to use nuclear forces in a conflict.

Russia does understand that it is counterproductive to its deterrence posture to make or allow the perception of threats to use nukes to be made that aren't credible.

Rust Martialis
May 8, 2007

At night, Bavovnyatko quietly comes to the occupiers’ bases, depots, airfields, oil refineries and other places full of flammable items and starts playing with fire there

Hamelekim posted:

I'm seeing a lot of geopolitical sorts arguing that Ukraine will fall eventually, within the year, then move on other countries bordering it, including NATO countries.

FYI, he doesn't do any confronting.

How long will it take to capture Warsaw? 2 days
Will Duda be killed? Yes
Total Polish civillian casualties: 500 dead
Total military casualties Poland: 3000 dead
Total military casualties Russia: 15 dead
Will the Polish army regulars hold the lines? No
Will the Winged Hussars fight to the end? No
Will chem/bio weapons be used on invading troops?: Yes
Will Duda launch attacks on Belorussia? Yes
Will Duda launch attacks on Chechnya? No
-If yes; will Kadryov retaliate harshly? Lol
Will Duda sacrifice Lviv (gas/nuke it)? No
Will the Belorussians make a grab for eastern Poland? Yes
Will Putin slap Luka silly for trying for land? Yes
Will Duda burn the sunflower fields? Yes
How long will Russia be occupying Poland? Forever, blin. Fourth Rome!
Will the war catalyze increased terrorism in Chechnya? No
In the long run, will this war be good or bad for the world? Blyat

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

gay picnic defence posted:

Are they those Littoral Combat Ships that no one actually wants?

The more I think about it the less I'm sure Ukraine benefits much from a surface fleet. Submarines might be of more use for them as their suspected presence would greatly hinder the easy movement of hostile ships. Combined with shore-based ASMs covering the coastal areas they could effectively blockade Sevastopol without being in any huge danger themselves (aside from other subs) as they could always withdraw to waters protected from surface vessels by missiles.

Yes, I forgot the program names but those ones. Besides just rotting out, there's some :lol: MIC background that I wasn't aware of:

quote:

The beginnings of the littoral combat ship program provide a clear-cut example of prime contractor influence. The U.S. Navy cited concerns about the future of the defense industrial base and its skilled workers when answering congressional queries on the program’s funding. Within the littoral combat ship program itself, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics were able to successfully argue first for additional Flight 0 prototypes, then for both designs to be put into production, and finally for the program to not only continue to be funded but to receive even more money. The structure of the prototype competition required such a large level of expenditure that the contractors could easily claim that their businesses would be significantly undermined if they did not get a production contract out of the process. Lockheed Martin, in particular, took full advantage of its lobbying teams to push Congress in the right direction.
https://warontherocks.com/2021/11/lessons-from-the-littoral-combat-ship/

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




https://twitter.com/maxseddon/status/1516343771251855363

Full evacuation called for Luhansk oblast.

Sashimi
Dec 26, 2008


College Slice

Rust Martialis posted:

How long will it take to capture Warsaw? 2 days
Will Duda be killed? Yes
Total Polish civillian casualties: 500 dead
Total military casualties Poland: 3000 dead
Total military casualties Russia: 15 dead
Will the Polish army regulars hold the lines? No
Will the Winged Hussars fight to the end? No
Will chem/bio weapons be used on invading troops?: Yes
Will Duda launch attacks on Belorussia? Yes
Will Duda launch attacks on Chechnya? No
-If yes; will Kadryov retaliate harshly? Lol
Will Duda sacrifice Lviv (gas/nuke it)? No
Will the Belorussians make a grab for eastern Poland? Yes
Will Putin slap Luka silly for trying for land? Yes
Will Duda burn the sunflower fields? Yes
How long will Russia be occupying Poland? Forever, blin. Fourth Rome!
Will the war catalyze increased terrorism in Chechnya? No
In the long run, will this war be good or bad for the world? Blyat
Thank you for your service, Major Grover.

Senjuro
Aug 19, 2006

Rust Martialis posted:

How long will it take to capture Warsaw? 2 days
Will Duda be killed? Yes
Total Polish civillian casualties: 500 dead
Total military casualties Poland: 3000 dead
Total military casualties Russia: 15 dead
Will the Polish army regulars hold the lines? No
Will the Winged Hussars fight to the end? No
Will chem/bio weapons be used on invading troops?: Yes
Will Duda launch attacks on Belorussia? Yes
Will Duda launch attacks on Chechnya? No
-If yes; will Kadryov retaliate harshly? Lol
Will Duda sacrifice Lviv (gas/nuke it)? No
Will the Belorussians make a grab for eastern Poland? Yes
Will Putin slap Luka silly for trying for land? Yes
Will Duda burn the sunflower fields? Yes
How long will Russia be occupying Poland? Forever, blin. Fourth Rome!
Will the war catalyze increased terrorism in Chechnya? No
In the long run, will this war be good or bad for the world? Blyat

Off topic but I'm suddenly seeing this meme everywhere I go. What's the origin?

Nosre
Apr 16, 2002


Senjuro posted:

Off topic but I'm suddenly seeing this meme everywhere I go. What's the origin?

A master architect and then-Goons in Platoons moderator, Grover, made that prediction back in 2003 or 2004 about Iraq

alex314
Nov 22, 2007

I remember Poles brainwormed by Kremlin propaganda stating a couple months ago that Belarussian Army alone is enough to take Warsaw, and with Russian help it will take 2 days. Looks a bit like someone finding Zhirynovsky's scribbles and reposting them

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Senjuro posted:

Off topic but I'm suddenly seeing this meme everywhere I go. What's the origin?

Nosre posted:

A master architect and then-Goons in Platoons moderator, Grover, made that prediction back in 2003 or 2004 about Iraq

How long will it take to capture Baghdad? 2 days
Will Saddam be killed? Yes
Total Iraqi civillian casualties: 500 dead
Total military casualties Iraq: 3000 dead
Total military casualties U.S.: 15 dead
Will the Iraqi army regulars hold the lines? No
Will the Republican Guard fight to the end? No
Will chem/bio weapons be used on invading troops?: Yes
Will Saddam launch attacks on the Kurds? Yes
Will Saddam launch attacks on Israel? No
-If yes; will Isreal retaliate harshly? Yes
Will Saddam sacrifice Baghdad (gas/nuke it)? No
Will the Kurds make a grab for independence? Yes
Will Iran do anything silly like try for land? Yes
Will Saddam burn the oil fields? Yes
How long will the US be occupying Iraq? ~15 years
Will the Iraq war catalyze increased terrorism in America?No
In the long run, will this war be good or bad for the world? Good

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Dick Ripple posted:

Do you have an argument on why that is not the case?
They are not the sole or strongest reason for this conflict, but they do play a role. If you are interested I would suggest you look up just about anything recent by Peter Zeihan, as he makes a fairly compelling argument on why demographics do indeed play an important and strong role in this conflict.

that dude does not appear to be even remotely an expert on russia or ukraine, why should anyone listen to what he says?

Tuna-Fish
Sep 13, 2017

Humphreys posted:

They are falling apart due to not ticking certain boxes during the construction phase. Namely sacrificial anodes.

Not even their only problem. The transmission system is also failing badly, for entirely separate reasons. The engine failures might be because of the galvanic corrosion, because seawater keeps ending up in the engine spaces and loving them up.

So yeah, they cost-cut so much that all the ships need to spend all their time being repaired. Very financially wise.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

NTRabbit posted:

The Littoral Combat Vessels that are being retired at half their service life because they're poo poo and falling apart, the US having tried to reinvent the wheel by designing 'light inshore combat vessels' on their own, rather than just asking any of the countries with fjords who mastered the concept some time ago.

Ah, good ol' USS Aggressive Disintegration at Molecular Level

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
Cyberwarfare being met by a Hellfire equivalent coming through the window of a room full of Russian nerds is probably the best possible deterrent.

CAT INTERCEPTOR
Nov 9, 2004

Basically a male Margaret Thatcher

That's legit next level amazing

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

steinrokkan posted:

Ah, good ol' USS Aggressive Disintegration at Molecular Level

Metallic aluminium doesn't have molecules. (It does aggressively disintegrate though.)

Humphreys
Jan 26, 2013

We conceived a way to use my mother as a porn mule


Payndz posted:

Cyberwarfare being met by a Hellfire equivalent coming through the window of a room full of Russian nerds is probably the best possible deterrent.

Don't copy that floppy

zone
Dec 6, 2016

The Ukrainians have titanium balls. :blyat:

Staluigi
Jun 22, 2021

U wouldn't download a HIND

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010

This guy's even less credible that the youtube "expert" we've been talking about these last few posts.

brugroffil
Nov 30, 2015


Tuna-Fish posted:

Not even their only problem. The transmission system is also failing badly, for entirely separate reasons. The engine failures might be because of the galvanic corrosion, because seawater keeps ending up in the engine spaces and loving them up.

So yeah, they cost-cut so much that all the ships need to spend all their time being repaired. Very financially wise.

They've been wildly successful in their primary objective

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011


Every IT department in North America and Europe probably gonna erect a monument to these brave pilots.

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS
It’s far more likely to be something like one of those SIGINT planes constantly on station along the border triangulating a bunch of radio signals coming from those buildings and someone decided to tip off the Hind pilots.

Staluigi
Jun 22, 2021

Hannibal Rex posted:

This guy's even less credible that the youtube "expert" we've been talking about these last few posts.

I don't care about factuality, I care about the idea of

Tired: sql injection attack
Wired: missile injection attack
Expired: russian hackers

FishMcCool
Apr 9, 2021

lolcats are still funny
Fallen Rib

gay picnic defence posted:

It’s far more likely to be something like one of those SIGINT planes constantly on station along the border triangulating a bunch of radio signals coming from those buildings and someone decided to tip off the Hind pilots.

Could we just roll with suspension of disbelief for a minute? I'd like to think that those bitcoin scams have just gotten a bit more risky.

Alan Smithee
Jan 4, 2005


A man becomes preeminent, he's expected to have enthusiasms.

Enthusiasms, enthusiasms...

Aertuun posted:

I would encourage anyone who's interested in accurately assessing the military situation in Ukraine to read and listen to any (and all) of Michael Kofman's material. As far as I'm aware he's gotten pretty much every prediction on Ukraine right so far, down to correctly predicting the date of the Russian invasion all the way back in December 2021.

He posts concisely on Twitter and also appears on a few different podcasts.

My poor summary of his analysis on the current situation: in a war of attrition, the eventual victor is uncertain. However, Russia needs to go to full mobilisation to win. It hasn't yet, and it may be getting too late for it to do so.

Also, one thing that I've noticed in this thread. There are a lot of people on Twitter, whether OSInt or analysts or academics, who are desperate for attention and clicks. To do this, they need to make Big Claims, the more outrageous the better. However none of these claims are based on anything, and frequently many of these people have no additional sources, and are in fact worse informed, than many people in this thread (imagine that).

I don't want to pick on anyone's favorite Twitter personality, but you can usually tell by looking at who someone is followed by. Some of the louder academics and analysts are only followed by talking heads and journalists, not the more serious analysts who have to get their predictions right.

im curious how did he predict the date of invasion

THE BAR
Oct 20, 2011

You know what might look better on your nose?


A terrifying blow to Heroes 3 modding.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>
that's actually the physical location that SA was being DDOS'd from and brown moses and jeffery's NATO contacts got the attacks shut down

FishMcCool
Apr 9, 2021

lolcats are still funny
Fallen Rib

Herstory Begins Now posted:

that's actually the physical location that SA was being DDOS'd from and brown moses and jeffery's NATO contacts got the attacks shut down

Someone photoshop a SA handgrenade sticker onto that smoking gun NATO laptop found by Russian troops.

Dick Ripple
May 19, 2021

Herstory Begins Now posted:

that dude does not appear to be even remotely an expert on russia or ukraine, why should anyone listen to what he says?

All his past assesments on when and how this current conflict would happen have been true?
He is by no means an expert on the region, but geopolitics is kind of what he does for a living. Also, like anyone we should consider what he has to say analytically.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Dick Ripple posted:

All his past assesments on when and how this current conflict would happen have been true?
He is by no means an expert on the region, but geopolitics is kind of what he does for a living. Also, like anyone we should consider what he has to say analytically.

He predicted that the us would be less willing to get involved in foreign conflicts and wouldn't honor security commitments because we'd be drunk on a glut of shale oil. Every layer of that prediction is comically wrong.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5