(Thread IKs:
Stereotype)
|
Fly Molo posted:lmfao lmao
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 02:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 06:18 |
|
|
Cloks posted:hey, at least the age of the automobile will be over lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 02:31
|
|
|
the age of the immobile
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 02:40
|
|
|
The replies to this tweet are already absolutely insane. https://twitter.com/KTLA/status/1519102974596829184
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 02:58
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Chrisdonis62/status/1519114658426220544 rocks, sand, and other poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:24
|
|
|
Raine posted:the age of the immobile lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:33
|
|
|
Brainwreck posted:The replies to this tweet are already absolutely insane. I mean, some of these people are nuts, but otoh https://twitter.com/go_kings_go25/status/1519104921731096577 https://twitter.com/sotosocal/status/1519130146036363266 I think this person knows something that we don't
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:33
|
|
|
What is 5.5? Earthquake magnitude?
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:44
|
|
|
cinco de Mayo
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:45
|
|
|
I tried doing my research but Google is hiding the truth, whatever that is. Person really isn't doing a good job of spreading the Truth
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:47
|
|
|
5.5 is probably around average i'd say. not ideal but could get the job done
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:50
|
|
|
is desalination not viable for california? they are already on the ocean so it doesn't need to be transported far. a wikipedia citation says the cost was 3.08 per 1000 gallons in 2008, based on data from a plant in florida
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:51
|
|
|
The normal average price is $1.50
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 03:54
|
|
|
is 5.5 the new jade helm is it a q thing
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 04:18
|
|
|
lol desalination
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 04:19
|
|
|
actionjackson posted:is desalination not viable for california? they are already on the ocean so it doesn't need to be transported far. its extremely energy intensive, in a state that is in the process of shuttering all of it's nuclear plants and having already got rid of some big ones recently, and it still has to require new pipelines and pumping inland. pipelines are usually laid out with a particular flow pattern in mind and it's usually from the mountain ranges to the east gravimetrically going downgradient to the coastal side,so it's not just a matter of plugging in even if you had a contiguous connection. desal is just going to be powered by burning ungodly amounts of fossil fuels san diego just spent 1 billion on a desal plant and it still only provides <10% of the cities water at like $3000 per acre-ft. nominal costs for typical water supply are like $500-1000. It's really hard to find but it produces around 50,000 acre-ft by using 'only' 300 GWh a year, and that's super fancy high-tech 'low-energy' usage stuff. Total state generation is around 200,000 GWh/yr. Typical suburban house uses up to about 1 acre-ft a year, more savvy houses or denser housed areas is more like 1/4 -1/2. Since we have 14.5 million households, say at 0.5 acre-ft per year, 7,250,000 acre-ft of production would require 45,000 GWh new energy to come online. That's not insurmountable compared to the 200,000 we already generate, but it's still a lot. So yes, overall it's 'viable', and that's probably what we'll do, but it's going to require a fuckload of money, fossil fuels, and lot of new infrastructure. There's also brine and other things which we mostly just handwave away. if you care, they're actually ecologically bad. personally, I don't, the oceans are already toxic wastelands that we've wiped out so gently caress it, what's some super concentrated brine going to do, just dump dat poo poo. Xaris has issued a correction as of 04:49 on Apr 27, 2022 |
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 04:22
|
|
|
I'm not ready for 5.5. It could be another thing to worry about.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 04:31
|
|
|
I absolutely believe people will be dying of thirst in california before they seriously consider table stakes water conservation techniques like, say, banning lawns, golf courses, almond farms, etc.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 04:35
|
|
|
SALT LAKE CITY (April 21, 2022) – Gov. Spencer J. Cox declared a state of emergency due to the dire drought conditions affecting the entire state. This declaration activates the Drought Response Committee and triggers increased monitoring and reporting. It also allows drought-affected communities, agricultural producers and others to report unmet needs and work toward solutions. “We’ve had a very volatile water year, and unfortunately, recent spring storms are not enough to make up the shortage in our snowpack,” Gov. Cox said. “Once again, I call on all Utahns – households, farmers, businesses, governments and other groups – to carefully consider their needs and reduce their water use. We saved billions of gallons last year and we can do it again.” Utah has been in drought eight of the last 10 years, and this year’s snowpack is 25% below normal. Conditions are changing rapidly as the snow continues to melt. According to the Utah Department of Natural Resources: - 99.39% of the state is in severe drought or worse, with 43.46% of Utah in extreme drought. - Statewide snow water equivalent (SWE), or how much water would be in the snowpack if it melted, peaked at 12 inches. This is 75% of the typical median peak of 16 inches for our water year. - Nineteen of Utah’s largest 45 reservoirs are below 55% of available capacity. Overall statewide storage is 59% of capacity. This time last year, reservoirs were about 67% of capacity. - Soil moisture is 4% higher compared to normal for this time of year. Wet soils are critical for effective spring runoff. - Of the 94 measured streams, 59 are flowing below normal despite spring runoff. Two streams are flowing at record low conditions.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 04:40
|
|
|
Increased reporting, assessments, and voluntary, individual action by rational actors is exactly what has solved all world crises so far. *puts finger to ear* Wait, I'm getting something from the special monitoring room...
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 04:48
|
|
|
what meaning does “normal” even have in a rapidly changing world? “less than normal” snowpack IS “normal” these days
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:11
|
|
|
dump the brine on the salt flats instead of back into the ocean, cant hurt nothin
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:15
|
|
|
I love how all water use restrictions never touch businesses. Lmao.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:25
|
|
|
sell the brine in those little mio water flavor bottles except brand it as an all-natural electrolyte enhancer
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:32
|
|
|
Raine posted:5.5 is probably around average i'd say. not ideal but could get the job done
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:34
|
|
|
Lilium Dimension posted:I absolutely believe people will be dying of thirst in california before they seriously consider table stakes water conservation techniques like, say, banning lawns, golf courses, almond farms, etc. lol there’s already entire communities getting displaced because almond farms lowered the water table below what their wells could manage lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:37
|
|
|
Raine posted:5.5 is probably around average i'd say. not ideal but could get the job done
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:37
|
|
|
actionjackson posted:is desalination not viable for california? they are already on the ocean so it doesn't need to be transported far. Whatya do with the salt? Edit: Googling brb
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:40
|
|
|
Raine posted:5.5 is probably around average i'd say. not ideal but could get the job done The average is 5.5? I thought it was 4. This is very unsettling
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:41
|
|
|
Mayor dave
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 05:43
|
|
|
RCP 8.5 is what we're on now, so if anything 5.5 is optimistic and/or cope.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 06:20
|
|
|
skooma512 posted:RCP 8.5 is what we're on now, so if anything 5.5 is optimistic and/or cope. Oh god dammit two loving posts above me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 06:37
|
|
|
skooma512 posted:RCP 8.5 is what we're on now, so if anything 5.5 is optimistic and/or cope. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 07:01
|
|
|
Lilium Dimension posted:I absolutely believe people will be dying of thirst in california before they seriously consider table stakes water conservation techniques like, say, banning lawns, golf courses, almond farms, etc.  might need to ban a lot more than almonds
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 08:38
|
|
|
It means 5.5G, which is going to control us from the shadows even harder than 5G. Hope you didn't get vaccinated, sheeple
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 08:54
|
|
|
Kal posted:
all mass agriculture is a nightmare of water wastage especially in california now if you raise your own chickens on compost materials and bugs...
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 08:58
|
|
|
Lilium Dimension posted:I absolutely believe people will be dying of thirst in california before they seriously consider table stakes water conservation techniques like, say, banning lawns, golf courses, almond farms, etc. They will mulch the corpses of a million children who died of thirst to use as fertilizer for the Cutie orchards. The big names in AG here have an absolute iron grip on water rights. They'll go full Water Knife before that is allowed to change.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 09:05
|
|
|
atelier morgan posted:all mass agriculture is a nightmare of water wastage especially in california california, for being a huge ag state, has a relatively small beef industry at least. there's also a ton of local roadside egg farms that you can get that arent produced via gigagllons of water and often use compost and roaming around off bugs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 09:08
|
|
|
one serving of almonds is like 4 almonds
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 09:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 06:18 |
|
|
T-Paine posted:It means 5.5G, which is going to control us from the shadows even harder than 5G. Hope you didn't get vaccinated, sheeple Gs are log scale too so 5.5G is 5 times worse than normal 5G
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2022 09:14
|
|