|
Unfortunately that's not where any of this poo poo is coming from, it's all deeply weird and objectifying fetishisation of women as holes where semen goes in and baby comes out.
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 05:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 12:40 |
|
|
I wonder what my gross creepy divorced uncle would say if I told him he had something in common with a group of self-described radical feminists, and that it was describing women as wet holes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 05:16
|
|
|
“Hey Uncle Creep, I found some broads who fuckin hate women even more than you do!”
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 05:39
|
|
|
brb, i'm inventing nanobots which will enable dick birth they will be airborn and relentless, soon every ballsack will be full of baby
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 06:08
|
|
|
Ghost Leviathan posted:Unfortunately that's not where any of this poo poo is coming from, it's all deeply weird and objectifying fetishisation of women as holes where semen goes in and baby comes out. This isn’t a fair characterization. It’s also a raging victim complex.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 06:32
|
|
|
tokin opposition posted:brb, i'm inventing nanobots which will enable dick birth Male abortions will be made legal
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 08:23
|
|
|
Trixie Hardcore posted:This isn’t a fair characterization. It’s also a raging victim complex. That too. But more that poo poo like blood-and-poo poo cakes aren't frankly acknowledging the realities of childbirth, they're trivialising them a silly joke. Also tied in with a lot of poo poo about pregnany and birth that's subject to dangerous levels of woo and grift.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 08:39
|
|
|
Oh sorry I though we were talking about TERFs not weirdos who eat birthing cakes
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 08:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 09:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 10:40
|
|
|
So if Clinton was better on gay rights then Iraq never would have happened? Wowy wow wow. Gee, that 50k is sounding like a very small and reasonable bribe.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 13:58
|
|
|
Can't believe the gays did 9/11.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 14:53
|
|
|
Zurtilik posted:Can't believe the gays did 9/11.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 15:50
|
|
|
What um. What's the story here
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 16:34
|
|
|
Milo and POTUS posted:What um. What's the story here dumb nft poo poo. more specifically that person very obviously traced tank girl covers and sold them as nfts and isnequating it to the looting of Iraq in a weird attempt to excuse themself e: https://twitter.com/toastasaurus/status/1530969891418918912?s=21&t=N10-kNuGsxsQxaB95xVhsg Jenny Agutter has issued a correction as of 17:06 on Jun 1, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 16:54
|
|
|
I'm gonna have a bad take here: If isn't more or less a straight copy I'm not sure the full problem. Artists use pre-existing art all the time. Is tracing the taboo here? IDK.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 17:10
|
|
|
Zurtilik posted:I'm gonna have a bad take here: It's considered incredibly tacky, in poor taste, a stain on the artist who is tracings reputation, and a disservice to the original artist. I don't care a ton about it personally but comic people really do, here is the man everyone loves to hate. http://jimsmashextended.blogspot.com/2008/07/greg-land-tracing-swiping-recycling.html?m=1
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 17:17
|
|
|
you can't plagiarize with a nft, it's not art. just like how hotdogs are not burgers
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 17:54
|
|
|
Zurtilik posted:I'm gonna have a bad take here: Normally it'd be not great but whatever, it happens all the time. However she got invited to be a guest at the Toronto Comic Arts Fest (presumably by someone else into NFTs) which is why her extremely cool art and opinions have been put under the microscope
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 18:00
|
|
|
Party Boat posted:Normally it'd be not great but whatever, it happens all the time. However she got invited to be a guest at the Toronto Comic Arts Fest (presumably by someone else into NFTs) which is why her extremely cool art and opinions have been put under the microscope Edit: Lol looks like they gave her the boot after getting ratio'd https://www.torontocomics.com/post/tcaf-statement-re-pink-cat quote:At the time of this invitation, the organization was unaware of Moeel’s online conduct, plagiarism, or allegations of tracing. We apologize for programming and promoting this artist. "We invited this nft-shilling hack grifter but had noooo idea she was a hack grifter  plz forgive us"
damn horror queefs has issued a correction as of 18:54 on Jun 1, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 18:49
|
|
|
tokin opposition posted:you can't plagiarize with a nft, it's not art. just like how hotdogs are not burgers
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 19:11
|
|
|
Trixie Hardcore posted:This isn’t a fair characterization. It’s also a raging victim complex. I can't think of any non-white TERFs now that you mention it. Is this all just a female and secular version of white christian men being the most persecuted minority or whatever? Just white angst all the way down?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 19:38
|
|
|
Zurtilik posted:I'm gonna have a bad take here: basic copyright violation, extra ironic when you're selling NFTs AxGrap posted:It's considered incredibly tacky, in poor taste, a stain on the artist who is tracings reputation, and a disservice to the original artist. if it's protected by copyright (it is) and if it's provably a derivative work (and admitting openly that it is is probably helpful in proving that) then if the original artist decides to take them to court over it, they generally take money from the violator and give it to the copyright holder Flesh Forge has issued a correction as of 21:08 on Jun 1, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 21:05
|
|
|
copyright is fake and information can't be owned gently caress you nerd
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 21:16
|
|
|
tracing over someone else's work is essentially stealing their labor and that makes you bourgeois.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 21:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/judiciarygop/status/1532081904601669632?s=21&t=oQEsWgSBwTTsDEb-gpSLTg
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 21:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ebruenig/status/1532087259188674561 liz owns lmao
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 21:51
|
|
|
Flesh Forge posted:basic copyright violation, extra ironic when you're selling NFTs I think the actual law is a lot muddier than that for derivative works, but yeah if someone wanted to pursue legal action they could gum them up for a while.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 22:20
|
|
|
I think it's rarely pursued in court because it's some combination of the original author not having enough to spend on counsel/violator has enough to take/case is too difficult to prove, but if someone is publicly selling copies and they admit publicly they are copies and if they manage to sell them for a lot of money 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2022 22:33
|
|
|
She and Joyce Carol Oates are great follows, Liz especially makes so many people insanely loving mad just by existing and refusing to pretend Twitter should be taken seriously
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 00:16
|
|
|
christmas boots posted:tracing over someone else's work is essentially stealing their labor and that makes you bourgeois. To the gulag for eight year old me…
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 01:21
|
|
|
it is copyright that is bourgeois, actually
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 01:29
|
|
|
Truga posted:it is copyright that is bourgeois, actually ok. how about patents? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 02:09
|
|
|
mawarannahr posted:ok. how about patents? Yes Gulag
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 02:17
|
|
|
"Derivative works" is a term of art in law, and in fact, in the US, derivative works can be perfectly legal if they're "transformational" (another term of art). If they're making a profit, a smart person does not publish a derivative work without consulting a lawyer.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 02:31
|
|
|
Remember this? Photoshop filter lookin rear end thing. I had remembered he had won that lawsuit, but I guess he settled.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 04:18
|
|
|
That’s a transformative work because you can use it for fundraising
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 04:52
|
|
|
People still talk about Banksy but no one cares about Fairey anymore. What a tool.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 06:34
|
|
|
Zurtilik posted:I'm gonna have a bad take here: tracing to practice or whatever is one thing tracing something and making cash off it (yes yes nft cash blah blah) and fame is a very different thing. basically, christmas boots posted:tracing over someone else's work is essentially stealing their labor and that makes you bourgeois.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 07:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 12:40 |
|
|
AxGrap posted:Remember this? it's a little bit better in that he was found to have broken the law in the course of hiding that he stole the original image lol quote:In February 2009, Fairey filed a federal lawsuit against the Associated Press, seeking a declaratory judgment that his use of the AP photograph was protected by the fair use doctrine and so did not infringe their copyright.[134] At first, Fairey claimed that he used the photo of Clooney and Obama, cropped the actor out of the shot, and made other changes. In October 2009, Shepard Fairey admitted he had tried to deceive the Court by destroying evidence that he had instead used the photograph alleged by the AP. Fairey admitted he had used a close-up shot of Obama, also taken by Mannie Garcia, as the AP had long alleged. The solo photo appears much more similar to the final HOPE poster than the photo of Clooney and Obama. Fairey's lawyers announced they were no longer representing him, and Laurence Pulgram, an intellectual property lawyer, stated that the revelation definitely put Mr. Fairey's case "in trouble".[135][136]
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2022 08:04
|
|
