Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

i think he is wrong on this. maybe post 2024 but i dont think Russia lasts til then especially if they lose Kherson and other battles and Americans arnt losing any blood in the fight outside various individuals. i think some EU leaders want to but its clear that ukraine will fight as long as they can. at some point some 1917 army mutinies will hit the russians.


its because he is worried if a popular competent officer comes along then he is loving gone. all Putin has now is being a spider of the bureaucracy and he has enough spy ghouls to kill his enemies.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo
RE: the west getting tired: of what? Bleeding Russia and feeding money continuously to the MIC: definitely a thing the US will hate

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

RE: the west getting tired: of what? Bleeding Russia and feeding money continuously to the MIC: definitely a thing the US will hate

Not making money by selling cars and guns to Russia

notwithoutmyanus
Mar 17, 2009
There's a definite concern Russia can push enough influence to control the election cycle this year and control us congress. It's an unfortunate possibility that if house and Senate go Republican (which is statistically probable for midterms) they will push to lift all sanctions

Quixzlizx
Jan 7, 2007

notwithoutmyanus posted:

There's a definite concern Russia can push enough influence to control the election cycle this year and control us congress. It's an unfortunate possibility that if house and Senate go Republican (which is statistically probable for midterms) they will push to lift all sanctions

They can't do poo poo to lift sanctions unless they also win the presidency, which means early 2025 at the earliest. They could refuse to pass new ones, though.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

mobby_6kl posted:

I think the problem with this is that while we're lucky that 2/3rds of russian economy is natural resource extraction, the downside is that even if all of Europe goes fully renewable and stops imports, the rest of the world will be more than happy to buy it at a small discount.
Yes, though this is much easier said than done. It comes down to logistics. How does Russia get it there? Via pipelines--which will be turned off over time--or via ships, which require insurance. Where are all of the insurance companies based? In Europe and the US (mostly Europe for shipping, iirc). I suppose China could try standing up its own shipping insurance companies, but insurance is its own specialty. Also, where will Russia get the ships? If we learn that e.g. Eritrea is ferrying Russian oil around, they risk having their ships blocked from Western ports.

These are all things that can be worked around over time, but it takes time and money to do so. And all of this will continue to degrade Russia's ability to field and supply a modern military.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

The west is going to get tired of making the best deal of the loving century.

DancingMachine
Aug 12, 2004

He's a dancing machine!

Dapper_Swindler posted:

i think he is wrong on this. maybe post 2024 but i dont think Russia lasts til then especially if they lose Kherson and other battles and Americans arnt losing any blood in the fight outside various individuals. i think some EU leaders want to but its clear that ukraine will fight as long as they can. at some point some 1917 army mutinies will hit the russians.

Winter will come in less than 6 months, oil and gas will become a more pronounced issue in Europe, public fatigue/boredom with the war will set in (it already is). People, including German leadership, will start to wonder aloud when and how this ends and how it "obviously" isn't sustainable indefinitely. In November the Republican party will win sweeping victories in the US House of Representatives and the Senate. They will start a dozen bogus investigations and impeach Biden and possibly other senior officials. They won't be able to remove him from office but they will turn the focus inward and create enough distraction and political cost to Biden's continued focus on foreign policy to get the US eye off the ball. Ukraine will be forced to accept whatever deal is on the table and sanctions will be lifted by Spring 2023.
Hopefully I'm wrong. The West and the forces of democracy can easily outlast Russia if they have the will to do so. But Putin is 100% right about Western leaders being vulnerable to election cycles.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Paladinus posted:

The official response from Russia to similar videos in the past was 'DNR is an independent state, talk to your own president'. Putin is not overwhelmingly well-liked by separatists to begin with, because many think that they were abandoned by Russia in 2015, when Russia basically traded LDNR's independence for avoiding the more severe sanctions (see Strelkov's TG channel for the best example of this sort thinking). I expect that the sentiment is only going to grow when/if Russia fails to rebuild newly occupied territories, and financial support of LDNR completely dries up.

not to mention basically throwing most of the men of the region into the meat grinder.

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

Dapper_Swindler posted:

i think he is wrong on this. maybe post 2024 but i dont think Russia lasts til then especially if they lose Kherson and other battles and Americans arnt losing any blood in the fight outside various individuals. i think some EU leaders want to but its clear that ukraine will fight as long as they can. at some point some 1917 army mutinies will hit the russians

Yeah, the US is able to spend an extremely long time pouring resources into wars even when there are US troops dying in them. A war where no US citizens die? Just one massive excuse to pour even more money into making military equipment? What are they even going to get tired of?

Baronjutter
Dec 31, 2007

"Tiny Trains"

Putin can absolutely still "win" this if his friends win elections in enough key western countries. He's already go enough pals in power throughout the west to sabotage a ton of aid and sanctions. It's a bit of a long shot for Putin though, and the longer he holds out hope for the long-game the longer he's being bled dry and the more expensive his eventual loss will be.

I just wish the west would ramp up support quicker, the folks prolonging the fighting and suffering are the germans and hungarians of the world. Folks who are anti-war and want to stop the fighting should support a massive upswing in western military aid to help end the conflict faster.

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

Normal guy just trying to escape for a few hours, but real life interrupts with a new normal.
https://twitter.com/visegrad24/status/1532761741746110465?cxt=HHwWgoCw4dyru8UqAAAA

DancingMachine
Aug 12, 2004

He's a dancing machine!
Lately I am increasingly preoccupied with this as not a proxy war between US/Nato and Russia, but as a proxy war between the forces of Democracy and the rule of law and Autocracy.
In theory, NATO and the EU are (or should be) instruments of democracy. But there are major cracks in that foundation with Hungary being a democracy in name only, and Poland and of course the US rapidly backsliding away from democracy. Russia has been extremely successful poisoning norms of democracy from within. Over the last 20 years, Russia (and fairly recently China) have been winning the war to weaken and supplant democracy all across the globe. An unequivocal victory of a smaller democratic nation over Russia, and subsequent weakening or outright fracturing of the Russian regime is an opportunity to reverse that trend globally.

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

Chalks posted:

Yeah, the US is able to spend an extremely long time pouring resources into wars even when there are US troops dying in them. A war where no US citizens die? Just one massive excuse to pour even more money into making military equipment? What are they even going to get tired of?
Are you implying the US aid is entirely self-serving and driven by commercial interests alone? If so, should the US stop aiding Ukraine militarily?

OzyMandrill
Aug 12, 2013

Look upon my words
and despair

DancingMachine posted:

The West and the forces of democracy can easily outlast Russia if they have the will to do so. But Putin is 100% right about Western leaders being vulnerable to election cycles.

Elections are also historically vulnerable to visibly winning wars in the media.

Llamadeus
Dec 20, 2005

the popes toes posted:

Are you implying the US aid is entirely self-serving and driven by commercial interests alone? If so, should the US stop aiding Ukraine militarily?
I think they're just saying that without the risk of American deaths the political costs of supporting the war are very low because pouring money into the military industrial complex is a thing the US likes to do in general.

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


https://twitter.com/oryxspioenkop/status/1532664734931202049?s=20&t=_ZW8Oy_miNw6fOaK1Km8GA

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

the popes toes posted:

Are you implying the US aid is entirely self-serving and driven by commercial interests alone? If so, should the US stop aiding Ukraine militarily?

Not commercial interests alone, but if you remove all moral or geopolitical considerations from the equation (as Putin thinks a Republican controlled government will do) what you're left with is an excuse to pour money into the MIC without the downside of US troop losses. I don't think anyone's going to get tired of this.

Even if I did think their motivation was entirely self serving, I wouldn't advocate they stop doing it. "Stop doing this good thing because your reasons are not selfless" doesn't seem like a rational position to me.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




https://twitter.com/osinttechnical/status/1532769664408895489

My ability to listen to Ukrainian is less than great, but this appears to be some kind of supplies-reinforcements run to aid Foreign Legion while Armed Forces proper are regrouping.

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

Baronjutter posted:

Putin can absolutely still "win" this if his friends win elections in enough key western countries. He's already go enough pals in power throughout the west to sabotage a ton of aid and sanctions. It's a bit of a long shot for Putin though, and the longer he holds out hope for the long-game the longer he's being bled dry and the more expensive his eventual loss will be.

I just wish the west would ramp up support quicker, the folks prolonging the fighting and suffering are the germans and hungarians of the world. Folks who are anti-war and want to stop the fighting should support a massive upswing in western military aid to help end the conflict faster.

partly but he loving crippled his soft power by doing this. the germans will eventually come around since the US/UAE/etc are stepping in with oil/gas/etc and hungary and turkey can be bribed or in Hungary's case isolated.

Dapper_Swindler fucked around with this message at 19:13 on Jun 3, 2022

Terminal autist
May 17, 2018

by vyelkin

DancingMachine posted:

Lately I am increasingly preoccupied with this as not a proxy war between US/Nato and Russia, but as a proxy war between the forces of Democracy and the rule of law and Autocracy.
In theory, NATO and the EU are (or should be) instruments of democracy. But there are major cracks in that foundation with Hungary being a democracy in name only, and Poland and of course the US rapidly backsliding away from democracy. Russia has been extremely successful poisoning norms of democracy from within. Over the last 20 years, Russia (and fairly recently China) have been winning the war to weaken and supplant democracy all across the globe. An unequivocal victory of a smaller democratic nation over Russia, and subsequent weakening or outright fracturing of the Russian regime is an opportunity to reverse that trend globally.

The USA's closest allies over the last 20 years have been Israel and KSA, lmao

Fragrag
Aug 3, 2007
The Worst Admin Ever bashes You in the head with his banhammer. It is smashed into the body, an unrecognizable mass! You have been struck down.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

https://twitter.com/osinttechnical/status/1532769664408895489

My ability to listen to Ukrainian is less than great, but this appears to be some kind of supplies-reinforcements run to aid Foreign Legion while Armed Forces proper are regrouping.

I'm a bit lost on the acronyms here. I assume RFERL is Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty but what's the Ukrainian SES?

Zedsdeadbaby
Jun 14, 2008

You have been called out, in the ways of old.
A lot of the industrial complex manufacturing is in red states and job security in every single one of them is a huge vote winner

It is how the F-35 came to be, despite being the single most expensive project in human history

It is almost certain that politicians will be lobbied very very hard to keep the gravy train going, arming a European state that is in a hot war is like a wet dream times a thousand to them

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Fragrag posted:

I'm a bit lost on the acronyms here. I assume RFERL is Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty but what's the Ukrainian SES?

State Emergency Service.

Edit:

To those who like me wonder why journalists were going to S-D:

https://twitter.com/hromadske/status/1532791729211981824

Reuters were hitchhiking with… Russian forces?

https://twitter.com/kyivindependent/status/1532796819071279106

Other side of the RFERL video, with S-D Foreign Legion fighters interview from 1:00 or so.

https://twitter.com/kharkiv_warnews/status/1532738875441008640

cinci zoo sniper fucked around with this message at 20:08 on Jun 3, 2022

Vox Nihili
May 28, 2008

notwithoutmyanus posted:

There's a definite concern Russia can push enough influence to control the election cycle this year and control us congress. It's an unfortunate possibility that if house and Senate go Republican (which is statistically probable for midterms) they will push to lift all sanctions

Russia doesn't actually control the American Republican Party. There are a few specific politicians who are effectively aligned with Russia.

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

Chalks posted:

Not commercial interests alone, but if you remove all moral or geopolitical considerations from the equation (as Putin thinks a Republican controlled government will do) what you're left with is an excuse to pour money into the MIC without the downside of US troop losses. I don't think anyone's going to get tired of this.

Even if I did think their motivation was entirely self serving, I wouldn't advocate they stop doing it. "Stop doing this good thing because your reasons are not selfless" doesn't seem like a rational position to me.

I hate to tell people this but everything a nation has ever done is self-serving. That doesn't automatically make it wrong.

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

I hate to tell people this but everything a nation has ever done is self-serving. That doesn't automatically make it wrong.

I don't know, at least democratic countries are capable of doing things for no reason beyond responding to a public outcry at injustice. On a mechanical level it's a politician doing things in order to win votes, but as a nation, it's being done for moral reasons.

I doubt the morality of the war in Ukraine has all that much impact compared to other considerations though.

thekeeshman
Feb 21, 2007
Seriously, the US MIC is probably the single most effective lobbying industry in the US, and they've made very sure to spread their jobs around key congressional districts. The Russia war is a huge money spinner for them, since every weapon given to Ukraine is going to have to be replaced, and the Europeans might start to take defense seriously which would mean more orders for weapons there too. Plus every US strategic thinker (other than rotten corpses like Kissinger) sees that the chance to just spend money to blow up Russians with zero risk to American lives is an incredible deal.

Also, Europe is building LNG import terminals to diversify their gas supply, and one of the places that will come from is the US, which is building LNG export terminals for fracking gas. That's another powerful constituency which will want things to continue.

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

https://twitter.com/Mylovanov/status/1532790261176324098

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


Counteroffensive taking place it seems
https://twitter.com/KyivIndependent/status/1532823509746982912?s=20&t=eyQGeKktLQfKLXjc8AbE-A

There's a lot more chatter on Twitter but nothing I feel comfortable as a source.

I also got some pictures from the front today from a friend that's been fighting for awhile there.
His crew seems in good spirits, at least. He also looks less gaunt than around Pasca.

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

The BBC are also reporting the Ukrainian counter-attack in Severodonetsk that's pushed the Russians back to controlling only 50% of the city.

Looking good for the idea that the Russians threw everything they had at capturing this but ran out of steam before being able to secure the area.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
If it turns out Ukraine pulled a feigned retreat to draw in Russian infantry and then attacked, I'll be very impressed. It's possible: they've shown remarkably good operational sense throughout the war so far.

Ola
Jul 19, 2004

Ynglaur posted:

If it turns out Ukraine pulled a feigned retreat to draw in Russian infantry and then attacked, I'll be very impressed.

Yeah. And Russia being Russia, that will work a few times more before they learn.

Akratic Method
Mar 9, 2013

It's going to pay off eventually--I'm sure of it.

Any day now.

Feels very postmodern if the fake-retreat-to-lure-them-in trick, that's probably as old as organized warfare, now includes going on international news to talk about "ohhhh no we're nearly cut off here it's very unfortunate how we have to withdraw and take alllll our soldiers out".

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep

Ynglaur posted:

If it turns out Ukraine pulled a feigned retreat to draw in Russian infantry and then attacked, I'll be very impressed. It's possible: they've shown remarkably good operational sense throughout the war so far.

I'm almost positive of two things

1. Ukraine's military leadership is extraordinarily competent in and of itself, and the military is run in a way which makes them capable of outplaying russia's command on their own with no outside assistance
2. They have outside assistance anyway, probably drinking up a massive feed of constant military intelligence being happily dumped on them by multiple other countries

they got good enough at this that even if they didn't complete a transition to having adaptable NCO's throughout their armed services in time for the war, they're still evolved enough to constantly throw russian forces into chaos, because, well, russia's forces need explicit and intact command structure and in any engagement where you disrupt that, it's a complete shitshow for them

ummel
Jun 17, 2002

<3 Lowtax

Fun Shoe

Ynglaur posted:

If it turns out Ukraine pulled a feigned retreat to draw in Russian infantry and then attacked, I'll be very impressed. It's possible: they've shown remarkably good operational sense throughout the war so far.

I can't help but think the "raze everything to the ground with artillery, then plant a flag on the ruins" tactic kind of backfires here too. Ukraine doesn't really have to hesitate to use heavy weapons and artillery like they would have to when retaking Kherson, as an example.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




ummel posted:

I can't help but think the "raze everything to the ground with artillery, then plant a flag on the ruins" tactic kind of backfires here too. Ukraine doesn't really have to hesitate to use heavy weapons and artillery like they would have to when retaking Kherson, as an example.

There still are a couple thousand civilians in S-D, according to information as recent as last week.

Rigel
Nov 11, 2016

cinci zoo sniper posted:

There still are a couple thousand civilians in S-D, according to information as recent as last week.

Another difference is that Ukraine can hit what they aim at, so they don't have to lob over thousands of dumb unguided rockets.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




https://twitter.com/jseldin/status/1532795318005276673

That’s a spicy meatball, if they open palm slam Navalnyi’s big list.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013
Probation
Can't post for 6 hours!

cinci zoo sniper posted:

https://twitter.com/jseldin/status/1532795318005276673

That’s a spicy meatball, if they open palm slam Navalnyi’s big list.

Actions like this are part of why I'm not as worried about potential R undercutting of action against Russia- for much of the party, it remains a base-pleaser.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5