Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
DaysBefore
Jan 24, 2019

The Maroon Hawk posted:

Yeah, I sometimes see people say “well they don’t wear helmets in Amsterdam!!!” and I’m like yeah, that’s because their infrastructure isn’t homicidally car-centric, and they have actual bicycle infrastructure and not just these bullshit sharrows and maybe a stripe of paint on the road

Yeah cyclists in the suburban commuter hellscapes of the US and Canada aren't dying because they don't wear helmets, they're dying because at best they get a designated gutter they're allowed to ride in, and at worst they're expected to mix-in with regular traffic. Should definitely still wear a helmet but like the issue isn't the strip of green paint designating a "safe" part of the six-lane freeway for people on bicycles.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

Pigsfeet on Rye posted:

You're #30, right behind Three Olives

Oh that’s kind of disappointing

endlessmonotony
Nov 4, 2009

by Fritz the Horse

Mx. posted:

AITA for telling my roommate his autism isn’t my problem?

Also aversion issues can be worked around, the mother is 100% the problem. You know those long-arm picking tools used to clean streets? That, plus something to hold a trash bag open.

Or just Ikea salad tongs, those are easily cleaned.

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

I don't understand how better bike infrastructure makes bikes shorter or concrete softer, but okay.

(wear a loving helmet)

Captain Hygiene
Sep 17, 2007

You mess with the crabbo...



CharlestheHammer posted:

Oh that’s kind of disappointing

I can help you get there if you want :respek:

DaysBefore
Jan 24, 2019

Stats Canada had a neat study of fatalities from a few years ago that showed 73% of cyclist fatalities were motor vehicles collisions. Not wearing a helmet was still a major factor (roughly 1/3rd of all dead were not wearing helmets [though in more than 50% of cases it wasn't known if there were helmets involved at all]) but even so it's clear that by far the biggest cause is not the helmet or lack thereof but the fact that people on bikes are expected to share the road or squeeze themselves into the gutters with F150s and busses and dumptrucks and idiot teenagers in Honda Civics.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-625-x/2019001/article/00009-eng.htm

Without a doubt wear a helmet! But building proper cycling infrastructure - i.e. blow up every American and Canadian city and build New Amsterdam's in their place - is going to save infinitely more lives than helmets.

Fil5000
Jun 23, 2003

HOLD ON GUYS I'M POSTING ABOUT INTERNET ROBOTS

CharlestheHammer posted:

Oh that’s kind of disappointing

I mean bear in mind BravestOfThe Lamps is only 8th on that list, it's really hard to crack that top ten man.

Biplane
Jul 18, 2005

DeeplyConcerned posted:

I found the ultimate solution:
1. let Mr. dumbass ride around without his helmet.
2. take a big rear end life insurance policy out on Mr. dumb rear end
3. wait for the inevitable to happen
4. collect the sweet payout
5. Collect a new husband

I call it the black widow

Claim denied for not having taken necessary precautions prior to riding the bike. You're now being sued for attempted insurance fraud.

Dr. Stab
Sep 12, 2010
👨🏻‍⚕️🩺🔪🙀😱🙀

DaysBefore posted:

Stats Canada had a neat study of fatalities from a few years ago that showed 73% of cyclist fatalities were motor vehicles collisions. Not wearing a helmet was still a major factor (roughly 1/3rd of all dead were not wearing helmets [though in more than 50% of cases it wasn't known if there were helmets involved at all]) but even so it's clear that by far the biggest cause is not the helmet or lack thereof but the fact that people on bikes are expected to share the road or squeeze themselves into the gutters with F150s and busses and dumptrucks and idiot teenagers in Honda Civics.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-625-x/2019001/article/00009-eng.htm

Without a doubt wear a helmet! But building proper cycling infrastructure - i.e. blow up every American and Canadian city and build New Amsterdam's in their place - is going to save infinitely more lives than helmets.

You don't have to blow things up. Amsterdam was like that, and then they just added some concrete and paint and trees to the big urban roads to narrow the driving lanes and add grade separated bike lanes and then they suddenly had a more walkable (and also more driveable btw) city.

Obviously stop building things in the dumb way were doing it now, but the retrofit isn't actually a huge burden. It only seems like a huge deal because cities are used to allocating ten bucks a year to bike infrastructure and 17 billion to widening the freeway.

the holy poopacy
May 16, 2009

hey! check this out
Fun Shoe

Motronic posted:

I don't understand how better bike infrastructure makes bikes shorter or concrete softer, but okay.

(wear a loving helmet)

Yeah, I've known guys who went rear end over handlebars with no cars involved and it can get pretty grisly.

Dr. Stab posted:

and then they suddenly had a more walkable (and also more driveable btw) city.

This is the kicker--the more car-friendly your transportation infrastructure is the worse it is to actually drive in.

the holy poopacy fucked around with this message at 17:08 on Jun 5, 2022

limp_cheese
Sep 10, 2007


Nothing to see here. Move along.

Captain Hygiene posted:

:laffo: And I thought I hated weddings already. Good god

You have to get on a waiting list before you can get on a waiting list wtf? I'm so glad I do not care about the cult of Disney at all.



While I do agree places in the US are way too car focused and it would help to add more infrastructure to bikes until that happens cyclists need to follow the rules of the road like stopping at stop signs. I've almost splattered a few people while driving because they just cycle across the road while I have the right of way and they have a stop sign. And no I'm not talking about they do a rolling stop or whatever or that its a 4-way stop, I'm talking people who never even slow down and its like they are daring me to hit them. This is just in a neighborhood too so its not like they are bike messengers.

wizardofloneliness
Dec 30, 2008

Cyclists may or may not be required to actually stop at stop signs depending on the state. If it’s only a two-way stop and someone is driving through the other way, then yeah obviously you should stop so you don’t get run over. But where I am, you’re allowed to treat stop signs as yield signs and red lights as stop signs.

The Maroon Hawk
May 10, 2008

Finally, a good derail :hehe:

Zulily Zoetrope
Jun 1, 2011

Muldoon
People in Amsterdam die to bad spills and drunken collisions same as anywhere else. They’re just less likely to be murdered by car culture specifically.

Wear a helmet.

DrManiac
Feb 29, 2012

How much do you think it would be for Mickey to watch as you consummate your marriage on your honey moon? Is it by hour or is it included in the package.

ponzicar
Mar 17, 2008

DrManiac posted:

How much do you think it would be for Mickey to watch as you consummate your marriage on your honey moon? Is it by hour or is it included in the package.

If it takes place on Disney property, Mickey has the right of primae noctis.

wizardofloneliness
Dec 30, 2008

Goofy probably costs more anyway.

PokeJoe
Aug 24, 2004

hail cgatan


I'm into some pretty sick poo poo so I hired a dog and a few mice to watch me gently caress

Upgrade
Jun 19, 2021



wizardofloneliness posted:

Cyclists may or may not be required to actually stop at stop signs depending on the state. If it’s only a two-way stop and someone is driving through the other way, then yeah obviously you should stop so you don’t get run over. But where I am, you’re allowed to treat stop signs as yield signs and red lights as stop signs.

Yes it’s stupid to have two different standards for vehicles sharing a road. This also encourages cyclists to split lanes which should be illegal.

There’s a lot of things that should be done to reduce bike fatalities and a part of it does include “having cyclists obey basic rules of the road.”

My city finally made splitting lanes illegal, thankfully.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


DeeplyConcerned posted:

I found the ultimate solution:
1. let Mr. dumbass ride around without his helmet.
2. take a big rear end life insurance policy out on Mr. dumb rear end
3. wait for the inevitable to happen
4. collect the sweet payout
5. Collect a new husband

I call it the black widow

Consider: he might just end up becoming an expensive vegetable if the brain injury doesn't kill him

kru
Oct 5, 2003

CharlestheHammer posted:

Oh that’s kind of disappointing

like ur posting

trickybiscuits
Jan 13, 2008

yospos

carrionman posted:

I worked for a storage unit company as a high school job, probably 80% of the units were just stuff that didn't fit in people's garages, extra furniture, classic cars stuff like that.

Then there was the other 20%

The guys who used it for their drug stuff (we turned a blind eye to them for a few months but the fuckers kept leaving needles in the garden)
The lady who had a unit full of old birthday cards she'd turn up to read and cry over, then once she was done she'd come over and hit on me which was awkward as hell.
One unit that the guy stopped paying for, which when we went to empty it out was full of nothing but old national geographic magazines
The porn emporium, which contained a double bed, tv and a truly inspiring, to a teenage carrionman at least, amount of sex toys and bondage gear. We never did figure out if someone was filming porn in there or if it was some dudes affair nest.

This dude storing old kids toys and personal stuff that doesn't fit with the new relationship is pretty normal.
National Geographic is awesome but thinking they have value will ruin your brain. An instructor when I was in library school specifically said to turn down anybody who tries to donate National Geographic magazines as if it happened all the time (it does).

Motronic posted:

Yes. Because a closet is a normal thing that comes with normal housing and a storage unit is a $300+ bill per month for things they typically aren't worth that amount and never will be. Seriously, you should see the absolute poo poo people keep in storage units. Your Ikea furniture from college isn't going to be any good by the time your kids go to school, they don't want it, and you could have paid for new stuff with how much the storage costs. Or "special" furniture. Those are the ones paying even more for climate controlled. When do you think yo'ure going to be able to use this stuff? Is it waiting for your "dream house?" How much longer is that going to take to every be able to afford when you're pissing away an extra $500/mo?
My dad refuses to get rid of his textbooks from grad school, which have been in boxes while he redecorates the living room for upwards of ten years, and which he didn't touch for thirty years before that. Meanwhile I graduated library school seven years ago and kept only one book about colleciton maintenance. Library school did me a huge favor of teaching me that you NEED to weed your possessions every now and then.

Also that textbooks are so expensive they mess with people's brains. The system is designed so that you never get that two hundred dollars back!

trickybiscuits fucked around with this message at 18:57 on Jun 5, 2022

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012
Any textbooks that aren't primary references and are solely teaching books aren't worth keeping in the slightest because they churn out new ones as fast as they can.

It's amazing how academic books became more disposable then cheap harlequin paperback novels you can buy for $5 while costing a car payment.

nashona
May 8, 2014

Though she be but little, she is fierce


DrManiac posted:

How much do you think it would be for Mickey to watch as you consummate your marriage on your honey moon? Is it by hour or is it included in the package.

An hour? Like what happens after the first 3 minutes?

trickybiscuits posted:

National Geographic is awesome but thinking they have value will ruin your brain. An instructor when I was in library school specifically said to turn down anybody who tries to donate National Geographic magazines as if it happened all the time (it does).

One of my library school instructors once made a joke about libraries going around dumping them in other libraries book returns. No one wants them.

trickybiscuits
Jan 13, 2008

yospos

pentyne posted:

Any textbooks that aren't primary references and are solely teaching books aren't worth keeping in the slightest because they churn out new ones as fast as they can.

It's amazing how academic books became more disposable then cheap harlequin paperback novels you can buy for $5 while costing a car payment.
I just left a job at a college library where the library director partnered with some of the Bio professors- the library had an open-source Biology textbook printed and put into binders, and the professors assigned it as the text for their classes. It was cool.

Anyway, have some appallingly bad advice from Ask Amy!

quote:

Dear Amy: My in-laws are in town. They are staying at our apartment.

Thankfully, my husband and I are able to stay at my parents’ place while my own folks are away, because our apartment is too small for four adults and three animals.

My mother-in-law is cleaning and doing our laundry at our place while we are at work.

That’s nice, but my husband isn’t single anymore and I feel uncomfortable that she’s doing that.

Also, she wants to cook him a roast and potatoes for dinner. I don’t eat either of these things, so is it rude to cook my own meal?

I feel a little overwhelmed by it all, but I can’t say anything because he hasn’t seen his parents in almost a year.

Am I being ridiculous?

– Young Wife

Dear Wife: Yes, you are being ridiculous. But this brand of ridiculousness is often brought on by the presence of in-laws, especially when they are staying in your home.

You sleeping elsewhere is a lucky break, because your mother-in-law is trying to make herself at home – and be helpful – in your home. If you were cohabiting during this visit, your reaction about boundaries would be somewhat justified.

Cleaning and cooking are how your mother-in-law is expressing her gratitude for the visit. She is trying to mother both of you, and you would be gracious to accept her efforts.

If she wants to cook a special meal for her son, then embrace it. If you decide to eat a separate meal, then praise her efforts, tell her it looks delicious – but say, “Unfortunately, I don’t eat meat and potatoes, so I’m going to put together a little salad for myself. But I think it’s really sweet of you to do this, and I know your son is going to appreciate it.”

If later on in your relationship you find that your mother-in-law is leaping over domestic boundaries, then you should draw a firm line.

Captain Hygiene
Sep 17, 2007

You mess with the crabbo...



nashona posted:

An hour? Like what happens after the first 3 minutes?

The actor sits there rethinking their life

Splicer
Oct 16, 2006

from hell's heart I cast at thee
🧙🐀🧹🌙🪄🐸

wizardofloneliness posted:

Goofy probably costs more anyway.
Nah they're all loving goofy

rain dogs
Apr 19, 2020

nashona posted:

An hour? Like what happens after the first 3 minutes?


Mickey gets a turn

Woodchip
Mar 28, 2010
Prima Moustis

Armitag3
Mar 15, 2020

Forget it Jake, it's cybertown.


rain dogs posted:

Mickey gets a turn

I'm gonna go for that sloppy seconds, ha-ha.

DeeplyConcerned
Apr 29, 2008

I can fit 3 whole bud light cans now, ask me how!

Mr. Lobe posted:

Consider: he might just end up becoming an expensive vegetable if the brain injury doesn't kill him

man... whats the saying, dont try and reinvent the wheel? I guess that's why the ol' acid vat gets a lot of use.

Mr. Lobe
Feb 23, 2007

... Dry bones...


DeeplyConcerned posted:

man... whats the saying, dont try and reinvent the wheel? I guess that's why the ol' acid vat gets a lot of use.

Collecting insurance without a body would be pretty hard.

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

nashona posted:

An hour? Like what happens after the first 3 minutes?

Depends on if you paid for the basic shaming package or the deluxe cucking package.

Bruceski
Aug 21, 2007

The tools of a hero mean nothing without a solid core.

Upgrade posted:

Yes it’s stupid to have two different standards for vehicles sharing a road. This also encourages cyclists to split lanes which should be illegal.

There’s a lot of things that should be done to reduce bike fatalities and a part of it does include “having cyclists obey basic rules of the road.”

My city finally made splitting lanes illegal, thankfully.

For low-traffic areas it makes sense (I grew up in a rural area where "red as stop" counted for cars as well outside of rush hour, whether it was on the books or not) but it adds extra ambiguity as the traffic density picks up. I live near a busy 4-way stop with a major bike lane and the last thing I want when asking "do I need to hesitate on my turn because that approaching cyclist is going to blow right through" is the knowledge that they may mistakenly believe they're entitled to do so. The law (at least Oregon's version) does not grant extra right-of-way privileges, it allows for additional actions when you already have right-of-way.

But honestly I think the law just adds extra anxiety for me as a driver and doesn't actually increase the number of reckless cyclists. The problem ones were biking as if their legs having to do some extra work was as important as an ambulance's siren for decades before this law.

bltzn
Oct 26, 2020

For the record I do not have a foot fetish.

limp_cheese posted:

You have to get on a waiting list before you can get on a waiting list wtf? I'm so glad I do not care about the cult of Disney at all.



While I do agree places in the US are way too car focused and it would help to add more infrastructure to bikes until that happens cyclists need to follow the rules of the road like stopping at stop signs. I've almost splattered a few people while driving because they just cycle across the road while I have the right of way and they have a stop sign. And no I'm not talking about they do a rolling stop or whatever or that its a 4-way stop, I'm talking people who never even slow down and its like they are daring me to hit them. This is just in a neighborhood too so its not like they are bike messengers.

I drive and bike regularly and a lot of cyclists I see in this city are downright suicidal. Most frequently it's cyclists trying to squeeze past a right turning car, on the right side.

DoctorWhat
Nov 18, 2011

A little privacy, please?

Upgrade posted:

Yes it’s stupid to have two different standards for vehicles sharing a road. This also encourages cyclists to split lanes which should be illegal.

There’s a lot of things that should be done to reduce bike fatalities and a part of it does include “having cyclists obey basic rules of the road.”

My city finally made splitting lanes illegal, thankfully.

The most dangerous spot for a cyclist is sharing an intersection with a car. They need to be granted additional opportunites to cross intersections without sharing the crossing with cars. In the absence of seperate bike-only signal cycles, cyclists will bend and break laws to ensure their own safety.

By "splitting lanes" do you mean taking a whole lane? Cyclists absolutely need that power. Cars should not have the legal authority to bully cylists into gutter and double-parked cars that blockade bike lanes.

Motronic
Nov 6, 2009

DoctorWhat posted:

By "splitting lanes" do you mean taking a whole lane? Cyclists absolutely need that power. Cars should not have the legal authority to bully cylists into gutter and double-parked cars that blockade bike lanes.

It's the opposite of that. It's cyclists coming up between cars that are in adjacent lanes (as in riding on the dotted white line). Or people on motorcycles overtaking cars this way.

It has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with getting around faster and flouting the traffic laws which in different circumstances people will demand must be followed/apply to bikes, like you just did.

Tendales
Mar 9, 2012
Cars should have to pull over and come to a complete stop if a bike wants to use the road.

Biplane
Jul 18, 2005

Tendales posted:

Cars should have to pull over and come to a complete stop if a bike wants to use the road.

100% unironically yes.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Soylent Pudding
Jun 22, 2007

We've got people!


AITA for using my boyfriend's PS savings to buy a new camera?

quote:

My 24f boyfriend 26m asked if he could have my camera to take with him to the beach with his friends. I said no but he took it anyway and didn't tell me. He then came home to tell me that it broke. I was furious because 1) I never gave him permission to take it. and 2) it's an expensive camera. I demanded that he pay me for a replacement but he kept stalling saying he didn't have money.

He has been saving up for a new ps after his old one broke. it was about $450 in total so I took it and added about $80 to buy a new camera that was similar to my old one.

He found out about it this morning and went off on me saying I shouldn't have touched his money that he worked so hard to save. I told him he broke my camera and was responsible for paying for a replacement.he yelled at me saying that what happened with him was all accidental whereas what I did was on purpose and petty and theft as well. We had a big argument and he had his friend come tell me how I hosed up by taking his money and acting sneaky about it.

He's wanting his money back now and is pressuring me to return the camera saying it's not as essential as the ps he was planning to buy.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply