Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

Lib and let die posted:

Screaming at literally anyone not in Congress is like choosing to jerk off instead of getting laid - what's the loving point?
...sympathy and empathy? For the dead children?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Lib and let die posted:

Screaming at literally anyone not in Congress is like choosing to jerk off instead of getting laid - what's the loving point?

Sharon doesn't understand moé.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Kanos posted:

Yeah, I don't think the argument people are making is that 1/6 didn't matter, it's that it's extremely difficult to care about the Democrats' response to it because they themselves don't really seem to care. It was an open violent coup, an attempt to derail the normal democratic proceedings of our government and kidnap/murder elected officials in the country's capitol, and the response has been turtle-paced and anemic.

It's been a year and a half since 1/6 and no one more important than some boots-on-the-ground brownshirts have suffered any inconveniences or consequences for it, and the public version of these hearings aren't going to change anything about that.

They impeached Trump in a week

Abner Assington
Mar 13, 2005

For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry god. Bloody Mary, full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now, at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon.

Amen.
And it was effectively performative since they knew there wouldn't be enough senators to convict.

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

DarkCrawler posted:

Countless Americans, presumably with at least a shred of sympathy and empathy, choose not to do the same whenever they talk with a fellow American who values gun rights over the lives of children. I mean I don't understand that either but let's not pretend Kimmel is alone here.

Being obsessed with yelling at the powerless in a country you don't live in is an incredibly weird hobby.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

DarkCrawler posted:

...sympathy and empathy? For the dead children?

If you just want sympathy for dead children the republicans have a great handle on that

TheSpartacus
Oct 30, 2010
HEY GUYS I'VE FLOWN HELICOPTERS IN THIS GAME BEFORE AND I AM AN EXPERT. ALSO, HOW DO I START THE ENGINE?

yronic heroism posted:

They impeached Trump in a week

Yeah then the Dems acquiesced to the trial occurring after Trump left office, allowing for the bullshit arguments that gave the GOP the outs they needed to not convict.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Abner Assington posted:

And it was effectively performative since they knew there wouldn't be enough senators to convict.

Be honest with yourself. Would you really refrain from criticism if they didn’t impeach for this reason? Really?

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

TheSpartacus posted:

Yeah then the Dems acquiesced to the trial occurring after Trump left office, allowing for the bullshit arguments that gave the GOP the outs they needed to not convict.

The Republicans wouldn’t have convicted anyway hth

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

TheSpartacus posted:

Yeah then the Dems acquiesced to the trial occurring after Trump left office, allowing for the bullshit arguments that gave the GOP the outs they needed to not convict.

They would have done the same thing no matter when it happened.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Oracle posted:

They've apparently got a TV producer orchestrating the presentation of the evidence, so tonight might be the best night to tune in.



There should be a watch thread regardless.

Done

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=4004152

Kind of a lazy C&P OP I posted but anyone feel free to help with it.

Tonight probably isn't gonna be much. They're calling it a "table setter" so wheeeeeee....!

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

WorkerThread posted:

So we've established that democrats don't care about 1/6. Republicans don't care about 1/6. Many posters in this thread do not care about 1/6. What are your reasons for caring about it, then? How would you convince me?

Think of it as a dry run or a dress rehearsal, imagine how easily it could have gone far worse and what might happen next time since these people don't seem to have gone away anywhere and are, in fact, growing in numbers. Including within our halls of government. I personally think it was a flashpoint and will be looked at as a turning point in modern US history.

How it's written about and described is going to be determined by who "wins" moving forward. I mean, we're all going to lose but I was referring to the whole "history is written by the winners" trope and if the people behind that insurrection get their way, I'm pretty sure what the school books printed in Texas are going to tell my kid about it.

selec posted:



It doesn’t affect my life in any way, it’s just another show I’m not watching.

I believe it does. Unless you mean the hearing itself and not what unfolded 1/6 in which case I can see your point. It's gonna be a political TV commercial

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

BiggerBoat posted:

Think of it as a dry run or a dress rehearsal, imagine how easily it could have gone far worse and what might happen next time since these people don't seem to have gone away anywhere and are, in fact, growing in numbers. Including within our halls of government. I personally think it was a flashpoint and will be looked at as a turning point in modern US history.

How it's written about and described is going to be determined by who "wins" moving forward. I mean, we're all going to lose but I was referring to the whole "history is written by the winners" trope and if the people behind that insurrection get their way, I'm pretty sure what the school books printed in Texas are going to tell my kid about it.

I believe it does. Unless you mean the hearing itself and not what unfolded 1/6 in which case I can see your point. It's gonna be a political TV commercial

Most (eventually) successful coups fail the first time around.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

BiggerBoat posted:

Think of it as a dry run or a dress rehearsal, imagine how easily it could have gone far worse and what might happen next time since these people don't seem to have gone away anywhere and are, in fact, growing in numbers. Including within our halls of government. I personally think it was a flashpoint and will be looked at as a turning point in modern US history.

How it's written about and described is going to be determined by who "wins" moving forward. I mean, we're all going to lose but I was referring to the whole "history is written by the winners" trope and if the people behind that insurrection get their way, I'm pretty sure what the school books printed in Texas are going to tell my kid about it.

I believe it does. Unless you mean the hearing itself and not what unfolded 1/6 in which case I can see your point. It's gonna be a political TV commercial

Whether or not the "coup" participants goes to jail has absolutely 0 impact on the price of my Keppra today, next month, next year, or five years from now.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

nine-gear crow posted:

Most (eventually) successful coups fail the first time around.

Right. They WILL come armed next time and a lot of GOP congress people might just egg them on. People need to look at the cross tabs of the GOP base and their polling.

From WAPO, January 2022

quote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/07/republicans-big-lie-trump/

Nevertheless, the vast majority of Republican voters say they agree with Trump’s unsubstantiated claims that the election was stolen. In our most recent University of Massachusetts at Amherst poll, fielded online Dec. 14-20 by YouGov among a nationally representative sample of the U.S. voting-age population, only 21 percent of Republicans say Joe Biden’s victory was legitimate. This is nearly identical to what we found in our April poll, in which just 19 percent of Republicans said Biden was legitimately elected. Other universities, media outlets and polling firms have found nearly identical results.

These people honestly believe that Biden stole the election. A large plurality of half of our only viable political parties. One really has to get inside the head of a person who believes this, is probably heavily armed and what they might do about itbased on that perception of reality. Probably 1 out of every 5 republicans I meet - this includes co workers and cashiers and cops and my cable guy and my bank teller - suspects me of drinking adrenochrome from the blood of aborted fetuses under the orders of Lord Soros. Maybe not 1 out of 5 but even 1 out of 10 is too much when there are 100 people living on my loving street.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

Gumball Gumption posted:

Being obsessed with yelling at the powerless in a country you don't live in is an incredibly weird hobby.

Doesn't change anything I said, though. I guess I am just sympathetic/empathetic enough to yell at someone who values their hobby or violent fantasies of taking on the government over you know, dead children? Even if they are "powerless" (though if they voted in order to keep the gun poo poo going, they had some power and they used it all to make their stance clear).

EDIT: also, rural white voters literally have more power over this stuff and all stuff than the average voter, maybe you should note how they use that extra power. I figure if things were even, there would be more sensible gun laws. So your assertion that they have no power over here really doesn't bear true. I'd say they are in fact the most dedicated to opposing any sensible gun laws.

DarkCrawler fucked around with this message at 20:13 on Jun 9, 2022

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Lib and let die posted:

Whether or not the "coup" participants goes to jail has absolutely 0 impact on the price of my Keppra today, next month, next year, or five years from now.

I know. My son and his mother have epilepsy too so I know about Keppra.

It can still be meaningful and important without directly affecting your medical bills.

I'm not trans or gay but the poo poo that's happening to people who are matters to me anyway. I'm not black but the concerns of BLM effect me. I'm not a migrant worker or locked up in a cage in Texas so that doesn't directly effect me. I'm not a homeless vet suffering from PTSD and don't know anyone who it is but it matters...so forth and so on.

If the next fascist coup succeeds, I can promise you it will impact your access to epilepsy medicine.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Lib and let die posted:

Whether or not the "coup" participants goes to jail has absolutely 0 impact on the price of my Keppra today, next month, next year, or five years from now.

Here's a personal way it affects me. My wife requires a drug called methotrexate. Methotrexate is used as an immunosuppressant in combination with many other meds affecting immune response. If the GOP takes power either through an election or a coup, the drug will likely be banned because it is used as an abortion drug as well.

If any medication you use can be used as a cudgel in some culture war it will be.

Oracle
Oct 9, 2004

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

well we all know the counter investigations are already planned

https://twitter.com/HouseAdmnGOP/status/1534945980453363716

it is rather tiring, maybe caring about all this is just a losing game and the only way to win is to not play. I haven't gotten there yet.

Davis isn't likely going to be there once Republicans have the gavel; he's been redistricted into blood red 15th district in an impressive display of IL Dem gerrymandering. That district thinks he's a RINO and blood gargling psychopath whose husband's truck was spotted in DC on Jan. 6th Mary Miller will be there in his place.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

BiggerBoat posted:

I know. My son and his mother have epilepsy too so I know about Keppra.

It can still be meaningful and important without directly affecting your medical bills.

I'm not trans or gay but the poo poo that's happening to people who are matters to me anyway. I'm not black but the concerns of BLM effect me. I'm not a migrant worker or locked up in a cage in Texas so that doesn't directly effect me. I'm not a homeless vet suffering from PTSD and don't know anyone who it is but it matters...so forth and so on.

If the next fascist coup succeeds, I can promise you it will impact your access to epilepsy medicine.

I mean, we're not going to see eye-to-eye on this because you're in the camp of "holy poo poo this was a serious threat" while I'm in the camp of "are you loving kidding me a dude tased himself in the balls to death and another one had the gall to put their feet on Nancy's desk, I wish the worst day of my life were that traumatic" which I don't say to demean, but just point out that we're working out of two very different worldviews - I'm considerably more convinced that rather than seize power, the fascists are simply going to be given power out of a desire for the liberal democrats to not appear too far left (sound like a familiar precedent?).

Flying-PCP
Oct 2, 2005

BiggerBoat posted:

I know. My son and his mother have epilepsy too so I know about Keppra.

It can still be meaningful and important without directly affecting your medical bills.

I'm not trans or gay but the poo poo that's happening to people who are matters to me anyway. I'm not black but the concerns of BLM effect me. I'm not a migrant worker or locked up in a cage in Texas so that doesn't directly effect me. I'm not a homeless vet suffering from PTSD and don't know anyone who it is but it matters...so forth and so on.

If the next fascist coup succeeds, I can promise you it will impact your access to epilepsy medicine.

That could also happen just due to... republicans winning 'legitimately' (i.e. without overturning election results and just relying on voter suppression and the electoral college system). So Dems need to be educating people about poo poo like this.

Lib and let die posted:

I mean, we're not going to see eye-to-eye on this because you're in the camp of "holy poo poo this was a serious threat" while I'm in the camp of "are you loving kidding me a dude tased himself in the balls to death and another one had the gall to put their feet on Nancy's desk, I wish the worst day of my life were that traumatic" which I don't say to demean, but just point out that we're working out of two very different worldviews - I'm considerably more convinced that rather than seize power, the fascists are simply going to be given power out of a desire for the liberal democrats to not appear too far left (sound like a familiar precedent?).

Even accepting the premise that it wasn't a serious threat, I'd be 100% willing to act like it was anyway if it could help stop Republicans from taking power. In my opinion, the only salient question is whether it can help, or if it's actually just directing energy away from other strategies that could.

Flying-PCP fucked around with this message at 20:22 on Jun 9, 2022

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Lib and let die posted:

I mean, we're not going to see eye-to-eye on this because you're in the camp of "holy poo poo this was a serious threat" while I'm in the camp of "are you loving kidding me a dude tased himself in the balls to death and another one had the gall to put their feet on Nancy's desk, I wish the worst day of my life were that traumatic" which I don't say to demean, but just point out that we're working out of two very different worldviews - I'm considerably more convinced that rather than seize power, the fascists are simply going to be given power out of a desire for the liberal democrats to not appear too far left (sound like a familiar precedent?).

It's all good. Don't watch the hearings. Or don't care about 1/6. I'm not trying to convince you. Just mostly writing about why I personally think it's a big deal (the event itself not the hearings). I don't have an ax to grind with you about it or anyone else. I hope that moving forward you (and my son) are able to procure seizure medication. I'm being serious not snarky.

Uncle Boogeyman
Jul 22, 2007

nine-gear crow posted:

Most (eventually) successful coups fail the first time around.

What about the unsuccessful ones

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

DarkCrawler posted:

Doesn't change anything I said, though. I guess I am just sympathetic/empathetic enough to yell at someone who values their hobby or violent fantasies of taking on the government over you know, dead children? Even if they are "powerless" (though if they voted in order to keep the gun poo poo going, they had some power and they used it all to make their stance clear).

EDIT: also, rural white voters literally have more power over this stuff and all stuff than the average voter, maybe you should note how they use that extra power. I figure if things were even, there would be more sensible gun laws. So your assertion that they have no power over here really doesn't bear true. I'd say they are in fact the most dedicated to opposing any sensible gun laws.

America would be a different country if we were only blessed to have you live here. You could have saved us with your powerful empathy and good heart.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Flying-PCP posted:

That could also happen just due to... republicans winning 'legitimately' (i.e. without overturning election results and just relying on voter suppression and the electoral college system). So Dems need to be educating people about poo poo like this.

Even accepting the premise that it wasn't a serious threat, I'd be 100% willing to act like it was anyway if it could help stop Republicans from taking power. In my opinion, the only salient question is whether it can help, or if it's actually just directing energy away from other strategies that could.

It's going to be the Democrats' lack of material action that ultimately drives enough liberal-to-left spectrum voters to stay home or vote for "anyone but a Democrat" purely out of spite and allow Republicans to victory stroll into all the halls of power.

What have the state Democrats done - outside of "He's not DeSantis!" to make Crist an attractive option to someone like me? How is he anything other than - to borrow a term from Ron's own campaign against Nelson - an empty suit? Without looking it up, can you name a single decisive policy position Crist is going to take that would lower the cost of BB's son's or my own medicine?

Like it or not, there is an overwhelming majority of eligible voters that are disenfranchised from both the democrats' party and/or electoralism in general that are in essence, the "not republican" version of the right-wing "I won't vote for anyone, of any party, that is pro-choice" voter and where the republicans lean into and leverage those kinds of voters and their energy, the democrats - even the "rowdiest", youngest idealists in the party tell you that actually you need to be more realistic and vote to compromise and put your single issues aside.

BiggerBoat posted:

It's all good. Don't watch the hearings. Or don't care about 1/6. I'm not trying to convince you. Just mostly writing about why I personally think it's a big deal (the event itself not the hearings). I don't have an ax to grind with you about it or anyone else. I hope that moving forward you (and my son) are able to procure seizure medication. I'm being serious not snarky.

No animosity at all! I just think it's important that I try and communicate why I might disagree with a particular perspective.

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Uncle Boogeyman posted:

What about the unsuccessful ones

Most unsuccessful coups are usually brutally put down by the governing force in power so that they don't get the chance to take another shot at it and succeed. See Erdogan in Turkey in 2016. That coup against him failed because he crushed it with a giant steamroller and then purged everyone who he thought might have looked a little bit coup-ey just for the hell of it to make sure.

whiskey patrol
Feb 26, 2003
I think 1/6 stuff is a distraction from the far more concerning matter of voter suppression and general radicalization of the police. The 1/6 stuff just seems ridiculous. For it to be a real 'coup' you need the security services, you need the bureaucracy, you need the people who hold the actual levers of power. It was a riot that only got out of control because the police were setup to fail and many were friendly / sympathetic to the rioters. But the police all got medals and no one who intentionally botched the planning and withheld intel has been held accountable. So sure, I guess it maybe rises to a clown shoes coup, but it's still a distraction.

Where is the focus on the radicalization of the security forces in this country? The rank & file police are crazy conservative and I'm pretty sure groups like the border patrol are way worse. Using 1/6 as a way to draw attention to that issue would be great. But I doubt we'll even get a 'few bad apples' held accountable, let alone a systemic review.

Where is the focus on what's going on with state legislatures and the mass disenfranchisement going on in this country? Packing and cracking makes voting your way out impossible because the politicians choose their voters. The complete take over of the judicial branch also paves the way for 'legal' election theft as they will sign off on votes only being advisory to the state legislatures. A couple of idiots thinking if they can interrupt the swearing in that Trump would still be president isn't a threat to American democracy. The courts and the inability to address the already unequal nature of representation in this country.

A fascist take over is absolutely something to be terrified of because it's coming. It's just going to be carried out by the people who already have guns and decide the laws. 1/6 is just to distract people with Trump because there is no answer coming on as to how fix the judiciary or the cops.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

Gumball Gumption posted:

America would be a different country if we were only blessed to have you live here. You could have saved us with your powerful empathy and good heart.

The funny thing is that it doesn't even require that much empathy to pick dead children over "I really like guns, enough to think dead children are worth it and actively vote to stop things that might prevent more dead children"- people.

Now that we started talking about power though, isn't someone voting in a Senate election in say, Wyoming literally x times more powerful in regards to the sort of legislation (and through that, judiciary) than someone in a larger state?

Flying-PCP
Oct 2, 2005

Lib and let die posted:

Like it or not, there is an overwhelming majority of eligible voters that are disenfranchised from both the democrats' party and/or electoralism in general that are in essence, the "not republican" version of the right-wing "I won't vote for anyone, of any party, that is pro-choice" voter and where the republicans lean into and leverage those kinds of voters and their energy, the democrats - even the "rowdiest", youngest idealists in the party tell you that actually you need to be more realistic and vote to compromise and put your single issues aside.

No animosity at all! I just think it's important that I try and communicate why I might disagree with a particular perspective.

Are pro-choice republican elected officials really a thing? I'm not up on all the state politics around the country to know about that. Generally though, it seems like republican politicians have little need to tell their base to vote red no matter who, because they're a far more cohesive bloc to begin with, and they already care a lot more about keeping the 'enemy' party out of office. There's a mutual trust that R voters will hold their nose and vote for a namby-pamby election-truth-denying RINO in a general election, and that said RINOs will still support plenty of cruelty towards the groups that are causing the decay of society or whatever.

WorkerThread
Feb 15, 2012

BiggerBoat posted:

Think of it as a dry run or a dress rehearsal, imagine how easily it could have gone far worse and what might happen next time since these people don't seem to have gone away anywhere and are, in fact, growing in numbers. Including within our halls of government. I personally think it was a flashpoint and will be looked at as a turning point in modern US history.

How it's written about and described is going to be determined by who "wins" moving forward. I mean, we're all going to lose but I was referring to the whole "history is written by the winners" trope and if the people behind that insurrection get their way, I'm pretty sure what the school books printed in Texas are going to tell my kid about it.

I believe it does. Unless you mean the hearing itself and not what unfolded 1/6 in which case I can see your point. It's gonna be a political TV commercial

Thanks for answering. But do you think that group of 1776 cosplayers could have seized the bureaucracy, military, intelligence apparatus, etc? Even if something truly wild happened, like a handful of legislators being killed, would that change the answer to that question? Note that nothing remotely close to that actually did happen.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

selec posted:

The difference is J6 is their problem, not really my business. Covid, I look out for myself.

WorkerThread posted:

So we've established that democrats don't care about 1/6. Republicans don't care about 1/6. Many posters in this thread do not care about 1/6. What are your reasons for caring about it, then? How would you convince me?

We've established that posters in this thread take their lead from Democrats on policy. As that is the reason they have given for whether or not they should care about 1/6.

I think taking your lead from Democrats on policy is a bad idea. But people are openly stating that as their reasoning. More than one.

Seems bad.

WorkerThread
Feb 15, 2012

Jaxyon posted:

We've established that posters in this thread take their lead from Democrats on policy. As that is the reason they have given for whether or not they should care about 1/6.

I think taking your lead from Democrats on policy is a bad idea. But people are openly stating that as their reasoning. More than one.

Seems bad.

And I'm the one that gets accused of bad faith... The point they were trying to communicate is pretty clear. I also didn't say I took my lead from democrats. I asked you (in general) to explain why I should be concerned about 1/6, or at least why you think it's a big deal.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Lib and let die posted:

It's going to be the Democrats' lack of material action that ultimately drives enough liberal-to-left spectrum voters to stay home or vote for "anyone but a Democrat" purely out of spite and allow Republicans to victory stroll into all the halls of power.

What have the state Democrats done - outside of "He's not DeSantis!" to make Crist an attractive option to someone like me? How is he anything other than - to borrow a term from Ron's own campaign against Nelson - an empty suit? Without looking it up, can you name a single decisive policy position Crist is going to take that would lower the cost of BB's son's or my own medicine?


Nothing at all and I agree with all of this.

Crist is just one of those old guard "moderate Republicans" carrying the "I didn't Leave the GOP; They Left ME" bumper stickers around. So basically a centrist democrat right now and all he's got is not being a fascist. Problem is, a lot of people are totes coll with fascism right now and that number is growing.

I honestly think that sooner rather than later, someone of great importance is going to get killed and the gun violence is doing to reach Someone Who Actually Matters instead of a dumb old school kid or some stupid teacher. (I'm being sarcastic here). The Kavanaugh thing could have been real bad and the backlash from it had it gone worse would have been incredible.

Point being, and I hope I'm wrong, I think that eventually one of these bullets we love firing so much is going to hit Pelosi, McConnell, a SCOTUS judge...Pence...fill in the blank....because it almost doesn't matter who it is beyond the point that it WILL light a fuse if and when it happens on this powder keg of a nation. I'm pleasantly surprised that it hasn't happened yet but can't shake the feeling that it's coming in one form or another. Too many weapons and too many angry, unstable people. It wouldn't even entirely shock me to to see something like this staged Bob Roberts style either.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

BiggerBoat posted:

Nothing at all and I agree with all of this.

Crist is just one of those old guard "moderate Republicans" carrying the "I didn't Leave the GOP; They Left ME" bumper stickers around. So basically a centrist democrat right now and all he's got is not being a fascist. Problem is, a lot of people are totes coll with fascism right now and that number is growing.

I honestly think that sooner rather than later, someone of great importance is going to get killed and the gun violence is doing to reach Someone Who Actually Matters instead of a dumb old school kid or some stupid teacher. (I'm being sarcastic here). The Kavanaugh thing could have been real bad and the backlash from it had it gone worse would have been incredible.

Point being, and I hope I'm wrong, I think that eventually one of these bullets we love firing so much is going to hit Pelosi, McConnell, a SCOTUS judge...Pence...fill in the blank....because it almost doesn't matter who it is beyond the point that it WILL light a fuse if and when it happens on this powder keg of a nation. I'm pleasantly surprised that it hasn't happened yet but can't shake the feeling that it's coming in one form or another. Too many weapons and too many angry, unstable people. It wouldn't even entirely shock me to to see something like this staged Bob Roberts style either.

All I can really say about Kav is that you and I have very different ideas about "worst case outcome."

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

WorkerThread posted:

And I'm the one that gets accused of bad faith... The point they were trying to communicate is pretty clear. I also didn't say I took my lead from democrats. I asked you (in general) to explain why I should be concerned about 1/6, or at least why you think it's a big deal.

I didn't say you took your lead from Democrats. My apologies if that was unclear.

I said others did. Parakeet and Selec seemed to. If that wasn't the reason, and they were posting in good faith, why would they say that?

Where did I state my own position on 1/6?

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

WorkerThread posted:

Thanks for answering. But do you think that group of 1776 cosplayers could have seized the bureaucracy, military, intelligence apparatus, etc? Even if something truly wild happened, like a handful of legislators being killed, would that change the answer to that question? Note that nothing remotely close to that actually did happen.

Not yet.

Lib and let die posted:

All I can really say about Kav is that you and I have very different ideas about "worst case outcome."

I don't think that political assassinations are good.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Flying-PCP posted:

Are pro-choice republican elected officials really a thing? I'm not up on all the state politics around the country to know about that. Generally though, it seems like republican politicians have little need to tell their base to vote red no matter who, because they're a far more cohesive bloc to begin with, and they already care a lot more about keeping the 'enemy' party out of office. There's a mutual trust that R voters will hold their nose and vote for a namby-pamby election-truth-denying RINO in a general election, and that said RINOs will still support plenty of cruelty towards the groups that are causing the decay of society or whatever.

Oh yeah, there's some pro-choice elected Republicans, even at the national level. They're lying low right now, though, because the GOP base is actually super motivated to oust politicians that aren't seen as conservative enough.

POWELL CURES KIDS
Aug 26, 2016

In Lighter News:

https://twitter.com/WGNNews/status/1534952243644059650

FizFashizzle
Mar 30, 2005







Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

Here's a personal way it affects me. My wife requires a drug called methotrexate. Methotrexate is used as an immunosuppressant in combination with many other meds affecting immune response. If the GOP takes power either through an election or a coup, the drug will likely be banned because it is used as an abortion drug as well.

If any medication you use can be used as a cudgel in some culture war it will be.

Methotrexate is never going to be banned.

If you're concerned that any drug that could be used as an abortion pill or whatever will be banned, then you're also worried about things like Estradiol, Warfarin, Tretinoin, Aspirin etc.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

whiskey patrol posted:

I think 1/6 stuff is a distraction from the far more concerning matter of voter suppression and general radicalization of the police. The 1/6 stuff just seems ridiculous. For it to be a real 'coup' you need the security services, you need the bureaucracy, you need the people who hold the actual levers of power. It was a riot that only got out of control because the police were setup to fail and many were friendly / sympathetic to the rioters. But the police all got medals and no one who intentionally botched the planning and withheld intel has been held accountable. So sure, I guess it maybe rises to a clown shoes coup, but it's still a distraction.

Where is the focus on the radicalization of the security forces in this country? The rank & file police are crazy conservative and I'm pretty sure groups like the border patrol are way worse. Using 1/6 as a way to draw attention to that issue would be great. But I doubt we'll even get a 'few bad apples' held accountable, let alone a systemic review.

Where is the focus on what's going on with state legislatures and the mass disenfranchisement going on in this country? Packing and cracking makes voting your way out impossible because the politicians choose their voters. The complete take over of the judicial branch also paves the way for 'legal' election theft as they will sign off on votes only being advisory to the state legislatures. A couple of idiots thinking if they can interrupt the swearing in that Trump would still be president isn't a threat to American democracy. The courts and the inability to address the already unequal nature of representation in this country.

A fascist take over is absolutely something to be terrified of because it's coming. It's just going to be carried out by the people who already have guns and decide the laws. 1/6 is just to distract people with Trump because there is no answer coming on as to how fix the judiciary or the cops.

Terrific post, and one that mirrors my thinking as well.

Calling it a coup, or the greatest threat to democracy, not only ignores how acquiescent the capitol police were, or how impotent & amorphous the protestors were, but helps to criminalize any public protest that doesn't color within the lines from hereon.

The Madison Capitol protests, the Occupy protests, even the protests at the SCOTUS homes could all be painted with the same broad brush of "insurrection" and "coup" that has been used for 1/6.

Are we so jaded by a couple decades of the literal caging of protestors during political conventions and Occupy that anyone daring to breach the borders is "treasonous" or "seditious"? Those are terms I'd be more likely to use on behalf of elected officials who are elected on the basis of their fealty to corporations over voters than for the clowns at the Capitol on 1/6.

Flying-PCP posted:

Even accepting the premise that it wasn't a serious threat, I'd be 100% willing to act like it was anyway if it could help stop Republicans from taking power. In my opinion, the only salient question is whether it can help, or if it's actually just directing energy away from other strategies that could.

This is the brutally honest take, and the one that probably comes closest to explaining why we're having the primetime hearings, as well as the other pageantry like Hollywood-produced recap videos.

And, ironically, I think that Dems would be more persuasive by saying so rather than pretending 1/6 was on par with 9/11.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply