|
Looks better than I could have expected
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 13:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 17:01 |
|
|
So now its a comedy? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 14:16
|
|
|
Yeah this is good now Im 100% on board
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 14:24
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:So now its a comedy? I mean I expect it to have some darkly comedic elements, but it still looks like an action/adventure
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 14:54
|
|
|
Dr. Kayak Paddle posted:Get to look forward to this now too. Could be fun i hate his movies but maybe he's better at comedy but sheri moon zombie only knows how to do one character and i really don't think it's a good fit for Lily, but we'll see
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 16:25
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:So now its a comedy? its called “NOPE”
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 16:42
|
|
|
i'm not gonna even watch that trailer cause i know it's gonna be good and i'd rather be surprised by something for once oh poo poo, i keep forgetting to see Crimes of the Future. i even have a ticket already lmao
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 16:54
|
|
|
I'm catching it tonight, I'm pumped. Also think my expectations are in the right place thanks to goon reviews.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 16:57
|
|
|
I'm digging the idea of Michael Wincott playing Michael Khan, the last physical film editor on the planet
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 18:14
|
|
|
meh https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXYI77-pqrE
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 18:23
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:I'm catching it tonight, I'm pumped. Also think my expectations are in the right place thanks to goon reviews. It felt like Cronenberg's Greatest Hits to me. Ended a little too abruptly though. We never get to see the beauty pageant  The revival a few years back was pretty solid and Mike Judge still has talent left in him so I would watch (although would I subscribe to Paramount for it? Meh)
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 20:24
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:I'm catching it tonight, I'm pumped. Also think my expectations are in the right place thanks to goon reviews. it's good op
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 21:24
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:I'm catching it tonight, I'm pumped. Also think my expectations are in the right place thanks to goon reviews. i saw it, it owns. Viggo has big weird sexy peter weller energy. it's not as funny as i was hoping but it's really good.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2022 22:38
|
|
|
Yup, Crimes of the Future was real real good.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2022 03:43
|
|
|
I’d rather have a King of the Hill movie
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2022 00:57
|
|
|
whydirt posted:I’d rather have a King of the Hill movie no thank you. you just know it would be politically stupid. "well i tell you hwhat, looks to me like both sides are morons. maybe boys shouldn't go in the girls room, i tel you hwhat."
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2022 02:34
|
|
|
No way that’s Hank. Not one mention of propane and propane accessories. I love King of the Hill, but not sure about a long movie of it. I think they only had handful of multi part episodes?
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2022 02:40
|
|
|
So, do you think that Rob Zombie's Munsters movie will look good in black and white? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrQFHV6yTZ8
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2022 03:04
|
|
|
PeterCat posted:So, do you think that Rob Zombie's Munsters movie will look good in black and white? rob zombie has given the world no indication that he can write comedy, except the unintentional kind, so we'll really just have to see
|
|
#
?
Jun 15, 2022 03:32
|
|
|
thrawn527 posted:Because most of these YouTubers want to be actual content creators. Take Patrick in this example. He starting making pretty good videos about movies, but he really wants to be a director, so he’s trying to make the shift. He’s turned this Charl thing into a full blown movie only available on some pay streaming service, and it’s like, dude, that is not why most people are tuning into you. I’m sure you have a small vocal fan base telling you you’re doing a great job, but it’s just terrible stuff. I have a subscription to Nebula and tried to watch the Charl movie. I found it pretty unwatchable. I got about thirty minutes in with generous amounts of fast forwarding before giving up. I'm not sure what they were going for. I think it's supposed to be funny, but I kept thinking to myself, "Do they actually think this is funny? Did they actually laugh when they wrote, filmed and/or edited this?" Then I started to think they were going for some kind of anti-humor. I finally gave up when I decided that whatever their intent was, the end result, for me at least, was something just pointless and boring. The weird thing is that it's competently executed. It looks good, it's well edited, the acting is uneven, but fine for a low budget production. That's what really confuses me. Given the level of competence in the execution, I'm assuming that they made the movie that they wanted to make. Humor is subjective, obviously, but I don't know what mindset you have to come from to watch it and think, "Man, this is hilarious. They really nailed it." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxjWEgOCMzA
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2022 19:43
|
|
|
confused posted:I have a subscription to Nebula and tried to watch the Charl movie. I found it pretty unwatchable. I got about thirty minutes in with generous amounts of fast forwarding before giving up. I'm not sure what they were going for. I think it's supposed to be funny, but I kept thinking to myself, "Do they actually think this is funny? Did they actually laugh when they wrote, filmed and/or edited this?" Then I started to think they were going for some kind of anti-humor. I finally gave up when I decided that whatever their intent was, the end result, for me at least, was something just pointless and boring. I think part of the problem is that he’s so far up in his own rear end with the inside joke, he can’t see that no one outside his circle doesn’t get it. Like, Clerks was absolutely an amateur movie made by an amateur filmmaker, who didn’t know how to move the camera and barely knew how to edit. But it was about something relatable that everyone experiences (I hate my job), so the buy in was easy, and you forgave all the other poo poo. This coconut thing is just so obtuse that, unless you’re a regular watcher of his essays, you’re not gonna know what the gently caress he’s even doing, so most people won’t care if it’s well made. And I even am a semi-regular watcher, but I’ve been skipping the Charl stuff for a while, once I filed it under, “You don’t understand why people watch you.” thrawn527 fucked around with this message at 21:20 on Jun 19, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2022 20:07
|
|
|
thrawn527 posted:I think part of the problem is that he’s so far up in his own rear end with the inside joke, he can’t see that no one outside his circle doesn’t get it. Like, Clerks was absolutely an amateur movie made by an amateur filmmaker, who didn’t know how to move the camera and barely knew how to edit. But it was about something relatable that everyone experiences (I hate my job), so the buy in was easy, and your forgave all the other poo poo. This coconut thing is just so obtuse that, unless you’re a regular watcher of his essays, you’re not gonna know what the gently caress he’s even doing, so most people won’t care if it’s well made. And I even am a semi-regular watcher, but I’ve been skipping the Charl stuff for a while, once I filed it under, “You don’t understand why people watch you.” Totally agree. In general, I enjoy his videos. I, like you, mostly just skipped the Charl stuff. Maybe some of them made me chuckle here and there, but that's about it. I think another good comparison is RedLetterMedia's Space Cop movie. At this point, I don't remember if I've actually watched the movie or just seen enough random clips from it to feel like I have. Even if it was a miss for me, I totally understand what they were going for and am sure, knowing their sense of humor, that it made them laugh. Whereas with this, I just can't understand what the humor is supposed to be besides maybe "LOL random." If the goal was anti-humor, then it was a miss in that regard as well. I find some anti-humor funny, but you have to be a comic genius, like Norm Macdonald, to be able to pull it off.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2022 20:39
|
|
|
thrawn527 posted:
Lindsey's book is really good so I mean if YouTube content creators want to follow their dreams good for them. Patrick's movie is probably more about creating a movie than creating a good story movie.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 11:22
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcDK7lkzzsU nah
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 14:35
|
|
|
Jerkface posted:Lindsey's book is really good so I mean if YouTube content creators want to follow their dreams good for them. I enjoyed her book mostly, especially her characters, but it had some pacing issues, to the point where I thought the third act fell apart completely. But I've heard the sequel fixed this somewhat, so I'll have to give it a shot.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 14:43
|
|
|
That looks like a really dumb parody of It Follows or The Ring or something (both way better movies than this seems to be).
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 15:16
|
|
|
Paramount seems to think this has sleeper potential, given that they put a teaser in front of Top Gun i've seen worse-looking horror movies, but that seems pretty generic meanwhile, here's a children's classic as a Shawn Mendes musical https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSHecHtkXAc
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 16:08
|
|
|
This will either be good or utter poo poo, like most horror movies.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 16:13
|
|
|
FoneBone posted:Paramount seems to think this has sleeper potential, given that they put a teaser in front of Top Gun Immediately turned it off when the mini preview in the beginning had the croc singing in a high voice instead of sounding deep and croaky. You know, like how crocs usually sing
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 16:23
|
|
|
Yeah I can't figure this out. The production style looks pretty cool (love those colors) but the premise just seems... too wacky to make scary. I kinda lol'd at the last shot of that trailer. It Follows definitely did it better and holy poo poo was it an anxiety inducing classic.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 18:14
|
|
|
Jerkface posted:Lindsey's book is really good so I mean if YouTube content creators want to follow their dreams good for them. i think, total opinion here, but i think her book is "good if you go into it with appropriate expectations". if i'd just read her book in a vacuum without already liking her videos and getting familiar with her "voice", i don't think i'd have liked it nearly as much
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 19:53
|
|
|
Stealth Joker sequel?
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 20:12
|
|
|
I didn't watch but I'm assuming the whole trailer is just the Black Hole Sun video
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 20:13
|
|
|
y'all gotta watch the trailer if for nothing else than the very last shot
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 20:17
|
|
|
It's the sound direction and quick cuts that make this look poo poo. There's total silence in the wrong places. You could make it scarier with some low level static and some low distorted giggling (for example when passing the man in the room), but thats me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 21:21
|
|
|
I was kind of with it until that last shot and then I lol'd heartily.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 21:36
|
|
|
BonoMan posted:y'all gotta watch the trailer if for nothing else than the very last shot haha yeah
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 21:47
|
|
|
happyhippy posted:It's the sound direction and quick cuts that make this look poo poo. It completely felt like a parody. A24 this is not.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 22:21
|
|
|
JazzFlight posted:I'm guessing it's a movie on the level of The Bye Bye Man but the trailer editor really wanted to create a modern psychological horror "Jordan Peele" feel with those vocal "conk" and cello sting sounds and absence of audio. i mean, don't you think that's what it's going for? to me it scanned as a po-faced satire of A24 type indie horror, in every possible way whether the movie itself is fun or not, who knows, but the trailer for sure seemed to be winking
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2022 23:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 17:01 |
|
|
kiimo posted:I didn't watch but I'm assuming the whole trailer is just the Black Hole Sun video 
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2022 00:22
|
|
