Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
wolfman101
Feb 8, 2004

PCXL Fanboy
Just popping in to say that Kobi Libii was very good as the self hating black correspondent on The Opposition.

https://youtu.be/Nb-qYZG0BKo

They also nailed their last few weeks.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

BIG FLUFFY DOG posted:

He wanted Christie because trumps only real belief is loyalty to him personally and Christie was super loyal after he dropped out and was responsible for destroying Rubio trumps only real threat

He also found people who were more noticeably obese than him to be extremely funny in his twisted sadist way and wanted to use Christie as a glorified bag boy for 4 years as VP until Jared Kushner reminded Trump that Christie sent his father to prison.

Neito
Feb 18, 2009

😌Finally, an avatar the describes my love of tech❤️‍💻, my love of anime💖🎎, and why I'll never see a real girl 🙆‍♀️naked😭.

BiggerBoat posted:

It's pretty buts because if you were to make a Top Ten List of people who least embody the teachings of Christ, you'd have to put Trump on it somewhere, if not at the very top. But aside from abortion, I honestly can't figure out how people can conflate GOP policy with Christianity in the first place so yeah.

Because it fits their twisted, Prosperity Gospel-twisted version of it.

PeterWeller
Apr 21, 2003

I told you that story so I could tell you this one.

azflyboy posted:

I was under the impression that the Mittbot campaign picked Ryan because everyone thought he was a conservative wunderkind and was totally going to grab some of the youth vote from Obama, and Pence got picked because they wanted someone to appeal to the American Taliban wing of the party.

You're correct. Ryan was a rising star in the party and went on to a term as House Speaker. Then, after achieving his life-long dream of giving wealthy people and corporations a giant tax break and seeing the writing on the wall with regard to 2018's midterms, he retired into a lifetime sinecure as a guest on Fox.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



PeterWeller posted:

You're correct. Ryan was a rising star in the party and went on to a term as House Speaker. Then, after achieving his life-long dream of giving wealthy people and corporations a giant tax break and seeing the writing on the wall with regard to 2018's midterms, he retired into a lifetime sinecure as a guest on Fox.
I have no idea if Paul Ryan is a guest on Fox at all, but he is on their board of directors.

BIG FLUFFY DOG
Feb 16, 2011

On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.


nine-gear crow posted:

until Jared Kushner reminded Trump that Christie sent his father to prison.

No, as I recall, that was the reason he didn’t give him attorney general as a consolation prize

Murgos
Oct 21, 2010

BiggerBoat posted:

It's pretty buts because if you were to make a Top Ten List of people who least embody the teachings of Christ, you'd have to put Trump on it somewhere, if not at the very top. But aside from abortion, I honestly can't figure out how people can conflate GOP policy with Christianity in the first place so yeah.

Trump is a pretty credible embodiment of each and every one of the seven deadly sins and yet they take pictures of themselves laying hands on him.

Murgos
Oct 21, 2010

nine-gear crow posted:

He also found people who were more noticeably obese than him to be extremely funny in his twisted sadist way and wanted to use Christie as a glorified bag boy for 4 years as VP until Jared Kushner reminded Trump that Christie sent his father to prison.

Trump seems like the kind of guy that would bring Christie with him to a family get-together at Kushners house in some kind of mafioso style ‘I’m gonna hurt you and you’re gonna say you like it’ display of power.

J.A.B.C.
Jul 2, 2007

There's no need to rush to be an adult.


Murgos posted:

Trump is a pretty credible embodiment of each and every one of the seven deadly sins and yet they take pictures of themselves laying hands on him.

Don't forget the Golden Idol.

Enver Zogha
Nov 12, 2008

The modern revisionists and reactionaries call us Stalinists, thinking that they insult us and, in fact, that is what they have in mind. But, on the contrary, they glorify us with this epithet; it is an honor for us to be Stalinists.

Mr Interweb posted:

you know, i was hoping that roe being overturned would cause the most centrist-y rightwing, frat boy types to realize what they may have accidentally signed up for, but who knows any self-reflection will occur. i may have mentioned this before, but i had a roommate many years ago. high school friend, atheist (the first atheist i actually met in fact!), seemingly liberal and tolerant and such, etc. but one day we were with some friends and the topic of abortion came up and i was shocked to find out that he was against it. partly cause, like i mentioned, i figured he was a fairly liberal guy, but even moreso for the reason he stated he was against it: cause he said if the woman wasn't "responsible" then they deserved to be "punished" for it. i was taken aback. he didn't even try to argue it was about the safety of the baby or anything like that. for him it was entirely to punish the woman. and this was someone who had sex with tons of women.

obviously i don't expect his kind to support abortion cause of any noble feminist reasons, but if nothing else, you'd think self-interest would manifest itself. but i worry there are a lot of younger dudes, those that grew up on gamergate, especially, that are completely fine with this cause, even if they wind up suffering from it themselves, it's still worth it for the paramount goal that is owning the libs.
Yeah there have been a lot of people, both liberals and conservatives, who assumed that the less overtly Evangelical the GOP is, the more "moderate" it will be, and who saw Trump's ascendancy in 2016 as a source of optimism in this regard. It ignores that the "alt-right" and many other far-right types don't care for Evangelicals.

It turns out you don't need to think black people are inferior because of an interpretation of a Biblical story about a curse on Ham's descendants. You can simply cite "scientific" books and articles claiming millions of years of evolution have predisposed black men toward stealing your TV. You don't need to justify anti-Semitism on the premise that "the Jews killed Jesus," you can claim that "science" and "history" conclusively demonstrate that Jews use their super duper intelligence to out-compete other groups and plot to divide and destroy Western civilization.

Likewise one can find atheists who are "pro-life," misogynistic, homophobic, and so on. Hell, I've come across some atheist right-wingers who argue religion is unnecessary for themselves but necessary for society in order to keep the unwashed masses in line (which was the attitude of Voltaire and many other Enlightenment-era thinkers.)

It's certainly easier to invoke religious dogma to fortify one's lovely beliefs, but most lovely beliefs don't require religion.

Enver Zogha fucked around with this message at 23:11 on Jun 30, 2022

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010
oh, Donnie's son , Jared probably was a distant 2nd place in not getting the NJ fatass as a veep.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Murgos posted:

Trump is a pretty credible embodiment of each and every one of the seven deadly sins and yet they take pictures of themselves laying hands on him.

He's someone for whom the full nine sins applies. For those who haven't wasted your life on that particular Wikipedia page there was previously acedia, to show no care, which was later wrapped into sloth, and there was vainglory, being a braggart or boastful person, which was later wrapped into pride.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Now I think about it Trump's white house had rat infestations, cockroach infestations, ant infestations and even briefly raccoon infestations during his presidency. Between that and covid he was really refusing to let Moses' people go.

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

BiggerBoat posted:

It's pretty buts because if you were to make a Top Ten List of people who least embody the teachings of Christ, you'd have to put Trump on it somewhere, if not at the very top. But aside from abortion, I honestly can't figure out how people can conflate GOP policy with Christianity in the first place so yeah.

Remember Faith-Based X?

Also don't forget that it's not Christianity as much as it's American Christianity, which is almost always purely about justifying one's lovely beliefs or standards through cherrypicked bible passages.

Abortion is simply the banner cause for it because it's the one that has gotten so much attention for in order to drag them into politics in the first place.

Taerkar fucked around with this message at 11:54 on Jun 30, 2022

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

Taerkar posted:


Also don't forget that it's not Christianity as much as it's American Christianity, which is almost always purely about justifying one's lovely beliefs or standards through cherrypicked bible passages.


Eh, that's really, really not unique to american christians of any denomination. Half my wife's congregation ditched russian orthodoxy for the greeks because the patriarch is a bigoted vatnik shill, and that's far from the only pos branch of the religion outside the US. It's been hypocritical since before evangelical protestantism was a twinkle in some slave-owner's eye.

stringless
Dec 28, 2005

keyboard ⌨️​ :clint: cowboy

It's unique to the USA in how much power they hold.

BigglesSWE
Dec 2, 2014

How 'bout them hawks news huh!

FFT posted:

It's unique to the USA in how much power they hold.

Which kind of surprise me tbh because I don’t see how a fundie Christian society would benefit the big corporate sponsor groups that otherwise hold so much sway over political movements.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


BigglesSWE posted:

Which kind of surprise me tbh because I don’t see how a fundie Christian society would benefit the big corporate sponsor groups that otherwise hold so much sway over political movements.

Not an original thought but white evangelicals don't worship God but gently caress you got mine America.

kik2dagroin
Mar 23, 2007

Use the anger. Use it.
iirc the fashy evangelicals that are now at the helm of the US are of the prosperity gospel types. My guess is they'll continue to let corps do what they want so long as they get a cut of it. Followers of the prosperity gospel are the most gullible people in existence, so the heads of the church can just make up whatever justifications they want and it won't be questioned despite the Bible being pretty explicit about the accumulation of wealth, worshiping false idols, etc.

PeterWeller
Apr 21, 2003

I told you that story so I could tell you this one.

FlamingLiberal posted:

I have no idea if Paul Ryan is a guest on Fox at all, but he is on their board of directors.

Oh yeah, I forgot the specifics of his current relationship with Fox.

Rev. Bleech_
Oct 19, 2004

~OKAY, WE'LL DRINK TO OUR LEGS!~

J.A.B.C. posted:

Don't forget the Golden Idol.



a Don doesn't wear shorts.

BigglesSWE
Dec 2, 2014

How 'bout them hawks news huh!
Fun fact about the golden calf: it was not meant to signify a different God than Yahweh, just a specific representation of Yahweh that the people clamoured for because they felt they had been abandoned as Moses was up on Sinai/Horeb (Bible isn’t consistent with naming the mountain in question because ofc it isn’t) for weeks on end.

So the golden calf episode isn’t quite the type of sin that most take it for; the sin of the Israelites was to worship an idol of their God, not abandoning him. (Still gets them killed tho, because that’s how Yahweh do things).


Probably off topic but I’m a nerd who likes reading about the composition and original intent of the Bible.

ErIog
Jul 11, 2001

:nsacloud:

BigglesSWE posted:

Fun fact about the golden calf: it was not meant to signify a different God than Yahweh, just a specific representation of Yahweh that the people clamoured for because they felt they had been abandoned as Moses was up on Sinai/Horeb (Bible isn’t consistent with naming the mountain in question because ofc it isn’t) for weeks on end.

So the golden calf episode isn’t quite the type of sin that most take it for; the sin of the Israelites was to worship an idol of their God, not abandoning him. (Still gets them killed tho, because that’s how Yahweh do things).


Probably off topic but I’m a nerd who likes reading about the composition and original intent of the Bible.

This is a good point, but I don't know how many people misunderstand it in that way. No other gods is pretty clear on that, and then the story of the golden calf itself is also clear that the sin is in creating distractions to worship in the name of god.

But I guess when you have entire Christian sects based on various forms of direct idolatry you have to sweep it under the rug somehow so you're probably right to clarify it.

Murgos
Oct 21, 2010
Putting the cross everywhere has long been seen as idolatrous so many, has t stopped or even slowed them down.

Josef bugman
Nov 17, 2011

Pictured: Poster prepares to celebrate Holy Communion (probablY)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Murgos posted:

Putting the cross everywhere has long been seen as idolatrous so many, has t stopped or even slowed them down.

Alright Leo the III.

UwUnabomber
Sep 9, 2012

Pubes dreaded out so hoes call me Chris Barnes. I don't wear a condom at the pig farm.
Why would the t stop them? They're putting it up everywhere.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.
https://www.newshounds.us/hannity_desperate_damage_control_after_cassidy_hutchinson_testimony_062922

Hannity’s Desperate Damage Control After Cassidy Hutchinson’s Testimony

quote:

Despite the giant graphics blaring “MEANINGLESS” and “PURE THEATER,” Sean Hannity seemed rather panicked over Cassidy Hutchinson’s extremely damaging testimony to the January 6 committee yesterday as he tried to deflect to inflation, Black Lives Matter demonstrations, Hunter Biden, Nancy Pelosi and even Hillary Clinton.

Here are his tactics:

- Deflect to inflation

- Deflect to Black Lives Matter

- Attack Cassidy Hutchinson with lies
HANNITY: Today, we heard more rumors, a ton of hearsay, and wow a lot of impeached testimony that we'll get to in a second. And this is why it's never -- hearsay is never admissible in a real court of law, including this wild claim from a former low-level White House staffer.

Hearsay testimony is admissible in court, Sean - BiggerBoat



- Blowing up the significance of Trump yes-men’s denials about lunging at the Secret Service agent

- Hannity dishonestly suggested the Jan. 6 protesters weren’t really armed

- Hannity’s “zero guns” comment is beyond disingenuous and false. It also echoes a Tucker Carlson lie that none of the protesters were armed with guns.

As NPR noted, the protesters arrived at the Capitol armed with stun guns, pepper spray, baseball bats and flagpoles wielded as clubs. NPR also noted that someone allegedly planted pipe bombs by the headquarters of the Democratic and Republican parties the night before the riot and remains at large.

- Hannity tried to blame Nancy Pelosi with more falsehoods

Speaking of political theater, Hannity’s that is, Nancy Pelosi is not responsible for Capitol security.


Hannity concluded his attempt at damage control by bringing up Hunter Biden and Hillary Clinton

He also went after Rep. Liz Cheney. He said she is engaged in “one final hurrah at the bitter end of a sad and self-serving political career."

He complained that there isn’t a committee looking into the Black Lives Matter protests.

Those things I bolded up there...I notice this a LOT in GOP/RWM messaging and the Democrats should learn from it. Repetition and simplicity work. The radio shows I listen to are rife with "socialist", "Pelosi", "Soros", "AOC", "Black Lives Matter" and so forth over and over again to the point that most people don't even know why they dislike Pelosi or Soros and just know that they do.

There's not much the DNC can learn from the republican party but messaging and advertising are definitely one. AS someone who has worked in advertising and marketing, it's really frustrating to repeatedly see the dems fail over and over again to get their messaging on point, especially since (ostensibly anyways) the majority of their platform has overwhelming popular support.

It's basically advertising 101. Coke, McDonalds, Budweiser, Apple, Taco Bell...all these companies advertise during the Super Bowl and spend millions doing it. Why? Everyone already knows full well about those products.

...

At a bare minimum, what Sean has done here is muddy the waters and get people talking about anything other than the real meat of the 1/6 testimony so far and frame the debate. GOP is really good at this poo poo. Or at least compared to the democrats.

BiggerBoat fucked around with this message at 16:44 on Jul 1, 2022

Murgos
Oct 21, 2010
I expect that most people here understand the difference but Hutchinson was not providing hearsay evidence.

When she described Trump attacking Engles she was testifying to her direct conversation with Engles. What he told her happened. This is not hearsay. Engles may have lied to Hutchinson about the incident or exaggerated it, and neither of those would have been illegal, but Hutchinson's testimony about her conversation isn't hearsay.

Mustang
Jun 18, 2006

“We don’t really know where this goes — and I’m not sure we really care.”
I think a bigger issue is that Democrats don't go on the offense at all, as if they are terrified of any blowback from Republicans.

Democrats are feckless and timid, too worried about reelection to do what needs to be done.

And in the rare example they do go on offense it's just to attack Trump, they could never infringe upon the dignity of their colleagues across the isle.

Democrats shouldn't care about the GOP response because those voters would never vote for them anyway. Mitch McConnel is pissed? Good!

Screaming Idiot
Nov 26, 2007

JUST POSTING WHILE JERKIN' MY GHERKIN SITTIN' IN A PERKINS!

BEATS SELLING MERKINS.
The Democrats aren't afraid of the Republicans, they're in league with them. Any "resistance" is pure theatrics; it benefits them to be underdogs so they can keep their jobs without having to make any substantial changes to benefit us at the expense of their donors.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Murgos posted:

I expect that most people here understand the difference but Hutchinson was not providing hearsay evidence.

When she described Trump attacking Engles she was testifying to her direct conversation with Engles. What he told her happened. This is not hearsay. Engles may have lied to Hutchinson about the incident or exaggerated it, and neither of those would have been illegal, but Hutchinson's testimony about her conversation isn't hearsay.

Also this but that's not gonna stop Sean from spouting bullshit.

And, hell. If Trump or anyone else wants equal time and a chance to speak then, sure , let's do that. Come on down to the 1/6 hearings and swear yourself in, Rudy, Donald, Meadows or whoever. Nothing's stopping you and I'm sure the committee would be happy to accommodate you in this matter.

KozmoNaut
Apr 23, 2008

Happiness is a warm
Turbo Plasma Rifle


There was a shooting yesterday, at a mall here in Copenhagen. Details are understandably still scarce, but it appears to have been a 22yo Danish guy with a target rifle (another goon identified it as possibly a SIG Sauer 200). 3 people were killed and 4 are in critical condition.

Nothing is known about his motive, so far.

https://www.newsweek.com/conservatives-liken-denmark-shooting-us-gun-violence-criticize-left-1721312

In the three mass shootings (or any shootings targeting civilians, to use a broader term) we've had in Denmark in the last 30 years, fewer people were killed than in just the Uvalde shooting.

But "Denmark is just as dangerous as the US, they also have shootings!", right?

KozmoNaut fucked around with this message at 07:15 on Jul 4, 2022

No Safe Word
Feb 26, 2005

KozmoNaut posted:

But "Denmark is just as dangerous as the US, they also have shootings!", right?
Close, but an even dumber take is the actual one going around:
https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1543684847171936259

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Likewise in the UK we banned handguns in 1997 and see if you spot a pattern shift between the 90s and the subsequence decades. And yes less people have died in all subsequent shootings than in the Buffalo shooting, let alone Uvalde.

And so often the gunfuckers talk about how we get all stabby instead. Which, somewhat true, but you're way more likely to survive it, and second of all, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mass_stabbings_in_the_United_Kingdom

Zamujasa
Oct 27, 2010



Bread Liar

Tesseraction posted:

Likewise in the UK we banned handguns in 1997 and see if you spot a pattern shift between the 90s and the subsequence decades. And yes less people have died in all subsequent shootings than in the Buffalo shooting, let alone Uvalde.

And so often the gunfuckers talk about how we get all stabby instead. Which, somewhat true, but you're way more likely to survive it, and second of all, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mass_stabbings_in_the_United_Kingdom

quote:

This list may not reflect recent changes

:raise:

stringless
Dec 28, 2005

keyboard ⌨️​ :clint: cowboy

Better than "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it."

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

No Safe Word posted:

Close, but an even dumber take is the actual one going around:
https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1543684847171936259

Time to admit that restrictive abortion laws don't stop abortion! And strict drug penalties don't stop drug use!

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

FFT posted:

Better than "This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it."

Levantine
Feb 14, 2005

GUNDAM!!!

BiggerBoat posted:

Time to admit that restrictive abortion laws don't stop abortion! And strict drug penalties don't stop drug use!

Whatever a Conservative believes is true at any given time is true, regardless of any logical contradiction. "Contradiction" is just a liberal invention. All things are both true and untrue in any given situation to fit the argument being made that second, regardless of what was argued in the last second or will be in the next.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Levantine posted:

Whatever a Conservative believes is true at any given time is true, regardless of any logical contradiction. "Contradiction" is just a liberal invention. All things are both true and untrue in any given situation to fit the argument being made that second, regardless of what was argued in the last second or will be in the next.

Or, as the Alt-Right Playbook series terms this inconsistency, The Card Says Moops

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMabpBvtXr4

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply