Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Rustybear
Nov 16, 2006
what the thunder said

Failed Imagineer posted:

Being a pro-FPTP supposed leftist is a scorcher of a take, I lol'ed

just becasue i think PR isn't gonna save us doesn't mean i think FPTP is a good idea.

if there was a PR button I'd press it; just sick of hearing raised as the solution to everything anytime the uk is in crisis.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

I said it once and I'll say it again, PMQs is a dangerous thing to watch because all it ever makes me do is wonder if Stalin was as bad as he was portrayed.

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

Failed Imagineer posted:

Being a pro-FPTP supposed leftist is a scorcher of a take, I lol'ed

This is, um, not an unusual point of view actually? PR tends to mean you get centrism at all times. Anyone who wants 1945 to happen again (or 1997 even I guess) is going to want FPTP even if it's more usual to end up with rightwing majorities. Imagine the Coalition, but forever.

vegetables
Mar 10, 2012

“Quit, the Lightweight Brigade!”
Although their bed they’d made
When they had to defend
some silly stories.
Theirs not to unconvince,
Theirs not to watch and wince,
Theirs now to look up Will Quince.
Into the valley of Death
Stumbled some tories

jiggerypokery
Feb 1, 2012

...But I could hardly wait six months with a red hot jape like that under me belt.

Rustybear posted:

just becasue i think PR isn't gonna save us doesn't mean i think FPTP is a good idea.

if there was a PR button I'd press it; just sick of hearing raised as the solution to everything anytime the uk is in crisis.

No one is saying it's a solution to everything.

That doesn't mean it wouldn't make a massive positive meaningful difference.

Basically everywhere that has it has higher standards of living than everywhere that doesn't.

jiggerypokery
Feb 1, 2012

...But I could hardly wait six months with a red hot jape like that under me belt.

feedmegin posted:

This is, um, not an unusual point of view actually? PR tends to mean you get centrism at all times. Anyone who wants 1945 to happen again (or 1997 even I guess) is going to want FPTP even if it's more usual to end up with rightwing majorities. Imagine the Coalition, but forever.

We have the Coalition, but forever.

It's just that the coalition exists within the main parties.

Bacon Terrorist
May 7, 2010

to ride eternal, shiny and chrome

THUNDERDOME LOSER 2022
Javid twisting the knife here.

Escobarbarian
Jun 18, 2004


Grimey Drawer
Javid’s statement is basically “Boris is making it harder for us to fool people into thinking we’re not cunts”

Undead Hippo
Jun 2, 2013

feedmegin posted:

This is, um, not an unusual point of view actually? PR tends to mean you get centrism at all times. Anyone who wants 1945 to happen again (or 1997 even I guess) is going to want FPTP even if it's more usual to end up with rightwing majorities. Imagine the Coalition, but forever.

We have no idea what it would result in in the long term, because UK politics is infected so heavily with tactical voting amongst those who vote, and non-voting amongst those who think that even tactical voting will not get them representation. The current parties and splits would not survive.

What we do know is that PR would be a shift in how politics works, and it would take place over 4 or 5 election cycles to settle into a new normal, as existing parties split, new parties form, new people vote, parties combine and seek out new strategies. It would be political upheaval, and socialist policies and ideas have a better chance in that kind of shifting upheaval than they do in a system with 2(and a bit) heavily entrenched groups, dominated by machine politics hostile to socialism.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
Can someone explain to me why BJ is finally falling now, over something that seems relatively inconsequential, after surviving all the other horrible scandals all along for so long?

Eddy-Baby
Mar 8, 2006

₤₤LOADSA MONAY₤₤

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Can someone explain to me why BJ is finally falling now, over something that seems relatively inconsequential, after surviving all the other horrible scandals all along for so long?

The Daily Mail stopped supporting him

Undead Hippo
Jun 2, 2013

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Can someone explain to me why BJ is finally falling now, over something that seems relatively inconsequential, after surviving all the other horrible scandals all along for so long?

First scandal after losing byelections in Conservative safe seats, while polling 15 points behind Labour.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Eddy-Baby posted:

The Daily Mail stopped supporting him

Did he do anything specific that led to that or was it just Murdoch deciding to back a different horse

learnincurve
May 15, 2014

Smoosh
Because the Tory base are deeply homophobic, and supporting someone who groped men was always going to be the nuclear option for when they were ready to replace him.

JoylessJester
Sep 13, 2012

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Can someone explain to me why BJ is finally falling now, over something that seems relatively inconsequential, after surviving all the other horrible scandals all along for so long?

It's time for the tories to all swap chairs, slap on a 'new government' label and go to the polls.

Mega Comrade
Apr 22, 2004

Listen buddy, we all got problems!

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Can someone explain to me why BJ is finally falling now, over something that seems relatively inconsequential, after surviving all the other horrible scandals all along for so long?

From what I gather, he won the vote of no confidence under the promise of "no more scandals" and not being able to even go a few months without another one has annoyed a lot of tories.

Also I think some of them are embarrassed by going on TV to spout a lie they were told was true. They only want to tell lies they themselves know are lies.

Plus those by-elections have them spooked.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Did he do anything specific that led to that or was it just Murdoch deciding to back a different horse
Mail isn't Murdoch, it's the Rothermere's trust.

Which is... not better

Bug Squash
Mar 18, 2009

Housing Minister gone

Skarsnik
Oct 21, 2008

I...AM...RUUUDE!




It really didn't help that by going with the 'forgotten' line he painted himself as either a liar or incompetent

(yes I realise he is both, but still)

Matey boys letter yesterday was perfectly laser focused to utterly gently caress him. It laid out exactly how they lied, what they lied about, and had receipts to back it up

Julio Cruz
May 19, 2006
“PR would prevent leftist governments” is quite a take considering that the vast majority of people itt have never lived under a leftist government

Communist Bear
Oct 7, 2008

Yeah the "Woops I forgot this guy was a sex pest!" wasn't the brightest statement by Boris, given the multitude of evidence.

OzyMandrill
Aug 12, 2013

Look upon my words
and despair

Also, if they are quick, they swap leaders and get an election in before labour hoof Keir and get someone with an opinion. In the worst case, Boris and Keir go at about the same time and we have a 'clean slate' election between Hunt and Raynor by Christmas, and it will be tax cuts and privatised NHS all round. Huzzah!

Rustybear
Nov 16, 2006
what the thunder said
is it not a direct lie to say 'as soon as i found out about the allegations i removed the whip'; wasn't there a 24hr delay where the PM said resigning from the whips office was enough

loving boris has you questioning events that happened less than 48hours ago. i know it doesn't matter but lol that he lies about stuff that happened in virtually the same conversation

Confusedslight
Jan 9, 2020
The worlds crumbling apart and everything is terrible but I got to say this is great and I'm loving it. Watching from abroad but would be happy to never hear about that clown ever again. Something good must happen this year dammit.

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Did he do anything specific that led to that or was it just Murdoch deciding to back a different horse

From what I gather, the DM comments (ie the mail-reading public) have been turning against BloJob for a few months, but the editor kept supporting him. Apparently last week Rothermere who actually owns it (not Murdoch) stepped in and said they have to start to reflect the public opinion or some such. It started with Mail on Sunday (though that has been less hero-worshipping than the daily paper edition) but yesterday (I didn't see the day before's cover) definitely showed that change by referring to him as Greased Piglet.

Lord of the Llamas
Jul 9, 2002

EULER'VE TO SEE IT VENN SOMEONE CALLS IT THE WRONG THING AND PROVOKES MY WRATH

jiggerypokery posted:

We have the Coalition, but forever.

It's just that the coalition exists within the main parties.

Like the poster above I never said that I am pro-FPTP but I have a issues with PR being touted as an obvious improvement:

1. Parties have internal coalitions, yes, but at least they have to come to a common manifesto to present to voters. And contrary to common perceptions governments do tend to stick to manifesto commitments. Coalitions between parties allow them to burn their manifestos in the name of compromise so voters *never* know what they're actually voting for. The 2010 and 2015 results show this in the burning of the manifestos for the first coalition then Cameron/Osborne making the mistake of promising a bunch of poo poo they didn't actually want to do because they didn't expect to win a majority.

2. List based systems will make it easier to concentrate the power to select candidates more in the careerist central party offices. This would make it harder, not easier, to get leftist candidates who can win seats on ballot papers.

3. It would break or severely weaken the constituency link to elected officials. In the mixed systems like Holyrood this creates a confusing two tier representative dynamic too. What can the process of recall look like under PR? Currently you can't recall an MSP in Scotland.


I certainly think that a PR system that was well thought out could improve things but I'm pretty suspicious of some rushed agreement between Lab/Lib Dems would be any good. Personally my preference would probably look something like having AV in the lower house and replace the Lords with a PR based upper house maintaining the current understanding that the upper house can't block manifesto commitments indefinitely. But at the end of the day I think stuff like the toxic media environment and lack of more regional power distribution is more damaging to our politics than just FPTP.

Julio Cruz posted:

“PR would prevent leftist governments” is quite a take considering that the vast majority of people itt have never lived under a leftist government

Is this any less true of the countries that have PR? According to this list (https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/which-european-countries-use-proportional-representation/) the overwhelming majority of countries in Europe use PR and Europe is still a neoliberal hellhole?

Lord of the Llamas fucked around with this message at 13:15 on Jul 6, 2022

Rustybear
Nov 16, 2006
what the thunder said

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Did he do anything specific that led to that or was it just Murdoch deciding to back a different horse

murdoch and the mail were still backing him yesterday morning. as much as they set the tone they also have to be seen to do so, so they're as much pushing to the front of the crowd as they are leading the way

Myrddin_Emrys
Mar 27, 2007

by Hand Knit
PMs Question Time was brutal. Raab spent his time looking like he had shat his pants and Boris spent his looking like he was trying not to.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

https://twitter.com/JamesHLUK/status/1544642357718667265

https://twitter.com/mikegalsworthy/status/1544592029157675010

https://twitter.com/miffythegamer/status/1544588430629289985

fuctifino fucked around with this message at 13:24 on Jul 6, 2022

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018
https://twitter.com/Jimllpaintit/status/1544658166516006912?t=q6WTsFP2i8CrIFoUYOxiTg&s=19

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


Guavanaut posted:

Mail isn't Murdoch, it's the Rothermere's trust.

Which is... not better

He has an, ahh, 'interesting' wording on his wikipedia page:

wiki posted:

His open support for fascism and praise for Nazism and the British Union of Fascists contributed to the popularity of those views in the 1930s. That ambition, for which Rothermere became best known, was not successful, and he died in Bermuda early in the war.

"Ambition" indeed.

Convex
Aug 19, 2010

great, now I'm picturing central london being terrorised by a giant eric pickles

Diet Crack
Jan 15, 2001

Do you believeee in traggiiicc :toot:

Gyro Zeppeli
Jul 19, 2012

sure hope no-one throws me off a bridge

A really fun (not fun at all) fact is Nadhim Zahawi is a member and former chairman of Le Cercle, a pro-apartheid, anti-communist club founded by Nazi collaborators & Opus Dei members.

Gyro Zeppeli fucked around with this message at 13:34 on Jul 6, 2022

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Gyro Zeppeli posted:

A really fun (not fun at all) fact is Nadhim Zahawi is a member of Le Cercle, a pro-apartheid, anti-communist club founded by Nazi collaborators & Opus Dei members.

Well just look at him, such a fine Aryan specimen will clearly be revered like a god in the Fourth Reich

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


What a Cercle jerk.

peanut-
Feb 17, 2004
Fun Shoe
Apparently someone called "Claire Coutinho" has quit from the treasury, they genuinely are just making these up from the names of footballers now

Diet Crack
Jan 15, 2001

"Creation of a (private) intelligence service specialising in a selective point of view"

Where have I heard this befooooorreeeeeeeeee

Comrade Fakename
Feb 13, 2012


As much as the Tory's bill cracking down on protest is an absolute disgrace and terrifying totalitarianism, Steve Bray is still a massive oval office and we should stop lionising him.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

peanut- posted:

Apparently someone called "Claire Coutinho" has quit from the treasury, they genuinely are just making these up from the names of footballers now

They already exhausted the star wars universe with Guto Bebb, and Tom Tugendhat is some Sleve McDichael poo poo

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply