|
The Sikhs are one of the countries I'm looking forward to playing the most once I've had the chance to get some experience with the game, along with Krakow. I always have the most fun in Paradox games by starting out as a minor and having an organic target to aim for which also lines up with being a major or great power. The fact that you also get to humiliate the UK and Germany / Austria / Russia respectively in the process is a bonus.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2022 21:55 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 08:01 |
|
I'd love to try the Sikh Empire, but I really am concerned how in Vicky 3 you can actually manage to start expanding in India. I just don't really know what levers you have available to try to get in without incurring the wrath of the OiBruvs.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2022 22:13 |
|
Raenir Salazar posted:Do they have a good Wool industry? Then you can play Hide and Sikh.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2022 22:22 |
Reddit has a supposed leak image of the marketing campaign, indicating a November release date. Pinch of salt and all that.
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 16:56 |
|
The very first comment is Wiz saying it's fake and they should have tried harder.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 17:02 |
|
Sikh AAR pls.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 17:10 |
Zeron posted:The very first comment is Wiz saying it's fake and they should have tried harder. Confirmation of an August release???
|
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 18:18 |
|
trapped mouse posted:Victoria 3: Factories don't care about your feelings Factroys please
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 18:51 |
|
They shouldn't hurry, I haven't played as every country in EU4 yet (a country has to be played again after an update changes it).
|
# ? Jul 6, 2022 19:15 |
|
i would like to play this game very much thank you. any word on if this game will be made for M1 Macs? CK3 is basically unplayable (on Macs) nowadays.
|
# ? Jul 9, 2022 20:50 |
|
Lady Radia posted:i would like to play this game very much thank you. I play CK3 on a Macbook (M1 Pro), and it works/has been working totally fine for me. What has been the issue?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2022 00:59 |
release it now
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2022 01:25 |
|
DJ_Mindboggler posted:I play CK3 on a Macbook (M1 Pro), and it works/has been working totally fine for me. What has been the issue? the performance has been completely terrible. i'm on an M1Max, did a recent update improve performance or anything? Like it was just completely unplayable a few months ago when I last tried
|
# ? Jul 10, 2022 02:37 |
|
Lady Radia posted:the performance has been completely terrible. i'm on an M1Max, did a recent update improve performance or anything? Like it was just completely unplayable a few months ago when I last tried I think there may have been a brief period where I had slowdown immediately after the new Iberian DLc, but it was patched quickly. Can't remember anything too bad in the last year or so.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2022 02:53 |
|
DJ_Mindboggler posted:I think there may have been a brief period where I had slowdown immediately after the new Iberian DLc, but it was patched quickly. Can't remember anything too bad in the last year or so. Here's a discussion on it so I know I'm not crazy: https://www.reddit.com/r/macgaming/comments/qsd9fs/crusader_kings_3_on_m1_max/ Regardless, I'll give it another go and follow up - thanks for the, uh, hope!
|
# ? Jul 10, 2022 03:32 |
|
https://twitter.com/Martin_Anward/status/1546856907163435008
|
# ? Jul 12, 2022 15:20 |
|
Hmm, feels like a callback...
|
# ? Jul 12, 2022 17:07 |
|
https://twitter.com/Martin_Anward/status/1546893665351639041
|
# ? Jul 12, 2022 17:35 |
|
I thought this was what progressive taxation systems resolve?
|
# ? Jul 12, 2022 18:45 |
|
Raenir Salazar posted:I thought this was what progressive taxation systems resolve? This has nothing to do with progressive taxation - this is about a form of wage subsidies where if a Pop is paid less than X, the government pays the difference. So for example, if X is £10/week (calculated from average wage in your country and the size of your welfare institution), and the Pop makes only £5/week, the government pays £5/week to the Pop to make up the difference. Now let's say income taxes are 20% - if the Pop earned £10/week, this would amount to £8 after taxes. However, if it earned £5, got as much in subsidies, and then only paid income tax on the wage, the Pop would end up with £9 after taxes each week - meaning that if the Pop's wages went up, they would be taking home less money (they'd need to earn £11.25 to take home £9) Wiz fucked around with this message at 20:53 on Jul 12, 2022 |
# ? Jul 12, 2022 20:49 |
|
Wiz posted:This has nothing to do with progressive taxation - this is about a form of wage subsidies where if a Pop is paid less than X, the government pays the difference. So for example, if X is £10/week (calculated from average wage in your country and the size of your welfare institution), and the Pop makes only £5/week, the government pays £5/week to the Pop to make up the difference. Now let's say income taxes are 20% - if the Pop earned £10/week, this would amount to £8 after taxes. However, if it earned £5, got as much in subsidies, and then only paid income tax on the wage, the Pop would end up with £9 after taxes each week - meaning that if the Pop's wages went up, they would be taking home less money (they'd need to earn £11.25 to take home £9) Thanks for the explanation as I wasn't sure what was going on.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2022 21:01 |
|
Revenge of the Invisible Hand
|
# ? Jul 12, 2022 21:34 |
|
Wiz posted:This has nothing to do with progressive taxation - this is about a form of wage subsidies where if a Pop is paid less than X, the government pays the difference. So for example, if X is £10/week (calculated from average wage in your country and the size of your welfare institution), and the Pop makes only £5/week, the government pays £5/week to the Pop to make up the difference. Now let's say income taxes are 20% - if the Pop earned £10/week, this would amount to £8 after taxes. However, if it earned £5, got as much in subsidies, and then only paid income tax on the wage, the Pop would end up with £9 after taxes each week - meaning that if the Pop's wages went up, they would be taking home less money (they'd need to earn £11.25 to take home £9) lmao and who said this game wasn't gonna be realistic
|
# ? Jul 12, 2022 23:05 |
|
Wiz posted:This has nothing to do with progressive taxation - this is about a form of wage subsidies where if a Pop is paid less than X, the government pays the difference. So for example, if X is £10/week (calculated from average wage in your country and the size of your welfare institution), and the Pop makes only £5/week, the government pays £5/week to the Pop to make up the difference. Now let's say income taxes are 20% - if the Pop earned £10/week, this would amount to £8 after taxes. However, if it earned £5, got as much in subsidies, and then only paid income tax on the wage, the Pop would end up with £9 after taxes each week - meaning that if the Pop's wages went up, they would be taking home less money (they'd need to earn £11.25 to take home £9) This is extremely realistic and similar to the ongoing argument in the US about how best to administrate benefits. The centrist Democrats want to means-test everything to make sure that only the poorest / "most deserving" get benefits, even if it increases the total cost of the program. Often extremely arbitrary cutoffs for programs get set, and it can be possible at the very low end of income to hit a point where you see a net loss of income, for example if you make too much to be on state Medicaid. The leftist position that is studiously ignored is just to give these benefits to everyone and recoup it from the rich in income taxes rather than trying to figure out who is deserving and who is not.
|
# ? Jul 12, 2022 23:15 |
|
looking forward to some of the cool weird achievements for V3. like Dragging a reactionary total monarchy United States kicking and screaming passed the 1936 enddate sounds pretty fun. Smashing that house of saud button
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 00:02 |
|
Thank you for narrowly avoiding turning pops into libertarians, wiz.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 04:50 |
Fister Roboto posted:Thank you for narrowly avoiding turning pops into libertarians, wiz. wiz pledged that there wouldn't be incessant anarcho-liberal revolts in this one and he's following through
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 07:33 |
|
Wiz posted:This has nothing to do with progressive taxation - this is about a form of wage subsidies where if a Pop is paid less than X, the government pays the difference. So for example, if X is £10/week (calculated from average wage in your country and the size of your welfare institution), and the Pop makes only £5/week, the government pays £5/week to the Pop to make up the difference. Now let's say income taxes are 20% - if the Pop earned £10/week, this would amount to £8 after taxes. However, if it earned £5, got as much in subsidies, and then only paid income tax on the wage, the Pop would end up with £9 after taxes each week - meaning that if the Pop's wages went up, they would be taking home less money (they'd need to earn £11.25 to take home £9) Can't wait to do my taxes ingame too.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 11:24 |
|
Wiz posted:This has nothing to do with progressive taxation - this is about a form of wage subsidies where if a Pop is paid less than X, the government pays the difference. So for example, if X is £10/week (calculated from average wage in your country and the size of your welfare institution), and the Pop makes only £5/week, the government pays £5/week to the Pop to make up the difference. Now let's say income taxes are 20% - if the Pop earned £10/week, this would amount to £8 after taxes. However, if it earned £5, got as much in subsidies, and then only paid income tax on the wage, the Pop would end up with £9 after taxes each week - meaning that if the Pop's wages went up, they would be taking home less money (they'd need to earn £11.25 to take home £9) Is there a way to calculate taxes as (income + wage subsidies) instead of just income or would that completely break how the economy is set up? edit: Never mind, I saw the tweet and you did just that.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 11:59 |
|
I have faith in the team but it's little stories like that which make you realise what an achievement it's going to be if the economic system doesn't collapse completely after a few years or decades
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 12:44 |
|
That's pretty much what the real economy does though?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 13:18 |
|
the rate of profit has a tendency to glitch out
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 14:38 |
|
First Victoria 3 patch notes posted:* Fixed a bug where capitalist pops were hoarding all the money, causing economic collapse and pop death spiral as other pops could not afford to buy goods necessary for living.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 15:22 |
|
Tankbuster posted:Can't wait to do my taxes ingame too. Victoria 3 mod that updates every year but it's just messing around with a Form 1040 and checking if it's better to go with the standard deduction this time around.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 19:39 |
|
AG3 posted:That's pretty much what the real economy does though? i still say that a large part of the appeal of victoria 2 was that its politics and economy were inscrutable and unpredictable just like the real world was and is, even if it wasn't in exactly the same ways Tankbuster posted:Can't wait to do my taxes ingame too. yeah i'm hyped too
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 23:07 |
|
I mean Vicky 2's economy will literally always collapse if the game goes on too long so I wouldn't be surprised if something similar happened in V3.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 23:10 |
trapped mouse posted:Victoria 3: Factories don't care about your feelings New title
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 23:39 |
|
Hellioning posted:economy will literally always collapse if it goes on too long so I wouldn't be surprised if something similar happened in V3. fixed that for you
|
# ? Jul 13, 2022 23:41 |
|
getting railroaded into yet another crisis of overproduction in the 1920s Zzzz mods??
|
# ? Jul 14, 2022 00:02 |
|
|
# ? May 30, 2024 08:01 |
|
fuf posted:I have faith in the team but it's little stories like that which make you realise what an achievement it's going to be if the economic system doesn't collapse completely after a few years or decades
|
# ? Jul 14, 2022 00:19 |