|
Live this is a game day thread and those tend to have a lot of reactions to things said. To get the true reread experience, you need to pull up a replay of the trial and start it with the first posts of a day.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 11:58 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 06:24 |
|
yeah, that's just how TV IV livewatch threads go
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 12:49 |
|
Just sync up the start of the video to some easily recognized utterance in the thread, then set a clock and read comments in time, bingo bango so simple (And get hosed when law&crime deletes breaks in the recording)
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:05 |
|
I cancelled most of my calls today and put big blocks of “focus time” on my calendar. Cannot wait for this shitshow to start.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:06 |
|
The clownshow starts @ 9:00 AM CDT, doesn't it? Does the old stream link work, or do they spin up a new one each day?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:11 |
|
If I go to bed then he takes the Judge hostage and makes a run for Mexico. If I stay awake to watch it then it'll be pretty straight forward and boring.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:16 |
|
New one everyday but here's the link to the channel https://youtube.com/channel/UCF_rPoUGrNEGiqEtiAPTLEg and you can refresh like mad like I will be doing.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:16 |
|
Funky See Funky Do posted:If I go to bed then he takes the Judge hostage and makes a run for Mexico. If I stay awake to watch it then it'll be pretty straight forward and boring. nighty night, can I offer you a glass of warm milk
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:17 |
|
Confusedslight posted:New one everyday but here's the link to the channel https://youtube.com/channel/UCF_rPoUGrNEGiqEtiAPTLEg and you can refresh like mad like I will be doing. Sweet, thanks!
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:19 |
|
alf_pogs posted:nighty night, can I offer you a glass of warm milk Tuck me in and read me a quick story and you've got yourself a deal.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:23 |
|
UCS Hellmaker posted:The issue is he wouldn't admit it's a character because he can't, not without losing his viewers, and there's poo poo in discovery he's terrified of them actually finding hence stonewalling as much as he has. And his offer for settlements never were serious because he wouldn't back down or even show true sincerity. his lawyer is trying to portray him as a poor boy who isn't all that influential and doesn't have that much money but he can't help bragging about how influential he is and how much money he makes it's great
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:30 |
|
Naked fantasists just aren't that common to see in the wild.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:33 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:his lawyer is trying to portray him as a poor boy who isn't all that influential and doesn't have that much money The thing is, his lawyer is not allowed to preset 2/3rds of that information. He could have just built his entire case around Jones' reach and try to counter the 24% of Americans believe sandy hook hoax argument. That would have been an strategy that is allowed by the judge's orders. I'm really waiting to see the Judge's instructions to the jury this morning emphasizing that Jones is not bankrupt and did not participate in discovery.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:34 |
|
https://twitter.com/i/status/1554324334994407424 I like him already!
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:36 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:The thing is, his lawyer is not allowed to preset 2/3rds of that information. He could have just built his entire case around Jones' reach and try to counter the 24% of Americans believe sandy hook hoax argument. That would have been an strategy that is allowed by the judge's orders. If the judge thought they had a headache yesterday then they're going to regret waking up this morning.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:42 |
|
Whatever happens, it will certainly be a time.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:49 |
|
If they'd co-operated with discovery, apologised convincingly and made a focused and coherent free speech argument there's excellent odds they'd have gotten away with a succesful defence. Of course the point is a rational Infowars/Alex Jones, who were capable of such behaviour, would never have done the things that required such a defence.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:51 |
|
If they cooperated with discovery they'd probably have disclosed a shitload of illegality.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 13:59 |
|
Even the documents they did turn over included some weird poo poo like that background check on one of the plaintiffs that nobody will admit to ordering. Whatever they didn’t turn over is probably some poo poo.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:06 |
|
Alex Jones' lawyer at work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V74Jd6cdfYw
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:10 |
Didn’t their documents for discovery also include child pornography?
|
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:28 |
|
Is the VOD of the part yesterday after the jury left up anywhere?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:29 |
|
Bizarro Kanyon posted:Didn’t their documents for discovery also include child pornography? Inexplicably yes.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:29 |
I thought that I couldn't watch the first part of it because of meetings but my meetings actually start at 11
|
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:30 |
|
Pirate Radar posted:Even the documents they did turn over included some weird poo poo like that background check on one of the plaintiffs that nobody will admit to ordering. Whatever they didn’t turn over is probably some poo poo. Didn’t they accidentally turn over CSAM as well?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:31 |
|
Law and Crime might have had an inkling of how useful getting permission from the judge to be the only official real-time recorders of this trial would be, but I don't think they expected the level of bat-shittery they would document. And thank goodness the judge apparently underestimated it too, or I doubt she would have given the permission. KitConstantine fucked around with this message at 14:39 on Aug 3, 2022 |
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:31 |
|
When is this suppose to start?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:32 |
|
Sir Tonk posted:Is the VOD of the part yesterday after the jury left up anywhere? Yes. Skip to 1:05:00 in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px1nMI3mmjg
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:35 |
|
KitConstantine posted:Law and Crime might have had an inkling of how useful getting permission from the judge to be the only official real-time recorders of this trial would be, but I don't think they expected the level of bat-shittery they would document. Sorry forgot to quote my reply! Meant to be answering the discovery question.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:35 |
|
Confusedslight posted:Sorry forgot to quote my reply! Meant to be answering the discovery question. Oops! Well applies to both lol. I'll edit my post
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:39 |
|
drat this needs to start already I wanna see the cross examine dammit! And the Jury questions!
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:41 |
|
Danger posted:Didn’t they accidentally turn over CSAM as well? Man if we found out Alex was posting in cspam it would blow my mind
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:42 |
|
https://twitter.com/chucklindell/status/1554825257680343040
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:51 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Yes. Skip to 1:05:00 in this video: Hell yeah
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:52 |
|
Bizarro Kanyon posted:Didn’t their documents for discovery also include child pornography? Danger posted:Didn’t they accidentally turn over CSAM as well? It did, but I believe it was from an email that was sent to Infowars and the evidence was that email hadn't even been opened by them. Infowars had no idea it was there until it was found by the Plaintiffs examining what deposition was turned over. So loathe as I am to defend them, not actually Infowars fault.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:53 |
|
wear a tie you loving fat scumbag
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:57 |
|
https://youtu.be/oTKllFqNNQU it's live.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:57 |
|
Certainly testimony won't start for an hour right?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 14:59 |
|
Sir Tonk posted:Man if we found out Alex was posting in cspam it would blow my mind Fighting the info war in the glenn thread
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 15:00 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 06:24 |
|
We're live, baby! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTKllFqNNQU
|
# ? Aug 3, 2022 15:00 |