|
Ah yes, thank you for reminding me  I went back and gave him the recognition he deserved for this little bout of prescience
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 08:04 |
|
|
Can't believe the official Infowars photoshop of the judge on fire was one of the least damning things today.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:58
|
|
|
Scott Forstall posted:I think his lawyer effectively entered it into evidence? ianal obviously Ianal either, but I don't think that would be the correct term. Defense and Plaintiffs frequently exchange information over the course of a trial to facilitate things. I have NO idea why Jones' lawyers sent that, and still less of an idea why they didn't claim privilege. Once the information is in the hands of the plaintiffs and the defense hasn't claimed privilege it's just like any other evidence.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:58
|
|
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:Oh my god you think he has texts from Trump? At risk of violating a rule here would it even be shocking to discover alex jones has like 30 gigs of CP on the crimephone because why wouldn't he
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:58
|
|
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:Oh my god you think he has texts from Trump? I think Trump's friendship with Alex had ended by that point; Tucker was his new best friend.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:58
|
|
|
I hope he shared it with law enforcement and the other attorneys suing Jones in CT. Holy poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:59
|
|
|
I'm in Nz and have been watching this since 2am and now its 5am and It was definitely worth it. Screw my sleeping pattern.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:59
|
|
|
Lol that the judge keeps confirming Alex isn't listening at the loving door.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:59
|
|
|
Scott Forstall posted:jones's lawyer is professionally toast, right? Jones's lawyer might be going to jail after this
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 17:59
|
|
|
Since we have an official chili thread now, I'm putting in for changing the thread title to "Alex Jones vs Sandy Hook Parents: I'm savouring every moment of it"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:00
|
|
|
Xakura posted:I mean, when was the backup taken seems to be recent.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:00
|
|
|
Someone get atma to make the alexjones.exe CYOA thread
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:00
|
|
|
 and were back to jury questionsE: literally illiterate jurymembers
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:01
|
|
|
Jury's already asking, "There are other examples of rhetoric influencing tragic events. Do you agree with these examples or not?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:01
|
|
|
"But but Christopher Hitchens!" Lol.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:01
|
|
|
alex might have been right about these jurors being morons
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:01
|
|
|
Hacking their firm to add files into deposition would be some pro-tier work from a hacktivist.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:01
|
|
|
These questions are absolutely abysmal.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:02
|
|
|
goatface posted:Hacking their firm to add files into deposition would be some pro-tier work from a hacktivist. I think the lawyers are just morons, but hacking wouldn't shock me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:02
|
|
|
Lmao these drooling morons. "Would you just say sorry to them? Maybe volunteer for their charity?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:03
|
|
|
one of the jury referencing "globalists" is im sure a great sign
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:03
|
|
|
lol, doing the "1% murder" question, well done juror
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:03
|
|
|
A good question at last: "Is it your stance that it should be okay to break the law if it's only done rarely?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:03
|
|
|
Is the jury not watching the same trial?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:03
|
|
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:Can't believe the official Infowars photoshop of the judge on fire was one of the least damning things today. can we fit this into the thread title somehow, it's great
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:03
|
|
|
Serious_Cyclone posted:Jones's lawyer might be going to jail after this Before this morning, monetary and professional sanctions were almost definite but anything beyond that was unlikely. Now? He'll be lucky to not get disbarred and jail is actually on the table (though I think he'll avoid that one).
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:03
|
|
|
goatface posted:Hacking their firm to add files into deposition would be some pro-tier work from a hacktivist. I don't think it could have been introduced into evidence if Mark was unable to prove he received it legally? Lawyers wanna comment?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:03
|
|
|
Scott Forstall posted:jones's lawyer is professionally toast, right? he could always get a gig at world net daily
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:04
|
|
|
how come they have 12 years worth of texts, yet 1 day(or a few days) worth of texts from jan 6th is like "lol, someone put them in the recycling bin and right clicked empty"?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:04
|
|
|
ok these questions rule actually
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:04
|
|
|
The three stooges disorder in the court skit got an excellent remaster
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:04
|
|
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:Is the jury not watching the same trial? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:05
|
|
|
Scott Forstall posted:jones's lawyer is professionally toast, right? He's photogenic. With a little public speaking coaching he could have a fantastic future on fox news.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:05
|
|
|
"I guess this is your Perry Mason moment" had me laughing like an idiot.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:07
|
|
|
AARD VARKMAN posted:one of the jury referencing "globalists" is im sure a great sign theres definitely at least one infowarrior that lied his way onto the jury
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:07
|
|
|
AARD VARKMAN posted:one of the jury referencing "globalists" is im sure a great sign there's one juror who keeps asking questions about globalists but is clearly loving around, it's probably that one https://twitter.com/5DollarFeminist/status/1553142581080604672
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:08
|
|
|
Wee Bairns posted:"I guess this is your Perry Mason moment" had me laughing like an idiot. Agreed. That was such a solid line, but I have a feeling Alex was waiting to use that one.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:09
|
|
|
"Oh god"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:10
|
|
|
Xakura posted:"Oh god"
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 08:04 |
|
|
KitConstantine posted:I don't think it could have been introduced into evidence if Mark was unable to prove he received it legally? If they received it from the right people, and the legal team didn't later ask "what the gently caress is that and how did you get it?" when it was brought up, why would they ever question the legality of it?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2022 18:10
|
|