|
Sir Tonk posted:goddamit i have a meeting at ten, this is so good tho
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 03:37 |
|
|
Eeyo posted:Did Alex Jones' defense call him as their only witness? It seems pretty incredible to me, like surely you could find a crank psychologist to testify about how death threats are no big deal or some dipshit professor to testify about how all information is spread via messaging apps and Alex Jones isn't the main component of misinformation spreading. In the same way the corporate rep basically testified that Jones' free-associative rants are a new type of speech that should be considered both journalism and not-journalism simultaneously, Reynal was deliberately arguing that Jones is the main person spreading the misinformation - and that Jones was right to do so due to his belief in an absolute freedom to do anything. It's unclear how deep Reynal is in this pill poo poo, but his strategy has clearly been to become an 'Info-warrior'. The refusal or failure to get any other witnesses is directly analogous to Infowars' official stance that checking sources would compromise Jones' subjective truth by making it beholden to other truth(s). It's solipsism as a defense: "we occupy our own personal reality and we choose to perceive the judge as an extradimensional demon sent to perplex us." Calling witnesses besides Jones, appointing a corporate rep who knows what she's doing, etc. - this would deflate everything by acknowledging an external reality. A big chunk of the strategy has been to try and will things out of existence through a deliberate ignorance of them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:02
|
|
|
yesssssssssssssss
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:02
|
|
|
Cheesus posted:He'll probably have to as Reynal won't be able to afford to be there after this. You know how much I paid for that putter? I'm not trusting him with it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:03
|
|
|
lol try and work it out today
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:03
|
|
|
hahaha "go through it today"
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:03
|
|
|
Lol I love that Reynal is squirming right now "This is a lot of information to go through"
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:04
|
|
|
The judge should be shutting Reynal down hard. Don't give him any time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:04
|
|
|
Is it going well when the Judge is being openly sarcastic to you?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:04
|
|
|
Madkal posted:The judge should be shutting Reynal down hard. Don't give him any time. Didn't he already have time? 10 calendar-days, if I recall? It's not anyone's fault but his own if he frittered it away playing candy crush
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:05
|
|
|
lol @ this dude asking for a do-over
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:05
|
|
|
"Your honor, can I have ten days from yesterday to review the information?" "This should all have been disclosed a year ago. If you had done that, you would have had plenty of time." "What about the Jan 6th committee?" "They know the information exists, they're gonna come for it anyway, I can't stop that."
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:05
|
|
|
he wants 10 more days starting from yesterday
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:05
|
|
|
Serious_Cyclone posted:Didn't he already have time? 10 calendar-days, if I recall? It's not anyone's fault but his own if he frittered it away playing candy crush Yea. Which is why Reynal asking for 10 days from yesterday is BS
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:06
|
|
|
"they will now that they know about it" And the judge literally LOL'd
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:06
|
|
|
Haha, forcing Reynal to try to come up with a reason. I'm gonna bet he's unable to.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:06
|
|
|
haha just openly mocking him for asking for a mistrial "like 17 times now"
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:06
|
|
|
Serious_Cyclone posted:Didn't he already have time? 10 calendar-days, if I recall? It's not anyone's fault but his own if he frittered it away playing candy crush If I remember from ALAB in civil court lawyers gently caress up like this and miss deadlines and a lot of times they’re given time to unfuck themselves; that’s usually for people that are acting in good faith and like complying with discovery though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:06
|
|
|
heeeeeeeeeeeee motion denied SUCKER
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:07
|
|
|
Get hosed Reynal.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:07
|
|
|
reck lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:07
|
|
|
That was good stuff.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:07
|
|
|
Serious_Cyclone posted:Didn't he already have time? 10 calendar-days, if I recall? It's not anyone's fault but his own if he frittered it away playing candy crush Technically if they had turned it over back when discovery began they would have had literally YEARS to look through it But they didn't
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:07
|
|
|
Deeeeeeeeeee nied!
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:07
|
|
|
That was a nice surprise of serotonin to the system.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:08
|
|
|
I'm glad that she played hard ball and didn't really give into his poo poo. gently caress Reynal, gently caress Alex Jones, I hope they all rot
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:08
|
|
|
"that wasn't a serious request for a mistrial was it? you didn't mean that?" so good
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:08
|
|
|
the J6 Committee is ripping a fat blunt right now in anticipation
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:08
|
|
|
So she basically gave him a day to state what was privileged?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:09
|
|
|
TheMightyBoops posted:If I remember from ALAB in civil court lawyers gently caress up like this and miss deadlines and a lot of times they’re given time to unfuck themselves; that’s usually for people that are acting in good faith and like complying with discovery though. I know a lot about Canadian law and very little about American but judges do this to protect the case from appeal or mistrial usually.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:09
|
|
|
TheMightyBoops posted:If I remember from ALAB in civil court lawyers gently caress up like this and miss deadlines and a lot of times they’re given time to unfuck themselves; that’s usually for people that are acting in good faith and like complying with discovery though. Outside of absolute must always rule follow exactly assholes, most judges are very patient if you make an honest mistake and try your best to follow the rules. There’s lots of rules and judges often have to look them up too or have their staff remind them of specifics. But when you do nothing but gently caress with the rules for months, you get zero slack. Judge Gamble is so much more gracious and patient than she has any requirement to be.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:09
|
|
|
KitConstantine posted:Technically if they had turned it over back when discovery began they would have had literally YEARS to look through it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcI47GpiTcM
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:10
|
|
|
Lol Reynal is so hosed because no way he is able to in a day get everything privileged that he wants privileged
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:10
|
|
|
is there a live stream for today? the op is in contempt of thread
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:10
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:So she basically gave him a day to state what was privileged? And he will almost certainly gently caress that up and try and claim too much and his whole ask thrown out.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:10
|
|
|
lol at saying she's felt like she's been with 24 hours a day for this trial yes listening to alex jones talk is like that
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:10
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:So she basically gave him a day to state what was privileged? I think she gave him until the verdict from this 1st phase.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:11
|
|
|
Jerk McJerkface posted:is there a live stream for today? the op is in contempt of thread NOPE! The verdict is due today but this was a little surprise!
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:11
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:So she basically gave him a day to state what was privileged? at least a day. She didn't really give a deadline. The way I understand it though is that until then Mason can still broadcast it to 1/6 and the plaintiffs in CT? e:nm i am an idiot
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 03:37 |
|
|
Like, seriously, the Jan. 6th committee is going to have Alex Jones' cellphone image by the end of the day. Confusedslight posted:That was a nice surprise of serotonin to the system. RIGHT!? Jesus that was good.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2022 16:11
|
|
