(Thread IKs:
fart simpson)
|
Aren't most white women going to korea for love just kpop stans? like the korean equivalent of weeaboos visiting japan?
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 20:15 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 11:54 |
|
Tankbuster posted:Aren't most white women going to korea for love just kpop stans? like the korean equivalent of weeaboos visiting japan? If my niece goes to korea it'll probably be because of her love for kpop boys yes
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 20:16 |
|
still struggling to figure out what possible reasoning he could have for telling people to do a google search for porn instead of just linking examples he knew to be from actual respectable movies
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 20:23 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmiK9v6nO3I The air part of the parade is insane. I love North Korea.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 20:31 |
|
China: horny is forbidden Japan: too drat horny Korea: just horny enough
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 20:44 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:still struggling to figure out what possible reasoning he could have for telling people to do a google search for porn instead of just linking examples he knew to be from actual respectable movies doesn't know how to clear his search, plausible deniability
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 20:47 |
|
my uh, friend, is heh... going to asia for sex. But she's a girl and looking for men. And she's not me, no sir. so it's OK, totally understandable. Here watch some porn:
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 20:48 |
|
should submit that to https://journals.sagepub.com/home/qrj for publication
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 20:51 |
|
I ... what?
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:04 |
|
lol just doing the search brings up softcore porn. Dude finds porn and thinks it's just Korean cinema.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:12 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:still struggling to figure out what possible reasoning he could have for telling people to do a google search for porn instead of just linking examples he knew to be from actual respectable movies we all know he would put that late japanese colonial era boarding school movie that turns into lesbiotic sex partway through.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:18 |
This is in my top 10 whitest posts of all time
|
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:18 |
|
Jeff Fatwood posted:lol just doing the search brings up softcore porn. Dude finds porn and thinks it's just Korean cinema. i didnt even realize you could search for porn on google video and apparently this whole time you could grab it from innocuous searches that only vaguely allude to sex
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:18 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:Lower ranking lawmaker visit is like a salami sliced many moons ago. However a top rank lawmaker visit is a brand new salami slicing, so Beijing has to slice from the other endn of the salami to get even. lol if true. it'll probably be president trump 2.0 to really shove it in the face of the dems and look strong on chyna
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:19 |
|
Mantis42 posted:China: horny is forbidden
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:22 |
|
just trying to imagine some teenager trying to find a pg13 sex scene from a movie and falling dick first into pornhub its pretty absurd given all the bullshit youtube or even just a regular google search does to try to keep people away from objectionable content
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:22 |
|
Also this comes from an old trueanon ep about the Nth room, but doesn't South Korea ban pornography or something?
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:25 |
|
mostly they just have more restrictive filters im deadly curious now whether a regular rear end google video search from south korea will also list you a bunch of videos from explicit hardcore porn websites
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:27 |
|
aesthetically south korean porn does tend to have more plot than porn from other regions to try and get around censorship so it occurs to me that noah smith has maybe just never seen porn like that before and is astonished to learn that emotional engagement with characters in a pornographic film can improve the overall experience despite this being disastrous for the movies overall smut ratio
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:32 |
|
Grapplejack posted:https://twitter.com/Livermore_Lab/status/1557435615435788293 This is loving wild; if they can reliable ignite a fusion reaction we might actually have a chance to develop fusion tech within 100 years
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:34 |
|
Noah definitely looks like a guy that dabbles in sex trafficking
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:41 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/thenation/status/1558846408765194240
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:50 |
|
e wrong thread
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 21:59 |
|
I do think that the US and China focusing on entirely different methods of fusion is better for fusion in general but it's a bit hollow since they aren't sharing any info between each other and also US research is entirely focused on getting weapons tech out of it rather than power generation so any discoveries they make will be accidental at best
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 22:02 |
|
Grapplejack posted:I do think that the US and China focusing on entirely different methods of fusion is better for fusion in general but it's a bit hollow since they aren't sharing any info between each other and also US research is entirely focused on getting weapons tech out of it rather than power generation so any discoveries they make will be accidental at best Russia, the US, and China are all cooperating (still) as a part of ITER, it is just on their side projects they are going in different directions. I would say it would heat up if fusion gave some type of geopolitical advantage.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 22:08 |
|
genericnick posted:Enough to do what though? to appease the more belligerent faction in china while warding off future salami slicing
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 22:21 |
|
Seems like as long as fossil fuels are more profitable than fusion we don't have to worry about whether or not the United States will ever actually do it.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 22:28 |
|
Ardennes posted:Russia, the US, and China are all cooperating (still) as a part of ITER, it is just on their side projects they are going in different directions. wouldn't it? cheap clean controllable energy seems like it'd give the developer an instant market advantage
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 22:56 |
indigi posted:wouldn't it? cheap clean controllable energy seems like it'd give the developer an instant market advantage pretty much. you would be able to run all the heavy industry parts of your economy (the ones that draw the most power) for basically free and be able to sell power to your neighbors which is turning out to be a real important thing in europe rn
|
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 23:07 |
|
indigi posted:wouldn't it? cheap clean controllable energy seems like it'd give the developer an instant market advantage I mean, that's the thing, isn't it? There's just no way that it starts out cheap and reliable so the timeline is pretty unsure. Obviously we should throw everything we have at it to make it work, but even if it succeeds the timeline remains extremely uncertain.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 23:12 |
|
indigi posted:wouldn't it? cheap clean controllable energy seems like it'd give the developer an instant market advantage Yeah, so the current market advantage holders would murder them in the crib
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 23:13 |
|
KirbyKhan posted:Yeah, so the current market advantage holders would murder them in the crib exactly. see this documentary for an example: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115857
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 23:18 |
|
The current favor of nuclear energy is already cleaner than all the other energy options, but it still get blacklisted by the west that used to have technical lead in this solution.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 23:34 |
|
indigi posted:wouldn't it? cheap clean controllable energy seems like it'd give the developer an instant market advantage That is way down the line though, the first reactors will be ridiculously expensive. It is certainly still cheaper to burn a bunch of brown coal and leave the hard work to someone else. That said, no one really wants nothing on the table either, so there is still work being done but all of it is incremental. That said, commercial molten salt thorium reactors much sooner and could actually make a difference with climate change.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 23:39 |
|
Fusion will not be adopted by the west obviously but maybe after we use every last drop of oil
|
# ? Aug 14, 2022 23:57 |
|
Seatbelts posted:This is loving wild; if they can reliable ignite a fusion reaction we might actually have a chance to develop fusion tech within 100 years If
|
# ? Aug 15, 2022 00:02 |
|
Grapplejack posted:https://twitter.com/Livermore_Lab/status/1557435615435788293 this isnt correct (if you look outside of national labs). there are a bunch of different companies/labs pursuing different approaches in the US and MIT's SPARC will probably be the first "commercially viable" (still more expensive than solar PV) fusion plant, probably within the next 3-5 years. they're constructing it now and their physics and design are sound. inertial confinement fusion is a dead end though and lawrence livermore is strictly conducting research, they need to shoot a laser at God's Perfect Little Capsule and the capsules are far, far too difficult to mass produce since they need to essentially operate it like a machine gun shooting hundreds of capsules per day. it's not without its merit for the science though, fusion research helps other approaches too. helion energy is another dark horse which if successful will be even better since their approach uses direct energy conversion vs steam power. If helion's reactor works it might be cheaper than solar PV, but in general fusion probably won't be commercially viable for general utility use since solar/win + battery storage is cheaper, ironically. it'll need to be subsidized by the government for mass rollout which, lol, well, we'll see Justin Tyme has issued a correction as of 00:15 on Aug 15, 2022 |
# ? Aug 15, 2022 00:08 |
|
Is there feasible large storage yet
|
# ? Aug 15, 2022 01:29 |
|
check your rear end!!!
|
# ? Aug 15, 2022 01:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 11:54 |
|
brugroffil posted:Is there feasible large storage yet
|
# ? Aug 15, 2022 01:51 |