Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Goast
Jul 23, 2011

by VideoGames
i love the idea that barrel bombs are somehow more inhumane than regular bombs

Goast has issued a correction as of 06:01 on Sep 3, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

indigi posted:

what is a barrel bomb, I thought bombs were either barrel-shaped or cone-shaped

the phrase "barrel bomb" was popularized during the Syrian Civil War to describe instances where the Syrian planes (helicopters?) would drop barrels full of explosives, as bombs, presumably because the Syrians had run out of manufactured bombs and couldn't acquire more (or because they were dropping them from craft that were never intended to carry bombs)

this is not really any different from... bombing, in the absolute traditional sense, but it just made the Assad "regime" seem scarier and more brutal

Goast
Jul 23, 2011

by VideoGames
would you rather get blown up by this



or this

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

gradenko_2000 posted:

this is not really any different from... bombing, in the absolute traditional sense, but it just made the Assad "regime" seem scarier and more brutal

things that are properly institutionalized are moral, things that are not properly institutionalized are immoral. institutionality is morality.

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?
well, if Assad was dropping barrel bombs on civilians, I don't support that, that's bad, but if he was dropping them on troops why to gently caress would I care

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp

Goast posted:

would you rather get blown up by this



or this



that barrel isnt even red

otoh pretty sure that bomb is a hass avocado

skooma512
Feb 8, 2012

You couldn't grok my race car, but you dug the roadside blur.
Barrel bomb is an appellation only to be used for IEDs dropped from helicopters in the Syria region. In the case of Philadelphia Police vs MOVE in 1985 that’s just a sparkling satchel charge

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

seems like a branding problem - call them kegs or something

no one blinked when trump dropped a moab in afghanistan

Filthy Hans
Jun 27, 2008

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 10 years!)

The Oldest Man posted:

things that are properly institutionalized are moral, things that are not properly institutionalized are immoral. institutionality is morality.

https://twitter.com/chaostiktoks/status/1565857296722296832

Goast
Jul 23, 2011

by VideoGames
did he at least finish the beer before hitting the ground

1stGear
Jan 16, 2010

Here's to the new us.
you have to in order to get your parachutist's badge

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Cuttlefush posted:

that barrel isnt even red
yeah, i'm pretty sure not properly marking it with red is a war crime

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021


this looks very relaxing

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique


Don’t join the Canadian Airborne

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CAvPEzvrbX8

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011

gradenko_2000 posted:

the phrase "barrel bomb" was popularized during the Syrian Civil War to describe instances where the Syrian planes (helicopters?) would drop barrels full of explosives, as bombs, presumably because the Syrians had run out of manufactured bombs and couldn't acquire more (or because they were dropping them from craft that were never intended to carry bombs)

this is not really any different from... bombing, in the absolute traditional sense, but it just made the Assad "regime" seem scarier and more brutal

i think the theoretical issue with "barrel bombs" was that they are both highly destructive (you can pack a lot of explosives into a big barrel) and highly inaccurate (it's hard to aim precisely when you're just tossing a barrel out of a helicopter), leading to a ton of civilian deaths from indiscriminate bombing in dense cities

in practice, I think they were being used because Assad had both air superiority and a lack of specialized close air support, and I'm not certain that any other form of bombing used under the same circumstances would have led to any fewer civilian deaths given the nature of the urban warfare in which barrel bombs were being used

COPE 27
Sep 11, 2006

vyelkin posted:

i think the theoretical issue with "barrel bombs" was that they are both highly destructive (you can pack a lot of explosives into a big barrel) and highly inaccurate (it's hard to aim precisely when you're just tossing a barrel out of a helicopter), leading to a ton of civilian deaths from indiscriminate bombing in dense cities

Much like white phosporous, landmines, and cluster munitions, perhaps someone should do an international convention agreeing not to use them.

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

lobster shirt posted:

this looks very relaxing
I've only been skydiving once, but it was actually weirdly tranquil and quiet after the chute opened. I'd do it again if it wasn't so goddamn expensive.

A Bakers Cousin
Dec 18, 2003

by vyelkin
keg bombs would have been more of a party type of bomb and probably wouldnt have had such push back

fabergay egg
Mar 1, 2012

it's not a rhetorical question, for politely saying 'you are an idiot, you don't know what you are talking about'


skooma512 posted:

Barrel bomb is an appellation only to be used for IEDs dropped from helicopters in the Syria region. In the case of Philadelphia Police vs MOVE in 1985 that’s just a sparkling satchel charge

shrike82 posted:

seems like a branding problem - call them kegs or something

no one blinked when trump dropped a moab in afghanistan

in philly a keg bomb is an ied used in sports rioting.

Renaissance Robot
Oct 10, 2010

Bite my furry metal ass

vyelkin posted:

i think the theoretical issue with "barrel bombs" was that they are both highly destructive (you can pack a lot of explosives into a big barrel) and highly inaccurate (it's hard to aim precisely when you're just tossing a barrel out of a helicopter), leading to a ton of civilian deaths from indiscriminate bombing in dense cities

naturally this both very different from and much worse than high precision bombing of civilian targets done completely on purpose

skooma512 posted:

Barrel bomb is an appellation only to be used for IEDs dropped from helicopters in the Syria region. In the case of Philadelphia Police vs MOVE in 1985 that’s just a sparkling satchel charge

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer

shrike82 posted:

seems like a branding problem - call them kegs or something

no one blinked when trump dropped a moab in afghanistan

it won't stop them

The media did this poo poo were Russia using thermobaric weapons in Ukraine. Pretended that no one else uses them and they were somehow worse than dying to normal explosives.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique




4000lbs

COPE 27
Sep 11, 2006

Uh those are skipping bombs, NOT barrel bombs

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Just get the Syrian Army Band to play this

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wDpdPjf2aSE

Legal

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011
basically if a weapon was made in a factory by a defence contractor who's skimming off the top to line their own pockets that's legitimate and if it's made in any other way it's scary and you have to make up a catchy name like barrel bomb or ghost gun to make it clear that this is different from the legitimate ways to kill and maim people

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

It really did feel like all the barrel bomb talk dropped off completely after we bombed Mosul and Raqqa to death. A rare moment of self awareness from State Department thralls.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Pener Kropoopkin posted:

I don't give a gently caress what the warmongers in the military think.

you should if you are thinking dialectically. I mean would you rather be surprised by it?

indigi posted:

what is a barrel bomb, I thought bombs were either barrel-shaped or cone-shaped

the ones they were pushing out of helicopters at the beginning of the war in civilian areas. big nail bombs basically.


So the simplified written on a phone version. I’m mostly not going to be specific and instead will be just generalizing the trends in the thinking.

So I’m going to skip everything before WWI. Anyway opposition to war after WWI is mostly pacifism and isolationism. The organized groups in the US mostly, but not completely, tended to be religious. The same general groups that made up abolitionists, suffragists, Prohibitionists, a lot of the same people. Mostly Protestant but very diverse politically, religious socialists (before that spilt) to extreme conservatives. Anyway those groups end up having to confront their isolationism and pacifism during WWII. The big religious thinker during the war is Bonheoffer, who is a double agent and the moral backing for one of the serious plots to kill Hitler. His example, that the bad guys were the loving Nazis, and the horrors of the Holocaust pushes pacifism and isolationism from the mainstream outside of the most conservative groups and many of those most conservatives folks turn into Goldwater types. The Cold War starts kicking in, the motives states have traditionally had for war, the state’s interests formalizes into the thinking of Realism. This is half of the reason a state would still go to war under “Just War” theory now. But those folks who were pacifists and weren’t conservatives don’t disappear even though they aren’t pacifist/isolationists anymore. Then the Vietnam War happens. The people in that line of thinking that used to be pacifist but no longer was, was reacting to Vietnam and criticizing its ironies. they add the second criteria for a state going to war under Just War theory, the question is: Is this war moral? Vietnam becomes the immoral war exemplar.

So the two parts:

1. National interest
2. Morality of the actions of the war

The question of the morality is contextual to the dialogue of the time in the US.

Anyway as way of thinking this really starts phasing in with Bush I and the first Gulf War. That war starts of checking the boxes but then becomes immoral after the highway of death. During the Clinton administration you see him attempt to wage war for moral reasons but be restrained to air power for lack of a national interest in the Bosnian crisis. Libya later under Obama has similar circumstances. All the Presidents except Trump after Bush 1 are looking at these two criteria. Anyway W with the second Iraq war fabricates a moral crisis of “WMDs and falsely linking Iraq to 9/11. That’s a good example to understand how this thinking is a failure. The realist component can fake the moral reasoning and Cheney/ Rumsfeld almost certainly did so intentionally. The moral reason for a war can also easily be restrained by realist thinking and is contextual to the morals of American society (and we are real shitheads ). So the system of thinking has returned to mostly functioning like realism especially under Republicans and especially the Neo-cons who resented having to depart from Realism in the first place. The Trumpist line is oddly enough the isolationist element of the conservative branch at the beginning that didn’t stop being isolationist.

So what is to be done? We still are having immoral wars (eg. Iraq 2), moral wars that are in the national interest and are contextual moral (and you folks feel they are immoral) that’s still problematic, and potentially contextual moral military actions are restrained by realism. It’s hypocrisy.

To complicate the situation further we opened Pandora’s box by weaponizing social media in the Arab spring. Which was then pointed back at us both internally by a US right wing that was becoming fascist and now is fascist and externally by foreign states and right wing groups coordinated by shitheads like Dugin.

how this is thought about next will likely be answered politically by whoever wins the next or next two presidential elections. we could very easily end up with something worse.

Renaissance Robot
Oct 10, 2010

Bite my furry metal ass

vyelkin posted:

basically if a weapon was made in a factory by a defence contractor who's skimming off the top to line their own pockets that's legitimate and if it's made in any other way it's scary and you have to make up a catchy name like barrel bomb or ghost gun to make it clear that this is different from the legitimate ways to kill and maim people

oh unless it's made in a factory by a defence contractor who's skimming off the top to line their own pockets while working for non-allied near peer

I'm speaking of course of the awful scary inhumane thermobarics :supaburn:

Filthy Hans
Jun 27, 2008

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 10 years!)

vyelkin posted:

basically if a weapon was made in a factory by a defence contractor who's skimming off the top to line their own pockets that's legitimate and if it's made in any other way it's scary and you have to make up a catchy name like barrel bomb or ghost gun to make it clear that this is different from the legitimate ways to kill and maim people

broke: ghost gun

woke: Khyber Pass copy

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*
another analysis about how a war with china would go with a focus on AUKUS. a few interesting things there about the numbers of bombers/missiles the US has left and ship building capacity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1RRw6kDNWk

The Oldest Man
Jul 28, 2003

Renaissance Robot posted:

oh unless it's made in a factory by a defence contractor who's skimming off the top to line their own pockets while working for non-allied near peer

I'm speaking of course of the awful scary inhumane thermobarics :supaburn:

Bad: thermobaric
Good: metal augmented charge

Bad: improvised explosive device
Good: field expedient demolition charge

Bad: nail bomb
Good: flechette antipersonnel round

Bad: fire bomb
Good: white phosphorous illumination shell

420 Gank Mid
Dec 26, 2008

WARNING: This poster is a huge bitch!

Bar Ran Dun posted:


The question of the morality is contextual to the dialogue of the time in the US.

no it isnt you bloodthirsty imperialist

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp

The Oldest Man posted:

Bad: nail bomb
Good: beehive round

Bad: fire bomb
Good: obscurant

these are better

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




420 Gank Mid posted:

no it isnt you bloodthirsty imperialist

for the people making the decisions it is.

one doesn’t exist without sinning. to be is to have blood on ones hands. it’s still good to try to do the best one can even if one fails as a consequence of being.

Feral Integral
Jun 6, 2006

YOSPOS

evilpicard posted:

Uh those are skipping bombs, NOT barrel bombs

I doubt it. The bomb is being loaded in along the length of the plane

Turtle Watch
Jul 30, 2010

by Games Forum

Bar Ran Dun posted:

for the people making the decisions it is.

one doesn’t exist without sinning. to be is to have blood on ones hands. it’s still good to try to do the best one can even if one fails as a consequence of being.

I hope you stop sinning and stop having blood on your hands.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Feral Integral posted:

I doubt it. The bomb is being loaded in along the length of the plane
So? You just bank just before dropping the bomb.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Bar Ran Dun posted:

for the people making the decisions it is.

one doesn’t exist without sinning. to be is to have blood on ones hands. it’s still good to try to do the best one can even if one fails as a consequence of being.

Who did their best here?

crepeface
Nov 5, 2004

r*p*f*c*
the US somehow just accidently causing untold suffering over and over

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fart simpson
Jul 2, 2005

DEATH TO AMERICA
:xickos:

crepeface posted:

the US somehow just accidently causing untold suffering over and over

you don’t understand op, their intentions were pure. everyone fails sometimes

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply