|
https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/5073113#paper This might be the best modern goblins deck ever.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 06:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 17:41 |
|
The new goblin combo with it is incredibly hilarious if only because it's entirely random that you get to do it
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 07:05 |
|
AlternateNu posted:Looks like not enough people are playing Hushbringer. And lmao, I just also learned that while it stops the elementals come into play ability, it also means the elemental isn't sacrificed anymore either. Turns out they are strong bodies too.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 07:13 |
|
Eej posted:The new goblin combo with it is incredibly hilarious if only because it's entirely random that you get to do it I don't understand what you mean by entirely random. The deck is reasonably consistant. The deck is still probably not good, but the new lord has made the deck actually playable.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 07:15 |
|
Toshimo posted:Given that they loved using real-world references back then and Golgotha was the hill on which Judas betrayed Jesus, it's probably some poo poo like "This bowl contained the blood collected when the spear pierced Jesus' side" like a Lance of Longinus being a holy weapon type of deal.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 07:18 |
|
Sickening posted:I don't understand what you mean by entirely random. The deck is reasonably consistant. The deck is still probably not good, but the new lord has made the deck actually playable. The one where you win with Rundvelt Hordemaster + Snoop on field and Kiki-Jiki on top of your deck as long as they aren't holding an instant speed sweeper like Kozilek's Return. E: oh wait I forgot you can set it up with Boggart Harbinger Eej fucked around with this message at 07:34 on Sep 10, 2022 |
# ? Sep 10, 2022 07:29 |
|
Sickening posted:And lmao, I just also learned that while it stops the elementals come into play ability, it also means the elemental isn't sacrificed anymore either. Turns out they are strong bodies too. lol. That was part of the joke, but Poe’s Law and all that
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 11:18 |
|
Eej posted:The one where you win with Rundvelt Hordemaster + Snoop on field and Kiki-Jiki on top of your deck as long as they aren't holding an instant speed sweeper like Kozilek's Return. Snoop+harbinger was already the combo the deck set up when Snoop came out. I don't think Rundvelt offers much to the combo: infinite is infinite and you already had "dies=damage" triggers. What Rundvelt offers is more resilience against cards like verdict and fury. Gobbos can't play out if the graveyard like zombies can, but getting to vial in red undead augur on curve in response to a wrath to draw 3-4 cards will beat a control deck most times. Offer not valid against angry gods.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 14:09 |
|
AlternateNu posted:lol. That was part of the joke, but Poe’s Law and all that That was a joke? People are always suggesting it straight faced.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 14:10 |
|
If I recall the Brothers War book correctly, Mishra more or less started the war by sleeping with Urza’s wife. Which is kind of a funny inciting event for the story of wizards poker
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 14:38 |
|
HootTheOwl posted:Snoop+harbinger was already the combo the deck set up when Snoop came out. I don't think Rundvelt offers much to the combo: infinite is infinite and you already had "dies=damage" triggers. It also helps you search by getting poo poo off the top of the deck.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 14:46 |
|
HootTheOwl posted:That was a joke? People are also pretty bad at this game. It was the double edge to everyone bitching about the elemental ETBs because going for the easy direct answer means you just get to deal with a free relevant body instead.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 15:02 |
|
Mike N Eich posted:If I recall the Brothers War book correctly, Mishra more or less started the war by sleeping with Urza’s wife.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 15:20 |
|
For as much of a complete rear end in a top hat shithead fucker that Urza was, he didn't start the war. Mishra basically threw a temper tantrum because he wanted Urza's toy (Mightstone) in addition to his own (Meekstone), plus the dumb gently caress was wearing a phyrexian necklace that was corrupting him (Mishra's Bauble).
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 15:50 |
|
Silhouette posted:For as much of a complete rear end in a top hat shithead fucker that Urza was, he didn't start the war. Mishra basically threw a temper tantrum because he wanted Urza's toy (Mightstone) in addition to his own (Meekstone), plus the dumb gently caress was wearing a phyrexian necklace that was corrupting him (Mishra's Bauble). Mishra had the Weakstone, not the Meekstone.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 16:12 |
|
Urza had the dickstone
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 16:24 |
|
I mean, I’d also be pretty pissed if my brother got the mightstone and I got the weakstone
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 16:32 |
|
Toshimo posted:Mishra had the Weakstone, not the Meekstone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o52clsoKW8g
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 18:14 |
|
Ya poo poo's weakstone, Mishra
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 18:47 |
|
Is Transguild Courier a multicolored spell? I say no, because it doesn't require multiple colors to cast it and it's a multicolored permanent according to the card text but says nothing about the spell while being cast, but I'm getting into a dumb online argument with someone who insists that it is.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 19:16 |
|
I brought my Drake posted:Is Transguild Courier a multicolored spell? I say no, because it doesn't require multiple colors to cast it and it's a multicolored permanent according to the card text but says nothing about the spell while being cast, but I'm getting into a dumb online argument with someone who insists that it is. The rulings listed on Scryfall confirm that it is multicolored everywhere: https://scryfall.com/card/dmc/194/transguild-courier
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 19:26 |
|
TacoNight posted:The rulings listed on Scryfall confirm that it is multicolored everywhere: Oh God dammit I hate being wrong on the internet.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 19:29 |
|
I brought my Drake posted:Is Transguild Courier a multicolored spell? I say no, because it doesn't require multiple colors to cast it and it's a multicolored permanent according to the card text but says nothing about the spell while being cast, but I'm getting into a dumb online argument with someone who insists that it is. E: phone posting, I meant changeling, not channel.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 19:33 |
|
Yeah color setting abilities are characteristic-defining abilities and apply in all zones https://mtg.fandom.com/wiki/Characteristic-defining_ability
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 19:34 |
|
Apparently Lemurs got their name from Lemures in the first place because Carl Linnaeus thought they were kind of similar, so I guess he Planeswalked over from Ice Age Dominaria and that’s the explanation for all this
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 21:52 |
|
Weakstone, ahhhhhhhh fighter of the Mightstone
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 22:03 |
|
Johnny Truant posted:Ya poo poo's weakstone, Mishra
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 22:16 |
|
HootTheOwl posted:Snoop+harbinger was already the combo the deck set up when Snoop came out. I don't think Rundvelt offers much to the combo: infinite is infinite and you already had "dies=damage" triggers. I don't think I said anything about Rundvelt being key to the function of the deck, I was just saying the combo of infinite snoops dying and exiling your library until you see Sling Gang is funny.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 22:45 |
|
Eej posted:I don't think I said anything about Rundvelt being key to the function of the deck, I was just saying the combo of infinite snoops dying and exiling your library until you see Sling Gang is funny. I read your comment as Rundvelt adding something novel to the deck's combo potential. If that's not what you meant then my B.
|
# ? Sep 10, 2022 22:50 |
|
goblins are funny, period
|
# ? Sep 11, 2022 04:38 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:goblins are funny, period Only when they are not winning, like all the other tribes and strategies.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2022 17:28 |
|
I put Destroy Evil in my deck to deal with Sheoldred. Killing Sigarda, Champion of Light with it just feels wrong.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2022 21:26 |
|
Chamale posted:I put Destroy Evil in my deck to deal with Sheoldred. Killing Sigarda, Champion of Light with it just feels wrong. Maybe creatures that bolt can't kill are inherently evil. Maybe that's a correlation.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2022 21:27 |
|
Dumb Commander question: if I have the new Sol'kanar as my Commander, I can't cheat my way out of the fourth option ("Exile Sol'kanar, then return it to the battlefield under an opponent's control") using the "if your Commander leaves play, you can return it to your Command Zone instead" rule, since the entire ability has to resolve before the game checks state-based effects to see that he was exiled, correct?
|
# ? Sep 12, 2022 15:00 |
|
Top 8'd back to back Pioneer RCQs this weekend. 4th-8th on saturday, 3rd-4th on Sunday. Was on Boros Heroic, had to sneak in on Breakers both times. Mono-green matchup is like, ludicrously good. It might be 80-20. I would reccomend anyone looking at a field that is 35%-40% mono green to check out the deck!
|
# ? Sep 12, 2022 15:06 |
|
W.T. Fits posted:Dumb Commander question: if I have the new Sol'kanar as my Commander, I can't cheat my way out of the fourth option ("Exile Sol'kanar, then return it to the battlefield under an opponent's control") using the "if your Commander leaves play, you can return it to your Command Zone instead" rule, since the entire ability has to resolve before the game checks state-based effects to see that he was exiled, correct? it's a replacement effect so you decide during the resolution of the blink effect
|
# ? Sep 12, 2022 15:10 |
|
I thought that you couldn't choose to send it to your commander zone until it's on jts way to exile and once it's resolving there's not a step for state based responses.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2022 15:14 |
|
Paul Zuvella posted:Top 8'd back to back Pioneer RCQs this weekend. 4th-8th on saturday, 3rd-4th on Sunday. Decklist me.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2022 15:20 |
|
Paul Zuvella posted:Top 8'd back to back Pioneer RCQs this weekend. 4th-8th on saturday, 3rd-4th on Sunday. Nice job. I took scam to a modern RCQ but had to leave early for a pet emergency (cat's doing fine thankfully)
|
# ? Sep 12, 2022 15:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 17:41 |
|
W.T. Fits posted:Dumb Commander question: if I have the new Sol'kanar as my Commander, I can't cheat my way out of the fourth option ("Exile Sol'kanar, then return it to the battlefield under an opponent's control") using the "if your Commander leaves play, you can return it to your Command Zone instead" rule, since the entire ability has to resolve before the game checks state-based effects to see that he was exiled, correct? Correct. With the 2020 change, it's a SBA, not a Replacement Effect, so once the ability starts resolution, it completes fully before SBAs can be checked.
|
# ? Sep 12, 2022 15:51 |