Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Elentor
Dec 14, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

No Mods No Masters posted:

Tell me where is gandalf. For I much desire to watch scenes with him

lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Elentor
Dec 14, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
That's gonna play in loop in my head for hours now, thanks

CLAM DOWN
Feb 13, 2007




Elentor posted:

That's gonna play in loop in my head for hours now, thanks

Ugh yeah it already is for me.

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

fischtick posted:

I predict two harfoot caravans meet one another in the tall grass and Pallando and Alatar are each pushing the back cart. Cue animated spider-man pointing between the two, then they get a spin-off The Blues Wizards.

Jerusalem
May 20, 2004

Would you be my new best friends?

fischtick posted:

I predict two harfoot caravans meet one another in the tall grass and Pallando and Alatar are each pushing the back cart. Cue animated spider-man pointing between the two, then they get a spin-off The Blue Wizards.

Turns out they just retired out to the country somewhere to be together, and Gandalf and Radagast agreed to keep it a secret because nobody wanted Saruman at the wedding.

Everyone
Sep 6, 2019

by sebmojo

Hidingo Kojimba posted:

I can totally see Sauron eating snails and burning up the star map if he's desperate and addled by some sort of accident or usurpation that led to him being cast across the earth as a flaming ball.

What I cannot see is him having any time for helping out hobbits. Sauron does not give a poo poo about little, insignificant people. A Sauron who has even the slightest insight into the psychology of the average Hobbit is a Sauron who would not have lost the War of the Ring.

So yeah, while I could totally see the implications of him being a young Gandalf to be a red herring for the audience, unless there's some real wacky poo poo going on with the backstory, the Stranger just isn't psychologically anything like what Sauron should be at this stage.

Thank you for making my actual point better than I was making it.

Eiba posted:

Here's a thought with regards to early Gandalf: baby Gandalf gets sent in the 2nd age. He learns a lot about the world thanks to his adventures we get to witness in this series. He then leaves.

Then when he comes back with all the other wizards the elves immediately recognize his wisdom and such because he has earned it.

Would that satisfy lore purists? We established earlier that Tolkien had him existing in some primal form before he came as a proper wizard. Why not try out the form he'd eventually take? Just give it a bit if a trial run to work the kinks out and not embarrass himself in front of the elves in the third age?

This is an adaptation so they can do whatever. I really don't get the folks who are so dead set against early Gandalf. They're actually doing interesting things to develop his character and not just going, "wow, it's Gandalf, please clap!"

This I can buy because it makes so much more sense than anything else.


Arc Hammer posted:

withak posted:

New theory: Asteroid Wizard turns into Durin's Bane
This is where I'm aiming, personally. At least a Balrog.

Aside from as far as I know the only one who made Balrogs was Morgath and he's gone, let's consider what you're saying:

For five seasons or so we're going to watch Meteor Man bonding with the Harfoots and learning about the world, before he gets turned into a big flaming special effect that "shall not pass" Gandalf. Because that seems like an absurd waste of story to me.

Bugblatter
Aug 4, 2003

The Stranger is old Aragorn, who followed an evil sorcerer through a portal to the past, Terminator-style. That's why he's naked.

He's constantly befuddled because old Aragorn is in the late stages of senility.

AccountSupervisor
Aug 3, 2004

I am greatful for my loop pedal

Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

It is 100% Gandalf and that is good imo. The Istari were sent to combat Sauron, Sauron is around now just as he will be at the start of the third age. They're already messing heavily with the timeline, I just don't see the issue with him arriving an age earlier for the same purpose. And coming via meteor is a whole lot more interesting than arriving on a boat, and conveys to viewers that he's not just some normal guy.

For me it just completely changes the entire perspective of Gandalf in the TA if he was around for the events of the SA and remembers them or aided in them at all. That is not a minor change, thats a monumental shift in character to me. If Gandalf witnesses the War of the Last Alliance it changes so much of his characterization in the events of The Hobbit and LOTR, I just dont see the way Gandalf acts towards anything or anyone in the books making much sense if he was there for the first conflict. Like what is the point of Saruman in the TA then?

If its implied he is the same Maia and he returns to spirit form and is then sent back as Gandalf with a wisdom gleamed from those events similar to his return in LOTR, sure.

Again, you can do almost anything you want with a Baby Istari and more if he just specifically not literally Gandalf. The writers are making it harder on themselves otherwise.

Eiba
Jul 26, 2007


Everyone posted:

For five seasons or so we're going to watch Meteor Man bonding with the Harfoots and learning about the world, before he gets turned into a big flaming special effect that "shall not pass" Gandalf. Because that seems like an absurd waste of story to me.
In defense of the Balrog theory, which is not my favorite theory but I wouldn't rule out just yet: It would add pathos to the big flaming special effect.

When we first saw it: Gandalf was fighting a big scary monster, cool!

When we watch it again after Rings of Power shows DB's (Durin's Bane's) tragic backstory where a wizard much like Gandalf himself was corrupted (forcibly? via seduction?) by Sauron: Oh gosh, that's a person Gandalf is fighting. A tragic person who had sad things happen to him to leave him in this horrible corrupted state. Even a creature that first appears to be a monster might be an actual person with their own story.

In fact the pathos added to that encounter is the only reason I think the Stranger could be D.B. Balrog. It would be weird and pointless otherwise.

AccountSupervisor posted:

For me it just completely changes the entire perspective of Gandalf in the TA if he was around for the events of the SA and remembers them or aided in them at all. That is not a minor change, thats a monumental shift in character to me. If Gandalf witnesses the War of the Last Alliance it changes so much of his characterization in the events of The Hobbit and LOTR, I just dont see the way Gandalf acts towards anything or anyone in the books making much sense if he was there for the first conflict. Like what is the point of Saruman in the TA then?
That's an interesting perspective I haven't heard articulated in this thread that much before. The way most people have explained it it seems like a point of pedantry, but this seems like there's more to it. What interactions specifically make it seem like Gandalf couldn't have been around for events in the second age? You say there were moments in the books that were built off of this ignorance?

Would it make a difference if baby Gandalf doesn't participate in the war itself, but just kind of hangs around its periphery?

My (limited) understanding about the Saruman point is that he was jealous that Gandalf was recognized by the elves when Saruman was supposed to be leader of the order, correct? Perhaps Saruman is greater as an ethereal spirit, but doesn't bother to come to Middle Earth to get his hands dirty in the 2nd age like the Gandalf we see in the show. What we're watching could emphasize that story from the books in that case.

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
Don't forget that in the lore, Saruman arrived in Middle-Earth first of the Istari, and Gandalf last. An adroit nod to Tolkien's Catholic faith, of course (Mathew 20:16).

2nd Amendment
Jun 9, 2022

by Pragmatica
I'd say the Balrog was already corrupted by Melkor. But they've forgotten that and returned to a state of pseudo-innocence. They aren't a flaming monster but they are still of flame (meteor, fireflies) and monstrous (snails).

AccountSupervisor
Aug 3, 2004

I am greatful for my loop pedal

Eiba posted:


That's an interesting perspective I haven't heard articulated in this thread that much before. The way most people have explained it it seems like a point of pedantry, but this seems like there's more to it. What interactions specifically make it seem like Gandalf couldn't have been around for events in the second age? You say there were moments in the books that were built off of this ignorance?

Would it make a difference if baby Gandalf doesn't participate in the war itself, but just kind of hangs around its periphery?

My (limited) understanding about the Saruman point is that he was jealous that Gandalf was recognized by the elves when Saruman was supposed to be leader of the order, correct? Perhaps Saruman is greater as an ethereal spirit, but doesn't bother to come to Middle Earth to get his hands dirty in the 2nd age like the Gandalf we see in the show. What we're watching could emphasize that story from the books in that case.

Id have to take awhile to start pulling exact quotes or moment but for me what immediately sticks out is his relationship to Aragorn. His trust and belief in Aragorn to me Id find it a bit cheapened if he had been there for the times of the fall of Numenor or has any interactions with Elendil and Isildur or even a direct knowledge of them as existing when he did. His faith and belief in Aragorn because of who Aragorn is as a person and not just a descendants of the Numenorians/Dunedain would seem cheapened because Gandalf knew or was somewhat adjacent to two of his most important ancestors defining moments. It just starts to vere into Star Wars Tattooine everything is becoming smaller or too connected territory(its Tolkien I know lol) I know were already gunna get some of that by default with some of the timeline changes theyre making but I hope theyre at least somewhat cautious with how they do that adapting.

Also his relationship with Elrond would be strange given the whole "I was there bro" angle. It also kind of changes the White Councils dynamics.

This quote in particular from Unfinished Tales has me convinced hes just an oc Istari or is Gandalf in all but name and TA form and well understand that when he came back in the TA he was "reset".

Unfinished Tales posted:

"For it is said indeed that being embodied the Istari had need to learn much anew by slow experience, and though they knew whence they came the memory of the Blessed Realm was to them a vision from afar off, for which (so long as they remained true to their mission) they yearned exceedingly." (The Istari, *Unfinished Tales*)


We will absolutely be getting a scene where The Stranger "remembers" what he is and that will be whatever these constellations are leading to.




Itd be easier to just say my issue is him being specifically Gandalf and having remained in ME after the SA into TA, I have no problem with him being Olorin and returning in TA.

AccountSupervisor fucked around with this message at 01:52 on Sep 13, 2022

BoldFace
Feb 28, 2011
I think many of you are not fully appreciating under how strict rules from the Tolkien estate Amazon is operating here. It's one thing to condense timelines or omit certain characters and minor events. Inserting important characters from LotR like Gandalf or Saruman into the events of the Second Age without any basis on lore, is on a whole another level. It simply won't be allowed to happen. Amazon can freely create new original characters to play minor roles. They can somewhat freely manouver characters like Galadriel and Elrond, who are canonically present in Middle-earth during that time.

bagrada
Aug 4, 2007

The Demogorgon is tired of your silly human bickering!

My predictions:
Durins Bane will show up in a season finale and wreck Moria like Vader at the end of Rogue One. Someone will put a baby giant squid in the lake to keep people away.
Stranger is absolutely Gandalf who will help his new hobbit pals find somewhere safe with plenty of pipeweed to settle down out of the way of the war, but won't get involve with the main plot beyond dropping some sage fourth wall advice to Galadriel or Isildur.
Ending season 1 will be 4 more comet drop pods flying in. The blue wizards will be nonbinary nonwhite lovers in a particular gently caress you to the season 1 reactions.

Funky See Funky Do
Aug 20, 2013
STILL TRYING HARD

2nd Amendment posted:

Which lore? In order of hardness, we have 1) the personal journal of a blowhard 2) a pre-modern history both taken from the same ur-source, 3) a collection of religious texts and then 4) notes from the person who was transmitting 1-3.

Saying that you know what "can" or "can't" be true from a "lore" perspective is already pretty suspect. Like, the Last Ringbearer is a more authentic take than what you are offering.

I made a post earlier in the thread describing in brief what a Balrog is. Read that if you disagree with anything let me know. They're not just any old corrupted maiar they're primordial demons that were swayed to Melkor during the Ainulindale but trumping all that is the fact that this thing has the body of a man and it needs it. It eats. It needs a cloak to keep warm. It's an Istari OR it's a very sneaky primordial demon pretending to have lost its memory while eating snails and following around some Hobbits because I dunno. The bump on the head made it forget that it rebelled against God before the world was made?

It's all speculation and the writers will make the character be whatever they want it to be but if that speculation is base on things Tolkien wrote it absolutely cannot be Durin's bane.

AccountSupervisor
Aug 3, 2004

I am greatful for my loop pedal

BoldFace posted:

I think many of you are not fully appreciating under how strict rules from the Tolkien estate Amazon is operating here. It's one thing to condense timelines or omit certain characters and minor events. Inserting important characters from LotR like Gandalf or Saruman into the events of the Second Age without any basis on lore, is on a whole another level. It simply won't be allowed to happen. Amazon can freely create new original characters to play minor roles. They can somewhat freely manouver characters like Galadriel and Elrond, who are canonically present in Middle-earth during that time.

Yes if my knowledge is correct Tom Shippey who is/was their Tolkien Consultant specifically said in an interview years ago that the TA is completely off limits in terms of making changes.

Also iirc the deal is highly centered around any changes or blanks filled into the SA cannot "contradict" anything Tolkien wrote. So considering a Blue Wizard in the form of unnamed oc Istari is something that does not contradict anything given the inconsistent arrival time of them. Having him being specifically Gandalf does, while they would probably have to heavily appeal to the Tolkien Estate even if they wanted to make him Olorin pre-TA.

Thats also why you get these sort of weird half almagamations of events from the FA. They explain the SA so they are allowed to touch on them loosely but not directly.

Edit: heres the article where they go into some detail
https://www.slashfilm.com/568297/lord-of-the-rings-season-1-episode-count/#more-570775

AccountSupervisor fucked around with this message at 02:34 on Sep 13, 2022

covidstomper58
Nov 8, 2020

If it's one of the Blue wizards is it Darkness-slayer or East-helper? If he's helping pull a cart, that could work. But streaking across the sky and landing in a big fireball could be slaying darkness. And he's working out how to use fire to see things on paper, that could also help with Darkness slaying.

Or... what if it's a baby giant. That's just how they are born, they get shot out of a volcano as magma and land as old humans, eventually they go bald and start growing really big.

Funky See Funky Do
Aug 20, 2013
STILL TRYING HARD
It seems like they've already contradicted things Tolkien wrote and changed the TA. Wildly too. It looks as though they've written Celeborn and Arwen out of the story. I guess at some point they could have her come back to middle earth and reunite with her husband and daughter that absolutely not mention of has been made so far. If they have her meet Celeborn in the show that directly contradicts stuff Tolkien wrote.

Everyone
Sep 6, 2019

by sebmojo

Eiba posted:

In defense of the Balrog theory, which is not my favorite theory but I wouldn't rule out just yet: It would add pathos to the big flaming special effect.

When we first saw it: Gandalf was fighting a big scary monster, cool!

When we watch it again after Rings of Power shows DB's (Durin's Bane's) tragic backstory where a wizard much like Gandalf himself was corrupted (forcibly? via seduction?) by Sauron: Oh gosh, that's a person Gandalf is fighting. A tragic person who had sad things happen to him to leave him in this horrible corrupted state. Even a creature that first appears to be a monster might be an actual person with their own story.

In fact the pathos added to that encounter is the only reason I think the Stranger could be D.B. Balrog. It would be weird and pointless otherwise.

It's already weird and pointless. It's been a while since I've watched Fellowship, but there was no sense of kinship between Gandalf and the Balrog. There was no sense that the Balrog regarded the Hobbits as anything other that something else to destroy. Pathos would seem to require some kind of personal connection and there isn't one here.

I mean, sure the Balrog was nice before it became a Balrog but once upon a time Ted Bundy was probably a really cute toddler before he murdered 30 women.

Beyond that, Durin's Bane requires said bane to be way the gently caress underground when the Dwarves "delve too deeply" and wake its rear end up. It just seems like a lot of effort to delve into the backstory of a "character" that ultimately has only a minor effect on the overall story. It temporarily kills Gandalf, who then returns as Gandalf the White. It'd be like getting a ten episode miniseries following the orcs who ended up killing Boromir.


Eiba posted:

That's an interesting perspective I haven't heard articulated in this thread that much before. The way most people have explained it it seems like a point of pedantry, but this seems like there's more to it. What interactions specifically make it seem like Gandalf couldn't have been around for events in the second age? You say there were moments in the books that were built off of this ignorance?

Would it make a difference if baby Gandalf doesn't participate in the war itself, but just kind of hangs around its periphery?

My (limited) understanding about the Saruman point is that he was jealous that Gandalf was recognized by the elves when Saruman was supposed to be leader of the order, correct? Perhaps Saruman is greater as an ethereal spirit, but doesn't bother to come to Middle Earth to get his hands dirty in the 2nd age like the Gandalf we see in the show. What we're watching could emphasize that story from the books in that case.

It works better for me that this isn't Gandalf... yet. That he's hanging around with the Harfoots learning language, food and how fires work while other folks are dealing with Sauron. That this version of Gandalf learns to love Nori and her family, to grieve when they eventually die and to extend that love to all the Harfoots/Hobbits. And not just love them but know them. Know their powerful strength of character, which is strong enough to resist the lure of the One Ring much longer than anyone else could - including himself.

2nd Amendment
Jun 9, 2022

by Pragmatica

Funky See Funky Do posted:

I made a post earlier in the thread describing in brief what a Balrog is. Read that if you disagree with anything let me know. They're not just any old corrupted maiar they're primordial demons that were swayed to Melkor during the Ainulindale but trumping all that is the fact that this thing has the body of a man and it needs it. It eats. It needs a cloak to keep warm. It's an Istari OR it's a very sneaky primordial demon pretending to have lost its memory while eating snails and following around some Hobbits because I dunno. The bump on the head made it forget that it rebelled against God before the world was made?

It's all speculation and the writers will make the character be whatever they want it to be but if that speculation is base on things Tolkien wrote it absolutely cannot be Durin's bane.

How many Balrogs are there and do they have wings?

BoldFace
Feb 28, 2011

Funky See Funky Do posted:

It seems like they've already contradicted things Tolkien wrote and changed the TA. Wildly too. It looks as though they've written Celeborn and Arwen out of the story. I guess at some point they could have her come back to middle earth and reunite with her husband and daughter that absolutely not mention of has been made so far. If they have her meet Celeborn in the show that directly contradicts stuff Tolkien wrote.

When and where Galadriel meets Celeborn is not really a major plot point. For example, the show can easily have Celeborn reside in Eregion, where Galadriel meets him for the first time and falls in love to finally give her some semblance of a character arc. It will not be the same character arc she has in the books, but again, that has little to do with the major historical events like forging of the rings, fall of Numenor, and the wars against Sauron.

covidstomper58
Nov 8, 2020

Tuor killed five Balrogs. Gandalf one. Ecthelion three and Glorfindel one. I seem to recall that Feanor killed a lot, or maybe none. So there were more than ten.

Funky See Funky Do
Aug 20, 2013
STILL TRYING HARD

BoldFace posted:

When and where Galadriel meets Celeborn is not really a major plot point. For example, the show can easily have Celeborn reside in Eregion, where Galadriel meets him for the first time and falls in love to finally give her some semblance of a character arc. It will not be the same character arc she has in the books, but again, that has little to do with the major historical events like forging of the rings, fall of Numenor, and the wars against Sauron.

That was in response to the post above mine where they were saying that the deal Amazon made meant that the show couldn't contradict anything Tolkien wrote. Which I doubt is true since the show directly contradicts a lot of things with that being the most glaring example.

Everyone
Sep 6, 2019

by sebmojo

Funky See Funky Do posted:

That was in response to the post above mine where they were saying that the deal Amazon made meant that the show couldn't contradict anything Tolkien wrote. Which I doubt is true since the show directly contradicts a lot of things with that being the most glaring example.

Honestly it seems like toward the end Tolkien contradicted a lot of what Tolkien wrote.

FLIPADELPHIA
Apr 27, 2007

Heavy Shit
Grimey Drawer

No Mods No Masters posted:

Tell me where is gandalf. For I much desire to watch scenes with him

posts that you can hear

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

Funky See Funky Do posted:

That was in response to the post above mine where they were saying that the deal Amazon made meant that the show couldn't contradict anything Tolkien wrote. Which I doubt is true since the show directly contradicts a lot of things with that being the most glaring example.

i think the issue is they can't make it so an event did not happen or happened differently. Galadriel is blank slate in this period. Compressing time or rearranging order of events does not contradict it either.

2nd Amendment
Jun 9, 2022

by Pragmatica

We've got the Arkenstone which some people incorrectly think is a silmaril. But we all accept that there are things beyond the One Ring and the Silmarils that can ... let's call it "create obsession". For Dwarves Sauron's rings are basically Andvaranaut without the downsides. But given their aberrant creation, a fruit of the earth can drive them mad.

I don't know if Tolkein thought about wuxing but I'm sure the old Germans had a similar elemental theory. And the Dwarves have metal, a very special metal, that might also create an obsession in another being.

covidstomper58
Nov 8, 2020

They can just put off indefinitely that Galadriel has a daughter who is almost 3000 years old, doing her own thing. In season three we get a status check of Galadriel after she goes to get Nenya that she checks in with her daughter and sets her up with Elrond.

2nd Amendment
Jun 9, 2022

by Pragmatica

covidstomper58 posted:

Tuor killed five Balrogs. Gandalf one. Ecthelion three and Glorfindel one. I seem to recall that Feanor killed a lot, or maybe none. So there were more than ten.

I imagine that is already more than Funky See Funky Do would accept even though it is supported by the text because there are "certainly not more than ten."

I say they number in the thousands and that is also supported by the text!

covidstomper58
Nov 8, 2020

2nd Amendment posted:

I imagine that is already more than Funky See Funky Do would accept even though it is supported by the text because there are "certainly not more than ten."

I say they number in the thousands and that is also supported by the text!
You can just ask how many dragons there were. Go ahead, I dare you.

Funky See Funky Do
Aug 20, 2013
STILL TRYING HARD

Everyone posted:

Honestly it seems like toward the end Tolkien contradicted a lot of what Tolkien wrote.

I mean yeah, he was totally revising his cosmology to try and make it less mythological and "real" before he died. But at the end the day what's been published in the Silmarillion and I guess Unfinished Tales is what's canon. I have to assume his son collated all the notes and half finished stories and revisions faithfully and in keeping with his father's vision as best he could.

The Histories of Middle-Earth and his letters are interesting read and insights into his writing process if you're a hardcore fan and but IMO they don't count as "lore".

2nd Amendment
Jun 9, 2022

by Pragmatica

covidstomper58 posted:

You can just ask how many dragons there were. Go ahead, I dare you.

Unless you are a sockpuppet: why the hostility?

covidstomper58
Nov 8, 2020

Sorry, I was displacing geekery with having a jape. It was not meant as hostile. Also, are you going to ask? Because it's over 10.

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug

2nd Amendment posted:

I imagine that is already more than Funky See Funky Do would accept even though it is supported by the text because there are "certainly not more than ten."

I say they number in the thousands and that is also supported by the text!

Both are true. There are simultaneously under ten Balrogs and thousands of them, because Melkor corrupted the Maia of Mathematics. . From above it looks like one of those impossible object illusions. Manwë banished them all below the earth because that bullshit was giving him a headache.

WoodrowSkillson
Feb 24, 2005

*Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

Funky See Funky Do posted:

I mean yeah, he was totally revising his cosmology to try and make it less mythological and "real" before he died. But at the end the day what's been published in the Silmarillion and I guess Unfinished Tales is what's canon. I have to assume his son collated all the notes and half finished stories and revisions faithfully and in keeping with his father's vision as best he could.

The Histories of Middle-Earth and his letters are interesting read and insights into his writing process if you're a hardcore fan and but IMO they don't count as "lore".

the issue is all of that stuff has internal contradictions, and The Histories only provide more of them. He second guessed a ton of his own choices, fiddled with the cosmology as you said, and still never resolved a lot of things. thats why i don't have any true issue with shows like this in concept. in the end he had a grand idea, but it is was never finalized in "canon" beyond christopher piecing together scattered notes and drafts.

this one can still gently caress it all up, so far its been good and fun, but im absolutely ready to just stop watching if it gets bad.

2nd Amendment
Jun 9, 2022

by Pragmatica

Funky See Funky Do posted:

I mean yeah, he was totally revising his cosmology to try and make it less mythological and "real" before he died. But at the end the day what's been published in the Silmarillion and I guess Unfinished Tales is what's canon. I have to assume his son collated all the notes and half finished stories and revisions faithfully and in keeping with his father's vision as best he could.

The Histories of Middle-Earth and his letters are interesting read and insights into his writing process if you're a hardcore fan and but IMO they don't count as "lore".

To me the conceit that Tolkein is an interpretor and not a creator is key to my engagement with Legendarium. He's the best (and only) source we have and he is a tertiary source. His opinions change but I argue the world he is interpreting doesn't. Anyone saying "the lore" without caveat is a lunatic and probably Protestant.

2nd Amendment
Jun 9, 2022

by Pragmatica

Killer robot posted:

Both are true. There are simultaneously under ten Balrogs and thousands of them, because Melkor corrupted the Maia of Mathematics. . From above it looks like one of those impossible object illusions. Manwë banished them all below the earth because that bullshit was giving him a headache.

While a shitpost this is better than anything Funky See Funky Do has posted in sincereity

2nd Amendment
Jun 9, 2022

by Pragmatica

covidstomper58 posted:

Sorry, I was displacing geekery with having a jape. It was not meant as hostile. Also, are you going to ask? Because it's over 10.

Cool! What's the relevance?

covidstomper58
Nov 8, 2020

2nd Amendment posted:

Cool! What's the relevance?
How many balrogs are there is directly related to how many dragons are there. Because both are equally rad.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MrMojok
Jan 28, 2011

Ain’t no man what can kill five balrogs :colbert:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply