Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

https://twitter.com/NeilPHauer/status/1570023513095868418

Seems bad man!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

FishBulbia posted:

I hope she stays safe. Azerbaijan is going to use the collapse of Russia's forces and the EUs dependence on Azerbaijani oil to take as much as they can.
That's what she said too :( I offered support but not sure there's anything we collectively or I personally could do as there's probably no way of getting out at the moment.

Do you have a clear idea of what specifically they want? Is it about a corridor to Nakhchivan or a buffer are? I have the other war to worry about so I haven't been able follow this closely.


Well it's better than attacking Armenian targets, but definitely a good way to kick something off

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




mobby_6kl posted:

That's what she said too :( I offered support but not sure there's anything we collectively or I personally could do as there's probably no way of getting out at the moment.

Do you have a clear idea of what specifically they want? Is it about a corridor to Nakhchivan or a buffer are? I have the other war to worry about so I haven't been able follow this closely.

They were proclaiming that they need a buffer area to protect themselves from Armenia or some poo poo.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

mobby_6kl posted:

That's what she said too :( I offered support but not sure there's anything we collectively or I personally could do as there's probably no way of getting out at the moment.

Do you have a clear idea of what specifically they want? Is it about a corridor to Nakhchivan or a buffer are? I have the other war to worry about so I haven't been able follow this closely.

Well it's better than attacking Armenian targets, but definitely a good way to kick something off

I think the official claim is about Armenia failing to open the corridor. But I think they're going to probably try to take all Syunik (the 'tail' part of the country). Either way, it loving sucks that Armenia's existence was essentially dependent on Russia's ability to project power. I'm not confident that Azerbaijan and Turkey won't just try to eat the country whole.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

Just so everyone can see how big of an existential deal this is for Armenia, the green polygons are confirmed advances since morning.

FishBulbia fucked around with this message at 15:39 on Sep 14, 2022

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

FSB denies that Russian soldiers were injured in the attack, suspiciously not commenting on whether they were attacked at all or not.

golden bubble
Jun 3, 2011

yospos

https://twitter.com/OCMediaorg/status/1570053561525932033
https://twitter.com/jkass99/status/1570069773727186948

slurm
Jul 28, 2022

by Hand Knit
What's the right thread for Kyrgyzstan/Tajikistan stuff anyway?

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

There is a rumor on the internet that Pashinyan surrendered Artsakh and protestors are flocking downtown in Yerevan.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




slurm posted:

What's the right thread for Kyrgyzstan/Tajikistan stuff anyway?

This one as well. Everything in the OP map is welcome here anyhow, and I’ll gladly break out or bless distinct threads if it garners meaningful attention - historically we haven’t had many posters discussing southern Caucasus or Central Asia in great detail.

slurm
Jul 28, 2022

by Hand Knit

cinci zoo sniper posted:

This one as well. Everything in the OP map is welcome here anyhow, and I’ll gladly break out or bless distinct threads if it garners meaningful attention - historically we haven’t had many posters discussing southern Caucasus or Central Asia in great detail.

Hopefully someone turns out to be knowledgeable about these things, it's remarkable to me to see two Turkic countries armed with Turkish weapons going on the warpath instantly like this. Bayraktar as emblem of a vigorous pan-Turkism?

Qtotonibudinibudet
Nov 7, 2011



Omich poluyobok, skazhi ty narkoman? ya prosto tozhe gde to tam zhivu, mogli by vmeste uyobyvat' narkotiki

slurm posted:

Hopefully someone turns out to be knowledgeable about these things, it's remarkable to me to see two Turkic countries armed with Turkish weapons going on the warpath instantly like this. Bayraktar as emblem of a vigorous pan-Turkism?

Pan-Turkism hasn't been particularly relevant in the Central Asian states after independence (it was, sort of, a big deal immediately prior to the formation of the USSR). Turkey had attempted to make overtures to that effect, but didn't succeed much (and has since regretted some of their initial attempts after domestic power shifts. A shared post-Soviet culture was more prevalent (though there's also been a resurgence of interest in Islam) and economic ties with Russia were far more relevant than ties with any new pan-Turkic community, which are further hindered by ongoing disagreements with other Turkic nations in the region. The Ukraine war has shaken that up a fair bit, but it's still too early to say how that will affect relations within the region. Turkey's willingness to sell weapons systems to whomever (other than the Armenians) isn't irrelevant, but the fracturing of ties with Russia is pushing the Central Asian states to engage more with everyone else--they've also been talking more with China, Iran, and Afghanistan/Pakistan, all of which share closer geography than Turkey.

That all said, border skirmishes in the Fergana region aren't exactly uncommon and aren't likely to lead to war. The borders are a mess, unmarked, and have no shortage of idiot teenagers on guard duty.

khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.

It will be a sad appendix to the Ukrainian war if it ends up being the case that one of the dominos it set in motion is the ethnic cleansing of Armenians once again.

gently caress at this point I feel like the best case scenario is for Russia to abandon all the occupied territory in Ukraine and declare a ceasefire and send all those troops down to the Caucasus, which of course is an absurd fantasy scenario that will never happen.

khwarezm fucked around with this message at 21:46 on Sep 14, 2022

Qtotonibudinibudet
Nov 7, 2011



Omich poluyobok, skazhi ty narkoman? ya prosto tozhe gde to tam zhivu, mogli by vmeste uyobyvat' narkotiki

khwarezm posted:

It will be a sad appendix to the Ukrainian war if it ends up being the case that one of the dominos it set in motion is the ethnic cleansing of Armenians once again.

gently caress at this point I feel like the best case scenario is for Russia to abandon all the occupied territory in Ukraine and declare a ceasefire and send all those troops down to the Caucasus, which of course is an absurd fantasy scenario that will never happen.

technically Armenia is party to the CSTO and can invoke its collective defense agreement, which will presumably result in Russia saying "sorry, nah" again. Kazakhstan already did, apparently confusing a bunch of people on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/ReidStan/status/1570148249075601410

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

For when people ask in a few years how the world could've stood by and let this happen

https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1549008925806268416?s=20&t=2oSXgqq6MjzxnKm90PS11A

Doctor Malaver
May 23, 2007

Ce qui s'est passé t'a rendu plus fort

FishBulbia posted:

For when people ask in a few years how the world could've stood by and let this happen

Another reason might be that Armenia occupied a part of Azerbaijan, and their puppet state Artsakh has never been recognized by anyone. I know that Azeris' attacks are hitting Armenia proper too but the bottom line is that they are fighting to reclaim their own territory. It's hard to oppose that while supporting Ukraine in reclaiming Donbas.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

Doctor Malaver posted:

Another reason might be that Armenia occupied a part of Azerbaijan, and their puppet state Artsakh has never been recognized by anyone. I know that Azeris' attacks are hitting Armenia proper too but the bottom line is that they are fighting to reclaim their own territory. It's hard to oppose that while supporting Ukraine in reclaiming Donbas.

Principles of self determination are dead? I guess?

Regardless, Azerbaijan can make the international law argument once it stops lopping the heads off of any Armenian civilian that doesn't flee from its advance in time.

golden bubble
Jun 3, 2011

yospos

https://twitter.com/ZekeJMiller/status/1570174106489991169

Hopefully? But I wouldn't consider this confirmed until an Azerbaijani official confirms it too.

As for the conflict, remember that struggles for Nagorno-Karabakh began well before either country got independence. It's less occupied territory, and more like an originally multicultural region that got an arbitrary line drawn down the middle by a European power (Stalin in this case) that immediately exploded into sectarian war the second the European colonizers left.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




https://twitter.com/notesfrompoland/status/1570017369300295680

Uhhh

Antigravitas
Dec 8, 2019

Die Rettung fuer die Landwirte:
The European Parliament also just declared that Hungary is not a democracy.

quote:

Believes that, taken together, the facts and trends, as illustrated by Parliament’s resolutions, represent a systemic threat to the values of Article 2 TEU and constitute a clear risk of a serious breach thereof; expresses deep concern about and condemns the deliberate and systematic efforts of the Hungarian Government to undermine the founding values of the Union enshrined in Article 2 TEU; highlights that these trends have substantially worsened since the triggering of Article 7(1) TEU; stresses that the Hungarian Government bears responsibility for the restoration of compliance with EU law and the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU and expresses deep regret that the lack of decisive EU action has contributed to a breakdown in democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights in Hungary, turning the country into a hybrid regime of electoral autocracy, according to the relevant indices;

3. Deplores the inability of the Council to make meaningful progress in the ongoing Article 7(1) TEU procedure; urges the Council to ensure that hearings take place at a minimum once per Presidency during ongoing Article 7 TEU procedures and also address new developments affecting the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights; calls on the Council to publish comprehensive minutes after each hearing; emphasises that there is no need for unanimity in the Council either to identify a clear risk of a serious breach of Union values under Article 7(1), or to address concrete recommendations to the Member States in question and provide deadlines for the implementation of those recommendations; reiterates its call for the Council to do so, underlining that any further delay to such action would amount to a breach of the rule of law principle by the Council itself; stresses that Member States have an obligation to act together and to put an end to the attacks on the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU; calls on the Council to issue recommendations to Hungary as soon as possible in order to remedy the issues mentioned in its resolution of 12 September 2018 and in the present resolution, asking it to implement all the judgments and recommendations mentioned, including those related to the general elections held on 3 April 2022; insists that in all proceedings related to Article 7 TEU, Parliament should be able to present its reasoned proposal to the Council, to attend Article 7 TEU hearings and to be promptly and fully informed at every stage of the procedure;


Emphasis mine, from the INTERIM REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision determining, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021



A map of speculative positions as of the ceasefire. Obviously the Azeris did not take very much, but there simply isn't very much Armenia, so not much Salami tactics needed. No populated points captured though.

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010

golden bubble posted:

As for the conflict, remember that struggles for Nagorno-Karabakh began well before either country got independence. It's less occupied territory, and more like an originally multicultural region that got an arbitrary line drawn down the middle by a European power (Stalin in this case) that immediately exploded into sectarian war the second the European colonizers left.

Wasn't like 2/3rds of the territory of controlled by the Artsakh outside the historical "Nagorno-Karabakh" boundaries though? That would be to me very much explicitly occupied territory, where the Armenians had done a full blown complete ethnic cleansing of cities entirely settled by Azeris prior to 1990. Like even if you look on Google Maps you can see tons of destroyed cities in the countryside that was controlled by the Artsakh administration, most notably Aghdam but also all sorts of smaller settlements.

Like drat, you can directly see the lines of pre-2020 Nagorno Karabakh by looking at Google maps:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/A...94!4d46.9297085

Look at Qapanli there. The parts controlled by the Artsakh government are ruined, blighted land that look like Mordor. The parts controlled by Azerbaijan look like happy green farming fields, look at what an immediate contrast that is. Follow that ring of blight around south and count all the destroyed and ethnically cleansed villages with ruined land, stretching all the way to the Iranian border in like a 100km by 15 km thick band of death. Even places that aren't in the band of death but that were ethnically cleansed by Armenians, like Kalbajar, look like absolute hell.

I mean I'm sure there were mitigating circumstances prior to 1990 that address why they ethnically cleansed the Azeris during their moment of power, but everything I've ever read about the conflict makes me feel about as sorry for the Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh as I do for Israeli settlers in the West Bank, even though they had a rough time of the preceding like, 2000 years. Even recently, with the Shusa bypass road and the new road from the Lachin corridor to ethnically Armenian NK, the Azeris completed their part of the road in time, and the Armenians appear to have done like, gently caress all on their part of the deal for the road construction.

I have no dog in this fight, but personally I won't lose any sleep over buying Azeri gas this winter unless they actually invade Armenia proper or unless they re-invade NK and start ethnic cleansing there. Even in the relatively limited parts where Azerbaijan did re-capture where ethnic Armenians had colonized, it looks like the Armenians there mostly destroyed their houses and torched their fields before leaving, all on their own initiative. I mean I wouldn't stay either and I do feel a little bit bad for NK people who live/lived in Hadrut or Shusha who were not post-1990 colonists, but everyone settled outside of those areas, like in Kalbajar, knew 100% that they were in land that had been ethnically cleansed of the actual owners within very recent times and that the real owners were in refugee housing in Baku.

E: Wow, even worse than I thought if this article is true. The population of NK in 2019: 150k. The number of Azeris ethnically cleansed from the territory captured by Artsakh in 1990: 600k. ( https://time.com/6208925/shusha-nagorno-karabakh-azerbaijan-capital/ )

Like is there something major I'm missing? I also have seen all sorts of stuff about Armenia stonewalling the Azeris for a Nakhchivan corridor for decades too.

Saladman fucked around with this message at 17:33 on Sep 15, 2022

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
I really should know considering my background but since my ancestral homes are in two unrelated ongoing wars, it's a bit :negative:

My very basic understanding is that NK was a mixed area with an Armenian majority, but during USSR border drawing they decided to give the territory to the Azerbaijan SSR. The Armenians tried to get the borders changed around the end of the union, but Gorby said it's not possible. Eventually this led to protests, pogroms, ethnic cleansing and finally Armenia took the territory during the war with Russia's backing. Then they did some more ethnic cleansing.

I honestly can't tell at this point who started exactly what and who did more atrocities.

The Azeri regime is not nice though.
https://twitter.com/presidentaz/status/560718307515318272

This is their guy in charge, and they're super friendly with Turkey, which also has... a history with Armenia.

Armenia is in the meantime democratic and the current government has nothing to do with what happened in the 80s. They do have their own nationalist assholes though that threaten to overthrow the government if any concessions are made. I don't really know what exactly they're stonewalling and if it's reasonable objection.


E: I was looking for some material on this and came across this paper on the Khojaly genocide by the Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan so... take it with a grain of salt, but it could be instructive to see what their position is
https://files.preslib.az/projects/khojali/enkhojali/gl1.pdf

mobby_6kl fucked around with this message at 18:33 on Sep 15, 2022

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

I think a lot of people just can't comprehend how officially racist the Caucasus are. Now, I'm not saying if Armenia took over Azeri land they would treat civilians with the dignity and respect all humans deserve, but I know that the Azeris won't, and they're far far more likely to take land.

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

Saladman posted:


I have no dog in this fight, but personally I won't lose any sleep over buying Azeri gas this winter unless they actually invade Armenia proper or unless they re-invade NK and start ethnic cleansing there. Even in the relatively limited parts where Azerbaijan did re-capture where ethnic Armenians had colonized, it looks like the Armenians there mostly destroyed their houses and torched their fields before leaving, all on their own initiative. I mean I wouldn't stay either and I do feel a little bit bad for NK people who live/lived in Hadrut or Shusha who were not post-1990 colonists, but everyone settled outside of those areas, like in Kalbajar, knew 100% that they were in land that had been ethnically cleansed of the actual owners within very recent times and that the real owners were in refugee housing in Baku.

E: Wow, even worse than I thought if this article is true. The population of NK in 2019: 150k. The number of Azeris ethnically cleansed from the territory captured by Artsakh in 1990: 600k. ( https://time.com/6208925/shusha-nagorno-karabakh-azerbaijan-capital/ )

Like is there something major I'm missing? I also have seen all sorts of stuff about Armenia stonewalling the Azeris for a Nakhchivan corridor for decades too.
Well for starters the Azeris have already invaded Armenia proper.

The city of Aghdam which you cite is kind of a case in point. Aghdam - itself used as a launching point for indiscriminate artillery attacks and military raids - was brutally destroyed in revenge for the massive destruction done to the town of Martakert earlier in the war. The war itself seems to be an escalating cycle of violence that really kicked off when the Azeris dissolved the autonomous government of NK, a point which they continue to refuse to compromise on - articles i've read state that currently the Azeris plan to extend 'limited cultural autonomy', with 'perhaps a say in local government' to the Armenians in the area. Not exactly encouraging.

Fun fact: Azerbaijan named the newly-retaken economic region on the Armenian border 'East Zangezur'. There is no West Zangezur; it was a rather naked statement of their intent to create one by conquering Armenian territory.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




FishBulbia posted:

I think a lot of people just can't comprehend how officially racist the Caucasus are. Now, I'm not saying if Armenia took over Azeri land they would treat civilians with the dignity and respect all humans deserve, but I know that the Azeris won't, and they're far far more likely to take land.

Yeah. I’m not the hugest fan of Artsakh around, but Aliyev is a sociopathic dictator perfectly comfortable with torturing locals who look at him wrong, and any military moves Azerbaijan could make towards Artsakh or Armenia will be characterised “just” by excessive cruelty in the best case scenario.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

Well for starters the Azeris have already invaded Armenia proper.

The city of Aghdam which you cite is kind of a case in point. Aghdam - itself used as a launching point for indiscriminate artillery attacks and military raids - was brutally destroyed in revenge for the massive destruction done to the town of Martakert earlier in the war. The war itself seems to be an escalating cycle of violence that really kicked off when the Azeris dissolved the autonomous government of NK, a point which they continue to refuse to compromise on - articles i've read state that currently the Azeris plan to extend 'limited cultural autonomy', with 'perhaps a say in local government' to the Armenians in the area. Not exactly encouraging.

Fun fact: Azerbaijan named the newly-retaken economic region on the Armenian border 'East Zangezur'. There is no West Zangezur; it was a rather naked statement of their intent to create one by conquering Armenian territory.



Yeah, this is the new claim circulating around on social media. It would probably mean the end of Armenian statehood. The shaded green would be a demilitarized zone patrolled by Azeri "peacekeepers."

Of course, you can find equally absurd nationalist maps from the Armenian side, but its just like how Ukrainian claims on the Volga are not as much of a concern as Russian claims on Kharkiv.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
Jesus christ that map. It might be a psycho nationalist dream but... they psycho nationalists are also in charge. :ohdear:


I know this is a distraction from the other two or three wars we have going on but I completely forgot that it was literally just last year that Lukashenka tried to blackmail the EU by trafficking people from Iraq. What a year.

The reason this came up is that I got to this video about the plot by Anders Puck Nuelsen (he does naval and Ukraine videos now) which could be interesting for anyone who missed that situation, so I thought I'd share https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6wQzxTu01I

Vietnom nom nom
Oct 24, 2000
Forum Veteran
Not an expert on this by any means, but since this is the internet...my take:
Without a supranational authority like the USSR to keep the peace, the region started to self-organize along ethnic lines via pogrom. Both sides engaged in ethnic cleansing (both sides-ism!) and eventually Armenia took NK with Russian help, then made the population overwhelmingly Armenian.

There is no right/wrong in this kind of ethnic conflict. In a just world, the UN would step in, put an immediate end to hostilities via peacekeepers if necessary, and some sort of reasonable compromise would be worked out that would take into account the recognized borders while balancing the practical considerations of established populations in the area. We do not live in that world. And that's especially true with how much attention is on Ukraine right now.

So we'll get the usual: a bunch of nationalists cheerleading while sending others to do the dying for them. And Turkey gets to poke Armenia in the eye again.

It is interesting though how quickly Russia is experiencing the consequences of their Ukrainian misadventure. There's clearly some realignment going on.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Vietnom nom nom posted:

Not an expert on this by any means, but since this is the internet...my take:
Without a supranational authority like the USSR to keep the peace, the region started to self-organize along ethnic lines via pogrom
Well, about USSR keeping peace

quote:

"One of the leading figures in the Kremlin, A. Mikoyan played a major role in the execution of the
Armenian nationalists' plans for the ethnic cleansing of Armenia. Making use of his influence over Stalin, he
secured the signature of the “little father of the peoples" on decrees by the Council of Ministers of the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics No. 4083 of 23 December 1947. "Resettlement of collective farmers
and other Azerbaijani inhabitants from the Armenian SSR to the Kur-Arax Depression in the Azerbaijani
SSR", and No. 754 of 10 March 1948, "Action to resettle collective farmers and other Azerbaijani
inhabitants from, the Armenian SSR to the Kur- Arax Depression in the Azerbaijani SSR".
Now this is from that Azerbajani document, and I dunno about the Mikoyan guy, but the ethnic cleansing checks out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deportation_of_Azerbaijanis_from_Armenia_(1947%E2%80%931950)

It's really like an onion of atrocities. Or a nesting doll.

Of course russia refused to let international peacekeepers earlier and now Armenia is fully dependent on their Wish.com NATO for protection. Hopefully the threat of some response and pressure from EU/US would get Aliev to cut it out. No matter who's fault is what historically, nothing good can come out form them taking more territory by force now.

Doctor Malaver
May 23, 2007

Ce qui s'est passé t'a rendu plus fort
I visited Armenia 7 years ago and saw a country that was
1. staggeringly poor (and my reference point are the Balkans)
2. isolated
3. depopulated with a very poor demographics outlook

In that situation the last thing you'd want to spend your meager resources and political capital is a puppet state on another country's territory. But they were also
4. nationalist with a sense of entitlement

Leaving, I had a strong impression that country is going nowhere past. I feel sorry for all the victims of war and ethnic cleansing, but can't say I feel sorry for Armenian political ambitions. Then again, I didn't visit Azerbaijan, maybe I'd get an even worse impression there...

Randarkman
Jul 18, 2011

Doctor Malaver posted:

I visited Armenia 7 years ago and saw a country that was
1. staggeringly poor (and my reference point are the Balkans)
2. isolated
3. depopulated with a very poor demographics outlook

In that situation the last thing you'd want to spend your meager resources and political capital is a puppet state on another country's territory. But they were also
4. nationalist with a sense of entitlement

Leaving, I had a strong impression that country is going nowhere past. I feel sorry for all the victims of war and ethnic cleansing, but can't say I feel sorry for Armenian political ambitions. Then again, I didn't visit Azerbaijan, maybe I'd get an even worse impression there...

I'm not sure about the demographics on their part (probably not awesome, considering former Soviet Union) but Azerbaijan, though it is incredibly unequal, is not super poor (nominal GDP per capita is almost 4x Armenia's), and with its oil and gas and its relationship with Turkey (and Israel), not as isolated as Armenia.

Doctor Malaver
May 23, 2007

Ce qui s'est passé t'a rendu plus fort

Randarkman posted:

I'm not sure about the demographics on their part (probably not awesome, considering former Soviet Union) but Azerbaijan, though it is incredibly unequal, is not super poor (nominal GDP per capita is almost 4x Armenia's), and with its oil and gas and its relationship with Turkey (and Israel), not as isolated as Armenia.

Their population is steadily growing. At the time USSR broke up they were twice the Armenia's number. Now they are more than three times.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Doctor Malaver posted:

I visited Armenia 7 years ago and saw a country that was
1. staggeringly poor (and my reference point are the Balkans)
2. isolated
3. depopulated with a very poor demographics outlook

In that situation the last thing you'd want to spend your meager resources and political capital is a puppet state on another country's territory. But they were also
4. nationalist with a sense of entitlement

Leaving, I had a strong impression that country is going nowhere past. I feel sorry for all the victims of war and ethnic cleansing, but can't say I feel sorry for Armenian political ambitions. Then again, I didn't visit Azerbaijan, maybe I'd get an even worse impression there...
Azerbaijan is definitely richer but also a dictatorship so :shrug:

Armenia had elections in 2018 I think and since then had been working with the EU on infrastructure and social development stuff. So I think there was promise, which of course got derailed by the previous war.

I guess the god news is that they don't have to support NK anymore. But nationalist hardliners are of course mad and will make negotiating anything very difficult.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

Yeah wild that really attempting to entirely extinguish an identity makes people into nationalist hardliners

Qtotonibudinibudet
Nov 7, 2011



Omich poluyobok, skazhi ty narkoman? ya prosto tozhe gde to tam zhivu, mogli by vmeste uyobyvat' narkotiki
tangential to the USSR keeping the peace thing, i was reading some stuff and could not for the life of me find a source (in english, anyway) speaking authoritatively as to exactly why Georgia was the one non-Baltic SSR that didn't sign the Alma-Ata Protocol (though IIRC i did find something on Google Books that was about to say before the preview ended), but all the other info i can find about Georgia at the time strongly suggests it was because a nationalist militia had started marching into Tbilisi the same day, and the de jure government was busy hiding in a basement.

granted, the USSR not keeping the peace in late December 1991 isn't exactly a surprise, but i still found it amusing.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




I have finished my big Latvian elections post. Now I need to clean up and partially rewrite half of it or so, and I'll post it. Hopefully, later today, but we'll see how that goes.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

https://twitter.com/jhaboush/status/1570554472555810817

The US is taking Armenia's side in principle, probably not in practice.

Saladman
Jan 12, 2010

TheDeadlyShoe posted:

Fun fact: Azerbaijan named the newly-retaken economic region on the Armenian border 'East Zangezur'. There is no West Zangezur; it was a rather naked statement of their intent to create one by conquering Armenian territory.

Yeah, Aliyev seems like a real expansionist rear end in a top hat. I also wasn't bothered at all by Russia taking Crimea and thought it was kind of reasonable, kind of like Azerbaijan retaking NK in 2020 seemed reasonably justifiable to me, so uh, I don't have a great track record there. Unfortunately I see how that worked out with Crimea just making Putin salivate more over the rest, so I can only imagine Aliyev is doing the same.

Too bad there's rarely room for middle ground in territorial disputes, even – or maybe especially – in cases where both sides have reasonable and justifiable claims and real human concerns. I also looked into e.g. Shusha a little more and while it was 90% Azeri in 1990, I see the Azeris got a good massacre plus ethnic cleansing of 20k or so Armenians in 1920, which looks like it was about half of the population at the time.

Although hell, it seems to be a big problem even when only one side has a justifiable claim, like in Western Sahara circa 1976, where I don't even understand why Morocco cared about that territory at the time any more than Sudan and Egypt care about the Birrwil triangle today.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010
Armenia-Azerbaijan isn't the only former Soviet states going to war.

https://twitter.com/Peter__Leonard/status/1570685301273788416

These are both members of the CSTO by the way.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply