Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
MegaZeroX
Dec 11, 2013

"I'm Jack Frost, ho! Nice to meet ya, hee ho!"



Telegram rumors have Ukraine at Krasnorichens'ke right now. If true, this means Ukraine would have already busted open the Kremina - Svatove line lol.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Dolash posted:

I have to assume that the offensive in the North-East by Ukraine will run out of steam sooner or later - even if the Russians completely crumbled, the massed up supply of fuel, ammo, armored vehicles etc feeding the offensive will get exhausted eventually.

The fact that they've made it as far as Kremmina though really makes me wonder about Luhansk. They're really close to Severodonetsk at this point, and while that looks like a major settlement (so it's probably not easy to take), it's also the last major stop before the capital of one of the "separatist" regions.

Does it make sense to continue driving East toward such a big target, or would the offensive momentum eventually shift North (to secure more territory up to Russia's borders) or South (to relieve the pressure where the Russians are currently on the offensive themselves)? This might not be something that gets answered until the next offensive phase, but it really looks like the Ukrainians might be close to some very important strategic goals in the North now.

The last time they did a drive on the proxy regions, in 2014, they went around capitals entirely and just started severing their connections with Russia. This time that’s likely the play to go for again, since the Kyiv-facing areas of them have 8 years of pillboxes and mines now, but I don’t know if marching into those areas is a short term tactical priority for Ukraine. My gut says no.

Fray
Oct 22, 2010

MegaZeroX posted:

Telegram rumors have Ukraine at Krasnorichens'ke right now. If true, this means Ukraine would have already busted open the Kremina - Svatove line lol.

Also in rumored advances from Telegram is Dudchany. Big day if these get confirmed.

https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1577017353673400321

Patrocclesiastes
Apr 30, 2009

Cinci shut this down if its too speculative at this point, but how does anyone see this war ending? What will keep russia from just shelling ukraine even if theyre driven from the east and crimea without some major shift within russia?

Though the rate russians are falling back theyre gonna be driven all the way to moscow by next year.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Patrocclesiastes posted:

Cinci shut this down if its too speculative at this point, but how does anyone see this war ending? What will keep russia from just shelling ukraine even if theyre driven from the east and crimea without some major shift within russia?

Though the rate russians are falling back theyre gonna be driven all the way to moscow by next year.

This is too speculative, and also discussed like 10 times in the last month.

Hand Row
May 28, 2001

MegaZeroX posted:

Telegram rumors have Ukraine at Krasnorichens'ke right now. If true, this means Ukraine would have already busted open the Kremina - Svatove line lol.

Crayon man got it right so far.

https://twitter.com/ThreshedThought/status/1576340933238722560

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

Have some Ukrainian ingenuity

https://twitter.com/PaulJawin/status/1577003226234515456

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?
^^^ Other than lack of peripheral vision, that's pretty ingenious.

Something I try to keep in mind: unless you're following the war very closely, and either have a background in military operations or are in a community--online or otherwise--with such a background, the Western public at large seems to continue over-estimating Russian military capability. Just one anecdote, I was talking with a friend over the weekend and his take was basically, "I'm glad Ukraine is doing so well, but things are going to get bad for them when Russia gets the rest of its military in there." This is a former US Navy officer, reasonably intelligent, educated, etc. And even he hasn't put together that Russia has already committed a large majority of its conventional forces.

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

This sounds good of military standardization and cohesion:
https://twitter.com/SamBendett/status/1576994499678478336?s=20&t=VCUMOWRcrIOU4ZUuRm_hPw
https://twitter.com/SamBendett/status/1576996835390259200?s=20&t=VCUMOWRcrIOU4ZUuRm_hPw
Nothing will backfire in anyway, at all.

Seriously, this sounds like a recipe for disaster on par with mobilizing the various state militias of the Confederate States Of America against a standing united army of the Union. The Russian MOD just giving up on logistics means that various regions are going to be a mix of Russian gear (either new or refurbished), Chinese and Iranian surplus, or no gear whatsoever. And it will end up with regions getting their own logistics trains separate from Moscow, which will be handy when those same regions turn around and declare their independence in five-ten years.

smug n stuff
Jul 21, 2016

A Hobbit's Adventure

Fray posted:

Also in rumored advances from Telegram is Dudchany. Big day if these get confirmed.

https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1577017353673400321

Second Russian source on Dudchany being liberated:
https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1577025320393199616

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Young Freud posted:

This sounds good of military standardization and cohesion:
https://twitter.com/SamBendett/status/1576994499678478336?s=20&t=VCUMOWRcrIOU4ZUuRm_hPw
https://twitter.com/SamBendett/status/1576996835390259200?s=20&t=VCUMOWRcrIOU4ZUuRm_hPw
Nothing will backfire in anyway, at all.

Seriously, this sounds like a recipe for disaster on par with mobilizing the various state militias of the Confederate States Of America against a standing united army of the Union. The Russian MOD just giving up on logistics means that various regions are going to be a mix of Russian gear (either new or refurbished), Chinese and Iranian surplus, or no gear whatsoever. And it will end up with regions getting their own logistics trains separate from Moscow, which will be handy when those same regions turn around and declare their independence in five-ten years.

I think the bigger issue here isn't standardization but budget. It's more of center dumping responsibility on regions while centralizing all the cash yet again.

Crow Buddy
Oct 30, 2019

Guillotines?!? We don't need no stinking guillotines!

Young Freud posted:

This sounds good of military standardization and cohesion:
https://twitter.com/SamBendett/status/1576994499678478336?s=20&t=VCUMOWRcrIOU4ZUuRm_hPw
https://twitter.com/SamBendett/status/1576996835390259200?s=20&t=VCUMOWRcrIOU4ZUuRm_hPw
Nothing will backfire in anyway, at all.

Seriously, this sounds like a recipe for disaster on par with mobilizing the various state militias of the Confederate States Of America against a standing united army of the Union. The Russian MOD just giving up on logistics means that various regions are going to be a mix of Russian gear (either new or refurbished), Chinese and Iranian surplus, or no gear whatsoever. And it will end up with regions getting their own logistics trains separate from Moscow, which will be handy when those same regions turn around and declare their independence in five-ten years.

I am the enormous erection some CIA agent woke up with this morning.

Off loading military procurement to various regional civilian administrations will certainly not have any undesired outcomes (for Russia.)

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

Young Freud posted:

This sounds good of military standardization and cohesion:
https://twitter.com/SamBendett/status/1576994499678478336?s=20&t=VCUMOWRcrIOU4ZUuRm_hPw
https://twitter.com/SamBendett/status/1576996835390259200?s=20&t=VCUMOWRcrIOU4ZUuRm_hPw
Nothing will backfire in anyway, at all.

Seriously, this sounds like a recipe for disaster on par with mobilizing the various state militias of the Confederate States Of America against a standing united army of the Union. The Russian MOD just giving up on logistics means that various regions are going to be a mix of Russian gear (either new or refurbished), Chinese and Iranian surplus, or no gear whatsoever. And it will end up with regions getting their own logistics trains separate from Moscow, which will be handy when those same regions turn around and declare their independence in five-ten years.

That's a bit...huh. The idea of Russia splintering has been wildly speculative at best due to Russia's centralization, but this feels like the first step to decentralization and I wouldn't really have expected it of Putin. It feels like he's shoveling literally everything he's done over his time in power into the furnace to feed the war. Starting to think he might actually care enough about Ukraine to be willing to pull down the pillars of his regime if there's a chance of cementing himself as "the one who brought Ukraine back to Russia."

OddObserver posted:

I think the bigger issue here isn't standardization but budget. It's more of center dumping responsibility on regions while centralizing all the cash yet again.

Yeah this feels like a sign of weakness - "We can't afford it, so you guys figure it out instead." Historically this tends to go wrong in, say, China, though - the imperial center stops being able to afford to maintain its projects by itself so it devolves responsibility onto the regional administrations, who naturally step up their own administrative and tax resources in order to meet such responsibilities which incidentally starts giving them enough of a power base to defy an already-weakened imperial center, which when it all reaches critical mass implodes through lack of authority with which to pressure the regional warlords. It's still a very tempting step for any emperor who wants to complete X project or needs to defend against Y threat but can't fund it properly.

smug n stuff
Jul 21, 2016

A Hobbit's Adventure

quote is not edit: Rybar thinks that only half of Dudchany is controlled by AFU, that RF blew up a bridge in the middle of the city to stop the advance. Who knows. https://t.me/rybar/39708

Neorxenawang
Jun 9, 2003
Question for native Russian speakers: it seems like increasingly I see русский used where I would expect российский (like in the above post, "русская армия," or at Zmiinyi Island "русский военный корабль"). Has that distinction always been mostly in really formal/academic language, or is there an ideological element that's relatively new? Like authorities are intentionally conflating Russian ethnicity with Russian statehood.

Dwesa
Jul 19, 2016

smug n stuff posted:

quote is not edit: Rybar thinks that only half of Dudchany is controlled by AFU, that RF blew up a bridge in the middle of the city to stop the advance. Who knows. https://t.me/rybar/39708
This "bridge"? It looks like a small earthen dam, I am not sure how would they blow it up



cgeq
Jun 5, 2004

Tomn posted:

Yeah this feels like a sign of weakness - "We can't afford it, so you guys figure it out instead."

Cool that the Russian military has the same mentality as a small business tyrant. Are they doing the, "Can you work for us for free? It will be a great resume builder" yet?

Orthanc6
Nov 4, 2009

Dwesa posted:

This "bridge"? It looks like a small earthen dam, I am not sure how would they blow it up





If they had a lot of time to prepare I could see them making a line of charges to at least turn a strip of that bridge into a small river.

But ah, pretty sure they did not have time nor consider that they would have to prepare bridges this deep into their "territory" against enemy advance. Hubris and corruption are a delicious combo.

Some very specific force movements spotted in Russia:

https://archive.ph/iBerF

Image only shows what looks like regular logistics equipment getting trained over, and I'm betting it's likely that the equipment and personnel are being dug up to help stem the bleeding, not to start anything spicy.

That said, they know the West is watching these specific forces like hawks, and it could be another more physical form of sabre rattling, similar to blowing up their own gas pipes.

Atreiden
May 4, 2008

cgeq posted:

Cool that the Russian military has the same mentality as a small business tyrant. Are they doing the, "Can you work for us for free? It will be a great resume builder" yet?

That's basically Russian conscription minus the great for the resume part.

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

smug n stuff posted:

quote is not edit: Rybar thinks that only half of Dudchany is controlled by AFU, that RF blew up a bridge in the middle of the city to stop the advance. Who knows. https://t.me/rybar/39708

I think a map of the location in context helps here:

https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1577033916946345984

I don't think anyone could call this a city. Can you even call it a town? Seems more like a large village.

No matter what you call it, this is not a significant bridge and will not take the Ukrainians long to bypass even if it is destroyed

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Neorxenawang posted:

Question for native Russian speakers: it seems like increasingly I see русский used where I would expect российский (like in the above post, "русская армия," or at Zmiinyi Island "русский военный корабль"). Has that distinction always been mostly in really formal/academic language, or is there an ideological element that's relatively new? Like authorities are intentionally conflating Russian ethnicity with Russian statehood.

Ideological and imperial

Русский is often meant as ethnically Russian, while российский is always "of the russian state". Russian nationalists loathe the words российский and россиянин while for every non-white person in Russia русский as an adjective before unusual things is a red flag.

Think English vs British, sort of, how the former frequently has nationalistic connotations.

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

Tiny Timbs posted:

This is the approach Biden is trying to implement:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...hs-accountable/

It makes sense on one level but I think this sort of thing is only going to make any stab in the back mood in Russia even worse

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

Chalks posted:

I think a map of the location in context helps here:

https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1577033916946345984

I don't think anyone could call this a city. Can you even call it a town? Seems more like a large village.

No matter what you call it, this is not a significant bridge and will not take the Ukrainians long to bypass even if it is destroyed

It's officially a village with about 2k residents.

d64
Jan 15, 2003
In the Hungarian parliament, Fidesz has blocked a motion to vote on ratifying Sweden's and Finland's NATO membership. As for Turkey, some commentators say progress before the elections in mid-2023 looks unlikely.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
^^^
Ahhhh not at all surprised but what a bunch of scumbags


What I've learned from watching too many Practical Engineering videos is that if they blew a hole in it and there's any amount of current flowing, the water could wash the whole thing out. That said from the streetview photos it doesn't seem to be much of a dam.

Tuna-Fish
Sep 13, 2017

Dwesa posted:

This "bridge"? It looks like a small earthen dam, I am not sure how would they blow it up

While most of the length of that is a solid dam, there is a short section where it's a bridge, on the southwestern side. If they blew up that and could direct fire on it, while the section they'd need to bridge is short I can't imagine it would be fun for the Ukrainians.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Neorxenawang posted:

Question for native Russian speakers: it seems like increasingly I see русский used where I would expect российский (like in the above post, "русская армия," or at Zmiinyi Island "русский военный корабль"). Has that distinction always been mostly in really formal/academic language, or is there an ideological element that's relatively new? Like authorities are intentionally conflating Russian ethnicity with Russian statehood.

The linguistic distinction is about as common and clear as a distinction between a brick and an apple, meaning that the only shift is with people who find it imperative to put an accent on Russian ethnicity for a reason, which is going to be highly dependent on what sort of people you’re hearing.

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

gay picnic defence posted:

It makes sense on one level but I think this sort of thing is only going to make any stab in the back mood in Russia even worse

I realize that a persecution complex isn't exactly logical, but what stab in the back? It's not like the US was a bosom buddy of Russia or Russian oligarchs before this. This is more of a stab in the front really, and less escalatory than what they've been accusing the West in general of already. And to be frank, even if Putin was overthrown I'm not entirely sure I'd trust any successor or cabal of oligarchs to agree to any significant reparations without enormous foot-dragging anyways.

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?

d64 posted:

In the Hungarian parliament, Fidesz has blocked a motion to vote on ratifying Sweden's and Finland's NATO membership.

What’re the options from here on out? Is this gonna cost Hungary anything?

MassiveSky
Apr 5, 2022

by Hand Knit

Tomn posted:

I realize that a persecution complex isn't exactly logical, but what stab in the back? It's not like the US was a bosom buddy of Russia or Russian oligarchs before this. This is more of a stab in the front really, and less escalatory than what they've been accusing the West in general of already. And to be frank, even if Putin was overthrown I'm not entirely sure I'd trust any successor or cabal of oligarchs to agree to any significant reparations without enormous foot-dragging anyways.

If Russia is going to have any shot at being a functioning state with any semblance of democracy, the first thing to take off the table are reparations.

Canned Sunshine
Nov 20, 2005

CAUTION: POST QUALITY UNDER CONSTRUCTION



MassiveSky posted:

If Russia is going to have any shot at being a functioning state with any semblance of democracy, the first thing to take off the table are reparations.

Yeah, reparations are dumb, regardless of who is the winner or loser.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

Paladinus posted:

TV analysis snip

This may be one of the best posts I've ever read on the forums. Thank you for your service so we don't have to watch it too

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

cgeq posted:

Cool that the Russian military has the same mentality as a small business tyrant. Are they doing the, "Can you work for us for free? It will be a great resume builder" yet?

You can get paid in exposure. To HIMARS. Also to the elements.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Szmitten
Apr 26, 2008
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/10/03/nuclear-weapons-convoy-sparks-fears-putin-could-preparing-test/

This is just a spooky headline and/or Russia posturing by moving poo poo around right? Or something about a scheduled test for Poseidon.

Libluini
May 18, 2012

I gravitated towards the Greens, eventually even joining the party itself.

The Linke is a party I grudgingly accept exists, but I've learned enough about DDR-history I can't bring myself to trust a party that was once the SED, a party leading the corrupt state apparatus ...
Grimey Drawer

SourKraut posted:

Yeah, reparations are dumb, regardless of who is the winner or loser.

Nah, they should be forced to pay lots of reparations, also what is left of their industry should be looted and moved to museums in the West.

Germany clearly proofs that this is the way to get stable democracies, you just sometimes have to try two times.

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

Szmitten posted:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/10/03/nuclear-weapons-convoy-sparks-fears-putin-could-preparing-test/

This is just a spooky headline and/or Russia posturing by moving poo poo around right? Or something about a scheduled test for Poseidon.

"Yes"

Nothing about this is out of character for Russia, which has continuously run a strategic weapon testing program in a provocative way.

d64
Jan 15, 2003

Rinkles posted:

What’re the options from here on out? Is this gonna cost Hungary anything?
Probably the cost is that other NATO states wishing the ratification to proceed can put some pressure on them. It might be more meaningful in the case of Hungary than it is with Turkey, but then again, Orbán and his people revel in getting into situations where they can be seen standing up to foreign nations.

You could just as well ask, what do they gain with this. Not much, it's pretty much theatrics for their internal purposes.

Zedsdeadbaby
Jun 14, 2008

You have been called out, in the ways of old.
I imagine Orban and Erdogan will try to wring (more) concessions from the rest of the bloc before finally giving the thumbs up. They're good at this sort of thing.

Orthanc6
Nov 4, 2009

Szmitten posted:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/10/03/nuclear-weapons-convoy-sparks-fears-putin-could-preparing-test/

This is just a spooky headline and/or Russia posturing by moving poo poo around right? Or something about a scheduled test for Poseidon.

I posted the non-paywall version of this article a bit above. My best guess is posturing, and I believe the Poseidon test is actually happening in the Arctic. That sub can't enter the Black Sea, it was last spotted at its base in the Arctic and Turkey has closed the Bosporus to the Russian navy.

I suppose a nuclear test nowhere near Ukraine would be the "safest" while still biggest nuclear sabre rattle Putin could do. But I don't see that doing anything but dump more economic woes on Putin with precisely 0% chance of helping the battles in Ukraine. And it would greatly jeopardize the little support he has left for that nothing gain, and I think even Putin knows that.

They'll launch the torpedo without a warhead is my bet.

Orthanc6 fucked around with this message at 23:05 on Oct 3, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Owling Howl
Jul 17, 2019

cinci zoo sniper posted:

The last time they did a drive on the proxy regions, in 2014, they went around capitals entirely and just started severing their connections with Russia. This time that’s likely the play to go for again, since the Kyiv-facing areas of them have 8 years of pillboxes and mines now, but I don’t know if marching into those areas is a short term tactical priority for Ukraine. My gut says no.

I would suppose the Svatovo --> Starobilsk direction is the priority right now since that cuts the last rail line through Luhansk, would put Severodonetsk in a more difficult position and just generally opens up a lot of opportunities.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5